Photo by Whitehorse Star
Pictured Above: DARREL PASLOSKI
Photo by Whitehorse Star
Pictured Above: DARREL PASLOSKI
Premier Darrell Pasloski has tabled a letter from the Yukon’s conflict of interest commissioner that he says exonerates him from any inappropriate actions in the Mountain View Golf Course deal, which itself was legitimate, according to the government.
Premier Darrell Pasloski has tabled a letter from the Yukon’s conflict of interest commissioner that he says exonerates him from any inappropriate actions in the Mountain View Golf Course deal, which itself was legitimate, according to the government.
But the NDP told the legislature Thursday that Pasloski, who was a Mountain View board member when the transaction went down, has been “all but caught with his hand in the cookie jar.” He now leads a party that is “riddled with cronyism,” said NDP Leader Liz Hanson.
The controversial arrangement saw the government quietly hand over $750,000 to Mountain View to discharge its sizable debt, provide an additional cash boost and put a 51-hectare parcel of land — leased by the course in 1997 — back in government hands.
The NDP brought the “backroom deal” to light last week after Meadow Lakes Golf and Country Club owner Jeff Luehmann spent a year and hundreds of dollars trying to wrest relevant documents from the government via access-to-information requests.
The deal went through in February 2011 following months of back-and-forth between senior territorial and municipal civil servants and direction from then-Community Services minister Archie Lang.
Conflict of interest commissioner David Phillip Jones wrote that “there is no actual or perceived conflict of interest under the Act....”
The Conflict of Interest Act relates to potential conflicts while MLAs and ministers are in those roles. “No conflict between a person’s private interests and his or her governmental responsibilities can arise before they become a member.”
Pasloski resigned from the Mountain View board on May 27, 2011 — about three months after the deal went through — and stepped into the premier’s office the next day.
Hanson focused initially on who knew what, rather than outright conflicts of interest. She noted government ministers have claimed ignorance of the arrangement, which occurred under the previous Yukon Party regime and then-premier Dennis Fentie.
Education Minister Elaine Taylor was in cabinet at the time, while Energy, Minister Scott Kent and Community Services Minister Brad Cathers received a briefing in October 2013 alerting them to the deal — “yet they both claim ignorance,” Hanson said.
“Now we know that (Pasloski) himself was on the board of the golf club when the secretive deal was made, just months before he became premier.”
Kent responded in question period yesterday: “With respect to this deal, obviously it was made by a previous minister and it appeared at that time to address some of the expressed needs of Yukoners at that time — first, of course, being the need for land.”
He pointed to the “crisis for lots” in the Whitehorse area in 2011. He repeated the government defence that the “prime location” was taken back as a potential expansion site for the Whistle Bend subdivision, despite the fact the city of Whitehorse explicitly stated its disinterest in a parcel that a feasibility study showed to be largely unsuitable for development.
Kent also said that bailing out the indebted non-profit was a motivating factor in the cash handover, $500,000 of which went almost directly to discharging the golf club’s mortgage.
“You know, other Yukon NGOs have been in difficulty and they didn’t get the friendly gestures like this one did. By avoiding the issue, this government is confirming the suspicions of many Yukoners that this Yukon Party government is riddled with cronyism,” Hanson said.
“Every time more details come out, the government claims that they are learning about it, but what they are learning about is becoming less credible. We have seen the documents, and they have the premier’s fingerprints all over them.
“Does the premier honestly believe that Yukoners trust him and his cabinet when they pretend they didn’t know what happened?” she asked.
Kent responded with a tribute to volunteers and NGO board members across the territory.
Pasloski has recused himself from discussion of the affair, following advice from the conflict of interest commissioner.
“(A)ny involvement by him in responding to this inquiry might create a perceived conflict of interest in light of his previous involvement as a member of the board of directors of Mountain View Golf Course,” Jones wrote.
The letter was sent Dec. 4 and tabled in the house the same day. It came in response to questions from NDP MLA Kate White and Liberal Leader Sandy Silver.
In 2008, Pasloski ran federally for the Conservative Party, finishing a close second to incumbent Liberal Larry Bagnell. In May 2010, he ascended to the golf club’s board, and announced his candidacy for leader of the Yukon party in April 2011.
“At the same time, the Conservative Senator Dan Lang’s brother — the minister behind the Mountain View bailout — was in the Yukon Party cabinet. Two months after the government’s deal with the golf club, the former Conservative Party candidate became the premier and the leader of the Yukon Party,” Hanson said.
“Talk about a coalition,” she added, inverting the government’s oft-repeated characterization of the NDP and Liberal opposition.
“Instead of coming clean with Yukoners, the premier is hiding behind his ministers and pretending he had nothing to do with this backroom deal. Yukoners know that this is a prime example of the old boys’ club at work. Yukoners know that this is an inside job,” Hanson said.
