Whitehorse Daily Star

MP strongly condemns vote results challenge

The Council of Canadians is supporting lawsuits to overturn 2011 federal elections results in seven ridings, including the Yukon.

By Ainslie Cruickshank on March 28, 2012

The Council of Canadians is supporting lawsuits to overturn 2011 federal elections results in seven ridings, including the Yukon.

Under the Canadian Elections Act, any person who is eligible to vote in an electoral district, or any candidate in an electoral district, can legally contest the results of the election for various reasons, including "irregularities, fraud or corrupt or illegal practices that affected the result of the election.”

In the May 2, 2011 election, the Conservatives' Ryan Leef beat then-Liberal incumbent Larry Bagnell by 5,422 votes to 5,290, ending Bagnell's 11-year run in the seat.

Earlier this month, the council conducted a survey of its members and other Canadians to try to determine the impact of the misleading robocalls currently under investigation by Elections Canada.

Whitehorse resident Thomas Parlee, who is listed as the applicant on the Federal Court proceedings for the Yukon lawsuit, responded to the survey and filed a complaint with Elections Canada. He said in an interview he was subsequently asked by the Council of Canadians to file the lawsuit, with the council's backing.

Garry Neil, the council's executive director, said the group is backing the suits because it is concerned about the impact of the misleading robocalls on the fundamental right of Canadians to vote.

"For this legal case, it doesn't matter who was responsible, we have no indication that in the Yukon these calls were originated from the local Conservative Party, we have absolutely no indication of that and it doesn't matter,” Neil said.

"What we have to prove is that they happened and that the consequences of them happening are sufficient to put in doubt the results of the election.”

Leef said Tuesday the lawsuit is "an absolutely transparent attempt to overturn the election results they weren't happy with.

"My opinion is it's absolutely pre-emptive because Elections Canada hasn't finished its investigation, and by all accounts probably hasn't even started it in the Yukon,” he told the Star.

Neil said the Elections Canada investigation is looking into criminal activity, whereas the lawsuit is focusing on overturning election results where interference may have inhibited the right to vote, regardless of who's responsible.

Leef said he fully supports an Elections Canada investigation into the allegations in the Yukon.

"What binds our democracy together is the fact that we have fair, transparent, legal elections and if someone is suggesting that that wasn't the case then Elections Canada has the authority and the duty to investigate it. We need to support the investigation, we need to encourage it,” he said.

"When I say we, all of us that were involved in the election, every single party needs to provide all of the information that they have, that's asked of them, in an effort to expedite Elections Canada's investigation so we can get to the bottom of it, so we can get find out who did it and whoever that is needs to be held accountable. And that includes anybody that's providing false or misleading information to spur on an investigation,” said Leef.

Charlie Angus, the federal NDP critic for Ethics and Accountability, said he's not surprised the issue has been brought to the courts.

"I think there's a real frustration among Canadians who feel that their vote was interfered with, who felt they were denied the chance to participate properly in the democratic system.

"I don't have a comment on the legitimacy of the case or its possibility of success, but I understand it and I find it very disturbing that the Conservatives' response is to try and again paint these Canadians as extremists, as radical fringe, they're throwing smears at people who are talking about electoral fraud. It's a disturbing situation we're in,” Angus said.

"This isn't about Liberal, or NDP or Conservative; this is about the fundamental right of Canadians to vote.”

Bagnell told the Star Tuesday he preferred not to comment until the Elections Canada investigation has been completed.

Former territorial Liberal cabinet minister Sue Edelman, who acted as the returning officer for the election in the Yukon, also declined comment when contacted Tuesday.

John Streicker, the Green Party candidate in the Yukon election, could not be reached before press time this afternoon.

An Elections Canada spokesperson would only confirm that an investigation is underway, but would not confirm whether the body had begun investigating the issue in the Yukon specifically or what the timeline for the investigation is.

Angus said Elections Canada is doing its "due diligence” and has been in contact with the NDP for information regarding the investigation.

"This is a much larger investigation than it appears,” he said.

See letter

Comments (7)

Up 0 Down 0

Conservative spending?? on Mar 31, 2012 at 2:59 am

Cheap shot? I think not. Just a quick check reveals Plenty of wasteful government money spent by the Conservatives. Let's see: $1 billion for a 72-hour G8/G20 meeting,$6 billion annually on tax cuts for the largest corporations,$13 billion for megaprisons, $3 billion more on consultants and outside professional services,$27 million on signs and advertising! Privy Council Office spent $340,000 on hospitality...ad infinitum.

Up 0 Down 0

Joel on Mar 30, 2012 at 1:59 pm

Wow, the gun registry is now over THREE BILLION DOLLARS. Wonder what the number will be next month?

This is not the opposition although they are going to make the most of the problem and the bad press just the same as the Conservatives did when the Liberals were in power, this is about documented fraudulent calls during the election and it has to be dealt with whether the Conservatives like it or not. Attacking people's integrity will not change that.



Guncache is right on one thing at least, there is always the possibility that the Conservative vote could be higher as well, that is part of the process since ~200 ridings means anything could happen at this point. The lawsuit and the investigation are both good things at this point in time.

The ridings the lawsuit targets were the very close vote counts. Once again, if there was another election in the riding, who knows what could happen. Would Larry Bagnell run in the election? Would Ryan? Would Ryan get more votes based on his performance so far? Less? Would the Green party gain votes?

At least this could make for some interesting times in Canadian politics

Up 0 Down 0

Doug Rutherford on Mar 30, 2012 at 8:48 am

Is anyone surprised that he doesn't want the possibility that the election results could be overturned?

Up 0 Down 0

Mike Hawk on Mar 30, 2012 at 6:44 am

Dear Opposition Parties: YOU LOST! Quit whining and trying to get the results overthrown. #Democracy

Up 0 Down 0

YUKONER on Mar 30, 2012 at 2:18 am

GET OVER IT

Up 0 Down 0

Guncache on Mar 30, 2012 at 12:36 am

A cheap shot by the opposition to disrupt the government. I wonder how many Conservative supporters did not get their vote in? Perhaps the Conservative government vote should be much higher. Or does the public want a Liberal government that brought forward the wasteful and ineffective long gun registry that has cost taxpayers over THREE BILLION DOLLARS or the Liberal program to purchase useless submarines for 750 MILLION DOLLARS with the price climbing to 1.5 BILLION DOLLARS for maintenance and 125 MILLION DOLLARS for torpedo upgrades. Thank you Liberal government. Then again the NDP would spend that much on social programs for dead beats.

Up 0 Down 0

Anne Bauman on Mar 29, 2012 at 7:00 am

While we're waiting for Elections Canada to deal with evidence of election fraud in 200 ridings across Canada (that's 65% of the whole country, folks) I'm glad the Council of Canadians is proactively launching court challenges in seven of them.

How else do we show our dissatisfaction with a government that increasingly appears to have stolen its majority?

We have a putative prime minister busily passing legislation without any clear right to do so, and seemingly without any constraint under parliamentary process. Litigation seems very appropriate under the circumstances.

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.