Whitehorse Daily Star

Image title

Photo by Vince Fedoroff

PARTNERSHIP IN POLITICS – Premier Ranj Pillai and NDP Leader Kate White, holding copies of the Supply and Confidence Agreement, walk to the location of Tuesday’s news conference where its terms were unveiled.

Opinions divided on changes to rental laws

New housing regulations that came into effect in the Yukon this week were a long time coming – or too much too quick – depending on who you ask.

By Ethan Lycan-Lang on February 3, 2023

New housing regulations that came into effect in the Yukon this week were a long time coming – or too much too quick – depending on who you ask.

As part of a new Confidence and Supply Agreement (CASA) between the Liberal government and the NDP, rent control will continue into 2025.

As well, landlords are now required to provide a reason for evicting tenants.

Tuesday’s agreement, which provides NDP support for the government in a confidence vote in exchange for the advancement of third-party initiatives, will also lead to a review of the Residential Landlord and Tenant Act (RLTA) by June.

“We’re so proud of this,” NDP housing critic Emily Tredger told the Star Thursday.

“It’s going to make such a big difference for so many tenants.”

Kate Mechan at the Safe at Home Society agrees. She said she’s “heartened” the decade-old RLTA will be reviewed – her advocacy group has long called for updates that would better protect renters – and called the end of no-cause evictions “a game changer.”

“All that’s happening is the Yukon is following suit with the vast majority of the country in their approaches to evictions,” Mechan said Thursday.

Prior to an order-in-council that ended the practice this week, Newfoundland and Labrador was the only other province/territory that allowed landlords to end a tenancy agreement without cause.

Landlords were required to provide ample notice – three months for annual leases – but no reason. 

Ending this type of eviction was one of the 10 calls to action on housing that Safe at Home created last summer.

Tredger said she’s been thinking of the phone calls she’s received over the years from tenants who’ve had to leave their homes – without ever getting a reason.

She mentioned Darlene Pollard in particular.

As the Star reported last August, Pollard, a senior citizen, was given two months’ notice to leave her Whitehorse apartment after 20 years living there. Her landlord subsequently raised the monthly rent for that apartment by $500.

Pollard was one of nine tenants removed from the same building.

She was unable to find another rental she could afford, and took her story to the Yukon NDP and the media after moving in with her daughter.

“She said to me, ‘I know it’s too late for this to help me, but I’m hoping if I speak out, it can help other people,’” Tredger said.

“And it has. I am so proud that the next time someone calls and says, ‘my landlord’s evicted me with no reason; is there something I can do?’ I can say ‘yes, you’re protected.’”

Not everyone is excited about the new regulations, though.

Lars Hartling is president of the Yukon Residential Landlord Association. He says landlords have been blindsided and confused by changes that seemingly took place overnight.

“(The Liberals and NDP) came to this agreement internally, but without understanding the ramifications,” Hartling said in an interview this week. “We have a ton of questions that are unanswered. I’m getting calls all day long.”

The new rules on evictions, Hartling said, have landlords asking what they can evict their tenants for, or if they can sell their property as a non-rental if tenants are already living there. 

The order-in-council that removed no-cause evictions from the RLTA this week, he noted, only lists three reasons for evictions: property damage, unpaid rent or if a landlord or their family member want to move in themselves.

Hartling said he’s concerned that doesn’t cover noise complaints, smoking in non-smoking units or other breaches of contract as cause for eviction – leaving landlords powerless over their own property.

The RLTA does, however, list a number of causes.

Tenants cannot breach their lease contracts with impunity and landlords are still able to remove tenants for justifiable reasons, as they were before. The three causes listed in the order-in-council are just additional causes.

The confusion may be the result of what Hartling called a lack of consultation and communication.

Tredger said she’s been talking with individual tenants and landlords since becoming the third party’s housing critic, and has met with the residential landlord association multiple times.

“That’s really informed this decision to go ahead with this.” she said

The Star requested an interview with Premier Ranj Pillai, but he was unavailable before press time this afternoon.

But Hartling noted the immediate changes to rent control and evictions came with little warning.

He said, for instance, the government had assured landlords that rent control would end in the territory in early 2023.

Rent control was first introduced under the original CASA between the Liberals and NDP in spring of 2021.

That original agreement was set to expire this week, and Community Services Minister Richard Mostyn told the legislature in November 2022 that rent caps would be removed then.

But they’ve been extended into 2025 – and modified. 

Hartling said rent control has forced landlords in some cases to evict tenants just so they could raise their rents to keep up with rising mortgage, fuel and insurance costs.

Since 2021, landlords have been allowed to increase their rents once a year by a percentage based on Whitehorse’s Consumer Price Index (CPI).

Now, though that annual increase is still tied to the CPI, new caps have been added.

