Whitehorse Daily Star

Image title

Photo by Whitehorse Star

YEU president Steve Geick

Many Rivers staff prepare to return to work

Striking workers who have lined the Fourth Avenue-Hawkins Street intersection over the last nearly three months will be heading back to work after they ratified an agreement with their employer Tuesday afternoon.

By Palak Mangat on January 23, 2019

Striking workers who have lined the Fourth Avenue-Hawkins Street intersection over the last nearly three months will be heading back to work after they ratified an agreement with their employer Tuesday afternoon.

Many Rivers Counselling and Support Services workers will see, among other things, a seven per cent increase in their base salary over the five years the pact covers.

A release explaining that a tentative agreement had been reached was circulated around 8:30 a.m. Tuesday, just hours before the vote was held.

The ratification was announced shortly before 2 p.m.

The Yukon Employees’ Union (YEU), which represents the workers, said it was a long time coming after negotiations ramped back up again last weekend.

“We started back at the negotiating table, so to speak, last Thursday,” YEU president Steve Geick told the Star Tuesday afternoon. The agreement hasn’t come without its toll, he added.

According to the release, the union’s bargaining team was in talks into the early-morning hours of Tuesday to get that tentative pact.

A meeting of the membership and vote Tuesday afternoon resulted in most of the workers signing off on it.

“Most workers are happy with this; it’s a very emotional time, being out on the picket lines,” Geick said.

Temperatures sank into the -30s C earlier this month.

It’s estimated there are fewer than 20 workers impacted by the strike, throughout Many Rivers offices in Whitehorse, Dawson City, Watson Lake and Haines Junction.

The return to work will be a gradual one, with the plan to fully open the doors to clients by around the first week of February.

“It’s going to take some time,” Geick said.

Administrative staff are likely to begin going back into work, who will then be followed by councillors.

That’s before a session will be held with the employer for about two days, Geick added. That will ensure everybody is on the same page about things like “return to work protocols.”

The agreement will cover five years, with the release laying out some of the requests from the workers, which the president echoed as well.

Some were previously mentioned in a Dec. 18 briefing held by the union and some Many Rivers workers.

“The employee demands were focused on improved access to EAP services for themselves, flexibility to respond to client scheduling needs, and the ability to meet with specialist clinical supervisors during their working hours,” the release said.

All these were met – along with that seven per cent increase.

The union did not share what this increase means in exact dollar figures or ranges going forward.

However, Deborah Turner-Davis, a spokesperson, directed the Star to figures as laid out in the old agreement, which is available on its webpage.

According to that document, the annual rates of pay for administrative staff ranged from $43,600 to $51,758 between the time period of April 2014 to April 2016 (depending on level classification).

For office managers, it sat at between $55,607 and $66,275; counsellors and those with a bachelors degree and co-ordinators received between $61,387 and $73,265; and counsellors and those with a masters or doctorate earned between $64,669 and $77,238.

Meanwhile, office co-ordinators were paid between $53,242 and $63,418 and data entry staff earned between $41,093 and $48,719 annually.

All figures vary depending on the level classification and are also effective between April 2014 and April 2016.

Turner-Davis confirmed this morning that the seven per cent increase in base salary over the five years is to be applied to the figures mentioned above.

Because that old agreement expired in 2016, the newer one reached Tuesday is already two years old, she added.

Meanwhile, Geick continued to be impressed by what he called the strength of the small group and determination of sticking together to not settle.

“It’s been quite a ride,” he said, noting that the strike is one of the longer ones he can recall throughout his many years in the labour movement.

Workers had been on strike for 80 days since they headed to the picket line on Nov. 2.

And while it may have taken some time, Geick is happy with the result of the negotiations.

“Our priorities have always been things that will allow counsellors to give better client services.”

Meanwhile, that December briefing also stressed the importance of having leadership within the organization be closer to home.

Financial accountability from management and the board was another. That may be a significant point, given that has at least in part landed the organization in hot water with the territorial government.

As the Star confirmed Tuesday, the group is still under investigation by the territory’s registrar for being listed as in non-compliance with the Societies Act.

