Photo by Whitehorse Star
Doug Graham and Liz Hanson
Photo by Whitehorse Star
Doug Graham and Liz Hanson
The planned new 300-bed continuing care facility could cost $126.2 million, according to an early-stage planning report completed in June 2013.
The planned new 300-bed continuing care facility could cost $126.2 million, according to an early-stage planning report completed in June 2013.
The Yukon government has allocated $6.9 million in the 2014/2015 budget to plan a new 150-bed continuing care facility that will be built to allow for a future expansion to 300 beds.
The $126.2-million price tag is estimated for a facility that is approximately 194,000 square feet.
The report notes costs could be reduced as planning for the building evolves and possible efficiencies are discovered.
Today, Health and Social Services Minister Doug Graham called the care facility a "huge, huge building construction project.
"It's probably going to be the biggest single facility in the territory,” he told the Star. "It will be one of the biggest construction projects ever in the territory, as well.”
The Yukon Party cabinet has already approved the project, Graham said.
Yet, the community has not been consulted – and that's a real concern for the NDP.
"The big question when you look at that report is: who did they talk to?” Liz Hanson, the leader of the official Opposition, said in an interview this morning.
"It's all internal talk. There's a lot of questions, I think, that we as Yukon citizens need to have answered before the government makes the definitive move.
"In my view, this is a continuation of how they've made the most important health care decisions. They do it in a way that's behind closed doors and excluding the stakeholders that they should be making plans for. We saw that when they built the two acute care hospitals,” she said.
The government took harsh criticism from the Auditor General of Canada for its planning of the new hospitals in Dawson City and Watson Lake, in particular that it didn't complete a needs assessment nor properly consult the community.
"I don't know what kind of community consultation you would talk about at this stage,” Graham countered.
"At this stage, we know there is a need. We know that we're going to have to provide some kind of facility. We've determined the approximate need, that's why we set it at 300.”
The minister said once the preliminary planning to determine what the building will look like is completed, the government will "probably consult to some extent with seniors in the territory.”
When asked why the community wasn't consulted before the government decided to move forward with a single, large facility, Graham said the government made the determination that the Yukon can't afford to duplicate smaller facilities and pay the associated increased staffing and utility costs.
"We know from our current locations, the fact that we have, what, four or five different seniors' facilities in the city right now, we know how much extra that costs us on an annual basis .... We would like to put all of them together as well,” he said.
But Hanson questions whether such a large facility is the appropriate model for a community of 36,000 territory-wide or 26,000 in Whitehorse.
"Is the intention to centralize all of the services in Whitehorse, then?” she asked today.
"I would like to see them actually engage with the stakeholders, and that would include the potential residents, in terms of looking at what kind of patient-centred care they're going to be delivering and how it's most appropriately done.
"And does that translate into a 300-bed facility in terms of community-based care? Is this the only model that can deliver what Yukon citizens need?” she asked.
The report, led by Kobayashi + Zedda Architects, examines the Yukon's existing and projected continuing care facility needs.
It also outlines the results of a physical and functional review of Whitehorse's three existing continuing care facilities – Macaulay Lodge, Copper Ridge Place, and Thomson Centre – and describes the functional requirements of a new 300-bed facility.
The report, New Whitehorse Continuing Care Facility: Facility Review and Functional Program, is not available online for public viewing.
A copy was provided to the Star this week by the official Opposition.
Currently, there are 182 continuing care beds in the Yukon, 11 in Dawson City, with the remainder located in Whitehorse. As of early March, 27 people were on a waiting list for continuing care.
The report notes that based on various projections, the Yukon will need upwards of 320 new continuing care beds by 2021.
The need to replace the 1970s-era Macaulay Lodge and Thomson Centre – which is just 22 years old – will also factor into the number of new beds needed, the report notes.
During building reviews, the writing team found that Macaulay Lodge does not meet the building code for its current use. It scored a 49 per cent on the technical assessment and has a 7.5-year life expectancy.
The report notes that some rooms and a lot of the bathrooms at the lodge are too small for a wheelchair to manoeuvre, one of several difficulties with the space.
The report also highlights some issues with the functional space at the Thomson Centre.
It notes the facility is set to revert back to the Yukon Hospital Corp. and will no longer be the responsibility of the Department of Health and Social Services continuing care.
Graham explained today that the new facility will eventually replace the beds at the Macaulay and Thomson facilities.
He also explained that while the government expects to need more than 320 new beds by 2021 and more than that into the future, they're only planning for 300 at the new facility. That's because they'd like to see a mix of government, non-profit, and private operations within the territory.
The report goes on to underscore the need for various types of care that should be included in a new facility.
That includes respite care, specialized secure care for residents with dementia, palliative care, day care programs, stabilization and assessment facilities, facilities for obese patients, and mental health facilities.
