Whitehorse Daily Star

Image title

Photo by Vince Fedoroff

CLASHING IDEALS – Pro-choice supporters (left) look on as pro-life demonstrators walk past them Thursday afternoon outside the Elijah Smith Building. Edna Lorenzem Hillary Aitken Ketsia Houde Gary Gordon

Passion marked pro-choice, anti-abortions rallies

Thursday afternoon's abortion rallies were some of the quietest protests Whitehorse has seen in the last year,

By Ainslie Cruickshank on May 10, 2013

Thursday afternoon's abortion rallies were some of the quietest protests Whitehorse has seen in the last year, but the strength of each side's convictions was evident all the same.

The pro-life group gathered outside the Old Log Church, Christian soft-rock music playing on a sound system in the background.

Children weaved among the adults, but the estimated 50-person group was mostly made up of middle-aged and older residents, with a handful of teens and young adults thrown in.

A few blocks over, in front of the Elijah Smith Building, a second, slightly smaller group with more brightly coloured signs gathered, standing firm behind a woman's right to choose.

"We want to show the community and the anti-choice movement that there are people who are standing for this right to have access to abortion,” explained Ketsia Houde, the executive director of Les EssentiElles.

Making abortion illegal wouldn't stop abortions, she argued. It would, however, make them unsafe.

The Yukon has one of the highest abortion rates in the country, indicating a clear need for the service, Houde added.

Reasons for the high rate vary from rape, to failed contraceptives, and expensive birth control.

But failed contraceptives accounts for the highest number of abortions, says a leaflet handed out at the rally.

"In the Yukon, the access to health care is difficult, mostly in the communities, because you only have access to a community health centre, and there's the price of contraceptives as well,” Houde said.

"For teenagers and women who don't have much money or don't have insurance coverage, you need to pay $30 to $40 a month for contraceptives pills,” she added.

Anti-abortion and pro-choice rallies took place across the country Thursday, with many pro-lifers focusing on the issue of sex-selective abortion.

The issue was highlighted in March, when Conservative MP Mark Warawa attempted to raise it in Parliament. He was removed from the list of MPs selected to speak that day and an all-party committee of MPs declared his motion ineligible.

But making abortion illegal wouldn't combat the issue of sex-selective abortion, said Houde. What would is gender equality.

Back at the Old Log Church, Edna Lorenzen, one of the pro-life organizers and a member of the Whitehorse Right to Life Society, explained why she's against abortion.

Lorenzen wore a gold-coloured pin, the same size and shape as the feet of 10-week-old fetus.

The pins were handed out at the rally along with a small pamphlet outlining the various stages of development from conception to birth.

"Life is so precious, it's so important,” Lorenzen said. "I can't imagine not wanting a child. If you don't want it, have the child, give it up for adoption.

"There are always other options besides abortion,” she said.

Even in situations of rape or incest, Lorenzen remains convinced abortion is not the solution.

"These children are still children,” she said.

"If they don't want them, they can always give them up for adoption, if they can't stand the fact that it was through force that they had this child,” Lorenzen added.

"I think it's very traumatic to be raped, but that is still a part of her in that womb.”

Catholic Bishop Gary Gordon agrees.

"The choice for life is a greater choice than any other choice, and that's kind of what the right-to-life movement is all about,” Gordon said.

He went on to explain that the group would like legislatures across the country to recognize that life begins at conception and continues until the natural end.

The pro-life group marched from the Old Log Church to Main Street, where the pro-choice supporters had gathered. Both sides remained quiet as the pro-lifers walked by.

"I can't believe we still have to protest this,” said Hillary Aitken.

"I thought it was decided in the '70s and the '80s, but we'll be here as long as there's another side.”

Aitken, the program co-ordinator at the Victoria Faulkner Women's Centre, said abortion has been an issue for more than a century in Canada.

"It comes down to a woman's right, control over her body, control over reproductive justice,” Aitken said.

"Bringing a child into the world has a huge impact on a woman's life and those around her, so of course it's her decision, and any attempt to move otherwise is an affront to women's rights in this country,” she said.

"If you don't support abortions, don't have one, but leave the rest of us to make our own choice as well.”

Comments (11)

Up 0 Down 0

spectrum on May 17, 2015 at 1:05 am

I am so sick of these arguments about tax payers footing the bill for this type of service. I would argue that people who don't take care of their health; for instance, the obese or smokers...heavy drinkers etc. who know that their actions are contributing to a decline in health but continue to engage in them are far bigger culprits as far as ''wasting'' tax dollars. Speaking of taxes, If I had my way birth control would be free for everyone.
An embryo is not a human. It is not murder.

Up 1 Down 1

David Hayes on May 18, 2013 at 10:14 am

@Living In the Yukon

The unborn baby is clearly a human being in development with the characteristics of a person. Being Pro Choice is being Pro Murder of the unborn. The unborn's heart is beating in less than 21days after conception. You want to be allowed to legally murder another human being because it's your body. Well while it's your body the body of the unborn baby in you is not yours to murder.

Up 1 Down 0

Chilkootwoman on May 17, 2013 at 3:39 am

Good for you Amber, all the best. And to all of you out there let's all just do our best to get with the times, 2013..Mind your own business and look unto yourselves rather than a woman who is making her own life choices. Seriously.

