Whitehorse Daily Star

Man's behaviour created discomfort, women testify

Two former female employees of the Alcan Motor Inn Restaurant and Lounge in Haines Junction have filed human rights complaints against their former boss, Sid Quenneville, for sexual harassment.

By Ainslie Cruickshank on May 22, 2013

Two former female employees of the Alcan Motor Inn Restaurant and Lounge in Haines Junction have filed human rights complaints against their former boss, Sid Quenneville, for sexual harassment.

The names of the complainants are under a publication ban because both women were underage when the alleged harassment took place.

Both complainants provided testimony Tuesday before a Yukon Human Rights Board of Adjudication in Whitehorse. They were accompanied by Colleen Harrington, lawyer for the Yukon Human Rights Commission.

Quenneville was not present for the tribunal. He has not provided an explanation for his absence, according to Deana Lemke, the board's secretariat.

During her testimony, the first complainant explained she began working at the Alcan Motor Inn in April 2011. It was her first job, and she was hired as a server and cashier.

Working at the restaurant was "fun when Sid wasn't there,” the complainant explained, "because you didn't feel uncomfortable.

"You'd always feel his eyes on you,” she told the board.

The complainant explained that there were times when Quenneville would be talking to her and she could see him "checking her out.”

She testified that Quenneville had spread rumours about a relationship between her and one of the cooks.

The young woman told the board her breaking point came May 28, a Sunday, when she was in the kitchen talking to one of the cooks, and Quenneville came over and poked her in the ribs.

The cook said at least he wasn't like their former boss "grabbing a handful of ass,” the complainant testified.

Quenneville then grabbed her bum, she testified, and told her it was now wet because he had been doing dishes.

"I felt degraded,” she told the board.

The complainant did not raise the incident with Quenneville nor the owner because she was afraid to lose her job.

She went into work the following Tuesday in the morning; it was only herself and Quenneville on shift.

Quenneville explained the new schedule to her, but was standing too close for comfort, making her feel extremely uncomfortable, she testified.

Following that conversation, she returned to the cashier station. Feeling unnerved, she called her mom to pick her up.

That morning, she and her mom went to the RCMP to file a complaint. The police, she said, never followed up with her.

Since her experience at the Alcan Motor Inn, the complainant said, she's been socially awkward at her new job.

She also feels uncomfortable around male employees even though she knows they wouldn't do what Quenneville did to her, she told the board members.

She also testified that she suffered a financial impact during the summer of 2011 because she was unable to secure another full-time job.

The second complainant had worked previously at the Alcan Motor Inn during the summer of 2010 as a dishwasher, and returned for the summer of 2011.

The second complainant also testified that Quenneville made her feel uncomfortable at work.

"There's just something off about him,” she testified. "Just the way he looks at people.”

She told the board that she caught Quenneville staring at her multiple times while she was washing dishes.

But the key incident occurred towards the end of May, when she was doing dishes and Quenneville allegedly kicked her in the bum twice.

It felt weird and wrong, she told the board.

One of the cooks who was in the kitchen when this happened urged her to approach the owner.

The complainant did, but said the owner brushed the incident aside, suggesting Quenneville was trying to get her to work harder.

Following that incident, the complainant testified that Quenneville poked her in the lower back a few times, even though she told him not to do it again after the first time.

About a week after she quit, she told her grandmother about the incidents, and her grandmother went to the police.

The second complainant explained that her experience at the motor inn affected her in many ways. She stopping trying to find another job and stopped wanting to go out, scared it would happen again.

But this process has helped her sort through those issues, she said, and she is on the job hunt again.

The commission was unable to reach the cook who was present for both incidents to bring him forward as a witness. He has since relocated to Manitoba, and cannot be summoned because he no longer resides in the territory.

On Friday the commission will come before the board for closing statements. At that time, Harrington will ask for a specific remedy for the complainants.

Comments (13)

Up 0 Down 0

Arn Anderson on May 31, 2013 at 4:34 am

If I had my way, the human rights department will be full to the brim of complaints on every person, every situation and every moment.

Up 0 Down 0

Just Say'in on May 30, 2013 at 6:30 pm

Employers are going to have to look long and hard who they hire. Years later people come forward with alligations that are impossible to defend ones self against, and in the case of these ladies with complete immunity and concealing their identity but not his, even before proven guilty. Something is wrong with that picture.

Up 0 Down 0

shenya on May 27, 2013 at 8:10 am

To the two young ladies,-what you did by way of reporting this incident is the right way. Brave you are! The above comments made by the people were probably never touched or had to encounter these kinds of harassments. And, yes we need to bring these kinds of behavior out in the open. For those of you who are afraid to come forward because of the shaming, don't be. Just do it. No matter what the dumb or dumber public states, I support all victims of sexual harassment in a workplace. Gotta stop it!!

Up 0 Down 0

Joel on May 27, 2013 at 7:25 am

Hillary, changes need to happen, but this is not going to do it. Every time the tribunal starts, the person accused is automatically guilty. This is not about sexual assault, pay equality or butterflies and rainbows. The person accused did something that the complainant didn't like...therefore they are guilty.

