Whitehorse Daily Star

Image title

Photo by Whitehorse Star

DISMISSED – Yukon Supreme Court granted Northwestel its request to dismiss a defamation lawsuit it launched against a local company last January.

Northwestel drops its lawsuit against local technology company

Northwestel Inc. has dropped a defamation lawsuit against local company Orange Technology, according to publicly available court documents filed on March 1.

By Pierre Chauvin on March 9, 2016

Northwestel Inc. has dropped a defamation lawsuit against local company Orange Technology, according to publicly available court documents filed on March 1.

On that date, Yukon Supreme Court granted the company an order to dismiss its own action.

On Jan. 14, Northwestel had filed a statement of claim alleging part of an interview Orange Technology director Martin Lehner had given to local CBC radio several months earlier had been libelous.

Lehner was also named as a defendant in the lawsuit.

Both Lehner and Northwestel declined to comment for this story.

In a requisition for order, Northwestel’s lawyer, James Tucker indicated, that “each party affected has consented to the order.”

“The court orders that ... the said dismissal be of the same force and effect as a judgment pronounced after trial of the within action upon its merit,” the order reads.

Northwestel is the sole Internet provider for the territory. It also provides TV and phone services.

Lehner’s Orange Technology offers computer and network support, online security and phone services.

In the lawsuit, Northwestel took issue with several statements Lehner made during a Nov. 20, 2015 interview on CBC’s radio morning program, A New Day.

While talking about the Yukon government’s plan to have a second fibre line to offer more reliable Internet, Lehner commented about what he said were issues with Northwestel’s infrastructure.

Lehner claimed that some of Orange Technology’s clients in McRae experienced daily Internet outages.

“They’ve been told that there’s an issue with some of the infrastructure that delivers Internet in that area and there’s no plans to fix it at all,” the statement of claim reads, quoting Lehner.

Northwestel alleged at the time the statement discredited the company because it suggested it was unresponsive to complaints by its clients.

The statement also damaged its reputation and business, and exposed them to “contempt or ridicule,” Northwestel said.

The company also claimed that the statement exposed them to “possible sanctions by the CRTC,” without elaborating further.

Northwestel was asking Yukon Supreme Court to order Orange to publish an apology on all of its social media pages.

It was also seeking a restraining order to prevent Lehner and Orange from publishing the statement at stake “or any similar libel.”

On Feb. 10, Orange Technology filed its statement of defence and invited media to a press conference about the lawsuit.

“We will be sharing a brief statement, after which time the media will be invited to ask questions,” Lehner wrote in an email.

An hour before the planned Feb. 11 press conference was to start, Lehner cancelled it.

“A development has occurred that requires our attention prior to continuing with a public statement,” Lehner wrote in an email, adding the development had occurred the morning of the press conference.

In its reply to Northwestel, Orange Technology laid out three defences to the allegations.

The statements only referred to the company’s services, and are true, and fall under the defence of fair comment, the company argued.

Canadian courts have established that fair and honest comments on matters of public interest can be libelous without being actionable – meaning they can’t be used as grounds for a defamation lawsuit.

Comments (7)

Up 18 Down 1

Groucho d'North on Mar 11, 2016 at 6:30 pm

Settled out of court I believe is the popular term. Both parties came to an agreement of some kind which includes a silence clause so none will know of these deeds. I suspect the case came to a rapid conclusion because if it had proceeded there would have been some level of investigation to confirm the levels of service and failures the telco delivers to corroborate the accusations made by Mr. Lehner. Dang! What if he was right?

Up 10 Down 32

so we wait for the apology from Lehner? on Mar 10, 2016 at 3:25 pm

I'm assuming they gave up the charge if he met the conditions of an apology and posting on social media
They didn't ask for money. I'm trying to find the transcript.

Orange risked more then they would ever gain. NWTEL was right in what they did ... and to support this... phone Lehner and ask about what he thinks about NWTEL.

Up 8 Down 25

nonymous on Mar 10, 2016 at 11:33 am

Don't know why they dropped it, it was a clear cut case, Maybe the CRTC let them off the hook, no need for NWTEL to apologize.

Up 34 Down 7

Politico on Mar 10, 2016 at 11:02 am

Talk about a frivolous abuse of the court system

Up 40 Down 12

Apology? How did you come to that conclusion? on Mar 9, 2016 at 5:07 pm

I'm curious as to what happened here but I don't see any reference to an apology in the dropping of the suit. If anything, Northwestel should be doing some apologizing for putting Martin and Orange Technology through this.

Up 27 Down 10

YukonCold on Mar 9, 2016 at 4:57 pm

I don't see an apology. Neither side is making comments. Sounds more like they agreed to drop the suit in exchange for Lehner's silence. How upstanding of Northwestel [sarcasm].

Up 16 Down 38

so we wait for the apology from Lehner? on Mar 9, 2016 at 3:45 pm

I take it they dropped the suit because Lehner is apologizing?

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.