Whitehorse Daily Star

Image title

Photo by Photo Submitted

PROGRAM’S DEFICIENCY NOTED – Split three ways, parent Stacey McDiarmid points out, the Yukon government’s $400 benefit amounts to only $130 for each of her three children who are eligible for the assistance.

Money for disability services is granted on household basis

The Yukon government funding that was promised last week for families who receive disability services is being awarded per household, not per individual.

By Gabrielle Plonka on June 10, 2020

The Yukon government funding that was promised last week for families who receive disability services is being awarded per household, not per individual.

That has sparked criticism from families who have more than one member with disabilities.

“It’s a little bit disappointing; I really appreciate the support but I think it should be equitable,” Stacey McDiarmid, a Yukon parent, said in an interview with the Star Tuesday.

McDiarmid is the mother of four children with disabilities, three of whom have autism and are in virtual occupational therapy during the pandemic.

When the government announced the $400 benefit, McDiarmid said, the announcement led her to believe the benefit would be paid per child.

She was surprised to learn that all families would receive the same flat rate.

“It’s really tough,” McDiarmid said.

“I split the $400 three ways and that’s $130 per child, when someone who has one child receives $400 for them.”

McDiarmid said she’s spent hundreds of dollars on equipment and supplies for her children to continue occupational therapy at home during the pandemic.

These expenses include Internet overages for virtual therapy lessons as well as sensory materials and gym equipment. This is equipment that would usually be provided by schools and disability services programs.

“I don’t foresee being able to cut any of those things out,” McDiarmid said.

“Typically, children with autism have a lot of sensory needs – squishy balls, therapy aids, special putty stuff – there’s lots of tools you don’t really think about, but if you’re going to be delivering this programming at home, then you need it.”

This summer, McDiarmid and her children will travel to Vancouver for behavioural camps specializing for kids with autism and dyslexia.

These services aren’t available in the Yukon, and the disability funding could have aided in recouping some of those extra travel costs if it was allotted per child.

McDiarmid said other families in her circle have incurred even higher expenses for extensive occupational therapy equipment during the pandemic.

“I don’t want to paint it that I’m not appreciative of the services, because I am so appreciative of our social worker and the program is really great,” McDiarmid said.

“I just feel like there should be an equitable way of doing it…. If you think about it in logical terms, that person needs that support, it should be person-based, it shouldn’t be family-based, because each family is made up differently.”

NDP Leader Kate White said she didn’t know the government funding was per-household until she spoke with McDiarmid, because the announcement last week was misleading.

“The premier (Sandy Silver) made a statement that said ‘disability services clients’, which makes you think of individuals,” White said.

The payment per household is a gaping hole in a well-intentioned support program, she added.

“My hope is it’s a small oversight and it will be remedied immediately,” White said.

“We shouldn’t be saving money on the backs of families or individuals with disabilities ... we have to remember those children weren’t getting the support they were getting in schools.

“For households with complex needs, how do you decide where that $400 goes?”

White said this situation is an example of why debate in the legislative assembly is important – as this could have been caught and rectified at an earlier stage.

“It could have strengthened the program, which is the point we’ve been bringing across all the time,” White said.

Clarissa Wall, a spokesperson for the Department of Health and Social Services, told the Star in an email that families can request additional funding for disability support.

“Families who need more support can reach out to Disability Services to discuss their options,” Wall said.

“They may also be eligible for other funding, including the educational funding offered by the Yukon government, and new supports announced by the federal government on June 5.”

Comments (6)

Up 4 Down 2

Amber Lenski on Jan 17, 2022 at 3:35 pm

Good old Stacey Work-the-System-for-Every-Penny McDiarmid.

Up 8 Down 4

John on Jun 16, 2020 at 2:25 pm

I think what raises my eyebrows is not that there is a disabled child but three afflicted with the same issue. Why does it raise my concern? If you have a child that has a disability that is more than likely genetic (3 for sure raises not just a red flag BUT a huge one) and yet this family has chosen to keep having more children who are equally afflicted. That is irresponsible. They know full well that this is now a state problem to fund and look after. I really don't mind helping children but not the parents who are propagating this malady that makes their situation a societal problem to deal with.

Up 10 Down 6

Yukoner123 on Jun 15, 2020 at 5:09 pm

"Equitable" eh? Where's the $400 for every other household? So, kids without disabilities don't also require educational tools? Huh. How equitable is the fact that kids with disabilities will be given priority to occupy school space once they reopen? For every special program tailored to those with disabilities or who need extra help, there should be a program catering to kids who excel. Oh yeah, the parents of those kids pay extra for that, out of their own pockets, for the betterment of the kids. But, yeah, you deserve more than everybody else.

Up 32 Down 7

C Bukowski on Jun 11, 2020 at 9:42 pm

...And in other breaking news : KIDS COST MONEY. Who knew? ....Oh right, nearly everyone. In a territory bursting at its seams with entitled whiners, SM stands tall among the masses. This free money was only a problem once it became clear her neighbour might have more of it to spend. It's all very 2020. At the current price tag north of $250k per child (raised to adulthood), it's all quite immaterial as well. Surely now that K.White is on the case, she'll annoy enough low level YG managers with an ill-informed letter-per-hour, that SM will be given the keys to the city. And Society wins. And the earth spins. What a comedy.

Up 29 Down 3

Trish on Jun 10, 2020 at 6:49 pm

This announcement was a surprise overall. My daughter has had a disability since she was approx 4 months old and I have never had Disability Services funding, I didn't even know it was an option until last week. Somehow she fell through the cracks between all her specialists. I'm glad to be receiving anything to help out, even if it was only $130.00.

Up 62 Down 12

Yukoner on Jun 10, 2020 at 4:37 pm

I'm sorry, but is this person saying that taxpayers should be on the hook for her children who all have disabilities? I have kids, I also spend hundreds of dollars on them to help with education/sports and so on and don't expect others to pay for them.

There are public programs and services for her kids (child development centre, public funded health, school assistants, etc.,) paid for by taxpayers, shouldn't that be enough for this person who decided to have 4 kids?

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.