Whitehorse Daily Star

Image title

Photo by Whitehorse Star

Bill Thomas

Minimum rental standards established

The Yukon government has released long-awaited regulations for the new Residential Landlord and Tenant Act.

By Rhiannon Russell on September 16, 2015

The Yukon government has released long-awaited regulations for the new Residential Landlord and Tenant Act.

The regulations were signed by Commissioner Doug Phillips last Friday, and will come into effect, along with the new act, on Jan. 1, 2016.

The Residential Landlord and Tenant Act was introduced in 2012 to replace the 2002 act, but it had not come into effect pending the regulations.

Despite communications between the Star and the Department of Community Services earlier this week about the legislation, the department did not reveal the new regulations had been completed.

After inquiries were made to Community Services this morning, the department released an announcement.

“This act promotes a healthy private rental market in Yukon by balancing the interests of landlords and tenants and will serve both well,” Community Services Minister Currie Dixon said in the statement.

Yukon opposition parties and local housing advocates have questioned the three-year wait for the regulations.

Shane Hickey, director of employment standards and residential tenancies, said in an interview this morning that public input and consultation had to take place before they could be crafted.

“The issue around developing the legislation was very complex,” he said.

“It was important to take the time to ensure it was developed properly in order to administer it.”

The new regulations set out minimum rental standards to “ensure rental units and residential properties are safe, sanitary and fit for human habitation.”

They mandate that every bedroom must have a window that provides safe passage out of the building; bathrooms must meet “reasonable health and safety standards”; landlords must provide rental units with sufficient ventilation in order to prevent damage or moisture that leads to rot or mildew; and landlords must provide units free from infestations, and take appropriate action to exterminate if they occur.

Hickey said the minimum standards were added for clarity.

“The whole point of modernizing the legislation was to make it easier for both landlords and tenants to interpret, as well as to put the safety issue out there,” he said.

“That was our main concern in drafting the minimum rental standards – addressing the safety of tenants and creating clarity for what is expected of landlords.”

Under the old legislation, hotels are not regulated as a residential tenancy, meaning people living month-to-month in hotels, often while on social assistance, have no tenant rights.

In the new act, the definition of a “residential property” does include hotels. But the regulations stipulate that the new legislation does not apply to hotel occupancies shorter than six months.

For people living in hotels longer-term, this will provide them with minimum rental standards and other coverage they didn’t have before.

But many people living in hotels while on social assistance are evicted in the spring, before tourist season, and not allowed to return until the fall or winter.

This means they may not be living in the hotels for a full six months, so the new legislation won’t apply to them.

Wenda Bradley, executive director of the Fetal Alcohol Syndrome Society Yukon, said some of the organization’s clients have resided in hotels in the past. Stays are usually shorter than six months, she said this morning. Often, they’ll be evicted in April or May.

“It is a last resort for us ... but it’s better than being on the street,” she said. “A hotel isn’t a home, or it shouldn’t be in our society.”

This clause is also a concern for the Yukon Anti-Poverty Coalition (YAPC), co-chair Bill Thomas said today.

“Things can really, really worsen, and to be there for six months before you can do something is .... I don’t think it’s the most optimal situation,” he said.

Hickey said that for stays shorter than six months, the Hotels and Tourist Establishments Act applies.

The new legislation limits rent increases to once per year, and landlords must give three months’ notice before an increase.

There is, however, no cap on how much rents can be increased from year to year.

Hickey said during the public consultation period, landlords and tenants had mixed feelings about rent controls.

No cap was imposed in order to allow landlords to plan their finances to deal with rising costs, inflation, interest rates and renovations, states an overview of the legislation produced by Community Services.

The new legislation also creates a new residential tenancies office to deal with landlord-tenant disputes.

“The intent for any administrative process is obviously, in one part, to improve the timelines and services delivered to the public,” said Hickey.

“The other avenue is to reduce the burdens placed on the courts.”

He will begin accepting complaints as of Jan. 1.

A problem the YAPC sees, though, is the $50 fee required to take a dispute to the residential tenancies office. For low-income tenants, this could deter them from pursuing a complaint, Thomas said.

Overall, though, the new legislation creates more clarity regarding the rights and responsibilities of tenants and landlords, Thomas said.

“That’s a good thing.”

