Whitehorse Daily Star

Man seeks counselling after ‘heinous’ behaviour

A young Carcross-Tagish First Nation man is hoping to get counselling after pleading guilty to seriously injuring a puppy.

By Emily Blake on December 19, 2017

A young Carcross-Tagish First Nation man is hoping to get counselling after pleading guilty to seriously injuring a puppy. In territorial court in Whitehorse last Friday, Kashies James, 22, pled guilty to one count of willfully maiming a dog.

He also pled guilty to failing to attend a court appearance and reporting to a bail supervisor in relation to the incident.

Judge Nancy Orr sentenced James to a total of 70 days’ jail time for the charges minus 45 days’ credit for time served.

James will also be on probation for 12 months after his release, with conditions including counselling.

Defence lawyer Amy Steele told the court the incident made James realize he needs help to address trauma he’s experienced and resulting addictions issues.

“It’s obviously a very disturbing offence; I think Mr. James himself would agree himself that it’s very disturbing,” Steele said.

According to the admitted facts, on the evening Aug. 15, 2017 James had shown up at the home of his teenaged sister in Carcross, intoxicated and demanding the repayment of money he had loaned her.

They began arguing, and at one point, James grabbed her eight-week-old puppy and threatened to break its neck.

His sister and a friend said they didn’t think he was serious and walked down the road away from him.

When they returned 10 to 15 minutes later, they found the puppy laying on the ground alive but having difficulty breathing and with an injury to its neck.

The friend claimed James admitted to throwing the dog.

The animal was then “put out of its misery” with several blows to the head.

Due to how the puppy died, a necropsy was unable to determine which of its injuries had been caused by James.

But it did confirm the puppy’s neck had been broken and it would have been in respiratory distress before it died.

On Oct. 3, James failed to appear at a scheduled court appearance in relation to the incident.

After being released from custody on Oct. 13, he also failed to make weekly visits to a bail supervisor between Oct. 31 and Nov. 22 as required.

Steele said James has no memory of hurting the dog, as he was intoxicated on drugs and alcohol. But she noted he takes responsibility for his actions and believes he should be punished.

“He doesn’t understand why he would’ve done such a thing,” she said.

“He’s upset also because he loves dogs; he’s essentially shocked he would’ve done that to a puppy.”

As for the latter two charges, Steele said James did not have legal representation at the time and was scared.

“I think it’s safe to say it’s been kind of hanging heavily over him for months,” she said.

Steele noted that James has experienced “severe trauma” in his life, the details of which he was not comfortable sharing in open court.

James did allow her to share that his mother had attended residential school and had died when he was young. He also lost a close family member who was like a brother to him.

Growing up, he lived with different relatives and in foster care, often running away and hitchhiking back to Carcross.

A Carcross-Tagish First Nation elder also confirmed to Steele that James has had a difficult life. The elder described him as a “good man with a good heart,” saying he hoped the court had compassion.

Steele said James has acknowledged he uses substances to deal with the pain from what he’s experienced.

But she also noted that he enjoys providing food, chopping wood and doing yard work for single mothers and elders in his community.

As well, he hopes to run a cultural camp one day to help youth get back to their roots, she said.

Steele argued that James should get time served for the offences, saying more jail time would not be rehabilitative. She noted James said additional jail time would make him “feel more worthless and like nothing.”

Community work should be part of his sentence, Steele added, as he wants to contribute positively to his community. And she said probation with counselling would help James address issues in his life.

Crown prosecutor Amy Porteous, however, argued that a period of incarceration of four to five months would be appropriate for the charges.

She told the court the incident was an act of violence against a small helpless animal, calling it “sadistic” and “heinous behaviour.

“It’s simply a violent and terrible offence on a creature that could not effectively defend itself,” she said.

She added the offence had “shades of extortion,” and said it was “troubling” that James used an animal as a means of getting his way.

She also noted James has a criminal record that includes violent offences. And she said the sentence should be a deterrence to him and others from committing this type of crime.

But Porteous did note that James pleading guilty was a mitigating factor.

While she believed the Crown would have been able to prove its case, she said the evidence was largely circumstantial, and it wouldn’t have been a “slam dunk”.

Porteous also said rehabilitation should be an important factor in James’ sentence.

“It’s important that Mr. James get counselling because for anyone to think that this is an appropriate way to deal with a dispute towards a family member is highly concerning and needs to get stopped,” she said.

Judge Orr noted the sentence must reflect societal views on this type of crime and send the message that it will incur consequences.

“Our society will not tolerate individuals that decide that they’re just going to do what they want to some poor defenceless animal because it happens to be there,” she said.

But she said a mitigating factor was that James had pled guilty. And she noted the difficulties James has experienced in his life and that he is a young man with the “best part of his future ahead of him.