Landlords will be allowed to raise rents by two per cent if the CPI falls below that number, but will only be able to raise rents by a maximum of five per cent.

Last year’s CPI for Whitehorse was 6.8 per cent, meaning rents can go up only five per cent on May 15.

“We’re going to be subsidizing people’s units to keep them below the cost of doing business,” Hartling said. “At some point, these costs do need to get passed on.”

Yukon Party Leader Currie Dixon has also been critical of rent control in interviews he gave this week, saying rents should be returned to the free markets and the government should focus on building more housing to bring prices down.

Hartling said the landlords’ association isn’t totally against rent control, but landlords need to be a part of the conversation.

“If (rent control) must happen, (consultation) needs to take place, and it can’t happen in the backroom between two parties trying to figure out how they’re going to hold power,” he said.

“This is not how government should be operating.”

In lieu of an interview with the premier, cabinet spokesperson Renée Francoeur sent an email saying “the Yukon government has heard from a wide range of individuals since residential rent indexing was introduced in 2021, including landlords, tenants, business owners, non-governmental organizations and individual Yukoners.”

But Hartling said landlord concerns have been ignored in the new CASA and rent control is punishing landlords who, like tenants, are dealing with rising inflation. 

Hartling suggested rent control be removed, and the government instead provide rent subsidies for those struggling to make ends meet.

Mechan agrees that rent subsidies – which already exist for moderate- to low-income Yukoners – are part of the solution.

But she believes rent control and changes to the RLTA have to be part of it too.

“I think we need to be really cautious that we’re not subsidizing landlords and private sector with government money,” she said, saying it’s not sustainable.

“In the face of housing and homelessness crisis, we actually need to be using all the tools we have at our disposal.”

It’s not just the changes to regulations that have Hartling upset though; it’s the way they were changed, being implemented through a two-party agreement instead of legislative debate.

He said prospective landlords will be less likely to rent and potential real estate investors will be discouraged from spending money in the Yukon if the housing rules can change every few years under CASAs.

The Whitehorse Chamber of Commerce is also worried about how easily things can change.

“With a government in power that does not hold property rights in high regard, commercial property use could also be shaped by the ongoing Lands Act revision,” chamber president Ben Pereira said in an email.

“New investment into the territory across many sectors may be harder to find, with the tone this new government has set.”

Pereira said the new CASA is an improvement over the original, but the chamber believes it will deter landlords from taking risks investing in new rental properties under the new regulations, which could harm a rental market already in need of more housing stock.

Francoeur’s emailed statement said the upcoming review of the RLTA will “include a broad public engagement to ensure a modernized piece of legislation is meeting the needs of all Yukoners.”

Hartling and the Residential Landlord Association aren’t encouraged, though.

“The consultation is a farce at this point, because you can’t consult in good faith when you’ve just announced these are the regulations that you’re going to work by,” he said.

“We’re putting them in place today. And in six months, we’re going to consult. And all that means is they’re going to be put into legislation.”

Some or all regulations announced this week could be cemented into law following a review of the RLTA this year.

Mechan at Safe at Home said the main point is the rental market is becoming too exclusive, and renters and landlords need balanced protections. She said all parties should be working together to find solutions.

“These issues don’t need to be polarizing. It doesn’t need to be us versus them,” she said.

“Because everybody seems to be grappling with a layer of issues or facing barriers and we need to collectively figure out how to stimulate a healthy safe housing market.”

Comments (53)

Up 2 Down 0

Mark on Feb 10, 2023 at 5:53 pm

@really?

First, it was not my petition nor did I sign it.

What I can agree with you on is that the last petition was an embarrassment for various reasons, especially the fact that it was invalid because of the celeb names, duplicate names, etc. Why the YP or anyone would even present the petition is another major concern. They could have at least acknowledged the obvious issue and attempt to distill it down to (likely) valid names before presenting the petition in the Legislature.

I also agree with you that the next Territorial election will be in years. We will know it is near when the Liberal Party starts to distance itself from the NDP.
I am interested in good government. I will never be affiliated with any one party and will consider all candidates/parties for each election vote.

Up 0 Down 0

Roy on Feb 10, 2023 at 3:51 pm

@Jvrest

"I get it that landlords are making money and you have zero sympathy for them."
You lost me right off the top - because I clearly and repeatedly said being a landlord is not easy and that we need good landlords and good respectful tenants.

If you're gonna twist my words to suit your post I'm not going to read any further. Be better.

Up 2 Down 0

JRivest on Feb 10, 2023 at 6:29 am

@Roy, I get it that landlords are making money and you have zero sympathy for them. That's not really the issue here. The issue isn't really even about current landlords. The real issue is that Whitehorse needs far more rental stock than what we currently have. That is why prices are so high - because we have a shortage. The only way to drive prices down is to increase the number of rentals we have. And the only way that can happen is if investors with money decide to create additional rental suites.

