Whitehorse Daily Star

Image title

Photo by Whitehorse Star

Ryan Leef

MP onside with planned pension reforms

Ryan Leef is backing Prime Minister Stephen Harper's plans to overhaul Canada's pension system.

By Nadine Sander-Green on January 31, 2012

Ryan Leef is backing Prime Minister Stephen Harper's plans to overhaul Canada's pension system.

The prime minister announced his intentions during a speech he made last week at the World Economic Forum in Switzerland.

The Yukon MP believes his government is planning for the long-term future by making changes to the Canadian pension system.

"It's one of those forward-looking things that governments over history have been criticized for not doing,” Leef told the Star this morning from Ottawa.

Leef said there are currently 4.7 million Canadians 65 years old and older. In 20 years, that number will jump to 9.3 million, he said.

"If we do nothing, it will be absolutely too expensive and unsustainable,” Leef said.

Harper's speech in Switzerland was vague in terms of what changes the government would make to pensions. Over the last few days, it has been widely speculated that the prime minister wants to increase the eligibility age for Old Age Security (OAS) from 65 to 67 years of age.

There is also the proposed pooled pension legislation on the table. The plan gives employers and workers another option to set aside retirement savings in the form of a group Registered Retirement Savings Plan.

Opposition parties have cried foul over the proposed changes, claiming the Conservatives didn't tell Canadians about altering pension formulas during the spring 2011 election campaign.

"The opposition took the approach that it wasn't part of our commitment and platform, and then they said we didn't highlight it enough,” said Leef

He said pension changes was outlined clearly in their platform and that maybe the NDP didn't pay close enough attention during the campaign.

"What I can say with the utmost certainty is that everyone is speaking the same language of what we want; we just have very, very different ways of going about it,” Leef said.

The MP believes it's an inevitable struggle he's seen over and over. He's tired of opposition just for the sake of opposition.

"It's what happens when you have an NDP opposition and a Conservative majority.”

As for changes to the OAS, Leef said the key message is there will be no reforms that will affect Canadians currently receiving a pension, or even people who are close to retirement.

There will be a long adjustment period and a lot of notice if the changes do come into play, he continued.

Talk about changes to MPs' gold-plated pensions has come up in Parliament, but Leef doesn't know where the conversation will go from this point.

The 38-year-old said he would support any cuts to his wage or pension.

"I'm a young person and can save and make the necessary adjustments for my future.”

Although talk about retirement savings created most of the buzz after Harper's speech at the World Economic Forum, the prime minister outlined several key priorities his government will focus on.

These include overhauling the immigration system and make international oil and gas exports a priority.

"We will make it a national priority to ensure we have the capacity to export our energy products beyond the United States, and specifically with Asia,” Harper said in his speech.

"In this regard, we will soon take action to ensure that major energy and mining projects are not subject to unnecessary regulatory delays — that is, delay merely for the sake of delay.”

The prime minister also said the government will continue to make key investments in science and technology, but Canada has been getting "less than optimal” in these investments in the past.

Leef said he didn't disagree with anything in Harper's speech. He thinks Canadians need to focus on jobs and economic prosperity, and everything else will "come after that.

"Without a strong economy, everything else suffers.”

Leef is in Ottawa for the three-week House of Commons sitting which began Monday.

Comments (20)

Up 0 Down 0

Wayne on Feb 9, 2012 at 11:58 am

Social contract? There is no such thing. General laws of Canada? What might those be? Good grief, I've got to stop reading

comments.

Up 0 Down 0

Francias Pillman on Feb 9, 2012 at 11:30 am

Hey André. Having people work 2 more years means younger people have to wait 2 more years till another job opens up. By the time that happens we will be a subsidiary of China and making $2/day.