The government did not receive financial statements and annual reporting documents as needed by July 2018, Community Services Minister John Streicker confirmed late last year.

Once that happens, funding is cut by the territorial government – which provided the group with just over $2 million in 2018.

That was via an agreement that also pitched in a similar number the year before, and something that sat at $1.9 million in 2016, as annual reports listed on the group’s webpage show.

A report from that registrar’s investigation and next steps is expected in early February.

Doors to the free-of-charge services are expected to open Feb. 7 after the group does its phasing-in of workers as they return to the sites.

No one from Many Rivers’ management – which has refused to discuss the dispute since it began – was available to comment on the settlement.

Comments (9)

Up 14 Down 4

jake on Jan 28, 2019 at 9:46 am

@ YEU Must pay It's dues, agreed, but they should tackle the problem as an issue that violates the dignity of the workers. I don't see how involving themselves in scheduling, and job descriptions, as a role of the union. Management should always have the right to develop their organizational structures as they see fit. Just two responsibilities for any union are workers dignity and a fair wage. Some of the issues in this strike in my view crossed that line.

Up 11 Down 3

BOB on Jan 28, 2019 at 9:32 am

Finally I can work in peace!

Up 7 Down 3

YEU Must Pay Its Dues! on Jan 26, 2019 at 1:21 pm

@ Jake - Fair comment. Unfortunately the Union has abdicated its role as the equalizer to a dignified work place. YG knows it and routinely takes advantage of it. You ask the Union for help and they refer you back to the employer - The Respectful Workplace Office [RWO] Anything but.

The RWO serves the function of the ancient Roman tradition of manhood - Having a fox tied off inside your tunic - having to stand there while the fox rips and claws it way out. The RWO has burned a lot of workplaces and is is not welcome. But the Union? It tends to the foxes that tests the public services will.

Up 16 Down 4

jake on Jan 26, 2019 at 9:54 am

@ All is not what it seems, very good comment. And yes it is not what it seems. This was clearly a union, with a leader, that drew a line in the sand, using an organization that did not understand what role unions are supposed to play. Two basic issues the union should fight for, first a dignified work place for it's members, and second a fair wage for them. Nothing else. When I see this Union striking over issues that clearly an organizations responsibility to administer, and does not threaten the Unions two responsibilities, then I see a Union with a leader that should not get the respect or support of the public.

Up 15 Down 7

All is not what it seems on Jan 25, 2019 at 1:02 pm

When something seems too straightforward to be so messy, it usually indicates there's a lot more to it than meets the eye. Such reasonable requests, and a bunch of people, who live here with the rest of us, who have professional lives and reputation, can't see the reasonableness of it all, and risk being seen, labeled and branded as dysfunctional and the like?

Before we shake our heads over the sheer stupidity of what seems to be so clear-cut and simple to the rest of us, consider that what is disclosed to the public hides more than it reveals. We really do not know what was at issue, what were the stakes, what were the dynamics that played out behind closed doors.

Everybody has an agenda, and the union/workers side made clear everybody knew what theirs was. The management and board, meanwhile, kept a dignified silence, even as their names were thrown in the mud. I don't know any of the players but am old enough to discern when all is not what it seems.

Up 9 Down 12

Snow dogs on Jan 24, 2019 at 4:57 pm

Congratulations to the workers of Many Rivers! What they wanted (and finally got) did not seem unreasonable. The strike should have been settled many weeks ago and the board of directors needs to answer for this...

Up 27 Down 1

Groucho d'North on Jan 24, 2019 at 3:31 pm

I am curious, the government just completed a review of the Societies Act and regulations and then this situation with Many Rivers pops up where they are not in good standing with the government in a couple key areas of the regulations. So what is government now doing with the society to fix these concerns to bring Many Rivers back into compliance?

Up 15 Down 11

Dan Huntsman on Jan 24, 2019 at 1:46 pm

This is good news and the board that is very dysfunctional has to go as soon as possible.

Up 16 Down 1

Juniper Jackson on Jan 24, 2019 at 8:41 am

Nobody won.

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.