Rental caps and restrictive policies have been studied to death. Sure none of this (rental caps and eviction policies) is new... but because none of it is new, we also know exactly what the effects of this will be. And sadly for prospective tenants in the Yukon, those effects will not be good ones. We will see fewer rental units come online. And as more people move here with fewer and fewer rentals due to bad Liberal/NDP policies, that will drive up the costs (legally or illegally) for existing rentals and you'll see more ads about "professional tenants" - you know the ones with two good jobs and no kids. Tenants that come across as less desirable (younger people, single mothers, etc) will have a far harder time finding places.

It would be one thing if these policies worked to achieve their goals... but they won't. They can't. And we know this because of how much this has been studied. But of course that's not the Liberal/NDP's problem... because they won't be the ones affected by this.

Up 1 Down 4

Really? on Feb 9, 2023 at 9:38 pm

@Mark

Remember the last petition you brought to the Legislature?

Duplicate names. Names of deceased people. Names of White Supremacists. Names of children. Poorly executed political theatre with zero teeth to make change. Embarrassing, really.

Come to terms with the the very real fact that the YP are in opposition until 2025 regardless how many ‘scandals‘ they try to manufacture. Regardless of the whining and name calling. Regardless of the challenge of parking lot fisticuffs.

If you expect the YP to win they need to lose the frat boys current in their team.

Up 13 Down 0

Kyle on Feb 9, 2023 at 7:11 am

Roy I don't think anyone who is acting as a landlord isn't willing to accept the risk that tenants may trash a unit, etc. and don't really have much to complain about when that happens. All investment comes with risk. However when government policy and slow bureaucracy make it difficult or impossible to deal with that situation well that is a different story.

And yes it is true that landlords are in the business of making money (as most people are) and its not some sort of public service that they deserve praise for. At the same time we need rental stock because some portion of the population is going to renters. The capital for that investment needs to come from somewhere (buildings don't come from nowhere) and the state for some reasons seems to be failing to allocate what is needed to keep up with that demand. So it is important to consider the knock on effects of policies that deter such investment.

Up 8 Down 7

EJ on Feb 8, 2023 at 8:01 pm

@Jort "Unelected Coalition"

Technically, what the Liberals and NDP are doing is just fine under the Westminster System. But if you really don't want to end up in a situation where people don't get what they vote for, you should support the implementation of Proportional Representation. There is some kind of government committee studying this issue as we speak. Under proportional Representation, generally speaking, each political party is allotted a number of seats according to its popular vote. So this system gives people what they vote for or at least the very closest thing you can get to that. So please speak out and let all of the politicians know that you want a proportional representation system! Especially if you feel that what is happening right now is unfair and you would prefer an election.

Up 10 Down 3

Mark on Feb 8, 2023 at 7:29 pm

@really?

Of course I am aware of who and what can trigger an election.
I am suggesting a formal petition from the electorate to request that the premier call an election.

I do not believe that democracy is reflected in an elected government implementing the policy objectives of an unelected party (and the 3rd party at that). If the NDP has “confidence” in the Liberal Party’s policy objectives, then the NDP should vote in favour of bills (etc.) rather than enter into an “agreement” that is better described as coercion (re: do as I say or I will call an election). The fact that 33 (emphasis: 33) policy objectives of the NDP are being implemented under the CASA is not exactly what the Liberal Party campaigned on and what the electorate expects.

If you are “getting your way” as a result of the CASA, then good for you. My concern is to uphold democracy as it is intended to be. I am disappointed with political leaders (ex. Trump, Putin) that go to extraordinary lengths to retain power (not uphold democracy). I have added Pillai and White to the pile.

Frankly, it is unlikely that Pillai and White would respect the wishes of the electorate via a formal petition based on how they supported each other over the tragic school incidents.

Up 11 Down 31

Roy on Feb 8, 2023 at 12:20 pm

20 to 25% of real estate in Canada is owned by "investors"

Hey if you can afford to own more than one property that's great for you - rent it out and be a good landlord - seriously I'm not criticizing you. We need good landlords just like landlords need good (respectful) tenants.

But please spare me the tears - no one is forcing you to do it. Bad tenants trashing your place? No one is forcing you to own it - sell it to someone else.
Your extra real estate is worth more than what you originally paid for it. So take your profit if it's too much of a hassle.

It's a real simple solution - be honest and ask yourself why you are not taking it - you're not being a landlord for charity LOL. Got a house with a basement suite? Guess what you locked yourself into it - choices have consequences.

There's a reason why you'll complain in here about bad tenants and bad government policy but still keep being a landlord...

Up 15 Down 5

Heathen on Feb 7, 2023 at 5:55 pm

The de-kulakization will continue until morale improves. -Commissar Tredger probably.

