Metis association hails historic court decision
In a landmark decision released Tuesday, the Federal Court has ruled that Metis and non-status First Nations are to be considered "Indians” under the Constitution.
In a landmark decision released Tuesday, the Federal Court has ruled that Metis and non-status First Nations are to be considered "Indians” under the Constitution.
"This is great news for us, that's for sure,” Rick Christianson, the president of the Yukon Metis Association, said in an interview this morning.
"But at the same time, we'll have to wait and see what happens. This is a first step of many. There's a long ways to go yet.”
Christianson said an appeal to the decision is still a possibility.
It's a little early to tell exactly what the ruling will mean for Yukon's Metis population.
However, Christianson did say there are all types of things they can now discuss at a federal level, including the right to gather, health, and education.
"The awareness and recognition by our federal government is the main step here, and that's very important to us,” he said.
According to 2006 census data, there are 800 Metis in the Yukon, representing approximately 2.6 per cent of the territory's population at the time.
The Yukon Metis Association has between 200 and 300 members, Christianson said.
He's calling on people who claim Metis status in the census to put their names forward for membership.
Currently, the association is reviewing its member's genealogies.
"It's one thing to profess Metis; you have to have the genealogy proving that you are in fact Metis,” Christianson said.
The Congress of Aboriginal Peoples launched the court challenge in 1999.
"For the first time since 1867, the court has said that the Government of Canada, the Crown, has the responsibility, or a fiduciary relationship as the court said, with off-reserve, non-status, Metis peoples in Canada,” Betty Ann Lavallee said in an interview today.
Lavallee is the national chief of the congress.
"They can't ignore us anymore; they can't just push us to the back and say, ‘no, you're not our responsibility; go talk to the provinces,' and the provinces can't push us and say, ‘no. no – you're Indians; go talk to the feds,' ” she said.
"We've been like a hot potato between the two, and nothing happens for our people.”
Lavallee said the next step will be sitting down with Aboriginal Affairs and the Prime Minister's Office to discuss where to go from here.
There is potential that the government may pursue a legal challenge to the decision.
"We're hoping they don't. We're hoping that instead of spending more money on needless litigation, that that money's invested into the people, and that we start addressing some of the longstanding issues for them,” she said.
Comments (4)
Up 0 Down 0
Kris Fudali on Mar 10, 2020 at 6:28 pm
Hi.
I'm trying to contact the head of the Yukon Métis Association. I have tried to find contact information online with no luck.
If you could kindly point me in the right direction or have any information that could help, I would be very grateful.
Sincerely,
Kris
Up 0 Down 0
Whitehorse Legion on Nov 8, 2019 at 3:17 pm
Your assn has been asked to lay a wreath at the Remembrance Day celebrations- a letter was sent and returned - we do have a wreath seat #177 - sorry that we have the wrong address 2166- 2nd ave 4p 4P1
Call 667-4780 or 333-4780
Up 0 Down 0
robert dolan on Sep 3, 2015 at 3:20 pm
I was born in Alberta, my grandmother was born in Manitoba and I've lived in the Yukon since I was 18 now I'm 63. Where do I fit in?
Up 1 Down 0
ntut on Jan 9, 2013 at 9:14 am
Lets be very clear here, Metis does not mean your family originated from here in the Yukon. Let us remember that when the Yukon Association of Non-status Indians (YANSI) and the Yukon Native Brotherhood (YNB) amalgamed to form the Council of Yukon Indians (CYI) in 1973 any persons who could trace their lineage back to 1870 would be recognized as beneficiaries to the Yukon land Claim. So where did these 800 Yukon Metis come from? Which families? Which Communities? We have already settled with these issues many years ago. I for one do not see a need to revisit a settled question.