Silver tabled a motion callng on the government “to tell Yukoners what budget document funding for the Mountain View Golf Course buyback was contained in.”
Nowhere in the 2010-11 supplementary budget is the covert $750,000 buyback identifiable, though much smaller capital expenditures — adding up to $54 million and $5.5 million in Community Services and EMR, respectively — are listed.
The current government fought the release of documents related to the “buyback” of its own land from Mountain View Golf Club, resulting in an independent inquiry and a months-long battle for records that eventually saw the light of day, the Star revealed Monday.
One of those documents suggests former premier Dennis Fentie was aware of the deal.
On Christmas Eve of 2013, Diane McLeod-McKay, the information and privacy commissioner, launched a review of the Community Services department over its refusal to grant access to dozens of documents requested by Luehmann.
The privately owned business competes with the non-profit Mountain View for customers.
Luehmann had requested copies of “all records and information regarding land transactions ... between Government of Yukon and (Mountain View) from 1998 to present.”
Community Services twice extended the 30-day deadline by a month, with an eventual due date of Dec. 10, 2013. The department then failed to get back to Luehmann by that date.
Territorial legislation states a failure to respond in time “is to be treated as a decision to refuse access to the record.”
McLeod-McKay’s 36-page report, released in August, found that Community Services “had no authority ... to refuse access to the records or part thereof.”
Four of the 52 records were “letters written to Yukon Government employees and the Premier (Fentie) by Third Party representatives,” McLeod-McKay wrote.
In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.
Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.
Comments (18)
Up 0 Down 0
Why so many YP likes? LOL on Dec 11, 2014 at 9:41 pm
Really, does the Yukon Party have nothing better to do than to get its supporters to put 1010 likes on 'Pasloski is s good man', lol? And as for the comment that the 90's and NDP government time was a depression, AT LEAST the NDP had a LOCAL HIRE POLICY! This government has f*$%ed up the hiring policy so much that they ludicrously give their Yukon students over $25,000 in grants to go to university and THEN THEY WON'T HIRE THEM (or even interview them) YP: "We'll send you away and educate you-we'll even help to pay for it! But we prefer southern hires to local hires--they have more to offer'. !!! Try being a Yukon kid coming home to work after your trade or univ education and YOU CAN'T EVEN GET AN INTERVIEW. We need a strong alternative to this boys club called the YP! Let's get some common sense leading the YUKON.
Up 8 Down 5
northern man on Dec 11, 2014 at 9:17 am
As much as the YP has messed up as our Territorial Government.. I still can not vote for anyone else. The NDP's leader is well past her expiry date and the Liberals are still trying to find themselves. I know that many individuals feel the same way...I hope someone can step up to the plate otherwise the YP still has a shot in the next election.
And yes this goes against the radicals that often post on CBC or the local newspapers stating that the YP is done in the next election. But let's get real... I know many FN's that are Conservative through and through and many young/older people of the same political affiliation.
I hope this gets through to people and someone can step up to the challenge to sway individuals like myself to vote differently.
Up 16 Down 3
north_of_60 on Dec 9, 2014 at 5:27 pm
Pasloski for Pharmacist
Up 19 Down 6
I am sorry Yukon Party in panic mode to cover their mistakes on Dec 9, 2014 at 4:50 pm
With the issues of FH school, hospitals, treatment plant, education, health care beds, senior doctor, reports are showing how bad it really is in the Yukon Party and the endless trouble they are creating and waste of public funds, and with no checks and balances in place for the administration.
Voters are starting to rethink - why vote for people who can't politically manage the Yukon public business.
Up 1010 Down 26
Pasloski is a good man! on Dec 9, 2014 at 4:38 pm
Looks like the NDP are again on the losing end of this one in the court of public opinion, judging by the tally of thumbs up and down. I guess my hunch about the core supporters of the NDP is correct.
Real Yukoners support the Yukon! The Yukon Party is about making the Yukon the best place to live. No wonder they have had three straight majority governments. Results count! I'll take the last 12 years under the YP over the NDP's 1990s any day. For you recent arrivals (NDP supporters) the 1990s were known locally as the Depression.
Up 27 Down 70
Yukon Party in damages mode on Dec 9, 2014 at 2:34 pm
I see Yukon Party is in damage mode by the responses to the comments in this paper especially this piece. Why don't the Yukon Party just own up to their mistakes and put it behind them.