Up 12 Down 33

Really? on Feb 7, 2023 at 2:02 pm

@ Mark who said: Is it time to formalize a request for a Territorial election?

You do realize that’s not how things work right? What are you gonna do, send a ‘gotcha’ registered letter to Ranj formally requesting an election? Hahaha.
Maybe go back and re-do grade 8 Civics and learn about the Westminster Model of Parliamentary government.

Only Ranj can call the election. The other ‘out’ is if CASA fails a confidence vote, typically the budget vote. Or if you’re a real dreamer Currie lures a couple CASA folks across the aisle to gain the majority.

Anywho. Cool your jets until November 3, 2025 when the actual election is.

Up 41 Down 9

John on Feb 7, 2023 at 12:26 pm

Opinions are not divided, what is divided is the fact this unelected coalition does not have a public mandate and is making decisions without proper consultation with stakeholders. Political favours for each other’s political parties.

Up 35 Down 5

SH on Feb 7, 2023 at 10:38 am

"When you vote for clowns, you get a circus."

Up 5 Down 10

Bracelet guy on Feb 6, 2023 at 5:35 pm

I'm still wondering what Ranj's strange bracelet is all about.

Up 18 Down 7

Dallas on Feb 6, 2023 at 5:35 pm

Time to cut the double head off the snake I’d say.

Up 36 Down 9

Dallas on Feb 6, 2023 at 5:29 pm

Free drugs,a safe place to do them, zero accountability for crime, bail before jail kills another cop just before Xmas in Ontario, and now it’s illegal to use a plastic straw in BC yet you can have hard drugs on your person aaaaaand the common denominator is the Liberal /NDP alliance, Sandy, Kate and now Ranj along with that dufus Trudeau and Jagmeet are the demise of this country, someone, anyone do something to cause an election.

Up 29 Down 5

Mark on Feb 6, 2023 at 5:24 pm

@nightmare scenarios

Thank you for sharing the circumstance you experienced. I empathize with you as a (former) landlord. The circumstance you endeared is more common than what many would expect, and certainly our elected and unelected government (NDP) do not appear to appreciate the reality and risk landlords endure. I personally know other landlords that have equal nightmare scenarios - it is hardly a rare occurrence.

I notice a handful of “thumbs down” votes for your comment. I would be interested to know the perspective of these people if they have legitimate opinions (rather than just being contrary for the sake of it).

I hope that your circumstance is considered by Kate White and that she can implement something that protects landlords, not just tenants.

Up 33 Down 2

Sum Ting Wong on Feb 6, 2023 at 4:33 pm

Controversial? I'd say so!

These politicians who sit in judgement on those who choose, in spite of numerous obstacles, to offer housing most often to total strangers, in an environment where housing is already in such short supply, need to experience real life for a change.

There are conscientious tenants who pay their rent exactly on time or before, who are super careful not to damage the property, even those who realize improving the property benefits them for the duration of their stay! And then there are the other kind.

The kind who never carry out the trash, which slowly turns into worm infested gunk, who think nothing of spilling pop, beer, coffee or any and all kinds of bodily fluids on the furniture, the carpet, the curtains. Why don't they care? Mostly because SA is covering the tab. It's not their problem, they are "entitled". And when, in a year or so, they themselves can't stand the situation any longer, they simply move into a new apartment and begin the process once again.

You really have to have the experience of cleaning up after one of these tenants thankfully leaves to understand the disgusting smells and the physical burden of the work. It's laughable that Revenue Canada calls rental income, "un-earned income". If anyone should understand what unearned income really is it's most of them, yet they haven't a clue!

I have rental property and am strongly considering never renting it ever again due to these ludicrous punitive changes; punishing property owners for the crime of ownership.
But if I were to continue as a landlord , the only logical course would be to build a hardened concrete structure designed to be pressure washed with gallons of antiseptic when the tenants leave, with walls which bite back when punched and the whole thing sound and bullet-proofed "for their privacy".

As it now stands, what fool would want to be a landlord in the yukon?

Up 10 Down 31

Roy on Feb 6, 2023 at 2:39 pm

@Show Pillai the Door

"mom and pop Yukoner who have a house to rent out"

did you really say that? Just the good ol sourdough run of the mill 2+ house owning Moms and Pops - salt of the earth people who are the real Yukon heroes. Such a sacrifice to own multiple properties.

Won't someone think of those of use with a million+ in real estate holdings?

Yes. Yes Virginia someone will. Just as soon as they arrive in from their commute that they get per diems for that you pay for directly from your salary. Better put an extra hour in at work today as sandwich and coffee prices have gone up - no, not for you to buy - you need to brownbag it from home. No per diems for you - just for the people you vote for who are laughing at you when you do it.

Yes being a landlord isn't free money. And it isn't always easy money. But if you don't like it sell your extra "house to rent out" - you'll make money and be rid of these terrible hardships you speak of. No one is forcing you to be a landlord.

