Photo by Vince Fedoroff
SIPHONING FROM THE FISCAL RESERVOIR – Mayor Dan Curtis, seen Monday evening, says he’s not proud of the city’s plans to remove $320,000 from the reserves for operational spending.
Photo by Vince Fedoroff
SIPHONING FROM THE FISCAL RESERVOIR – Mayor Dan Curtis, seen Monday evening, says he’s not proud of the city’s plans to remove $320,000 from the reserves for operational spending.
Photo by Photo Submitted
In unveiling its proposed $70.6-million operating budget for 2016, which raises property taxes, utility bills and other fees, the city also revealed plans to use reserve funds to run its water and sewer system.
In unveiling its proposed $70.6-million operating budget for 2016, which raises property taxes, utility bills and other fees, the city also revealed plans to use reserve funds to run its water and sewer system.
The annual operating budget was brought forward at Monday’s council meeting. Council members approved first reading of the spending plan, which is up $1 million from the 2015 operating budget of $69 million.
The plans include a 1.7 per cent increase to property taxes, a four per cent hike to water and sewer rates, and an additional 6.8 per cent charge on waste collection.
There are also increases to a variety of fees.
The change to water and sewer bills will no doubt be noticeable to property owners.
Had the budget not included the provision to use reserves for the system’s operation, however, the increase would have come in at 7.5 per cent or a monthly rate of $78.50 instead of the proposed $75.94.
Ratepayers are currently charged $73.02 each month.
“It was a hard decision to make,” Mayor Dan Curtis told reporters Monday of taking the unusual move of dipping into reserves typically used for major repairs and the improvements to the system.
A total of $320,000 would be taken out of the reserves for operational spending.
The water and sewer system operates on a cost recovery basis with the rates typically reflecting the cost of running the service.
As Curtis told reporters, during budget discussions, council members thought it was better in the long run to offset the higher costs the system is seeing until there are more homeowners in neighbourhoods like Whistle Bend.
While the city provides the service to the new neighbourhood, with fewer homes there yet, it becomes a challenge to pay for it, Curtis explained.
As more development occurs in the neighbourhood, the increase in population will help offset the high costs of servicing the area.
Still, the mayor acknowledged that taking from reserves for now is not something he’s proud of, nor something the city can continue to do year after year.
“We know that every penny counts,” he said, noting the challenge for homeowners in budgeting for increased costs.
As he pointed out, it’s rising costs for wages and such that cause the city to raise property taxes, utility charges and other fees each year.
While taxpayers may be faced with another 1.7 per cent on their property tax bill this year, it’s lower than the 2.24 per cent increase the city had predicted for 2016 in last year’s budget.
The city’s operating budget also includes early planning for two years out. The city is projecting a 1.7 per cent tax hike in 2017 and a 2.3 per cent increase in 2018.
Curtis told reporters that though an increase of 2.24 per cent had been expected last year, October’s municipal election saw a change on council that resulted in the lower increase.
“This council really took ownership of this budget,” he said, noting the city worked hard to find efficiencies that would limit the tax boost.
Part of the reason the operating budget came forward a few weeks later than usual was the work council was putting into it since shortly after the election.
While the city looked for efficiencies in spending, Curtis told reporters, that will not mean any staff layoffs.
“Council appreciates the efforts of employees across the city,” Curtis said in his budget speech.
“We have an exceptional team of employees on the ground delivering a variety of services day in and day out.
“City departments and employees are continuing to do more with less. We know that isn’t easy, and they deliver an outstanding level of service to our community.”
He went on to point out that most of the city’s budget is spent locally, with the money making its way back into the community.
Throughout his address, Curtis emphasized how the city spends the tax dollars it receives.
“Taxes help pay for roads, fire protection, recreation facilities, parks and trails, transit, planning, engineering and other operations that keep the city running.
“Taxes in Whitehorse remain lower than most other comparable municipalities, and our modest tax increase will keep it that way.
“We are making the best possible use of tax dollars and we are working hard to keep taxes low. At the same time, we are working to maintain top quality services for citizens.”
Overall, Curtis said, he’s pleased with the proposed 2016 operating budget.
With first reading of the spending plan now passed, residents are invited to share their thoughts on it, with a public input session scheduled for council’s March 21 meeting.
A staff report on the input would then come forward a week later, with second and third readings expected March 29.
The city’s $16 million capital budget for 2016 was adopted in January.
Coun. Rob Fendrick attended Monday’s council meeting by phone.
See related coverage.
In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.
Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.
Comments (32)
Up 35 Down 0
Comparisons to where? on Feb 29, 2016 at 4:28 am
I hear about how Whitehorse taxes are comparable to other places, both from the City and now from other commentators. I'd like to see the evidence - what cities, and what do those cities provide? If the comparisons and benchmarking have been done, please provide the results. If not, stop referring to the comparisons.
