Whitehorse Daily Star

Image title

Photo by Whitehorse Star

Teslin Tlingit Chief Richard Sidney

Major court decision provides clarity, chief says

Major court decision provides clarity, chief says

By Chuck Tobin on January 17, 2019

Teslin Tlingit Chief Richard Sidney says Tuesday’s major court decision provides clarity for negotiating funding agreements to support the Teslin Tlingit Council (TTC) government.

Teslin sued the Government of Canada a year ago, arguing the federal government was in breach of its legal commitment to provide adequate funding for the self-governing First Nation.

It argued Canada was stuck in the old, outdated ways of basing funding on the number of status Indians on Teslin’s enrolment list.

The Tlingits argued their modern day treaty clearly states their self-government funding was to be based on their citizenship – all their citizens, status and non-status.

Justice Ron Veale of the Yukon Supreme Court agreed with the Teslin Tlingit Council.

Sidney said in an interview this morning Veale’s decision provides clarity in what is expected of the federal government when negotiating the annual financial transfer agreement with Teslin.

Whether Teslin and Canada can come to a new agreement by March 31, when the existing agreement expires remains to be seen, but Teslin is ready to get to the negotiating table, the chief explained.

“I am not sure where we will be by April 1,” Sidney said.

“We might be 90 per cent complete, we might be 100 per cent complete but we will not know until we engage in that process.”

Sidney reiterated the federal government knows exactly what Teslin’s position is because the Tlingit Council provided Ottawa with a comprehensive, detailed document in September 2017 itemizing the self-government financing it requires.

During the three-day trial last month, the court heard Canada has not formally responded to Teslin’s submission of 17 months ago, other than to ask questions.

The Teslin Tlingits argued the Government of Canada has refused to negotiate the financial transfer agreement based on the citizenship enrolment, and that it continues to base funding on the number of status Indians, just like the old days under the federal Indian Act.

The Yukon’s land claim and self-government agreements clearly state the territory’s self-governing First Nations would develop a citizenship list based on ancestry and blood quantum, not on what Ottawa defines as status and non-status Indians, Teslin argued.

They argued negotiations to establish financial transfer agreements were to be based on the citizenship enrolment, not the number of status Indians belonging to the First Nation.

Justice Veale agreed.

Veale ruled Canada has failed to honour its legal obligation to negotiate based on citizenship, but also emphasized the opportunity to enter into fair financial transfer agreements is a door to a positive future.

“The concept of self-government for First Nations holds great promise, as it is embraced by Canada and First Nations,” Veale wrote in his 24-page decision.

“However, self-government financing must be negotiated in an honourable way to ensure First Nations survive and thrive. It also ensures that Canada and TTC continue their journey down the road to reconciliation.”

Evidence put before the court by the TTC indicates Teslin and Canada are tens of millions of dollars apart on what Teslin insists would be a fair annual financial transfer agreement.

The federal government in 2015 entered into a national discussion regarding annual transfer agreements with the 25 self-governing First Nations in the country, including the 11 Yukon self-governing First Nations.

Teslin left the table and pursued legal action, indicating the time for talk was over, that it had put up with Canada’s failure to properly negotiate transfer agreements for the past 20 years and more, the court heard.

It’s felt by many that Teslin’s victory is a victory for all of the territory’s self-governing First Nations.

“I declare that Canada has a legal obligation to negotiate a self-government FTA with Teslin Tlingit Council pursuant to the Final Agreement and ss. 16.1 and 16.3 of the Self-Government Agreement, that takes into account funding based on TTC Citizenship and has failed to do so,” Veale concluded in his decision.

Federal communications officer Marie-Louise Boyland said this morning Ottawa is preparing a statement in response to Veale’s decision. It was expected later today, she said.

In his formal statement issued yesterday, the Teslin chief said: “We can now move forward on negotiating an FTA that is fair and equitable for our people.”

Comments (9)

Up 2 Down 2

Joe on Jan 24, 2019 at 6:55 am

There are nearly 30 federal departments and agencies that give money to aboriginal Canadians. Together, all federal spending on First Nations and First Peoples is closer to $13,000 per capita. The entire federal budget for non-aboriginal persons is $7,295 each per year. Hmmm....

Up 4 Down 1

Donald J. Trumped on Jan 23, 2019 at 7:25 pm

As a non indigenous settler prospering and thriving in Yukon (A territory not a province) I would like to thank Yukon First Nations from the north to south for keeping our economy viable and redundant. Old crow thank you for protecting old crow flats important for migrating birds and for the north slope management plan and for Air North. Thanks to Nacho Nyak dun for working with the proponents of Victoria gold to create opportunities for Canadians (just like you) and to Selkirk first nation for also working with Capstone mining showing what's possible in a northern relationship. What a great addition to WGH !! Thanks Capstone. Yukon first nations you have a story that's adding not subtracting from where you are. Let's keep moving forward as Elijah Smith said "We're not here looking for a hand out" . Make Yukon great again!!

Up 4 Down 3

Jack F. on Jan 23, 2019 at 3:22 pm

Follow Matthew's advice, go read the self-government agreements. Very uninformed and simplistic analysis on these comments. Joe and Jane - I guarantee that you don't know a damn thing about this subject - if I am wrong, provide an explanation rather than stretch the truth about your expertise.

Up 7 Down 4

Errr on Jan 21, 2019 at 3:55 pm

A court decision finding a "a legal obligation to negotiate a... [financial transfer agreement]" brings "clarity"? I'd be hard pressed to think of a court decision that muddies the waters any more.

Up 5 Down 4

Will Fare Paymont on Jan 19, 2019 at 10:20 pm

@ Joe - Soon your hard earned paycheck will become an allowance that you receive back from the government wards who will be giving out the dole because it is un-people-kind to say they are on the dole.

If you work or contribute to society in a productive way you will receive your welfare payment in the form of an allowance.

Up 16 Down 6

joe and Jane on Jan 18, 2019 at 4:45 pm

@matthew. I am very educated on the subject, that's why I am comfortable with the comment. This decision only reinforces dependency- adds more people to the eligible for free money list. When I left home I was not considered " independent" until I stopped depending on my parents...it's not really that complicated.

Up 11 Down 19

Matthew Mehaffey on Jan 18, 2019 at 3:32 pm

Joe and My Opinion,
Do you live north of 60? Do you know what sustains the economy north of 60? Well, it's simple, transfers from southern tax payers. Also, if you knew the first thing about Yukon First Nation funding agreements you would know that calculation of the base amount isn't based on revenue. The calculation could be $100 million and the actual transfer could be 0 depending on the own source revenue formula. Maybe educate yourselves on the issue.

Up 24 Down 15

Joe on Jan 17, 2019 at 11:32 pm

Eventually there will be no money to share. Self government is supposed to mean self sufficient- not give me more money. I’d be embarrassed.

Up 23 Down 14

My Opinion on Jan 17, 2019 at 6:00 pm

So I guess these guys are not a Nation at all. Just dependants with an attitude.

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.