No one is forcing you to be a landlord. Yes - I said it twice so it would sink in. Sorry I don't have sympathy for your hardship that has an easy and profitable exit available. Get some perspective.

Up 31 Down 5

John - with a J on Feb 6, 2023 at 1:37 pm

That photo makes them look like the two cats that just swallowed the pension canary.

Up 13 Down 2

CJ2 on Feb 6, 2023 at 1:31 pm

@Yukoner99 "So why would every single province do this if it was such a disaster?" What do we know about how it's working in every other province? Or how closely this regulation resembles others?

I do know Ontario, or at least Toronto, amended some of the stricter measures after a very long time of making it difficult for landlords to evict or raise the rent.

More to the point, what do our governments know about managing such regulations? In the provinces, they have the capacity to set up review boards and so on. The trouble with our governments is they tend to want to emulate other provinces' legislation in a hurry. The snafu with the rent controls should have instilled a little more caution, but apparently not. Though I do have some hope for Ranj Pillai being a little more business-minded.

Up 23 Down 3

Kyle on Feb 6, 2023 at 7:56 am

I'm super happy that YG decided to help themselves to my relatively modest retirement savings to cover for its own failure to deliver affordable housing for its citizens. Next time I guess I'll send my capital outside the Yukon in the form of RRSPs/TFSAs etc. Of course the idea of going after their own retirement savings in the form of public sector pensions never crossed anyone's mind.

Up 7 Down 14

@@JC on Feb 6, 2023 at 5:40 am

You keep thinking that, sugarbean.

We have many of the problems we have now, because when it was time to develop land for expansion, the ruling party at the time, being the Yukon party, sat on their hands, because increasing the value of homeowners and landlords property is priority 1 for the good old boys, bc that's their base.

Oh, and lovely slur, btw. I'd be shocked that the Whitehorse Star allowed it, but the moderators for this site are themselves wretched, so I'm not shocked at all

Up 4 Down 28

JC on Feb 6, 2023 at 5:21 am

yukoner99

Almost as if the landlords up here cry over every lost advantage they can get. They act like altruists and saints, while squeezing people for everything they can. People out here with properties they bought 20-30 years ago for a song, charging market rent bc that's what they say is "fair"

No cause eviction bans should be bare minimum expectation, but like usual, those on top in the land of milk and honey cry mercy whenever you expect anything at all!

Up 28 Down 5

Dave on Feb 6, 2023 at 4:20 am

Call an election.

Up 29 Down 5

Jort on Feb 5, 2023 at 9:54 pm

Unelected coalition.

Up 22 Down 1

JRivest on Feb 5, 2023 at 7:16 pm

@yukoner99

There's over 50 years of history re the effects of rental caps in North America. And it's been studied to death. Overwhelmingly the answer has been that the mere discussion of a rental cap will hurt the investment into creating new rental properties.

This is literally one of the very few things where the policies being implemented are not achieving the desired results and the government decides to implement even more restrictive policies.

The studies are out there and they're not hard to find. And the answer in the vast majority of these studies is that this is a terrible policy that will only hamper our efforts to create additional rental units in the Yukon.

Up 22 Down 2

JRivest on Feb 5, 2023 at 7:08 pm

@JC "Sounds like a disincentive to become a landlord, and that's ok by me"
@JC "Lars Hartling is one of the greediest POSs out there. No sympathy"

Two things. One, you're correct. This policy, like with the one that the Liberals implemented in May 2021 are disincentives to become a landlord in the Yukon. What's appalling is that you're okay with that. We have a rental shortage... the government doesn't have the time or money to build enough rental units for those that need them (the current wait list has something like 300+ families on it), and that's only one list. The ONLY way that list is getting filled is if private investors decide that the rental market makes financial sense for them to invest money into it. And the numbers (as well as the decades of history of rental caps) clearly show that that won't happen when the government implements bad policies. And that makes things worse for everyone. It's a sad state of affairs when people are actually okay with the government doing things that will make things worse for people.

Re Lars Hartling. It's not about greed... it's about policies that don't work. When the rental policy came out in May 2021, according to the Yukon's Bureau of Statistics, the number of rental units in town dropped. That's not good for anyone, especially when more and more people are moving here.

Up 24 Down 2

Zeus on Feb 5, 2023 at 5:08 pm

If it’s close to the BC or Ontario acts, I’m out. I know there is good tenants out there but most of what I had are horrible people only looking out for themselves. The scales are out of balance, I shouldn’t need to wait a year to evict bad tenants.

Up 96 Down 13

Nightmare Scenarios for all on Feb 5, 2023 at 2:05 pm

This quote: "leaving landlords powerless over their own property" hits super close to home for me.
I was renting out the bottom half of my house in BC and had my daughters who were attending UVic at the time live above.