Kevin Barr, the NDP’s Community Services critic, said he was displeased to see that the new legislation does not set a cap on rent increases and that no-cause evictions are still permitted.

Both the 2002 act and the incoming version allow landlords to evict tenants for breaches of a tenancy agreement, like not paying rent or conducting illegal activity on the property.

But laws in other jurisdictions also specify circumstances in which a landlord can evict a tenant even if he or she hasn’t broken any rules, such as home renovation or a family member moving in.

This cause-for-eviction clause doesn’t exist in the Yukon legislation.

Comments (6)

Up 3 Down 2

Max Mack on Sep 21, 2015 at 5:33 pm

It's not clear that this legislation is an improvement. The 6-month clause for hotels/motels may simply mean that longer term tenants, who are usually social services clients, will be evicted prior to their 6-month term . . . or contracts will be set in advance with less than 6-month terms.
It's not clear that this is a "win" for landlords. Certainly not for smaller landlords. Tenants didn't get everything they were pulling for, either.

If the ventilation requirements are too strictly enforced (e.g. mechanical ventilation instead of passive ventilation), then landlords may simply close their doors. Alternatively, they will pay for expensive renovations and will pass those costs on to their clientele.

My fear is that the smaller landlords will be forced out. Their facilities will be replaced by new shining edifices, backed by larger corporations with well-connected directors, where the rental rates are much higher but subsidized by government. Profits into the hands of the few. Whitehorse central will gradually become an abode only for the well-healed and their clients.

Up 31 Down 4

LD on Sep 17, 2015 at 1:07 pm

@Just Sayin' - thank you that is very true. And someone does have to own for there to be rentals. As an owner (and landlord) I have to be able to afford to fix unforeseen problems in my unit as well as any damage a tenant may cause (whether on purpose or accidentally). If I can't then I can't rent.
I still try to be reasonable in my price but my last tenant left my suite with expensive damage. The damage deposit didn't even cover half of what I had to pay to fix it. They covered up the damage by strategically placing furniture over it so whenever I did inspections I wouldn't see it and they were problems that were easily fixable in the beginning and preventable from more damage.

But not all tenants are bad tenants because damage aside my tenant was otherwise an amazing tenant. There are some GREAT tenants out there (probably more good than bad- you just hear about the bad ones more) and if you're a good tenant and take good care of my unit I really don't have much of a reason to raise my rent. I've learned since my last tenant which has put me in a better position for this new tenant.

But yes, I can agree that this agreement still heavily favours landlords which is not fair. We do still need an act that protects tenants more from less than favorable landlords (because there are bad landlords too) but tenants should know that there are still times when things are more in your favor than the landlords. I've seen a landlord lose a battle to evict someone despite the fact that they breached their contract in multiple ways (as well as nearly voiding the homeowners insurance due to making the decision that they would perform their own renovations without talking to the landlord or even hiring professionals to do the work) because it was the middle of winter and there weren't a lot of alternative rental options at the time.

Up 83 Down 10

Just Say'in on Sep 17, 2015 at 10:44 am

@June If you only were aware of how many landlords are ready to shut it down completely you would be shocked. There are so many bad tenants who destroy apartments that is no wonder they get evicted. If they keep making it tougher for landlords then affordable housing will cease to exist. Landlords are not these peoples parents or nannies, it is a business and there needs to be a return on investment.

Up 58 Down 58

Yukoner on Sep 16, 2015 at 6:10 pm

What has happened to the fuel oil fired appliance legislation that was supposedly in the works? Do more fatalities have to occur before the YP will act on this?

Up 36 Down 4

M B White on Sep 16, 2015 at 5:04 pm

This is a start on some kind of reasonable legislation but it is about 25 years behind a good fair legislation package. I would suggest someone in authority ask for a copy of the Prince Edward Island Landlord and Tenant Act which while not perfect does a pretty good job of protecting the reasonable rights of both landlords and tenants.

Up 66 Down 43

June Jackson on Sep 16, 2015 at 3:34 pm

Like most things the Paz government have done..the reality is this does nothing for the tenant and everything for the landlord.
There are more holes in this legislation than in Paslowski's head.

"No cap was imposed in order to allow landlords to plan their finances to deal with rising costs, inflation, interest rates and renovations, states an overview of the legislation produced by Community Services." You left out the greed part.

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.