Whitehorse Daily Star

Mayor ‘ecstatic’ about affordable micro-housing

A microapartment development could add 10 new living units to the downtown core.

By Stephanie Waddell on November 14, 2016

A microapartment development could add 10 new living units to the downtown core.

The plans were presented at last Tuesday evening’s council meeting.

Pat Ross, the city’s planning manager, brought forward the developer’s (360 Design Build) application for a zoning amendment that would allow the plans to go forward.

The change would see the city waive the requirement for private amenity space that is typically provided in the form of a balcony or patio and reduce the required off-street parking spaces from six to five.

The development would see a four-storey structure built at 305 Hawkins St. that includes 2,702 square feet of commercial space along with the 10 one-bedroom micro-apartment units measuring between 350 and 411 square feet.

The units are proposed to be affordable rental units, with the proposal by 360 Design Build showing a rental rates at $795 per month.

“The positive impact of a micro-apartment is not only felt in any one resident’s monthly rent cheque, but by the entire neighbourhood,” states the information package provided to the city by 360 Design Build.

“By concentrating people and disposable income in an otherwise dead neighbourhood, an urban street life can begin to emerge.

“Small units can easily double the number of residents in a typical apartment building, allowing for high-density living without towering height.

“In Whitehorse, activating the fringes of the downtown core would expand urban activity while allowing residents to stay close to necessary amenities.”

The zoning bylaw currently requires common and private amenity space. The developer is asking instead that the city permit a larger shared space in the form of a rooftop patio that would be available to all tenants.

“The proposed 500 square foot rooftop patio exceeds both the shared spaces for the eight residential units without balconies (two units have the space for balconies),” Ross said in his report.

“The developer suggests that a large shared amenity area would be more useful than very small balconies. It is also presumably more cost-effective than a revised building design that includes balconies for all residential units, which might require adding an additional floor or removing rentable area.”

On the issue of parking, a total of six off-street parking spots are required at a rate of one for every two units and one visitor’s spot with 360 Design asking that the city waive the requirement for a visitor’s spot.

As Ross told council: “A further review by administration found that the 2011 Downtown Parking Plan encourages residential visitor parking on-street rather than as off-street parking, since on-street parking is meant for short-term parking use.

“As a result, there is justification for waiving residential visitor parking requirements from downtown development and administration will consider this in future zoning bylaw updates.”

While council won’t vote on first reading of the proposed changes until this evening, last week, members expressed support for the new housing units, but voiced concerns over parking.

“We have tight parking downtown already,” Coun. Dan Boyd said.

He added he has concerns about reducing the number of parking spots beyond what is outlined in the bylaw now.

“I’m super-excited,” Coun. Roslyn Woodcock said of the development after council members wondered how many residents of the building might use the parking spots.

Woodcock was quick to point out that she lives downtown in a smaller living space and chooses not to drive nor own a vehicle.

Rental units are needed in the city, she said, wondering when the four-storey structure will be built. Ross said he would get back to council with the information in the coming weeks.

Mayor Dan Curtis noted that while he too is “ecstatic” about the project, he has concerns around the expanded pressure for parking downtown.

Coun. Betty Irwin pointed to other jurisdictions that assign on-street parking spaces to residents, wondering if city staff have looked at that possibility for Whitehorse.

Ross noted that staff are exploring possibilities for downtown parking provisions in the future through the zoning bylaw.

If council approves first reading of the zoning changes this evening, residents could have their say at a public hearing on Dec. 12.

A report to council on the hearing would follow on Jan. 9, with second and third readings then expected to come forward Jan. 16.

Comments (19)

Up 15 Down 0

Yukonertoo on Nov 18, 2016 at 5:50 am

Why do we continue to gift corporations with taxpayer money? It's not enough to cut corporate taxes, a gift, we provide hard cold cash, also a gift. Let's gift kids who go to school hungry for a change and leave the private sector to the private sector.