Up 33 Down 315
Ken on Dec 9, 2014 at 1:57 am
Correction - the article states Pasloski finished a close second to Bagnell in the 2008 federal election. This is one of those myths the Star should not be flogging. Pasloski was a distant second, receiving less than one third of all votes while Bagnell obtained an amount approaching half of all votes. Pasloski was soundly rejected by Yukoners when the whole Territory was able to cast a vote against him. Interestingly, Leef did little better, getting barely more than one third, the difference being Yukoners let a Conservative slither through by diluting their good sense with votes spread across the three non-extreme parties and Bagnell lost by barely 10 votes. Point is, Pasloski was a lousy and soundly defeated federal candidate and is a lousy and soon to be defeated territorial embarrassment. The one joy for us is that as a single term MLA, he will be denied a pension.
Up 14 Down 8
Calling the Kettle Black? on Dec 8, 2014 at 8:45 pm
Why did Mr Luehmann spend a year and hundreds of dollars trying to wrest relevant documents on the competition? I seem to recall he was in the media a few years ago regarding a golf course and the adjoining land.
Up 23 Down 5
MR on Dec 8, 2014 at 4:13 pm
Read today's article by Tom Patrick! He nailed it! Whitehorse Star articles have been awesome as well .
The only way you would side with this bail out is if you were part of the decision process or had something to gain from this deal! Any grade one student can see this was a sleazy, greasy back room deal meant to bail out MVGC and hide it from the taxpaying public!
Up 164 Down 206
Shame for Yukon Party on Dec 8, 2014 at 2:52 pm
Shame for the Yukon Party because it was built by a group of people who put aside their political beliefs and came together to do something to make the Yukon better. Now Yukon Party is mirrored in shame, scandals, mismanagement, poor leadership, lack of direction, disconnected from the voters and even their own party members. This looks like another Kim Campbell move, from a majority to 2 seats in Canada. This looks like Frank Mckennia election where he wins all 54 seats in his first New Brunswick election. Liberals are the ones with a strong leader that understands what the grass roots want for the Yukon.
Up 18 Down 15
north_of_60 on Dec 8, 2014 at 2:27 pm
The opposition should boycott the legislature until an election is called.
Up 12 Down 3
MR on Dec 8, 2014 at 1:51 pm
Taxpayers beware! FYI tennis Yukon in conjunction with MVGC wants to build a year round facility, how transparent will this be and can we trust this current regime to manage this! How much will this cost the tax payer ?
Up 36 Down 10
Bonusess/evaluation of senior managers in the Yukon Gov't on Dec 7, 2014 at 1:01 pm
Do the people of the Yukon know that the only thing is evaluated in the Yukon Gov't managers is if they completed their budget for the years. There is no system in the Yukon Gov't to evaluate senior management.
Up 39 Down 3
Lost in the Yukon on Dec 6, 2014 at 8:26 pm
"Follow the money" ... This must happen. The story is out there that a well known YP backer and realtor made money on this deal. How do you get the RCMP or Auditor General involved?
Up 47 Down 4
Mike Smyth on Dec 6, 2014 at 10:39 am
Follow the money.
This gift to the golf course has not been located in government expenditures. Follow up on this and find what also may be hidden there.
Up 162 Down 5
Audit on Dec 6, 2014 at 10:31 am
Do the people think there needs to be an independent audit completed on this gov't to find out the truth? Hands up if you do! Where there smoke there is fire. The fire has broken out for this gov"t. ie two hospitals did not have needs analysis completed, Whitehorse hospital out of beds, long standing doctor in the Yukon has to speak out, treatment plant in Dawson an engineering nightmare, citizens of Dawson were not provided the right information when choosing the type of treatment plant and the engineering problems with this type of system so they could make an informed decision. FH School lack direction in planning and design, education having challenges, economic development and PSC in management challenges according to YTG employee engagement surveys in 2010 and 2013. According to the 2013 employee engagement survey economic development 56% of staff do not understand what senior management is doing. Go on line, the employee engagement surveys are public to check the facts. There has to be an audit done before more of the system has issues.
Up 38 Down 4
MR on Dec 5, 2014 at 5:30 pm
If this is considered "legitimate"
Business practices as per government WOW! I'm dumbfounded that buying back land you already own is legit! No wonder people bitch about government!
Up 46 Down 5
Conflict of interest on Dec 5, 2014 at 5:05 pm
Time for someone to raise money to get signs posted all over the Yukon to remove this leaderless government. In discussion with people who know why the Yukon Party was established which was not to be associated or connected to any political beliefs of any type. Purpose of the Yukon Party was people coming together in small group at the time to talk about what we need to do help the Yukon move forward. Ms Taylor you know that better than anyone. Darrell you are not following the principals the Yukon Party was set up for and you do not listen or talk to the people of the Yukon including the Yukon Party members. It is time for a new leader because the direction you are taking the party is not what its mandate is and that is to represent the people of the Yukon. Members of the Yukon Party do you stand for all this lack of leadership that is taking place because ministers are trying to do their jobs but just caught up in the leadership mess. Take Brad with you.