Whitehorse Daily Star

Major B.C. curriculum changes may affect us

The Yukon's schools curriculum could be overhauled in the coming years as B.C. remodels its approach to education.

By Ainslie Cruickshank on October 31, 2013

The Yukon's schools curriculum could be overhauled in the coming years as B.C. remodels its approach to education.

B.C.'s curriculum forms the basis of the territory's syllabi.

The province released drafts of the proposed changes to its curriculum last week.

Broadly, the goals of the proposed curriculum are to:

• make it more flexible so teachers have more freedom to be innovative, and personalize education;

• increase the focus on big ideas and understanding;

• incorporate aboriginal world views and knowledge; and

• develop assessment policies that account for this changed approach.

Judy Arnold, the director of student achievement with the territorial Department of Education, said in an interview this week the proposed changes are "quite exciting.”

The changes stem from a significant shift in education-thinking both nationally and internationally.

"What this curriculum does is it reduces the number of outcomes but deepens the expectation of the competency or mastery of a specific idea,” Arnold explained.

"When there's a whole bunch of outcomes, (teachers) don't get to go in depth or chew on a challenge or a problem,” she continued.

These modifications will allow them to focus more on fostering deeper understanding.

Twenty per cent of the curriculum used in the territory is Yukon- or school-specific material. That wouldn't change if B.C. new curriculum is implemented here.

In fact, Arnold said, the change would offer a great opportunity to adjust the programs to fit the Yukon context.

For instance, B.C.'s First Nations education content would be adjusted to reflect Yukon First Nations.

Jim Tredger, the NDP's Education critic and a long-time educator, raised a handful concerns about how the new curriculum would be implemented and monitored in the Yukon.

"Like any curriculum change, how it affects the student-teacher relationship would determine whether it's working or not,” he told the Star.

A key component of the proposed curriculum is more individualized learning, enabling students to be more actively involved in their education.

It's an "important and viable” approach to education, Tredger said, but it requires time and resources.

Teachers would need specific professional development to help them prepare, and students and parents would need to be prepared for their new roles as well.

"It's more flexible and it's more student-directed. That has its advantages, but it takes a lot of skill and a lot of experience on the part of the teacher,” Tredger said.

"And many of our teachers are teaching four or five different subjects, so to be competent and knowledgeable in each of the subjects is pretty demanding.”

Arnold agreed these changes would require teacher training.

She noted the department is beginning to implement a "coaching” approach to professional development.

Moving forward teacher training would take place in the classroom in addition to more traditional workshop-style professional development opportunities.

The draft curriculum can be viewed at curriculum.gov.bc.ca.

Comments (8)

Up 2 Down 0

north_of_60 on Nov 5, 2013 at 8:40 am

'Just a thought' nails it. There is too much emphasis on 'college is for winners' and by default the trades is for losers, and as a result the schools are producing 'a few academically inclined students and a bunch of others that are lost'.

Schools should provide basic relevant education 'to read, write, and understand basic math' for the majority and additional academic opportunities for those who excel in that area.

We need more tradespeople not more unemployed college graduates with unmarketable skills and overwhelming student loans.

Up 10 Down 1

Just a thought on Nov 4, 2013 at 3:39 am

The Public education system needs to be able to provide a learning foundation for all students.

Not all students are going to be academically inclined. We need an education system that recognizes the talents and potential of all students and nutures it.

Also all students should leave high school being able to read, write, and understand basic math.

At the moment I see the schools producing a few academically inclined students and a bunch of others that are lost.

Up 7 Down 1

Yukon Highschool Graduate on Nov 2, 2013 at 2:37 pm

Jackie Ward,

As a product of today's schools myself (F.H. Collins graduate 2004) I can say your so-called "fact" is completely inaccurate. It is more a personal opinion and not a fact, a fact is based on actual occurrences of experiences or knowledge.

I think for myself, and in my career I improve upon my work by developing more efficient systems and provide innovative ideas to my employer to improve upon or change existing protocols. These wonderful skills, not to mention social skills, were taught to me throughout my education in the Yukon public school system. That is a F.A.C.T.

Up 8 Down 0

Anonymous on Nov 1, 2013 at 9:09 am

Jackie Ward,

You are expecting people to believe you without facts? Hmm Interesting! Prove that home schooled children have more success in social as well as academic progress please! Of course you must reference your facts so that people who are trained in scientific method can actually ensure there are no other attributing factors beyond a doubt. Opinion is one thing, fact is another. As well, please spend a month in a school volunteering in an unbiased, caring way. Teachers actually do their best to try to care for children. That is why they go into the profession. Take off the blinders and please look at today's multiple contributing factors.

Up 11 Down 14

Jackie Ward on Nov 1, 2013 at 5:41 am

Want to have bright children? Home school them. Want the opposite? Leave them in public school.

Here's something for you to ponder. We can all agree the government and parliament has no clue of what they are doing right. Ok then. So then why do you trust this same group of people to write the policy that teaches your children?

I just love F.A.C.T.S. and the facts are that today's schools produce nothing but a person who can't think for him/herself and only purpose is to take orders from authority.

If I'm wrong on any of the above I would love someone to disprove anything I said with facts not emotion.

Up 21 Down 2

Fred Norris on Oct 31, 2013 at 11:13 pm

I hope I'm wrong, but this sounds like what's known in the U.S. as Common Core, where 2+2=5. As long as the pupil can explain his/her "big Idea" to the teacher as to how they came to the number 5, then that answer will be considered correct. This does not raise the bar for education, but in fact lowers it.

Up 17 Down 4

Einstein on Oct 31, 2013 at 2:13 pm

What they should look at first is allowing the kids that WANT and CAN learn to be taught! They system needs to protect these students as well as those that do not learn as quick or cannot for a variety of reasons. Right now it's a hodgepodge of kids. The teachers are spending the majority of their time dealing with the behavioral issues which take away from their ability to teach. The School system is really doing a disservice to all the kids by lumping them all together...nobody wins, teachers get frustrated and on and on it goes. Why can we not protect our kids so that they receive the education they deserve?

Up 23 Down 9

Great News! on Oct 31, 2013 at 8:13 am

Halleluiah! It is about time for some changes like these. YG Department of Education is so far behind the times in public education it is sickening. Thank goodness we might actually start seeing some new and innovative solutions instead of just talk using trendy catch phrases that ultimately mean nothing for our students. Get with the times YG...support your teachers and start upping the bar for our children!

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.