Up 4 Down 1

Josey Wales on Nov 17, 2016 at 8:44 pm

Here is something to ponder folks, animals and their space required.
So, so many experts, enviro-fascists and other "all knowing" blowhards will cite you many different figures for wild critters to be happy and thrive.
Some of which are accurate, many are not. You will hear how nesting birds near have a stroke when the see and hear bipods, how the mere sight of a non organic bipod made item in the wild will disrupt the breeding cycles of caribou etc.
We have all heard rhetoric as that most certain.
But...like some feat of genetics only social engineers seem to understand, we are different?
No we are not, we too need space to develop as healthy humans.
Cramming us into crap under the guise they are?
Really is not much different than telling us that line up is for a shower, before the valve gets cracked.
As they are both completely fabricated piles of bovine scat.
I am not buying it, and will not get aboard..but derail...that train.

Up 33 Down 2

Doug on Nov 17, 2016 at 9:04 am

WAIT...a PRIVATE business (a very wealthy one from what I hear) just got free money from the PUBLIC to build apartments which they rent back to the PUBLIC, and in turn the PRIVATE company will make a healthy profit every month?
Does the PUBLIC and or the people get a piece of this pie? Does the PRIVATE COMPANY have to pay back the money?
If not...I'll agree to build an apartment building if I get free money to build it and keep the rewards of rent...under the thin veil of "economical housing" or "lowering building footprint"BS.
HOW IS THIS A THING!?!?!?!?

Up 28 Down 1

Mj on Nov 17, 2016 at 8:52 am

Affordable housing eh? Sounds good as a headline, no? Not that $800 a month is terribly expensive...but it isn't cheap either. I'd go out on a limb and say you could find most 1br in Whitehorse for $800 or a little more...then you consider you are paying basically the same price for a micro apartment...and I fail to see how this is a spectacular deal.

If the average 1br apartment size is 800-1000sq ft and you pay probably 800-1000 dollars a month for that....how is it a spectacular deal to pay $800 (possibly plus utilities) for less than half the space???

I call it bs...

Up 5 Down 10

Dawson on Nov 16, 2016 at 2:57 pm

The Yukon is one massive and largely empty outdoor amenity space already. I do indeed spend my time 'wandering' it by foot, bike and ski. One doesn't even need to drive, it's right there. A backyard or deck is just something else that has to be taken care of. This would be perfect for some but obviously not for all. We are all very different creatures.

Up 24 Down 3

yukonmom on Nov 15, 2016 at 9:19 pm

i am not sure the local residents would appreciate it being called "an otherwise dead neighbourhood. " I agree, Whitehorse Star, don't just parrot these guys. Why do Jack and Tony live in the even "deader" Riverdale neighbourhood if it is so "groovy" to be high density?

There are also businesses in this area that will be impacted by increased street parking by residents. K & Z are ALWAYS trying to reduce parking requirements in spite of the obvious reality that people have more vehicles than ever. Except for the rare person such as Rosalyn, most households have at least one vehicle per driver and in the last few years I have observed many have more vehicles than drivers.

This increased density works as long as everyone behaves I suppose. With these small indoor units they definitely need some outdoor amenity space. Where are they to spend their time, wandering the streets?

I wonder what the oversight will be on keeping these places affordable after the first year or so... will a whole bureaucracy be set up to monitor that too or will the government conveniently forget what the expectations were for their cool $500K.

i also concur with the issue of these guys being "planners" as well as developers. I have raised the issue of conflict of interest with city planners but they deny anyone else is concerned about it. They created the rules eg in the south downtown plan and the waterfront plans and then try to evade even those guidelines. Yikes, it does make one cynical.

Up 20 Down 36

Stu Winter on Nov 15, 2016 at 12:10 pm

This is a good thing as are tiny homes. Why have such a large footprint on the earth.

And all that debt and all those gas powered toys. No wonder the world is in such bad shape.

Up 24 Down 17

Dawson on Nov 15, 2016 at 9:02 am

I have been living in homes this size for years including many heritage buildings which were often tiny. I don't need more as all I do is eat, sleep or read there so why pay to heat a bigger empty space. I spend most of my time working or playing outside. I choose to own very little 'stuff'. These are single-person units, they sound perfect and the price is right.

Up 39 Down 11

ProScience Greenie on Nov 15, 2016 at 7:49 am

KZ eh. So we will see a shed roof with some jack pine poles sticking out at random angles and then they'll nominate themselves for some prestigious architectural award. More than a few great architects around the Yukon, not sure why KZ gets all the gravy. Something wrong with that.