Up 11 Down 1
Here's the approach I'd like to see on Feb 29, 2016 at 4:24 am
Start off with the direction of 'no increases' and see what the departments come up with. It's the reverse of 'produce a budget, then we'll see how much we have to increase taxes and fees. I think the City has an overblown sense of what its citizens can or can't live without, and the results are more services (which is great) but at an always-higher cost (not great)
Up 11 Down 34
Alan Munson on Feb 27, 2016 at 4:46 pm
Again, Mayor and Council are doing a good very job all things considered.
Up 44 Down 3
ProScience Greenie on Feb 26, 2016 at 4:59 pm
People living outside of Whitehorse drive those streets to spend their hard earned money at local businesses. These businesses pay city taxes and so do their employees. People using the CGC and other facilities pay user fees to do so. The city gets tons of direct money from outside of city limits and it's not those resident's fault that CoW spends it like drunken sailors.
Plans to expand CoW limits is nothing but pure greed by those that want all the trappings of a big city but want others to pay for it. Live within your means for once. It's the sustainable thing to do.
Trying to spin an expansion as anything other than a cash grab is nothing but hot air.
Up 28 Down 4
Barfy on Feb 26, 2016 at 6:48 am
Cut the Transit system loose to Private enterprise and save 7% right off the top.
Up 38 Down 2
Willy Boy on Feb 26, 2016 at 6:38 am
Bnr you are all wet. It's our job to question the City and Council. David Susuki says that as Seniors it is our job to be pissed off also. And not that it matters but I have lived here longer than you.
Up 6 Down 42
Alan Munson on Feb 25, 2016 at 6:47 pm
Mayor and Council are doing a good very job all things considered.
It would be nice to have tax increases no higher than the rate of inflation excluding the inflation cost associated with food and housing. However, sometimes major costs are associated with new buildings and retooling water and sewer systems.
I do like our facilities and think a few cuts here and there will satisfy most people. And please fast track city park planning because the new parks are important to most people. And the clearing of snow on the Millennium Trail is great and the bus service is good but more people need to use it and bylaw officers are very adaptive and respectful to people they encounter and the mayor and council show up for Town Halls where they respectfully listen to and engage the public.
All in all, the city serves us very well and it pays their employees very well and despite negative comments from many people it does try to introduce progressive sustainability initiatives. A good tract record when you think of it. I would vote for Mayor Curtis and all current city councilors again.
Up 27 Down 3
Tax Payer and pay and pay and pay on Feb 25, 2016 at 4:44 pm
No more trips and traveling for council that will save a bunch of money I am sure. No more sustainability department, that would save a ton! Cut back the city manager's pay buy at least $20 grand, and make a few more cuts maybe in your fleet vehicles they seem to be driving around a lot doing nothing down in Whistlebend!
Up 9 Down 4
Unreal on Feb 25, 2016 at 3:34 pm
@ProScience Greenie, who said:
"Expanding city limits would be nothing more than a tax grab on hundreds of people that will see zero service for it."
Are you suggesting that people who live outside the city limits never come to town, drive on our roads, use our services, the CGC etc? If you are, that's hilarious.
Up 25 Down 1
Give me your votes on Feb 25, 2016 at 9:28 am
I will show you how much of a mess I can make.
Up 22 Down 2
jc on Feb 24, 2016 at 10:06 pm
Mayor and City councillors, what were you doing before you got elected? Maybe you can get your jobs back after the next election.
Up 34 Down 4
jc on Feb 24, 2016 at 10:00 pm
Want to save some tax money Mayor? Shut off those Christmas lights a bit earlier. I mean like two weeks before Christmas and two weeks after New Years. Here it is the end of February and they're still burning thousands of dollars a day in wasted energy.
Up 3 Down 34
Clliford on Feb 24, 2016 at 9:46 pm
@proscience greenie: Nope, the guy who wanted to expand the city 15km in all directions is right, you are wrong.
Up 60 Down 1
north_of_60 on Feb 24, 2016 at 9:18 pm
NO TAX INCREASE
Instead:
►Dump Striecker's Sustainability Department, and save at least half a million.
►Freeze all bureaucrat salaries and benefits at 2015 levels starting from the top on down until the rest of the budget increase is covered.
►Act like fiscally responsible adults and work within your budget just like we have to in our families and businesses.
Stop acting like teenagers bugging their parents for an allowance increase so they can buy the newest toys, and go on fancy vacations.
►Start earning those generous salaries and benefits you feel entitled to.
Up 54 Down 1
north_of_60 on Feb 24, 2016 at 6:58 pm
If the City Manager was competent the CoW would be 'living within our means' and there would be no need for tax increases. Fire the City Manager for incompetence and earning that obscene salary. Hire someone with actual experience for the job.
