Whitehorse Daily Star

Image title

Photo by Whitehorse Star

BUILDING COSTS DEBATED - Dana Journeay inspects pumper 3 at Station 2 at the top of Two Mile Hill this morning. City council is leaning toward taking out a major loan to build a new Public Safety Building at this location. Star photo by BRIELLE WILL

Loan is 'absolute necessity,' mayor says

The economic downturn could work in the city's favour when it comes to building a new fire hall.

By Stephanie Waddell on March 3, 2009

The economic downturn could work in the city's favour when it comes to building a new fire hall.

"We do believe because of the global meltdown that the tenders will attract bigger companies, possibly in conjunction with local companies, and because of the meltdown probably a lower price than what we budgeted," Rob Fendrick, the city's director of administrative services, said at Monday's city council meeting.

"So I'm thinking that $10.7 (million) is a very maximum envelope at this point, in which case we would borrow less."

Fendrick spoke after Coun. Doug Graham questioned staff on how realistic the proposed $10.7-million budget is to build the new fire hall at the top of Two Mile Hill.

The budget includes a 25 per cent contingency, Fendrick said.

Despite the expectation the city may end up spending less than anticipated, Graham still wondered what would happen if tenders came in over-budget.

Fendrick explained a decision would then have to be made about whether to make budget changes or scrap the project.

Graham's queries followed a report Fendrick presented to council detailing the costs of the building and a recommendation that council move ahead with a first reading of a bylaw to borrow $6.7 million for the project.

The loan would cost the city an additional $4.9 million in interest over 20 years of repayment.

Factoring interest, the entire project would end up costing $11.6 million.

At 6.09 per cent interest, the city would pay almost $580,195 on the loan each year out of its operating budget.

After looking at the four major banks and the Yukon government for loan funding, Fendrick said, the city received the best offer from the Royal Bank.

It offered a 20-year term with the same amortization period (the entire length of time to pay back the loan).

The bank gave the city an indicator interest rate of 6.09 per cent.

The actual rate would be set 60 days after construction is down, likely in May 2010.

"The indicator rate is simply that - an indicator rate for the purposes of establishing an offer," notes the report to council.

"The 20-year term is very attractive as the term matches the amortization period. All other offerings were at about the same indicator rate of interest and with the 20 or 25 year amortization periods; however, the other proposals had five-year terms - meaning that there would be no guarantee on the interest rate and the interest rate would be subject to re-negotiation at the conventional five-year intervals."

The city has already drawn $250,000 from the federal gas tax revenue-sharing program for the design of and consultation on the building in December, and another $2.5 million on March 1 that will go toward construction.

Another $100,000 from the city's capital reserve and the entire $900,000 in the building replacement reserve will come out on Aug. 1, the same day the first $2.5 million in borrowed funds becomes available. All of that would go to construction.

On Nov. 1, a further $2.7 million would be available from the loan for construction.

Gas tax funding would be available for the project again on March 1, to the tune of $250,000, with the final $1.5 million from the loan being drawn for the final phase of construction the same day.

"I know it's always a huge thing for council to have to borrow money, especially at this magnitude, but I think we also know we've identified that it's a priority to replace that particular building and upgrade it and, in this case, borrowing is an absolute necessity," said Mayor Bev Buckway, suggesting city staff have negotiated a favourable rate on the loan.

"Unless we get a money tree," there's no one main area the annual loan payment would come out of, Fendrick said when questioned by Coun. Dave Stockdale.

The plans for the new building were presented by architect Charles McLaren at a council and senior management meeting last month.

Along with the new fire hall, the 2,732-square-metre building will house some offices that are currently in the Municipal Services Building downtown, such as bylaw services.

It will also have a meeting room for emergency measure officials and a room built specifically for computer equipment holding much of the city's information.

The water fill station will be moved to a smaller road off Range Road to alleviate many of the traffic problems that have come up with its current location so close to the fire hall.

While the city will build to certain environmental standards, maintenance and safety services manager George White said this morning the city won't be seeking any sort of certification, which he noted comes with a high price tag.

"I'd rather put the money into the building itself," he said.

To that end, the city will be following LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) standards with super-insulation, its windows and so on.

Light shelves - a shelf that comes part way down the window allowing light to bounce off the shelf and into the room - will be put in place to reduce the amount of artificial light needed, for example.

And rather than have two larger boilers, there will be 13 small boilers installed.