Up 0 Down 0

André on Feb 8, 2012 at 2:06 pm

Why need to work until 67? Because it is good for you, especially if you are male. Ask the actuaries about the percentage of men that die within 5 years of retirement. Also, one day pot will be legalized and you will need lots of money to pay a market-related price so you can have a happy old age here in the Yukon. So keep working to save up for that!

Up 0 Down 0

are you kidding? on Feb 8, 2012 at 9:45 am

CPP is a pension program. Your benefits depend on what you contributed. OAS is a social PROGRAM - not a contract - paid off the backs of the people working today and tomorrow. You are not entitled to it, and when our children get sick of being taxed to DEATH to pay for the old, it will stop.

I for one am not willing to ransom my children and my grandchildren's lives for old people - including myself.

Up 0 Down 0

Arn Anderson on Feb 8, 2012 at 9:34 am

Another reason for CPP to be a option along with EI for people that want to pay into a plan. On another note, income tax should be abolished. Canada was fine without it, but crushing in debt with it. hint hint?

Up 0 Down 0

Northtut on Feb 8, 2012 at 4:45 am

Canada has a social contract with us, the citizens. And like the general laws of Canada say, its a legal and binding contract. If Canada decides to break the contract, then it should be held liable, as I would if I broke this contract, Oh yea, i do not have that choice. If I broke this contract I would likely go to jail, or be fined severely by revenue Canada who would garnish my wages. As for Mr Harper, Mr Leef and their shadow conservative agenda, well Canada, do we not remember Mr. Mullrony? Ryan you are much to young to understand this social contract started probably before you born.

Up 0 Down 0

Anonymous on Feb 7, 2012 at 3:02 am

As a 25 yr old in the work force with income levels as they are in the Yukon I am lucky to be able to afford a $50 per month contribution to an RRSP from my pay as the rest gets sucked out in taxes and that small contribution is my only tax break. Now the government decides that I'll have to work an extra 2 years than expected and probably get less back in pension than I have been paying into? What a bunch of BS! Not to mention my poor parents who are nearing retirement age, have been paying into the pension system for 30 some odd years now they have to do an extra 2 years and receive much less than what they contributed. This is not beneficial to any Canadians.

Up 0 Down 0

north of 60 on Feb 6, 2012 at 3:07 pm

If this government places it's spending priorities on jets and jails instead of OAS pensions and health care, then they will discover that the people who voted them into a majority government won't vote for them in the next election.

The demographic with the highest voter turnout is people over 50. Mess with our pensions and it's very likely you won't be in office long enough to collect your generous MP pension.

Up 0 Down 0

Francias Pillman on Feb 6, 2012 at 12:53 pm

Mr Leef seems to have a short memory. Why did Larry get the boot? Because he put his party's interests above the people he is suppose to serve. Now we have this. No discussions with Canadians on this issue, just "we know what is best for you, so shut up" Ryan? Why are you our MP? You were elected to represent US. Why do we even need MP's anymore? It's painfully obvious that your party's wants trumps our wants. But wait a second. You are to answer to us, that is your job. Who needs you when anything king Harper says you just nod and regurgitate anything he says. What are you getting paid for? Weekly trips to Ottawa on my dime? I could easily go to the Internet and go to the Conservatives website and read exactly what their plans are. I hope Canada wakes up soon and realize Harper is selling our country to foreign interests and running Canada like a fascist country. How do you sleep at night Mr Leef? Knowing your boss is putting a lot of Canadian family's out of work. Does that bother you? Or do MPs automatically lose their morals the second they are elected? Mr Leef, how do you support something that not 1 Canadian has actually been consulted about? We live in what's called a democracy, maybe you forgot. Truly embarrassing to say the least.

Up 0 Down 0

Patrick on Feb 6, 2012 at 9:52 am

Ryan Leef and Dan Lang will always support the Harper government. Why would you expect otherwise?

Just wait until there is civil disobedience, they will be defending the government's abusive crowd control measures.

Mistakes were made with the election of Leef and the appointment of Senator Lang.