None of these tribunals will matter until there are real rules of how the tribunals operate. First thing that has to go is "guilty until proven innocent".

Up 0 Down 0

Julius Ceasar on May 25, 2013 at 11:51 pm

Michelle Evans, you are spot on. The same goes for running off to the police with some petty stuff. Most Italian men would be locked up for sex assault if they would live in the Yukon. Canadian women should never ride on a bus in Italy. Thinks derailed in Canada when a touch on the butt became sex assault. It is simply indecent assault at worst, that deserves on hell of a slap. Now it seems that looking towards any well formed part of a woman may become a human rights offense and next thing a criminal offense.

Up 0 Down 0

Michelle Evans on May 24, 2013 at 8:50 am

I think that inappropriate behaviour exists and that is should be stopped. I have a big problem however placing the authority with a tribunal that is known not to function well. And, as mentioned above, if you are accused, you are tried and convicted in the court of public opinion.

Thirty years ago, I was sexually harassed in my workplace. After a left, then a right hook and a black eye, it never happened again.

Up 0 Down 0

Frank Michigan on May 23, 2013 at 3:24 pm

I think its time for all people including men to stand up and bring forward harrassment complaints to this tribunal.

Women in the workplace have made demeaning and sexist comments to me on many occassions, and some comments have occassionally suggested I was not honest about my sexual orientation; this was done to provoke and harass me and they laughed together- they just did it for a perverse sense of togetherness and adolescent fun but they were working women no children.

And many women in the early days of winter have had low moods and their behaviour was petty, vindictive and abusive. They were depressed with little joy in their lives so they took out their frustration on me and others in the workplace who were more balanced.

Its time to bring their inappropriate behaviour forward.

Up 0 Down 0

Melba Disco Dancing Queen on May 23, 2013 at 9:37 am

I am glad these two are not putting up with the garbage. This is in fact common behaviour, don't kid yourselves. And it is a small number of men, and probably a few women too, who do this to young people on the job. I put up with a lot of it from a small number of men when I was a young working person. I did nothing, I played along and then avoided the harassers. I am glad that young women now are speaking out. Good for them. They are doing this for their own self respect but also to pave the way for a more healthy working environment for other girls in the future.

Up 0 Down 0

Max Mack on May 23, 2013 at 5:44 am

It doesn't matter what the evidence is, how believable it is, how much weight it has, whether the facts have been revised retrospectively . . .

This man will be "convicted" and forced to pay compensation to his "victims". His name and reputation will be ruined regardless.

Up 0 Down 0

Hillary on May 23, 2013 at 5:24 am

I'd like to say this is shocking, but I'm sure it just represents the many women out there who are sexually harassed at the workplace and choose not to report.

What appalls me about this case is that this young woman sought support from the owner of the hotel, AND the RCMP. And neither pursued action to stop the behaviour.

By speaking out against this behaviour and investigating the situation (that seems to blatant sexual assault), the owner and the RCMP BOTH had the opportunity to bring it to an end, educate employees and the public about sexual harassment, and support the victim. But they didn't.

Joel - I don't buy your comment that this doesn't matter. Of course it does. The more we realize this is happening, the louder we can be about the necessary changes that need to happen. Pay equity, safe workplaces, equal rights to vote all didn't just 'happen magically'. Things changed because people fought for a better standard of living and equal rights for all.

We have the opportunity to make the same statement now - no one should be subject to sexual harassment in their workplace. Let's work to change it.

Up 0 Down 0

Joel on May 23, 2013 at 1:09 am

Sadly, it doesn't really matter. He will be found guilty and we will have another complaint in the paper in a couple of weeks.

Up 0 Down 0

Northone on May 22, 2013 at 2:07 pm

Human Rights Commissions were set up in Canada in the 1960s when there was real discrimination going on and they served a useful purpose for a time.

Numerous ridiculous cases are springing up all over Canada, from a refusal to cut a woman's hair in a male only barber shop to yet more cases on women having to suffer the indignity of a few dirty jokes at work. The horror of it all! How much does the world need to censor itself to avoid offending anyone's fragile feelings?

It's the same old scene - the 'tribunals' advocate for the alleged victim, meanwhile, any accused is pretty much on his own to bankrupt himself on a lawyer to defend against allegations that can ruin a person's reputation, even if they are found innocent.

Kangaroo court indeed, get rid of these stupid wastes of tax dollars.

Up 0 Down 0

Josey Wales on May 22, 2013 at 8:17 am

Folks I have a big big biiiiiiig problem with this "tribunal". It seems OK to completely slander a person with any ol' allegation made...names in the paper for the public to judge?

At least the other Kangaroo courts (the real ones) often wait until a person has their day in court before publishing their names.

This HRT is a complete shame and often the zealots from the left actually feel it is a real court...it is not anywhere near one.

It is a PC Crusaders Utopia is what it is, and anyone offended with another can be tarred and feathered IMHO.

If called to one? I'd show just to make a complete mockery of it. Witch Hunters fine collection is what it really is.

I know not the parties involved, but everybody whom has an axe to grind can drag someone through the court of public opinion.

We need to decommission this circus and lay off the ring master AND the clowns hired for said circus...and use the other joke we have instead...The Law Courts!

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.