Whitehorse Daily Star

Image title

Photo by Vince Fedoroff

HELPING RENTERS – Liberal election candidates Christie Richardson and Dan Curtis discuss their party's housing pledge at this morning's news conference at Liberal campaign headquarters.

Liberals propose tax credit for renters

Most Yukoners who pay rent would be eligible for a $600 tax credit under a Liberal government

By Chuck Tobin on August 22, 2011

Most Yukoners who pay rent would be eligible for a $600 tax credit under a Liberal government, Liberal election candidates Christie Richardson and Dan Curtis announced this morning.

Under the proposal, all renters eligible for the federal northern living allowance would be eligible for the credit, they explained during a press conference at the Liberals' campaign headquarters.

The two Riverdale candidates – Curtis for Riverdale South and Richardson for Riverdale North – said the initiative would cost the territory approximately $2.5 million annually.

The announcement comes 10 days after the Liberals promised to double the annual grant for homeowners at an annual cost of $3.2 million if they're successful in the upcoming territorial election.

Both initiatives, said the candidates, are meant to help ease the bite from what they described as a territorial housing crisis borne out of inaction by the governing Yukon Party over the last nine years.

"We aim to have the tax credit in place for the 2011 tax year,” Richardson said.

Providing the credit is directed at the issue of affordability, one of two principles the party plans to address in its housing strategy, along with access to housing, she added.

Announcements regarding more initiatives under the Liberal housing strategy will be forthcoming, Richardson and Curtis emphasized.

The candidate for Riverdale South explained the annual cost of $2.5 million is based on having approximately 4,000 rental suites in the Yukon, according to the 2006 statistics generated by the last national census.

Curtis said if renters are eligible for the federal tax credit for living in the North, they would be eligible for the territorial tax credit for rent.

Both Richardson and Curtis said the Yukon can afford it. The current government, Richardson said, speaks of a financial surplus. Even if Ottawa tightens up its transfer payments to the Yukon, as some fear, Richardson is certain the tax credit makes financial sense.

"The Yukon rental tax credit is an affordable tax credit,” the Riverdale North candidate said.

Curtis suggested the credit could even reduce the Yukon's dependency on the federal transfer payment by encouraging a larger number of transients working in the Yukon to put down roots in the territory for themselves and their families.

Instead of leaving the territory to travel home on days off during their regular shift rotations, increased affordability may convince some to settle in the Yukon, he said.

A higher population, he and Richardson agreed, means more spending, leading to a stronger local economy and less dependency on Ottawa.

The candidates explained the tax credit will ease the burden of increasing rents, just as doubling grants for homeowners would take the sting out of the steadily rising taxes property owners have experienced in recent years.

Liberal Leader Arthur Mitchell announced Aug. 12 his party would double the maximum grant for homeowners from $450 to $900, and from $500 to $1,000 for seniors, if it's elected this fall. The election must be called by mid-October.

By Chuck Tobin

Star Reporter

Comments (17)

Up 0 Down 0

Redneck yt on Aug 30, 2011 at 10:36 am

Seriously folks, why should homes in Whse be any cheaper than anywhere else in Canada. Whse is a true northern city without any restrictions, we get building material, big box stores and everything else a big city has. I don't see why we need a northern living allowance either, not like we have to ship everything up by train and boat! This attitude that everyone should have a place to live is nonsense and building to fullfil a short term need is ridiculous. Of course seniors are moving here to retire, housing is relatively cheap and medicare is free and they haven't contributed to the transfer payments and guaranteed they aren't bringing their bank account with them. I suggest seniors should live here for a minimum of 5 years before they qualify for housing and medical. That should free up some housing and if Yukon housing could become even half-assed efficient we would have lots of affordable housing if they put a ceiling on rent instead of charging 25% of income before deductions to everyone but government employees and social services. Respectfully rednecked and fed up with the whining

Up 0 Down 0

Not A Liberal on Aug 30, 2011 at 10:17 am

Nice try Arthur Mitchell and Kyrsta Meekins...

Can't wait for my Big MAC and Fries....probably on lay away plan....

Up 0 Down 0

First Time Homebuyer on Aug 30, 2011 at 5:36 am

Great, I love how I finally got the guff to buy a place that I can barely afford because no one will rent to anyone with a pet in this town and now they give tax breaks to renters. What about incentives for everyone to enjoy?

Up 0 Down 0

north of 60 on Aug 29, 2011 at 7:48 am

Why are the Liberals proposing to give landlords a $600 increase in rental revenue? It should be obvious to everyone that this sort of vote buying gambit will simply result in rents being increased by $600 if it's ever implemented.