“The one positive out of all of this that Mr. James now acknowledges that he needs to get some help that he needs to deal with the issues that have caused him some great difficulty in his life,” she said.

Along with the sentence, Judge Orr mandated that James must not own, have control or custody, nor live with an animal while he is on probation

He must also get treatment for substance and alcohol misuse and anger management, along with completing 25 hours of community service.

Comments (13)

Up 0 Down 0

drum on Dec 23, 2017 at 7:49 pm

I am a animal owner and am disgusted by this man's actions. But think about it - in the north we allow wild animals to be trapped - they suffer in pain for hours maybe days until the trapper comes along and kills it. Think about it.

Up 4 Down 0

Josey Wales on Dec 20, 2017 at 7:36 pm

Hey precursor?? Whilst I do appreciate your support, there must be something I have said in my years you may disagree with?
I do what I do to get folks thinking on their own and not merely regurgitate propaganda fed to us by the state.
You are most certainly correct, he is saving that gladue card for a far more serious crime.
I have no apprehension about a public proclamation that if any angry warrior desires to mess up my canine family or myself they put themselves in veeery grave danger.
Our courts clearly support the racism of lower expectations, as such the courts to me are defunct.
We are on our own here, and everyday I act accordingly.
Given the on the record violence already?
Where is the cut and paste 10 firearms ban that whiteys get facing the courts?
Anyone else notice this trend.
Oh yeah...challenge even those you may agree with, it keeps everyone sharp and engages critical thinking skills.

Up 6 Down 2

Precursor ?? on Dec 20, 2017 at 2:26 pm

An excerpt from the CBC article:
James is an Indigenous man, but declined to have a Gladue report presented to the court, despite his lawyer's recommendation.
Sounds to me like he is saving that "ace in the hole" for bigger and better things. Like I said previously. Stay tuned !

Up 5 Down 2

Alan Boomer on Dec 20, 2017 at 2:02 pm

I especially agree with comments made by Josey Wales and Juniper Jackson.
I hope this man deals with his issues and chooses to no longer do drugs or abuse alcohol.

Carcross is getting a lot of negative press over this. The community has to step up and deal with the dysfunction.
Why not a community policing program?

Up 3 Down 2

Precursor ?? on Dec 20, 2017 at 12:33 pm

First of all, I agree with Josey Wales 100% as always. Secondly, don't we always see crimes like this escalate from defenseless animals being killed to humans? It is Criminal Profiling 101 that this is only the beginning. Stay tuned, we will see this POS in the news in the very near future. And yes, it's a good thing it wasn't my dog.

Up 6 Down 0

Groucho d'North on Dec 20, 2017 at 12:29 pm

For some time now physiologists have believed that mass murderers began by abusing pets and other animals. I hope those working with this young man are considering the bigger picture.
This article from Physiology Today explains it: https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/why-the-wild-things-are/201302/do-mass-killers-start-out-harming-pets

Up 7 Down 2

warlord on Dec 20, 2017 at 12:18 pm

Kinda makes you wonder where the big medicine man/healer/sweat-master of Carcross is hanging out in the midst of all these negative social issues affecting the First Nation, could it be he's part of the problem?

Up 11 Down 0

john henry on Dec 20, 2017 at 9:20 am

That's Messed up - Mr. James has some issues - to hurt some baby animal you have to be a psycho

Up 8 Down 0

ben on Dec 20, 2017 at 6:41 am

Not as "severe trauma" as the dog experienced.
I had a hard time reading this.

Up 7 Down 1

My Opinion on Dec 19, 2017 at 11:01 pm

My Lord. What a mess Carcross is. Disfunction reigns supreme.

Up 8 Down 0

Juniper Jackson on Dec 19, 2017 at 7:53 pm

"Steele argued that James should get time served for the offences, saying more jail time would not be rehabilitative. She noted James said additional jail time would make him “feel more worthless and like nothing.”

In my opinion? I don't believe "He loves dogs". Even drunk that would be the last thing a person who loved animals would think of doing...he held that life for ransom... good thing there wasn't a baby in the house.

Thank you so much to all those people who had a tough childhood for not growing up to murder people and kill the defenseless.

Up 8 Down 2

Josey Wales on Dec 19, 2017 at 4:33 pm

Hmm...the Webster’s definition of a savage, some men you just cannot reach.
If that was my dog, off to meet the creator he would be.
Nice speech...our society blah blah.
Complete bulls**t we tolerate all the time violent savage behaviour.

Up 8 Down 0

Dave Evans on Dec 19, 2017 at 4:31 pm

I dunno man...pretty hard to get any lower than violently killing a puppy, it can be done, buts it's pretty tough.

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.