Photo by Vince Fedoroff
SETTING OUT THE PLANS – Mayor Dan Curtis reads the budget speech Monday evening.
Photo by Vince Fedoroff
SETTING OUT THE PLANS – Mayor Dan Curtis reads the budget speech Monday evening.
Local residents will have a chance on Nov. 24 to let council know exactly what they think of the city’s 2015 capital spending plan.
Local residents will have a chance on Nov. 24 to let council know exactly what they think of the city’s 2015 capital spending plan.
On that date, council will host a public input session on the $30-million budget tabled Monday evening.
While the capital budget passed first reading, it will be Dec. 8 before second and third readings come forward for adoption after the input session on Nov. 24 and a report on the input coming to council on Dec. 1.
The bulk of the capital budget will go toward the building consolidation project, as reported in Monday’s Star.
It will move all city services into two structures – a larger building off Range Road and Two Mile Hill housing numerous operational services and another building on the same property as city hall where a number of services residents use day-to-day will be based.
While the city hall property would house the new building, city hall would remain.
While the city expects to spend $21 million on the project in 2015, a further $33.8 million is outlined in the 2016 provisional budget along with a final $1.5 million in the 2017 provisional capital budget.
As Mayor Dan Curtis outlined in his budget speech Monday evening: “The top priority for this capital budget is the city’s building consolidation project that will see new services and operations buildings for Whitehorse.
“By moving and consolidating our services and operations, this project will reduce heavy equipment in the downtown core, and free up prime real estate for development in our downtown and industrial areas, while still ensuring easy access to city services.
“On top of that, it will significantly reduce energy costs over the long term, improve service delivery and increase operational efficiencies.”
The mayor went on to note the economic opportunities the project will present to local businesses, contractors, tradespeople and suppliers.
Funding for the project is anticipated to come from the federal gas tax, city reserves and low-cost financing.
“There is a strong business case for this project, and this is the right time to move forward,” Curtis said.
“The city has examined a range of options and solutions. After taking a hard look at our budget and our needs, we chose the most practical and affordable option.
“This project provides the best solution for moving the city to where we want to be, a more efficient, cost-effective and sustainable place with a vision for a thriving future.”
An open house focused on the building consolidation project is set for 5-7 p.m. Nov. 19 at city hall.
In his speech, the mayor went on to note the $250,000 planned to be spent next year on implementing the city’s Solid Waste Action Plan, which aims to divert 50 per cent of waste from the landfill by 2015 with a goal of zero waste by 2040.
Pointing to last month’s closure of the Raven Recycling Society’s depot for non-refundable recyclables, Curtis said the city shares the concern of residents over the reduction of recycling options in the city.
Non-refundable recycling can continue to be dropped off at P&M Recycling on Ray Street and at the city landfill.
Or, residents can sign up for recycling pick-up with the Yukon Blue Bin Society, but many residents have argued the closure of Raven’s depot will have a negative impact on recycling efforts in Whitehorse.
“We share those concerns, especially for the long-term sustainability of our recycling system,” Curtis said.
“The current funding system that is in place in Whitehorse and Yukon is not sustainable. The city is committed to finding a solution.”
He then pointed to the city’s approval last week of spending $100,000 out of general reserves for a contract that will see the city implement a recycling collection system with the cost expected to be in residents’ utility bills.
Current estimates peg the program at $15 per month for a weekly collection service, but the plan being developed will confirm details such as the cost, schedule and so on.
The Yukon Blue Bin Society charges $20 per month for its twice-monthly pick-up service that residents can choose to sign up for.
“We recognize that we do not have enough resources to do this alone and will continue to work with Yukon government, the business community and others on a funding framework,” the mayor said.
“All waste costs money, whether it is recycled, composted or buried in the landfill. The city delivers waste disposal, composting and recycling services on a cost-recovery basis.
“These services are funded through tipping fees and utility fees, not tax dollars. We all create waste. We all need to pay our share.”
Costs associated with the new recycling program would be dealt with through the operating budget, expected to come forward in the coming weeks.
