Photo by Whitehorse Star
City Planning Manager Mike Gau
Photo by Whitehorse Star
City Planning Manager Mike Gau
A private developer has proposed buying the city's parking lot at Steele Street and Third Avenue to build a multi-level parkade.
A private developer has proposed buying the city's parking lot at Steele Street and Third Avenue to build a multi-level parkade.
City planning manager Mike Gau brought forward a report at Tuesday evening's council meeting recommending that the city begin by looking at rezoning the property before putting the potential land sale out to tender.
During a press briefing on the issue Tuesday afternoon, Gau explained the city had opted not to build and operate a multi-level parkade in the past because studies have shown such a venture would be too expensive for the city.
"Now we actually have somebody coming forward,” he said of the expression of interest in the property that surfaced about six weeks ago.
Coun. Dave Stockdale noted at the council meeting that he's pleased the private sector has expressed an interest in the project, taking a bit of a weight of the city's shoulders.
Gau is not providing further details about who is promoting the proposal to buy the land and build their own parkade as those details are confidential.
As he pointed out, if the city moves ahead on it, it may not even be the developer who came forward that ends up with the land.
"It's triggered this process,” he said.
City policy states that the commercial land must first go out to tender to be sold, but before that even happens, council would have to consider rezoning.
At last night's meeting, council was asked to begin the process to rezone the Commercial-Downtown zoned property to an entirely new zone that has been proposed for this.
The site would be zoned Community Parking Garage. It would be subject to a number of restrictions and design guidelines aimed at encouraging mixed-use development and making the building more aesthetically-pleasing than many parkades.
A minimum requirement of 80 stalls would raise by 22 the number of parking spaces that are there now.
"It's quite possible there would be more stalls,” Gau said, later noting that the cost of renting a parking stall would be left up to the private developer.
Coun. Ranj Pillai argued the minimum number of stalls should be higher though, suggesting the site should hold upward of 100 to 150 vehicles.
"I'd like to see us bump that number up,” he said of the minimum at last night's meeting, noting the city's responsibility to provide enough parking.
He also suggested there should be three levels of parking, countering other suggestions the top floor could be used for condos.
"I think it's a phenomenal opportunity,” he said of selling off the lot.
As Gau pointed out to council though, the city is trying to balance its interest in providing parking with the business interests of developers.
If too much is asked by the city, he said, the project could lose its feasibility.
The city currently charges $162 per month or 62 cents an hour (including the GST) to park in the lot. Weekend parking is free.
The higher number of parking stalls would no doubt be a benefit to businesses in the downtown core, where parking is at a premium.
"From a convenience factor, this should allow Main Street to become more vibrant,” Gau said, noting the city has heard of some problem areas for parking.
While there would also be a maximum, the planning manager said that would depend on the final structure design, involving such things as setbacks and the 20-metre height restriction.
The primary use for the zone would be for a multi-level parking garage, though commercial retail space would be encouraged on the bottom level as a secondary use, city planner Ben Campbell explained.
A facade would include the use of at least two different materials and screening of the parking areas to make it more visually attractive.
Trees would also be incorporated along Steele Street for the visual effect. Lighting facing downward would also be encouraged to limit light pollution into the night sky.
Council has been given until next week to ponder the rezoning before voting on whether to move forward with it.
City staff are also busy getting the property value assessed to have it sold at a minimum market value, as per city policy.
It is also continuing to draft the land sale agreement.
"We're looking at a complicated sales agreement,” Gau said.
So far, conditions include a clause that would see the developer have four years to build from the time the building permit is issued. That permit would have to be obtained within two years of being awarded the tender.
If those timelines weren't met, the land would revert back to the city. There would also be clauses aimed at ensuring the current parking lot can be used for as long as possible prior to construction.
If council goes ahead with the zoning, a public hearing on the proposal would be held in May, with second and third readings coming forward in June.
It's expected tender documents would be drawn up in May, with the tender and sale agreement being released later that month before it is awarded in June.
At the earliest, Gau said, construction could begin in July.
Coun. Doug Graham was absent from Tuesday evening's meeting.
In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.
Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.
Comments (8)
Up 0 Down 0
Arn Anderson on Apr 15, 2010 at 2:38 am
I propose a statue of Buckway to be placed on this parkade!
Up 0 Down 0
Doug Simpson on Apr 14, 2010 at 5:47 am
I lived in Whitehorse for 14 years before coming to Medicine Hat 10 years ago.
The City here has a similar parkade that is underutilized as people "don't want to walk" from the parkade to the downtown core, 1 block away. Its under-utilized. Good in theory, impractical due to construction costs and under utilization. Kind of like the Canada Games centre in Whitehorse. Operational costs are not even covered by the "fees for use", let alone the capital costs of building the facility.
Up 0 Down 0
bobby bitman on Apr 11, 2010 at 4:41 am
Only a net 22 parking spaces would be produced with this scheme. And new stores plus condominium housing would be a part of the project.
In other words, at least 22 spaces would HAVE to be produced just to meet the requirements for parking for new businesses and housing.
The parking that would be created would be difficult to access compared to the parking that is there now, and no doubt most of the spaces would be again rented out on a monthly basis to the law offices and retail workers in the Main Steel building, giving no additional parking to the general public.
I see no benefit to Whitehorse other than to create more housing and retail density in the downtown commercial core. (And that can be construed as a benefit.)
Let's not pretend this is about providing parking spaces though, nor is it about making it easier to find parking. Parkades are a drag to park in.
Up 0 Down 0
Joel on Apr 9, 2010 at 8:44 am
Finally a central location for dealers and prostitutes!
Beep once if you want your parking space, twice if you want something else.
Up 0 Down 0
D G on Apr 8, 2010 at 11:16 am
Mosi is a very negative person on these posts.
Up 0 Down 0
Arn Anderson on Apr 8, 2010 at 11:01 am
How about changing the mall's sign of 14 stores and services or making people re-do their driving exam because most of the people in town DO NOT know how to operate a motor vehicle.
Up 0 Down 0
mosi on Apr 8, 2010 at 5:16 am
Like those in Calgary and Edmonton, in time I am sure it will be a good cover spot for street 'dealers', thieves and sex trade workers to hang out?
Up 0 Down 0
Kailey Irwin on Apr 7, 2010 at 10:57 pm
Finally! A parkade is a great idea and the area they want to put it in is a good location. We really do need better parking in the downtown area.