Whitehorse Daily Star

Image title

Photo by Whitehorse Star

City councillor Ted Laking

Motion to stop renovation work is put off

City councillor Ted Laking has delayed putting forward his motion to halt the city hall renovation project.

By Chuck Tobin on January 20, 2022

City councillor Ted Laking has delayed putting forward his motion to halt the city hall renovation project.

The motion was on the agenda for the past Monday’s meeting but was put to next week’s standing committee meeting.

When it came time to discuss the motion, Laking said that in a conversation with his colleagues on council, it was agreed to put the city hall discussion over to next week.

Laking put his colleagues on notice at last week’s meeting that he would be bringing forward a motion to halt the project because of spiraling costs.

The motion notes when the city hall project was originally approved in 2014, the budget was set at $9.7 million.

The budget estimate is now set at $26.2 million, with approximately $15 million in external funding coming from the territorial and federal governments.

The motion directs city administration to halt the city hall renovation project and return to council with options to reduce the estimate cost.

The options include a reduction in the scope of the project, outright cancellation of the project and consideration of different locations for the relocation of staff, such as the Operations Building.

The motion also calls for plans to contain and prevent future cost increases related to the project.

Laking notes the money for the venture is coming from Whitehorse taxpayers, and the city has an inherent responsibility to taxpayers.

The city hall project involves demolishing the front section facing Second Avenue (the original city hall built in 1966) while keeping the rear section, the newest section where council chambers are located. It also involves the demolition of the old fire hall next door.

The project calls for a new transit station attached to city hall with public washrooms, to be located where the fire hall is.

Council voted Monday to adopt the capital budget for the years 2022 to 2025.

It calls for category A expenditures of $30 million from city reserves over the next five years.

The budget also identifies a list of category B expenditures that are dependent on securing external funding from the federal and territorial governments.

The city hall project is the last of the major projects in the city’s building consolidation plan under which the new $55-million Operations Building and the new $3.8-million Black Street fire hall were built.

Comments (6)

Up 5 Down 2

Wilf Carter on Jan 21, 2022 at 12:10 pm

Talking to Residents of City - every thing should be put on hold until every one has proper housing at a reasonable cost.

Up 5 Down 3

Wilf Carter on Jan 21, 2022 at 12:00 pm

City residents. We should be focusing our capital dollars on land development and housing - but neither City or YTG can't see that. Why is that?

Up 7 Down 2

Austin on Jan 21, 2022 at 11:24 am

Mayor and council are told what to do by senior management. Always have been and always will be.

Up 13 Down 7

Josey Wales on Jan 21, 2022 at 3:49 am

Looks like the town cronies got to him?
Must’ve explained to the newbie JUST how it works up here?
Council of Waste...CoW.
You will all own nothing soon, and you allegedly will be happy...
Says yet another megalomaniac that aligns with that crazy Austrian.

Government is a weed, we are becoming engulfed in foliage...we need some crop dusters laced with pure undiluted round up in our sky.

Up 10 Down 6

Vern Schlimbesser on Jan 20, 2022 at 5:31 pm

Ted will be under incredible pressure to drop this challenge.
As new comer he has no referent power and his will be the junior voice in the room when discussion is underway.
All the arguments are prepared, justified and polished by the bureaucrats. It would be nearly impossible for anyone to draft arguments to all things they will throw at him.
Promises have been made.
Dan and the senior councilors will not allow it.

Up 53 Down 8

Nathan Living on Jan 20, 2022 at 2:53 pm

I hope council sincerely considers this motion.
My confidence in mayor and council is at an all time low and many people I have talked to feel the same way.

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.