Terminate John Streicker's Sustainability Department. Striecker lives in Marsh Lake and doesn't have to pay for the silly ideas he's foisted on the taxpayers. The Sustainability Department accomplishes nothing useful and sucks-up money that should go to our actual needs not useless 'feel good' luxuries.
Up 60 Down 1
BostonPublic on Feb 24, 2016 at 4:03 pm
Complain all you want. It won't change anything.
Start with the Union and work your way down. Employees show up to work because they are salaried. After viewing the Boston Public the story is always the same:
Check the budget for running the City. The costs are all up by the rate of inflation. Yet fuel prices have decreased. The City should have saved considerable amounts of money this past year. It doesn't show anywhere.
There are extreme deficiencies in the City and the City and its managers are well aware of them. If the City would be so kind: Please list all of the staff and their starting wage, then the increase, against the number of years they've worked.
(silence)
When you elect a leader you should look at their background as a person; as they will lead the City in the same manner.
Poor financial planners who offer big opinions without earning money in the private sector. This speaks to the largest demographic of Yukoners; government employees and welfare handouts. 75% of the Yukon population.
Up 46 Down 5
ProScience Greenie on Feb 24, 2016 at 2:52 pm
Forcing the city to live within it's means would be the ethically correct thing to do.
Expanding city limits would be nothing more than a tax grab on hundreds of people that will see zero service for it. People outside of Whitehorse city limits already see too much of their territorial and federal taxes wasted by the city.
Up 42 Down 2
PJT1959 on Feb 24, 2016 at 2:14 pm
Well as many others I would like to see some cuts not just spending. People on fixed incomes are going to have to cut things down but council talks about affordable housing but it's got to be looked at with fees and taxes. Let's not forget the city wanting to do blue bin at more cost to us and not listed. Is the city going to cut the 50% discount city employees get at CGC and have them pay the same as everyone else to help pay the fees? Yellowknife did not raise taxes as economy was down, last council and this one which is majority of last seem to forget there is more than just raising taxes. Time to look at ways to save so taxes and fees can stay in touch with what people can afford. That is my rant.
Up 18 Down 80
BnR on Feb 24, 2016 at 12:55 pm
June, June, June
Where to begin?
Our mayor is correct, our taxes are low. Just because taxes go up doesn't mean they are high. You are confusing tax hikes with high taxes.
Your rent is going up $100 a month? Really? Well, it's what YOU wrote....
You were against Whistle Bend? Why? Have you been through WB lately? Lots of new construction and people creating a new community. We needed lots, people wanted lots, and here it is. It was a lot of capital costs up front, but Whitehorse is growing and this is the new locale. Get over it.
Is Dan perfect? No. But here's a quote for all the complainers: Lead, Follow or get Out of the Way.
Dans leading, our council has a vision, they were elected, not you, or anyone else. Don't like it? Run in the next election.
Whitehorse is an amazing city. I've been here all my life, and it keeps getting better.
All you whiners going on about how the city is changing for the worse. Give me a break. Look at the infrastructure and services we have and how little we pay.
Ya'll need some reality therapy.
Remember, don't confuse tax hikes with high taxes.
Up 53 Down 2
Tell me how tax payers on Feb 24, 2016 at 12:25 pm
like seniors on fixed income is suppose to cover these cost. Eat poorly.
How low income earner can pay more in fees and taxes. This will make them poorer.
The mayor is big on affordable housing and the homeless.
So how can people afford the costs of the City when costs continue to increase on his watch.
So the Mayor is only concerned about the homeless but not the other 99% of us. Don't get me wrong we need 100% interest of the people.
Mayor is taking the city off of a financial cliff lead by a City Manager who doesn't have the skills or experience to manage the City or none of this would be taking place.
Up 50 Down 3
ol dan on Feb 24, 2016 at 10:48 am
Must have taken a page from the drama teachers book. Tax and spend, tax and spend.
Up 71 Down 2
Just Say'in on Feb 24, 2016 at 12:49 am
OK Just stop. No you do not have any more money. You can only spend what you have, just like me. This is craziness. Before you get a penny more from us:
Stop all spending on East Yukon River Park. 17 times the size of Stanley Park the Largest Park in North America.
Get rid of the Department of sustainability as having them isn't sustainable.
Stop putting up two million Christmas Lights every winter. They are nice but we can't afford them. It isn't only the cost of the lights and the power it is the Dept of Rec. staff that have to put them up and take them down every year. Send them home till we can afford it.
No new building for administration. Sorry you spent all the money.
Stop doing such a fantastic job on snow removal when we haven't even had any. Sorry, send them home till it snows, we spent the money.
Shall I go on? Maybe ask the staff where they can save some money so that their team members can continue to have a job.
I am so fed up with you guys.
Up 23 Down 60
Elvis on Feb 23, 2016 at 9:17 pm
Expand the city limits 15km in all directions.