The idea behind that, White explained, is more efficiency that comes with boilers being used on an as-needed basis.

If only one small boiler is needed on a particular day, only one will run, but if it can't handle the operation another will come on, followed by another and so on rather than having to use one or two larger ones for less capacity than is needed.

Council will vote on whether to move ahead with borrowing the money for the building at its meeting next week.

Comments (8)

Up 0 Down 0

Just My Opinion on Mar 5, 2009 at 2:20 pm

I myself hope to see the new fire go ahead. I wonder if anyone who has posted has actually stopped by and seen the cramped, run down conditions that our fire fighters currently work in. Both of the fire halls were built in the late 50's early 60's and have outlived there useful life span. At least the city can give the fire fighters a new fire station, since they don't seam to want to settle the firefighters contract. They have be working without a contract now for 26 months. Where I think the city could save money in not spend the 2 million plus budgeted this year for landscaping.

Up 0 Down 0

Not Optomistic on Mar 4, 2009 at 4:52 pm

Ease up Josey. No conspiracy here.

I think Mayor and council should show some fiscal restrain and shelve this mega project right now. Spend our 10 million on better things like plowing the freakin' streets once in a while.

Up 0 Down 0

Francias Pillman on Mar 4, 2009 at 11:12 am

All the crap? You bet, its called REALITY. People without insight use personal attacks to try and better themselves. In Canada we have something called FREEDOM OF SPEECH. If what I write offends you so much, don't read it. But you people choose not to. Anything I say, no one can refute it, its always the same lines, COMPLAINING, WHINING, CRAP, etc, etc. Its a witch hunt on someone who has an opinion that can stir up the pot as much as I can. You would rather live in your fake fantasy world and ignore real problems. To bad it will be your downfall. So keep up with the childish attacks, because it makes you look like an un-educated member of society. The world is messed up because of people like yourselves who can't respect ones opinion, but rather attack it because its not what you want to hear. And who accept everything that the media and goverment shoves down your throat.

Up 0 Down 0

Josey Wales on Mar 4, 2009 at 9:45 am

Gee? I had a "opinion" on this topic yesterday...zilch posted!

What gives? It was not privately attacking anyone, just some CONSTRUCTIVE criticism for the "Hogs at the trough" we call our council, YES PUBLIC officials!.

Not at all like the crap we have to read from Arn Anderson, F Pillman?

this is not the CBC, why not include my POV?

You have my e-mail, perhaps you can use it to offer an explanation/excuse what have you!

Or do you use the CBC moderation team?

i stick to my original point....

that, "what is absolutely necessary" ...is a civic election!

Up 0 Down 0

Arn Anderson on Mar 4, 2009 at 7:48 am

Funny how the Bank of Canadas slashing interest rates has no effect on how the major banks handle the interest rates however when the bank of canada raises them, BOOM, banks are on it like gas stations on oil prices.

A fire hall? There is so much fires happening in the area of whitehorse eh?

Up 0 Down 0

Francias Pillman on Mar 3, 2009 at 11:32 am

*cut off* are the real problem, because especially on this board, people show more outrage at my opinions then descions that affect their daily life.

Up 0 Down 0

Francias Pillman on Mar 3, 2009 at 11:31 am

Gee, they whine about adding friday bus service for 50k, but this is an ABSOLUTE, for 10$ million. When people start defaulting on their mortgages, this fire hall will work well for a shelter. Can the people running this town please go mess up another city. But the residents of Whitehorse have NOT SPOKEN. This type of dangerous use of money is not a concern for the average folk up here. Its all most encouraged. People like me who see a real problem with the direction of this town and voice my concerns are the real

Up 0 Down 0

Josey Wales on Mar 3, 2009 at 10:47 am

Actually what really "is absolutely necessary"...is a civic election!

we have been hit with some of the biggest increases EVER from the CoW as of late!

well I very much agree that a building such as this is much needed, i would like to see a "buy Yukon" clause in this tender process.

call me crazy, but it is our money...is it not? We should try REALLY hard to keep it up here by hiring locals...using local purchased products,not "stimulating" some contractors Albertan economy!

The "Money Tree" as the Mayor called it actually does exist...but our current Mayor & Council has picked it clean down to the heartwood...it is also called the taxpayer.... once one leaves the bubble called City Hall!

Keep those scissors sharp Mayor....I have a hunch you may need them again...after the next civic election!

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.