Up 1 Down 1

Amber on May 16, 2013 at 8:26 am

The first thing I have to say here, is directed only to Rorex21. I was a 19 year old mother. My boyfriend, an 18 year old father. If you are trying to tell me that I should have had an abortion because of my age or maturity level, I would tell you that you are sorely mistaken.

I graduated high school when I was 17, and that was on time, so making the assumption that a 19 year old is likely still in high school is extremely judgmental. I agree that school is important, with that being said, I now have a 4 year old daughter, and in December I will be a University Graduate. I was just starting my first year of college in the Yukon when I found out I was pregnant. I finished that year, pregnant, and working, and managed to succeed.

You imply that carrying a child to term while attending school will affect a person's chance at successfully continuing, and yet again, I am not sure what world you grew up in, but I had a 3 month old daughter and went back to take night classes to continue my education, I then took correspondence courses through Athabasca University, and later transferred to the University of Alberta.

Will my daughter suffer "social stigma" and "emotional bullying" like you said because I had her when I was 19 years old? No, she won't, she will have her Mother's support every step of her life, because her Mother knows how much hard work it takes in life to succeed. She will be looked up to by students because her Mother is an elementary teacher in one of her peers' schools, and because her Mother will be a mentor and role model to others.

I am highly offended that you believe that just because I had a child when I was 19 that my life was virtually over and I would not succeed. Maybe that is your personal experience, it is not mine, and it does not have to be anyone else's.

Up 1 Down 1

Arn Anderson on May 16, 2013 at 2:33 am

Until pro lifer's runs out to Africa and all the poor countries to care for the children that has been born and are starving, I will take their arguement a little more seriously. As of right now, they only care if you are in a woman's womb, they don't care after you're born and until your 18 or 16 depending the military age so they can send you off to die for some old guys. Pretty soon life will begin at erections and certain solo human acts will be murder..sigh...

Up 0 Down 1

Living In the Yukon on May 15, 2013 at 8:11 am

To Jackie Ward,

Your statement "I do not own another woman's body, nor do I have the right to tell her what to do"

That's where you need to stop. Obviously people getting abortions KNOW that they are killing a "supposed life" (Who knows the girl may be very sick and not be able to carry to term naturally anyways) You have NO idea what's going on in these peoples lives. But in the end

"You do not own another woman's body" Leave it at that. Non of your business.

Up 0 Down 1

Jackie Ward on May 14, 2013 at 1:44 pm

Here's something "you" cannot counter. I do not own another woman's body. Nor do I have the right to tell her what to do. With that being said, I really don't care what choice you make. But what I do know is abortion is murder, period. You can try and spin it whatever way you want. You are killing life. The percentage of rape victims getting pregnant is so small it's not even up for discussion. You chose to have sex. No one forced you. So be an adult and deal with the decisions you make. Killing a life is sad and honestly pathetic.

Up 1 Down 1

Arn Anderson on May 14, 2013 at 4:10 am

Usually its a bunch of old guys trying to tell what other people should do, based on some book or teachings but usually are hypocrites themselves. They have been doing it for eons and will continue to try for another century or two more.

Up 0 Down 1

Living In the Yukon on May 13, 2013 at 5:13 am

Why is this still an argument?

People need to get out of my uterus!! My uterus MY CHOICE. I'm pro choice because frankly its NONE OF MY BUSINESS what other people choose to do with their bodies and their lives.

And as for the tax payer "footing the bill" Ok, so a ONE time abortion is cheaper then WELFARE for that young mom to raise(or not raise) that baby. Or all the treatment for the baby if it is born FASD... really, tax money should have nothing to do with it. They do more ridiculous things with the money start with those first. Like, lets say the Prime Minister flying to go see pandas.... Lets get real people.

Up 0 Down 0

Rorex21 on May 13, 2013 at 2:40 am

No offense June and I certainly don't know the person your talking about but I hardly think people (in any significant numbers) are going to use abortions as a sole means of preventing contraception. Also in the case of a 19 year old I honestly agree with the use of abortion. Not only is the girl likely too young and immature to raise a child as is the male likely but she was also likely still in high school. School is important and carrying a child to term while attending school is going to effect her chance to get an education. Not to mention the social stigma and likely emotional bullying that will occur. Lastly I think your looking at the problem from entirely the wrong side. First the government which already uses price setting for medication should set the price of birth control lower. Which would make it more affordable which would lower the likely hood of unwanted pregnancies. Second advancements need to be made so that birth control medication isn't so finicky. A pill that has to be taken at a everyday day at the same time in order to be truly effective sounds like some kind of scam to ensure people continuously use your product if you ask me.

Up 0 Down 1

June Jackson on May 10, 2013 at 1:45 pm

Personal opinion only here.. while I am not against abortion, I do object to abortion on demand. Canada has a high rate of abortion because women here can abort if tests show they are carrying a girl and they want a boy, they can abort if baby's eyes are blue, not brown, because they have a head ache, because its Monday and they wanted to have a baby on Tuesday. It just doesn't matter why, and no one but the taxpayer has to take responsibility.

Abortion on demand means just that. You don't have to use birth control, which you might have to pay for, you can make the taxpayer foot the bill.

I know a girl, 19, who has had 3 abortions. She would have carried to term and put it up for adoption, but, it takes too long and actually delivering doesn't sound appealing.

It's pretty costly to use abortion for birth control and convenience..to use it the way we use it.. and..I think costly in terms of guilt, grief, emotional problems for some..

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.