Up 50 Down 5
June Jackson on Feb 23, 2016 at 9:08 pm
I just want to cry when I see tax hikes like this. My landlord's tax hike goes up $20 or $30 a month, but my rent goes up $100. I am in my 70s..I am going to have to work until I'm dead.
“It was a hard decision to make,” Mayor Dan Curtis told reporters - No it wasn't.. put the screws to the taxpayer has been the name of the game for the last 20 years. We NEVER read about cutting back, making ends meet etc. We always hear raise those taxes. Has it occurred to anyone on council what some folks will have to give up to pay those taxes? How many more will get on Yukon Housing wait lists? How many more will shoplift this and that to keep extra money? When people can't pay, there are a lot of social ramifications. What is the ratio to homeowners and renters? The Territorial government failed to protect renters, tax hikes are like a money tree to landlords..
So many people are leaving, moving back in with family for awhile.. Maybe the Council thinks it can jack those taxes off the wall because Territorial pays taxes on Yukon Housing properties and that's not really like a real tax right?
I fought Whistle Bend development the best I could, with my handy dandy computer clear back to Buckway's ill advised plans..we're stuck with that money pit now.
“Taxes in Whitehorse remain lower than most other comparable municipalities, and our modest tax increase will keep it that way. Don't throw that comparable community crap at me Dan..it just ticks me off.. wish you were the Mayor of one of those "comparable communities" and busting their **** instead of ours.
“We are making the best possible use of tax dollars and we are working hard to keep taxes low. At the same time, we are working to maintain top quality services for citizens.” No you aren't.. our off streets aren't even plowed in the winter, you dish out money to every group, organization with a hand out and let costs escalate and our 'quality' sucks.
Whats a tax revolt look like anyway? I think the City of Whitehorse needs one.
Up 52 Down 8
Josey Wales on Feb 23, 2016 at 8:21 pm
Hmm is that "Soapy Smith" in the photo?
oh I see, it's just tax and spend Dan, the most recent conductor of the gravy train.
Folks, the absolute entitlement issue of our nobles and what/when/how they spend taxes in my view borderlines criminal.
If as an entity the city has so much to give to special interests, and THEIR own personal crusades why even suggest more without riots in our wee sty?
There is a redefining amount of fat that can be trimmed outta the bureaucratic insatiable appetite, why....
is the city even thinking of a new castle to showcase their arrogance.
is the city giving buildings away because their tenants are paid up in their rent.
is the city leaving the CHRISTMAS LIGHTS on still all over, wasting energy
is the city funding a dept. like By-law who chooses not to deal with our insane traffic when they have the legal means.
Man talk about "user fees" get your crew fining the EPIC and I mean EPIC volume of dullards we have in traffic.
back to rant....
is the city in the business loaning our money to say SBY.
is the city planning big gala events that consume huge volumes of money/resources.
Or even better question....why do I call this sty home?
A parade of fools have destroyed this town over the years.
Up 40 Down 5
Lost in the Yukon on Feb 23, 2016 at 7:49 pm
Fendrick seems to attend a lot of meetings by phone.
Up 34 Down 0
Max Mack on Feb 23, 2016 at 6:05 pm
"The plans include a 1.7 per cent increase to property taxes, a four per cent hike to water and sewer rates, and an additional 6.8 per cent charge on waste collection.
There are also increases to a variety of fees."
Sigh . . .
Up 73 Down 0
Lost in the Yukon on Feb 23, 2016 at 5:34 pm
Heck someone has to pay for the City Managers increase in salary to $190,000.00
Up 70 Down 0
mary laker on Feb 23, 2016 at 5:08 pm
Get rid of the sustainability department. As an aside, I believe that was John Strieker's baby, correct me if I'm wrong. A bunch of people who are paid to think up ways to make living in Whitehorse more expensive through initiatives of questionable value. Name me one thing that department has a) accomplished, b) accomplished without hiring consultants to do the actual work, and c) which is of service/use to the tax payer.
Up 93 Down 10
Happy to be moving on Feb 23, 2016 at 3:57 pm
I'm not opposed to paying a higher tax rate or more taxes, but, when I see how the city decides to spend the money raised through these taxes on things like Whistlebend, I can honestly say that I'm happy to be moving.
Up 49 Down 107
Alan Munson on Feb 23, 2016 at 3:44 pm
This will be a lightning rod for many people who will comment on this news.
First off, I want to say our council is doing a good job. I appreciate all the attention placed on the new parks and protecting environmentally sensitive areas. The city will become a better place to live under Mayor Curtis.
Maybe the city can get federal infrastructure funding and surprise us with an announcement that the tax increases will not take place.
Up 58 Down 40
Yukoner on Feb 23, 2016 at 3:32 pm
Sure glad he got voted in, not.