We can work towards changing this over the course of the next few years.

Up 0 Down 0

Wayne on Feb 6, 2012 at 9:21 am

Get this straight. CPP is a pension, and OAS is an entitlement. Apart from taxes, we've

paid nothing for OAS.

Up 0 Down 0

Northone on Feb 3, 2012 at 10:48 am

Al F - That's awfully nice for middle class people that could get educations and be picky about the jobs they did throughout our working lives. But not everybody has had the same choices for a multitude of reasons, and may not be able to "...qualify themselves for an enjoyable job...". In particular, those that did difficult physical labour throughout their lives may need to retire at 65, the option of working until 70 may not be realistic for them.

Regardless, I unfortunately don't expect anything more from my MP than a predicable endorsement of the Harper agenda.

Up 0 Down 0

Steve E on Feb 2, 2012 at 1:07 pm

Adios Ryan.

Up 0 Down 0

oicu812 on Feb 2, 2012 at 11:55 am

maybe ryan doesn't realize it his o a s that going to get cut!

Up 0 Down 0

excuse me? on Feb 2, 2012 at 8:17 am

What about those of us that are in our mid- or late-forties and have been paying into ALL of the pension systems for 25 to 30 years knowing full well the likelihood that there will be ZERO pension dollars for us?

The baby-boomers and the generation before are the ultimate entitlement generation and unfortunately have too long been in the position of power over these decisions. The pittances that you contributed - if you even contributed anything at all - will NEVER meet what you will drain from the system. It is always the generation after that pays for your decisions.

What about children under 18 right now - who will each be supporting 9 seniors through their working lives? Do you really think they will be ok being taxed to that extent because baby boomers and others didn't have the sense to plan for their own retirement?

Up 0 Down 0

Oscar on Feb 1, 2012 at 12:59 pm

Remember the last gutless MP that marched lockstep with the party?

He's now a stay-at-home dad

Up 0 Down 0

Denise G on Feb 1, 2012 at 8:51 am

I found it interesting that Harper stressed how important it was to keep the faith with the young workers yet seems very content to break the social contract that I and so many have laboured (literally) under. The contract I have paid for is one where I can retire at age 65 and receive a decent pension - both OAS and CPP. Not retire at age 67 on a reduced pension. I have saved and planned for my retirement around the age 65 deadline. To change the rules now is a breach of contract.

Perhaps if Harper wants to make changes he should do so for the young workers starting with anyone who is age 18 this year. They can then spend 40 plus years preparing to retire at age 67 or 70 although I am sure they too will want to see the financial figures that prove they need to.

Up 0 Down 0

Doug Rutherford on Feb 1, 2012 at 7:56 am

This whole issue is turning out to be quite bazaar. For example, the prime minister announced in Question Period today that the government has no intention of changing the pension system. If this is the case, why did he announce that it was unsustainable and would be dealt with in his speech at Davos. Is he lying to us or other world leaders?

"If we do nothing, it will be absolutely too expensive and unsustainable,” Leef said.

According to the government's own actuarial tables, the CPP system is funded adequately until at least 2070. I would expect some research from my MP before he offers comment, please.

Up 0 Down 0

Francias Pillman on Jan 31, 2012 at 11:19 am

Welcone to Harper land. Where foreign interests are more important than actual Canadian citizens. Where we pay some of the highest prices in the world for gas, but the world continues to knock on our door for more oil. Leave our pensions alone. Maybe new immigrants should stop receiving the red carpet treatment. Me no English? It don't matter, here is a cheque so your feelings don't get hurt. And if the age is raised to 67, so should the MP's age.

Up 0 Down 0

Max Mack on Jan 31, 2012 at 10:27 am

This is considered news? Does anyone truly expect Leef to say or do anything different than the party line?

Our government is proposing to spend billions (probably trillions once the final price tag comes in) on new ships and planes, while simultaneously looking for ways to cut social programs.

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.