The mayor went on to outline a number of other projects covered under the proposed capital budget, including:
• $400,000 to replace a fire truck and a further $100,000 on other fire protection equipment;
• $750,000 for sewage lagoon odour mitigation;
• $400,000 on various parks and trails upgrades;
• $370,000 for improvements to the city’s recreation facilities;
• $260,000 to make the intersection at McIntyre Drive and Hamilton Boulevard at Bernie’s Race Trac Gas safer;
• $75,000 for a new Quartz Road crosswalk and another $105,000 to etch in permanent crosswalk markings around the city; and
• $350,000 on rural road surfacing, among a long list of other initiatives.
Curtis highlighted the consultation that went into coming up with the budget.
It included the interactive online tool used along with staff taking comments at various displays set up around the city, an open house and through emails and phone calls.
“There was a strong response to these consultation opportunities,” he said.
“The comments and suggestions will be presented at upcoming pubic input nights for the capital budget and the operating budget.”
The capital budget is presented ahead of the operational spending plan to help the contracting community prepare for the next year by knowing what contracts will be available.
If all goes according to schedule, the capital budget will be adopted on Dec. 8 following the input session and report.
It’s expected the operational budget, typically adopted in the new year, will come forward in the next few weeks.
The operational budget deals with the cost of running the city – including things like snow plowing, water and sewer services, garbage collection and landfill services, among others. It is through the operational budget that annual property tax rates and user fees are determined.
While the 2015 tax rate has yet to come forward, the provisional 2015 and 2016 budgets that were part of last year’s documents estimated a 2.3 per cent tax hike (not the 2.53 per cent increase reported incorrectly in Monday’s edition) for both years following the 1.7 per cent increase this year.
In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.
Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.
Comments (15)
Up 93 Down 87
confused on Nov 18, 2014 at 3:27 pm
Wilf, if you want to run for ofifce just announce it and move on.
It appears you have to have the last word on EVERYTHING.
I dare you to reply and confirm my hunch.
Up 91 Down 91
Wilf Carter on Nov 17, 2014 at 8:38 pm
COW residents are divided on what they want for their elected officials to spend money on. Is that true according to the responses in this paper?
Up 92 Down 98
Wilf Carter on Nov 16, 2014 at 8:55 pm
Maryanne success in any community is what the people in the community see as important to them. I live in the COW and have my point of view as you and all COW residents. Be interesting to see what your view of what the capital budgets funds should be invested in. Thanks for making views known.
Up 103 Down 95
Marianne on Nov 15, 2014 at 9:00 pm
Wilf Carter -- which rewrite of the Municipal Act did you work on?
You say the people of Teslin decided what they wanted for infrastructure and went ahead with what was in their interest. Do you think Whitehorse is operating that way? Do you think the people of Whitehorse asked the city to focus 70 percent of our budget on this "consolidation"? Do you think the people of Whitehorse directed the city to support the LNG plant?
For myself, I'm utterly baffled that the same people who urge us all to minimize our footprint, reduce our waste, don't idle our cars and so on are the ones who never turn down an opportunity to build something new and are silent on the issue of fracking, and supporting fracking, that has preoccupied thousands -- thousands -- of Whitehorse residents.
Those are governance issues -- social license issues. That's not even mentioning the seeming recklessness of devoting 70 percent -- 70 percent! -- of our budget on one objective. I am extremely skeptical that this won't result in more expensive everything.
I'm willing to hear that this proposal makes as much sense as the city is saying. But I'd like to hear it from an independent party, not city administration. And, with all due respect for your experience, not you.
May I add, that if I went in search of any and all documents, minutes, reports that the city has as background for this proposal, including opposing or alternative views, that I would find it difficult, if not impossible, to obtain them. And the responsibility for that we can lay on the doorstep of the Municipal Act.
Wilf Carter, I am totally willing to accept that my definition of success for Whitehorse is probably very different from what COW's, or yours, is. But that's a question that has more than one right answer.
Up 90 Down 99
Wilf Carter on Nov 15, 2014 at 4:51 pm
So if you have experience and express your point of view people don't like it????
Up 104 Down 88
north_of_60 on Nov 15, 2014 at 1:41 pm
Why isn't the gas tax rebate being used to improve traffic flow and decrease congestion by installing left turn signals at key points like Main and 2nd, just to cite one of many examples?
The COW uses the gas tax rebate as their private 'slush fund' for greenwashed feel-good social-engineering projects and useless studies from southern experts.
How do they justify using it for a new building?
How about using it to fix roads?