"The lack of appropriate and adequate community resources, including supportive housing for clients whose health is at risk of deteriorating due to mental health issues, addictions, or other lifestyle factors, is a potential emerging impact on continuing care programs and capacity,” the report notes.
The consulting team recommends, in the report, building new facilities that include a minimum of 125 beds to a total new capacity of 300 beds.
It outlines advantages and disadvantages to a single large facility, two mid-size facilities of 125-150 beds each, and one larger facility of 200 beds and a smaller facility of 50 beds.
The benefit of one large facility would be the potential to maximize capital and operational efficiencies, a central location for staff and visitor access and that it could be built at once, but the government could open units only as required.
The disadvantages to a larger building include that it would limit access to ground level access to the outdoors for residents on upper levels (a 300-bed facility is envisioned as a two- or three-storey building in the report), initial large capital costs, and that it would be a larger-scale building than any other in Whitehorse.
Graham said he's not concerned about the phased construction approach the government has chosen to take nor the potential impacts of future construction on residents occupying the first 150 beds.
He explained the building will be designed in such a way to limit any disruptions to residents and operations due to future construction.
The advantages, as outlined in the report, of two 125-150-bed facilities are the potential for phased development and that more of the facility could be built on one floor, but it would also duplicate infrastructure, and it may be difficult to find two central sites that could accommodate buildings of this size.
The last option, a large 200-bed facility and a 50-bed facility for more independent residents, is the "best fit for the Yukon scale and ... the distinct care profile of continuing care residents in Yukon,” the report notes.
It would provide a less institutional setting for more independent residents, allows for the possibility of phased construction, and would allow for more ground-floor rooms.
However, it would again require two sites and it may have higher capital and operational costs than the other options.
The report recommends a single large facility be located downtown.
Graham said that would be ideal, and highlighted the importance of the location, especially considering access to shops and transit. But space is also a consideration, he noted.
The government is considering eight locations, he said, and is open to suggestions.
Hanson led off question period this afternoon by asking Premier Darrell Pasloski if he believes Yukoners want a 300-bed facility.
Graham stood up to take her initial questions on the subject.
Answering a later question from Hanson, Pasloski summarized some of his government's accomplishments in the collaberative care, assisted living and seniors' services fields.
In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.
Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.
Comments (10)
Up 3 Down 13
Sandy Helland on Mar 29, 2014 at 1:14 am
The 300-bed plan speaks to today's needs.
A 1200-bed plan speaks to tomorrow's needs.
Short-sighted vision, narrow-minded government.
Up 3 Down 7
spread the wealth on Mar 28, 2014 at 11:56 pm
In the meantime, Yg is building senior homes in the communities while disregarding the need for assisted living within the communities. A lady from Faro is being housed at McDonald lodge in Dawson City. She doesn't know anyone there and Faroites that knows and love her, are all seniors themselves and can't take the trip to Dawson regularly. As a matter of fact, when I visited her last summer in Dawson, she told me I was the only one that ever visited her from Faro.
We just had a new senior home built in Faro a couple of years ago with 6 units that were never completely occupied. Provision for one or two units dedicated to assisted living weren't in the plans. Why does everyone in Whitehorse believe that everyone in the communities dreamed of finishing their days in Whitehorse? WE DON'T!
Up 7 Down 1
Senior Facilities Design on Mar 28, 2014 at 4:43 am
The planning for seniors complexes has evolved greatly over the last 20 years. Quebec fire in the senior building is an example of the need for more change. The above comments about safety is important. Building a one story building for 300 units is very costly. It is also much more costly to operate a one story building. So this means a multi-story building is more cost effective. What design are doing in facilitates like a senior complex is building it into chambers where each chamber can be isolated from other chambers. I don't mean two or three hour fire stop in the walls. What chamber means the building is divided into chambers so if fire break out in one part of the building people can be moved to other parts of the building safely and the fire can only burn in the chamber that is on fire.
A lot of high rise buildings are starting to use some of the new technology. If you look on TV and they show a fire in a high rise with one or two units burning this means they have fire isolation system in place so the whole building does not burn to the ground. The way apartment builders do it is using structural steel building with structural title up concrete panels. What this means is each unit in the building other walls are concrete, the ceiling and floor are concrete. This means the fire cannot get through the concrete and it is isolated in the unit that is on fire. If anyone has stayed in the down town Four Seasons hotel it has some of this type of construction not quite the same.
