Whitehorse Daily Star

New workers' contract would obliterate surplus

A new report from the CD Howe Institute, a conservative economic think-tank, ranks the Yukon last among federal,

By Jason Unrau on May 17, 2010

A new report from the CD Howe Institute, a conservative economic think-tank, ranks the Yukon last among federal, provincial and territorial jurisdictions for meeting budgetary revenue and spending projections over the past 10 years.

But Premier and Finance Minister Dennis Fentie is blaming the government's accounting practices for the Yukon's poor showing in a study that examined 10 years' worth of budgets from federal, provincial and territorial governments.

Deputy Finance minister David Hrycan said the territory's Crown corporations, including the hospital corporation and Yukon College, are not included in annual main spending estimates presented each spring, but show up in the year-end statements.

"If we would've included them, we would've gotten a different mark (in CD Howe's report), end of story,” Hrycan told the Star. "If you were to compare budgets, including the corporations, we're very close to the plans. All CD Howe is saying, ‘Why don't you put it in the main estimates?'”

Colin Busby, a policy analyst for CD Howe and co-author of the institute's latest report, said this method of reporting the Yukon government's finances makes it hard to figure out what's happening.

"You can't actually tell what's going on. Clearly, in my opinion, that's a real issue of obfuscation, and it can be quite troubling,” Busby told a local radio station last week when questioned on Yukon's rating.

"Changes should be made so the government can explain why it's spending more than it's taking in.”

With a record $1-billion budget in 2009/2010, Fentie's government projected a $20-million surplus, but wound up posting a $23-million deficit.

The premier said the swine flu crisis that mobilized Department of Health and Social Services staff for a territory-wide vaccination program last fall added to the spending overrun; however, the territory could be short on cash to manage a repeat during the coming flu season.

As well, funds from the government's emergency fire fund have dwindled to less than $200,000, providing the government $6 million less than it had in the previous year to combat forest fires.

For the 2010/2011 fiscal year, the government has $1.075 billion at its disposal (some $70 million more than last year), but projects a meagre $2.9-million surplus.

Already, the new collective agreement between the government and the Yukon Employees' Union, in which government employees would get a two-per-cent wage increase for 2010 (6.5 per cent over three years) if they ratify it, has cancelled the surplus, placing government spending in the red by more than $5 million.

With the fire season essentially here and the flu season around the corner, the government is facing another deficit; this one even bigger than last year.

Questioned on the CD Howe report at a Friday afternoon press conference following a meeting between the three northern premiers, Fentie dismissed the findings.

"We know statistically, and factually, that there's only two jurisdictions in this country that are not in a net debt position – that's Alberta and the Yukon,” Fentie responded. "I'm sure the CD Howe Institute might have reflected on that too – at least, I hope they did.”

Net fiscal position of the country's jurisdictions was not part of the CD Howe study, but in terms of meeting projected revenues and spending, Alberta ranked worst among the provinces, surpassing just Nunavut and the Yukon.

When Nunavut Premier Eva Aariak responded to a conference-call question from a reporter based in Iqaluit about the territory's $40-million public housing shortfall, Fentie could not resist wading in.

"CD Howe must have missed that one,” he said.

Comments (3)

Up 0 Down 0

Doug Rutherford on May 18, 2010 at 5:30 am

I'm not sure what is worse. Ending up in last place in the area of budget management or having a premier that isn't competent enough to know that this is a problem.

Up 0 Down 0

Retiree on May 18, 2010 at 12:30 am

How about the headline on this story blaming the possible surplus loss on the civil servants contract settlement!!

That's NOT the story - shame on you Whitehorse Star!

Up 0 Down 0

bobby bitman on May 17, 2010 at 7:09 am

Huh? Is Dennis Fentie suggesting that a 'swine flu mobilization' turned a $20 million surplus into a $26 million deficit? That's $46 million dollars in 'unexpected spending', and I highly doubt it was all due to immunization clinics. Guessing that half the Yukon got immunized, that would be 17,000 for $46,000,000 which turns out to be $3,000 per flu shot.

Seriously. Are we supposed to believe that? Fentie once again is dodging the issue. Ya right, 'we ran over because of unexpected flu shots'. There is no way that the flu shot contributed meaningfully to his $46 million dollar spending spree. How about some clarity and honesty from this Fentie, Yukon Party government on how they spent 46 million dollars without intending to?

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.