Within two months the situation became unbearable as the tenants proved to be some pretty bad people. We did our due diligence on calling references, checking credit, etc.
Unfortunately you can't check for everything, especially attitude.
So it became, constant partying, noise, drugs (not pot), fights, etc. Not to mention trashing the place.

It took us 8 months to remove them. The BC RTA (Residential Tenancy Act) is so biased against landlords it's not even a joke. Of course we also lost 8 months of rent, and about $25k in damages to the hardwood floors and gyprock throughout the house.

Believe me, this thing they cooked up for the Yukon will eliminate a lot of secondary suites, half home and full home rentals. Would you like to see something you worked your ass off for be destroyed all whilst getting the middle finger from the tenants and the government happily supporting them and sh**ting on the land lords.

The majority of us rent a suite in our home to get by with the increasing costs of everything. A lot of us will not want to do this as we now risk "being powerless over our own property".

Good luck, we will all need it.

Up 60 Down 7

John - with a J on Feb 5, 2023 at 12:42 pm

This is exactly why I hate party politics. The ruling party that gets 39 percent of the popular vote gets to control 100 percent of the budget. The other two parties whine about everything the ruling party does and in 4 years the political tables get turned and the chronic whining continues only in the other direction.
These people care more about pleasing some dork in Ottawa than they care about the people of the Yukon. And that goes across the whole political spectrum. I can’t stand whiners, but that’s all you seem to get decade in and decade out, no matter who you vote for.

Up 60 Down 11

Mark on Feb 5, 2023 at 10:08 am

Is it time to formalize a request for a Territorial election?

The CASA has not only been extended but also EXPANDED to now include 22 incremental policy objectives of the NDP - the party with the lowest number of elected seats and the lowest popular vote from the 2021 election.

Not a single Yukoner voted for this arrangement. I am not aware of any party that presented a coalition government option or preference as part of an election platform. Further, you will recall that the ballot did not reflect a coalition option. To be clear, both the Liberal Party and NDP are referring to the arrangement as an “agreement”, not a coalition government. You decide what it is.

All Yukoners that believe in the importance of democratic principles and practices should question the current form of governance in the Yukon Legislature. Two political parties have abandoned democracy by not respecting the wishes of the electorate. To be clear democracy has been usurped. Some may argue that the CASA reflects “cooperation”, but can the Liberal Party implement their full election platform AND the platform (conflicting?) of a different party in the same term? If the answer is no, then which programs (that more Yukoners voted for) will be abandoned or amended to accommodate the 3rd party?

The fact that one party (N.B., unelected) has power over the other reflects “coercion”, not cooperation (nor the euphemistic term “confidence”). It is also concerning that the leader of the 3rd party has as much power to call an election as the Premier.

It is still “early days” under the new CASA but evaluate for yourself how it has gone so far. Not a single person in either the NDP or Liberal Party - senior or otherwise - thought to consult (much less inform) the City of Whitehorse about funding for transit fares. We have no information about which programs the Liberal Party will now cancel or amend to make way for the (unelected) NDP agenda. The now known “unintended consequences” on rental supply has been exacerbated under the terms of the new CASA.

For clarity, I am presenting this comment without any regard to partisan politics/bias. My objective is to uphold the principles and practices of democracy. Please correct anything that is not factual or is inaccurate (I have no intent to propagate misinformation or disinformation).

Ultimately, is their interest in creating a public petition to compel the minority government to call an election? In effect, do we (the electorate) have confidence in the current governance arrangement imposed on us?

Such a petition should be presented to the legislature in a manner that does not reflect partisan politics (esp., NOT via the leader of the Yukon Party).

———————————————————-

FYI - the following 22 programs are included in the extended and expanded CASA (source: CBC.ca):

“The commitments of the new agreement as laid out by White are as follows.

Healthcare:

Open a new walk-in clinic in Whitehorse.
Investments for new healthcare workers.
Helping families with the cost of fertility treatments and surrogacy.
Support Yukon First Nations to create land-based healing initiatives.
Increase the number of bed nights for detox.
Open a managed alcohol program.

Education:

More money to recruit and retain new educators.
Plan to have more educational assistants and learning assistance teachers starting this fall.
Reduce barriers for kids who need Individualized Education Plans.
Hire wellness counsellors for every school.

Affordability:

Increase the Yukon Child Benefit.
Increase social assistance rates by $100 per month until a full review is done.
Ensure more affordable housing for seniors.
Work with the City of Whitehorse to make public transit free.

Housing:

Ban no-cause evictions.
Review the Residential Landlord and Tenant Act.

Reconciliation:

Seek consent from Yukon First Nations chiefs to start discussions on the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.


Environment:

Increase funding for renewable energy infrastructure by $5 million per year.
Collaborate on a strategy to protect salmon in Yukon rivers.