Up 12 Down 4
Supply and demand of land/housing to Economic Grow on Mar 28, 2014 at 3:47 am
I have spent over 20 years in real development and construction of residential, commercial and public facilities. I have worked on land planning for future demand in NS Alberta, BC and the US. Whistle bend was 10 years to late in one way and years ahead of the next economic up turn. The major price increase in Whitehorse real estate from 2004-2012 was do to supply and demand of housing. No land available means price increases for the limit housing stock available. Whitehorse is not a true market condition for real estate prices because of this factor. Back in 2003/04 the Department of Economic Development should have provided land planning forecasts of future demand so land planning could get ahead of the demand curve. It is one thing to criticize and another to understand supply and demand and to balance the needs of future growth.
Alberta learn their lesson from 1974 to 1986 and were not prepared for the growth. From 1998 to present they got prepared and have done fairly good job at it. The key with land planning are having good forecast data on what to expect in the next 10 years, let the private sector foot the cost for land development and let the market determine the price and provide for the demand.
Up 11 Down 6
Yukon needs cost effective Change moving forward on Mar 28, 2014 at 3:24 am
More and more seniors are choosing to stay in the Yukon. The existing system is on overload and has been for awhile. Having an outlook demand for over 300 beds in 2021 usually means you can double that. I have been involved with developing health care facilities in Alberta many years ago. I watched how NS has completed their health care planning. A lot of regions underestimates their need going forward then you end up in situation like the individual stated above..
The Yukon Government is going to have 50% of their staff retiring in the next 5 to 10 years. That is 1900 workers or more becoming seniors. Do the math. The Yukon Government has to get more creative in developing and building facilities of this nature. They should look at the three P model Public Private Partners. A lot of other parts of the world are using this model especially social Democratic government.
It is a better use of capital investment for public service, less risk, and more can be put into programs. The government owning all these facilities without having the operating dollars is hard. Same as other regions. It is easy for a party not in power to criticize and make statements. If any party is going to question the government management of a project it does not matter what party is doing it, it should done smartly. NDP should check their facts before speaking. NDP should come out strong on the issue picking it apart making suggestions that make sense or provide alternatives that the people well listen to and take notice. The same old gong show does nothing for the NDP or any party. If you want to know more about P3 contact Ernst Young in Vancouver ask for Eleena Marier Manager Advisory Services. She has been in the Yukon talking about P3 and has worked in different parts of the world.
Up 12 Down 9
Max Mack on Mar 27, 2014 at 2:30 pm
So . . . an architectural firm, which designs and constructs buildings for profit, was the lead on a "study" that concluded that the government should build a massive new care facility to the tune of over $100 million?
I think lack of community consultation is only one concern I might have with this process.
Another monstrous capital addition to our health care expenditures via the magic of depreciation and increased operating expenses. Be warned, Yukoners. Reinstatement of health care premiums is imminent.
Up 12 Down 3
Charles on Mar 27, 2014 at 12:05 pm
Agree somewhat with both previous posts. Downtown location? They have to be joking; Whistle Bend, here we come. As someone who fought long & hard for 2 yrs to have an aged relative accepted into a Continuing Care facility, I recognize YT has a problem that will only increase in future. What I find odd is the concept of a 2-3 story building. Macaulay has an elevator to 2nd floor so only persons who can use stairs in case of fire are housed upstairs. New idea offers outdoor access to residents on ground floor & limited outdoor access for those on upper levels. Assuming those who are housed on ground level are ambulatory enough to access outdoors, who are they planning on putting on upper levels that can use the stairs in case of fire or are they going to be disposable?? Someone hasn't thought this through or spent time around our current facilities. Macaulay is old, we just spent mega $$ retrofitting Thomson, but it is written off as being 22 yrs old & going to YHC. CRP is a good facility, but poorly designed with wasted corridor space; individual pods could have been built around a common internal garden instead of each pod having its own small, internal sun starved garden. Next question is: how is YTG going to staff this monster building?
Up 3 Down 14
Sandy Helland on Mar 27, 2014 at 12:02 pm
It's time for tiny towns of tiny houses for short stays.
Downsizing with dignity.
Up 35 Down 4
Dorothy Pratt on Mar 27, 2014 at 7:20 am
I usually do not comment in newspapers but I do have to say to the people who are opposed to this building, have you ever tried to get a sick elderly person into one of our care centers? The lists are very long. Never mind that our pallative care place is non existent. My mother inlaw is dying there is no room in the places we have or staff. Right now she is in Thomson center getting great care for her last days. Its so sad that we do not have a pallative care unit and the elderly people that are sick and frail have to be moved from place to place because there is no room anywhere. Our the nursing staff do a great job its just sad that when you are dying there is not a pallative care place for them to die with what dignity they have left. We do need a new facility that can handle all the elderly people who cannot look after themselves. Just my opinion.
Up 16 Down 7
Yukon56 on Mar 27, 2014 at 6:59 am
FINALLY, a use for Whistle Bend!!!!