Nothing wrong with tiny homes but when they all get jammed together you might as well just build a standard off the shelf apartment building. Tiny homes are best when they are on a small lot where people can grow a garden, have a few shrubs and a bit of privacy. Not everyone is into this new age group hug living arrangement thing. Whitehorse is suppose to be a 'wilderness city' not some random bit of Vancouver or Toronto. Again, look at any Jim Robb painting or talk to our elders and you'll find the solution(s).

Up 9 Down 25

Michael on Nov 15, 2016 at 7:10 am

Though I am surprised by the amount of subsidy this micro housing project is receiving, I think this is a good plan. As well, the need for onsite parking does seem like an outdated bylaw, especially for projects within downtown.

Up 33 Down 5

north_of_60 on Nov 15, 2016 at 1:43 am

"Micro-housing" is little more than a sweet scam to reduce the size of legal apartments so they can have more revenue producing units in the same size building.

Up 33 Down 14

jc on Nov 14, 2016 at 9:34 pm

$795.00 for a one bedroom micro apartment is ridiculous. Affordable for government workers. When I came up years ago, a person could build a cabin in the bush and squat. Lets go back to those rules. Now, that's affordable.

Up 32 Down 13

Nile on Nov 14, 2016 at 7:52 pm

Zelda and Kobyashi are good Liberals. They will be getting all sorts of gravy deals and exceptions to the rules now.

Up 30 Down 2

CJ on Nov 14, 2016 at 7:38 pm

Thanks to the commenters for drawing the connection between this project and the grant that YTG gave the architects.

While one project may not be objectionable, it's not really necessary to take dictation from them about how laudable it is, is it? Especially if the comments here are true, and they stand to make a healthy profit on a government investment. At the very least, it would make more interesting reading than yet another fluff piece for Kobayashi and Zedda's testimonials page.

I just wish local media would catch up to the sophistication of the professionals they write about, whether they're developers or political operatives. The lack of analysis just gets so boring.

Up 51 Down 3

Michael on Nov 14, 2016 at 5:38 pm

I built two 500 sq feet units downtown with my own financing and did not get anywhere near the government funding these two wealthy developers are getting. I'm not crying poverty, but wow, now I know how the rich get richer.

Up 60 Down 26

Klondiker on Nov 14, 2016 at 4:11 pm

This is not a good thing. We need affordable and adequate housing. The 'tiny' fad will pass, and we will be stuck with these tiny apartments that, yes offer shelter, but don't offer an adequate solution. These are only affordable because they are small and inadequate.

We should be building the heritage homes of the future. Not these little sardine can apartments. Make housing adequate, and affordable. Not just affordable.

Up 71 Down 16

joe on Nov 14, 2016 at 3:46 pm

Sad day. Cramming people into hotel room size lunch boxes under the guise of affordability.

Up 83 Down 5

BB on Nov 14, 2016 at 3:26 pm

PS - I do not think they are asking for too much when it comes to eliminating the need for one parking space, and swapping the balconies for a roof top space. I just hope this kind of flexibility is inherent to the rules for everybody, not just urban planners who help to make the rules.

And I do stand by the reminder that these people received $500,000 of government funding to produce ten 400 sq foot apartments. That's 4000 square feet of living space. In other words, the public is paying $125 a foot for multi-floor, economy housing. How much is this type of construction costing to build in Whitehorse right now? It looks to me like Tony and Jack have been given a building almost for free, which they are going to rent out for $8,000 a month.

Super low cost! For the owners at least.
I think people should be aware of what goes on, and of the whole story here.

Up 80 Down 7

BB on Nov 14, 2016 at 3:19 pm

Another Kobyashi-zedda boondoggle.

From the Yukon Government website, "360° Design Build, owned by Antonio Zedda and Jack Kobayashi, will receive $500,000 to construct urban micro-apartments on Hawkins Street in Whitehorse. The four-story building will consist of furnished one-bedroom apartments. "

Note that they were already approved for this funding before getting permission from Whitehorse City Council for their non-parking and non-public spaces. They are used to getting their way and YG did not require these permissions before promising the money.

Just a few weeks ago KZ was asking for massive exceptions to the area plan to make their Ikea building for the McBride Museum.

For so-called urban planners, they do not show much respect for urban planning. I guess they like to make rules but do not think they apply to Tony Zedda and Jack Kobyashi.

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.