Rural Yukon:

Work with partners to provide low-cost transportation between communities.
Create more Yukon Government jobs in rural communities.
Work with the four communities affected by closure of waste transfer stations.”

Up 23 Down 9

yukoner99 on Feb 4, 2023 at 8:48 pm

I'm not sure what to think of this. On the surface, it seems horrible and as many commenters here say, will destroy investment in the rental market. What gives me pause is that every province aside from Newfoundland has a ban on no-cause-evictions along with a rental cap. Even Alberta and Ontario. So why would every single province do this if it was such a disaster? Would love to see more case studies and data from across the country on this issue.

Up 63 Down 10

Show Pillai The Door on Feb 4, 2023 at 6:36 pm

If the Liberals and NDP want to help why don’t they put price controls on groceries? Or on the price of gas when the oil companies are raking in obscene profits? No, the leftist bullies in this government only go after the low hanging fruit that they know they can push around, that is mom and pop Yukoner who have a house to rent out. Corporations would tell these weak little wanna be politicians Pillai and White to go pound sand if they tried that with them. I can’t wait to show these two and their parties the door next election!

Up 97 Down 12

Double down on Feb 4, 2023 at 11:21 am

Mostyn, White & Pillai had more than a year to see the damage done by their rent caps. If they were ignorant before, they can only be acting with wilful intent to harm now.

Up 76 Down 18

@JC on Feb 4, 2023 at 10:52 am

It doesn’t matter if he’s greedy, f***tard. What Hartling is saying makes mathematical sense. If emotional and ignorant half-wits weren’t constantly dominating the discussion and policy making, we wouldn’t have a rental crisis. This is going to destroy what is left of the private rental market, and that’s exactly what the socialists want.

Up 78 Down 19

Midnight son on Feb 4, 2023 at 10:45 am

Surgeries are being cancelled and all these two can do is work on Miss Whites pet project
Come on mr Dixon. Spruce up your caucus, get some new blood in there and get elected. I know you’re professional enough to get the Yukon out of this mess.

Up 72 Down 8

Mark on Feb 4, 2023 at 10:35 am

So here we are today with not enough supply of housing to meet demand after decades of “land planning” by various levels of government.

Restricting landlords’ ability to charge rents based on market demand and cost of providing a rental unit will not increase supply, in fact, the issue will be exacerbated under the updated RLTA.

With a projected economic recession nearing we can expect that there will be some job loss in the Territory. Are the Nibs (NDP-Lib) expecting that landlords will further bare the burden of our governments’ planning if tenants have no income to pay rent?

Up 81 Down 10

Anne on Feb 4, 2023 at 10:01 am

As a landlord, I assure you I do NOT remove good tenants. I remove problems and beg good tenants to stay! Without cause was simply a kinder and more gentle way of removing problems by giving two months notice instead of two weeks.
Now, the RTO is going to be snowed under with disputes and they will need more personnel to deal with the disputes.
Let me say again, landlords are NOT evicting good tenants. Why would we do something so counter productive.
What needed to stop was new owners evicting people in order to raise rents. That was the problem. Easy solution. If you buy units, evict people and do renovations it’s ok on one condition. The unit must never rented at the previous rate for a time frame if day 2/3 years. Pretty sure that would curb some of the problem.
Once again government solving the wrong problem.
And I’m pretty sure the territory was divided over liberals and conservatives last election.
The sheer audacity to shove NDP into power is staggering.

Up 58 Down 8

JC on Feb 4, 2023 at 9:37 am

Sounds like a disincentive to become a landlord, and that's ok by me

Up 59 Down 3

Groucho d'North on Feb 4, 2023 at 9:31 am

I anticipate the issues related to this new direction of "landlords are now required to provide a reason for evicting tenants" will fester into guidelines for the required proofs to justify the eviction. Step back and examine this cluster of ducks and imagine the systems and procedures YG will need to create for this eviction justification process to function. It won't be simple and it probably won't be cheap either.

Up 67 Down 5

It’s So Disgusting on Feb 4, 2023 at 5:33 am

Nothing else in Canada comes to mind as being priced controlled. Oil companies charging $400 per barrel equivalent at the pump when oil is at $80 per barrel, government taxes and fees going up just because they can, grocery costs spiking uncontrollably, electricity prices going up through the roof, liquor taxes tied to inflation. Federal government artificially and deliberately raising the rate of inflation and making things even more expensive by carbon taxing. The common thread is that big corporations and governments are raising costs at will but somehow the small private individuals who rent out a duplex or house have to be price controlled.
Give me a break, I’m not a landlord I’m on the other end of the spectrum but anyone can plainly see through the smoke and mirrors. Pillai is just selling his political soul to the highest bidder to stay in power following the example slippery Sandy set.