Up 92 Down 111
Wilf Carter - WCQ on Nov 14, 2014 at 12:29 pm
Hi WCQ whom every you are.! Just for your information I was a CAO in Teslin and worked with the Association of Yukon Communities. I even worked on re-writing the Yukon municipal act. I developed infrastructure plans and I advised on the Northern Housing Trust. I worked for Champagne and Aishihik First Nations Government as Director of Municipal Housing and Properties. CAFN has municipal services in the Village of Haines Junction and three other communities, two have full municipal services. Also working in the private sector managing construction of social/affordable housing 15 projects all together. I have managed construction of court houses, rec-center, arena's, one hospital, land development of subdivisions etc. WCQ visit the Village of Teslin and see what the people of Teslin have done for themselves in infrastructure. People of Teslin decided what they wanted and moved ahead with what was in their interest. Teslin has the best infrastructure in the Yukon including municipal, territorial and federally and they built their own success. That's what it is all about WCQ success for the COW and like you we all have our own opinions. For your information I have worked on infrastructure, commercial, industrial and housing in Alberta BC, Nova Scotia, Quebec, western US and for a major middle east company in land housing and commercial development.
Up 110 Down 88
WCQ on Nov 14, 2014 at 10:55 am
Wilf Carter, Wilf Carter. Hmm. You say you worked in municipal administration for years so I thought I might be able to reach into my memory...yet all I'm getting is a picture of a guy with a banjo and a winsome way with harmonies. And apparently complete exasperation with those of us who don't agree that more, more, more is what we all should be dreaming of.
Up 93 Down 109
Wilf Carter Fire Hall on Nov 13, 2014 at 2:55 pm
The new fire hall is in the middle of the City and is best situated to serve all of the COW residents. Top of the two mile hill was the most effective location for the fire hall so it can service all the COW, safety as a major factor. The two mile hill fire station is still closer to Riverdale than some major parts of COW. Measure the distance. Also the higher population will be in Porter Creek and Whistle Bend. The COW from my view tried to balance how to protect all the residents of the COW in a fair and reasonable manner.
Up 118 Down 88
Mark Smith on Nov 13, 2014 at 1:27 pm
The fire hall downtown should remain where it is. Think of how many people live in Riverdale and all the high density real estate downtown that requires s a quick response.
My opinion is this should not be changed.
We need to consider people's safety.
Up 124 Down 98
Yukoner 2 on Nov 13, 2014 at 10:11 am
Well it sure looks like Dan and Bev must have gone to the same school of screw you. its just a pi$$ing contest to see who can build the biggest building while in office.
Up 111 Down 92
Hold er there Partner on Nov 12, 2014 at 10:32 pm
I take umbrage with the City reserve fund aka revenue reserves. I would like to see this fund which I understand has 27 million in it called for what it really is. I propose calling it the Over Taxing Gouging Fund. It seems the City is predisposed to build up this fund so they can acquire nice things for themselves at work.
Up 124 Down 97
Confused on Nov 12, 2014 at 8:15 pm
Sound business plan? Let's spend all our cash, quadruple our debt, use our Gas Tax funding, give the public no other option and 4 weeks to comment before giving them a multi-decade payment plan.
I don't think this would get an 'A' for fiscal responsibility. It could get one for 'arrogance', or 'amateur'. I would give it a 'B'. A B for bull****.
This 'Curtis Castle' idea needs to be filed at the dump.
There must be another option.. Like leasing some existing office space? There is some innovative thinking.
Here is another one, stop hiring more employees and let private business clear some snow, operate the buses, and cut the grass.
Up 98 Down 117
Wilf Carter on Nov 12, 2014 at 7:29 pm
As an individual who has managed infrastructure of municipalities, this is a good move for the COW people. The benefits are true and integration also makes municipal service delivery much more effective.
Up 119 Down 92
June Jackson on Nov 12, 2014 at 5:06 pm
Maybe they can turn the meeting on the 24th into a good bye party too.. i am pretty sure they already know what the public thinks of the consolidation plan, and I'm pretty sure that taxpayers are so tired of having their taxes jacked up that when they go to the polls next election if they know the name, voters will check off someone else.
I am so disappointed in this council. When they got elected, I voted for everyone except Stockdale, I had such high hopes for a better council. How could it be worse than the Buckway years? And... here we are... *sad face*