Up 54 Down 7

JRivest on Feb 4, 2023 at 1:20 am

It's not really a surprise that this is happening. I mean when the Yukon Liberal party only manages to add 13 rental units to the market over a 5-7 year span despite 2509 dwellings being built... yeah I'd be embarrassed too about it and trying to do everything possible to blame landlords for the problems.

Thanks Stats Canada and Yukon Bureau of Statistics for the data... as appalling as it is.

Up 68 Down 10

Jack Pott on Feb 3, 2023 at 10:49 pm

Election please so we can throw both these parties into the political wilderness for a looooooong time.

Up 59 Down 9

Jim on Feb 3, 2023 at 7:11 pm

This isn’t so much to do with the rent controls or eviction cause. This is simply 2 power hungry individuals worried more about their jobs and clinging to power. Kate knows she can bend Ranj over the desk because he is desperate to remain premier. The part that should worry everyone is that there was zero consultation with the stakeholders, much like before. Renters will think landlords are greedy and landlords will be leery of what a tenant does to their property. But when the government becomes involved, both should be at the table. This government has a very long track record of failure to consult. This is a classic example of a back room deal.

Up 62 Down 7

Mean Ole Landlord on Feb 3, 2023 at 6:02 pm

You can't support the renters by pulling down the landlords. The writing is on the wall. Even Sandy Silver sold his rental in Dawson. So glad I sold mine. After 30 years of providing well-maintained rentals to families at below market prices I am not going to be the scapegoat for a government who thinks that pretending landlords are the bad guys will solve anything. It simply polarizes people. Consultation ie. hearing both sides and finding common ground is, I guess, a quaint old notion that isn't as quick as back room deals between know-it-all cowboys who want to shoot guns and shout ye-haw! No matter what your persuasion, better woke up and kiss residential housing investors good-bye.

Up 45 Down 6

Max Mack on Feb 3, 2023 at 5:31 pm

I'm not completely sure what this "ban" on "no-cause evictions" means.

Ignoring the limited grounds to justify an eviction, does this imply that a landlord is bound in perpetuity to continually grant a month-to-month rental agreement to tenants?
This seems like an egregious over-reach and I fail to understand how the courts would allow this to stand.

BC has had similar rules for years and it has only worsened the rental market. 2006 saw an almost complete collapse of rental starts, and 2009 hit an all-time low partly because of the 2008 financial crisis. Rental starts have since begun to trend upwards, partly because home ownership has become unattainable for many and because of massive market interventions by all levels of government; free or cheap land, preferential zoning and bylaw changes, direct government subsidies, tax incentives, grants, low-interest loans, etc.

It seems the coupling of these policy approaches are designed to drive out the small landlord in order to give preferential treatment to large development corps. Is this the plan?

Up 75 Down 11

Priorities on Feb 3, 2023 at 4:38 pm

This week in Whitehorse:

2 overdoses and 1 murder.
Looks like all the free bail, zero arrests and safe injection sites are making things safer. Nothing like ruining the rental market at the same time!!

Up 40 Down 77

JC on Feb 3, 2023 at 3:59 pm

Lars Hartling is one of the greediest POSs out there. No sympathy

Up 98 Down 16

bonanzajoe on Feb 3, 2023 at 3:51 pm

PARTNERSHIP IN POLITICS" Dumb and Dumber3

Up 125 Down 27

Matthew on Feb 3, 2023 at 3:25 pm

Sickening! Keep Government OUT of private lives! Only a matter of time before the government is going to FORCE you to rent out your spare bedroom... they should have ZERO say in rentals!

Up 104 Down 10

KC on Feb 3, 2023 at 3:18 pm

I get why people instinctively don't like the idea of "without cause" anything because it always seems reasonable to give people a "reason" for things especially when there is a power dynamic involved. But I don't think a lot of people really appreciate the cumbersome logistical challenges of have courts and quasi-judicial tribunals adjudicate issues of "cause". It is such a massive process that most people determine it is just not worth the effort especially when the person they're trying to evict/fire/etc is determined to bog down the process. This is the reason why we see difficult and incompetent employees at YG promoted and shuffled around: because the task of firing them is so immense. It is also why we hear horror stories out of BC about people who can't get evictions through an overwhelmed residential tenancy system. I sure hope YG is going to give the RLTA more funding to deal with the likely increase of caseload it is going to see and not stick landlords with genuinely problematic tenants. We've traded one problem for another here.

Up 115 Down 22

Juniper Jackson on Feb 3, 2023 at 3:14 pm

I’m so tired of all this crap. The Liberals and the NDP are just making me crazy!

Up 121 Down 14

BnR on Feb 3, 2023 at 3:11 pm

Our medical system is in crisis and our politicians are wasting time with this BS.
All three leaders should be working collaboratively on our healthcare issues and making this job number one.

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.