Up 0 Down 0

bobby bitman on Aug 26, 2011 at 6:40 am

From today's Globe and Mail: Vancouver is encouraging construction of rental units by: allowing more density, demanding less parking space, faster processing of applications for projects, and other goodies not specified. In return, Vancouver gets a a legal guarantee that the building will remain a rental building for its entire life. The result in the case being examined was a 22 story building with 600 sq ft one bedroom units going for $1380 per month. This cost/size/package is what was deemed neccessary for the project to be 'economically feasible'.

Up 0 Down 0

One renter who would like a break on Aug 25, 2011 at 10:34 am

Wow, I've never seen so many people complain about the possibility of getting a tax break...

The fact is, the cost of buying/renting a house right now is inflated because there is hardly anywhere to live. This sounds like a short term solution that will help deal with the inflated prices for now. As a renter, it will definitely help me out...hopefully either the Libs or the NDP will present a good plan for creating more places for people to live as well...the YP has created many problems and few solutions over the past 5 years, so I won't hold my breath for them to come forward with anything.

As for costs...the article said it would cost $2.5 million. How much is that in a billion dollar budget? Seriously. Last I checked, the Premier said that the government is in great financial shape. With such a great outlook, I can't see why there would need to be any tax hikes or cuts at all to support this initiative. If the territory's got the money, I say, share the wealth with the people who live here.

Up 0 Down 0

Hahahahaha on Aug 25, 2011 at 10:24 am

Johnny Wintertime is right. The NDP have stated outright that they will increase taxes, thus we will be paying ourselves. At least those with jobs will be paying much more to help those who do not and never wish to attain a job. It is very nice to see and feel a cheque, however it is what we do not see that will bite us in the butt.

Up 0 Down 0

Anthony on Aug 24, 2011 at 8:53 am

Nice vote buying Arthur.......it reeks of desperation.

Up 0 Down 0

Johnny Wintertime on Aug 24, 2011 at 8:08 am

What a shameless attempt to buy votes. How is taxing people so you can give their money right back to them a good idea?

Here's a thought Libs, let me keep my money if you seem to think you have too much of it, rather than using it bankroll your election promises.

It boggles the mind.

Up 0 Down 0

vote for sale on Aug 24, 2011 at 3:02 am

I too agree these subsidies should be concentrated on the basis of need as well as those most affected. Perhaps waiving property taxes altogether for first time home buyers. Those of us who bought our homes for half price or less 7 or more years ago are already sitting pretty on the equity of our golden nest eggs and have no business benefiting from subsidies connected to the current housing crisis.

It would be just as well to dispense with questionable justifications and simply promise to mail out cheques to the head of every household come Christmastime.

Although, I do think there is a case for further subsidy to offset costs of northern living. Federal Northern Residents tax credit rates have not kept pace with inflation and have only been recently increased after many years of dormancy. And why isn't the Northern Residents Travel within a Prescribed Area tax credit made available to all employees? Is access to this credit still dependent upon an employer's whim?

Up 0 Down 0

Max Mack on Aug 23, 2011 at 11:56 am

This is a feel-good policy, but will not improve the situation of renters. Likely, rents will simply increase as a result and renters will be no further ahead.

Same with increasing the grants for property owners . . . it seems pretty clear that Mayor Bev and crew intend to continue raising taxes until the effect of the HoG has been completely offset.

Up 0 Down 0

Nile on Aug 23, 2011 at 11:46 am

What the Libs aren't saying is what programs will be getting the chop so they can pay for this. My first guess would be education. The Libs have a long history of cutting back education dollars.

Up 0 Down 0

Fed up renter on Aug 23, 2011 at 11:43 am

rent @ some apartments in Riverdale is out of hand. owners are raising rental incomes to satisfy other personal habits that they are involved in. And if you ask for renovations... Eviction. The party that cracks down on landlords gets my vote.

Up 0 Down 0

Francias Pillman on Aug 23, 2011 at 8:53 am

The poorer half of renters? Where do you people get this nonsense from? Anyways, nice try liberals. Baiting votes with financial incentives? What's next a Big Mac & fries for everyone? Give me a break. Too late, I'm voting for Obama.

Up 0 Down 0

Red Emma on Aug 23, 2011 at 5:09 am

Here's a thought. How about make it $1200 a year, but only make it available to the poorer half of renters. The rest of us can afford our rent already.

Up 0 Down 0

June Jackson on Aug 22, 2011 at 7:55 am

Gosh.. this is a good idea..

To bad I don't like the Liberal runners that much..

Only one up there worth a darn and he dosen't talk a lot..

Up 0 Down 0

Krysta Meekins on Aug 22, 2011 at 7:42 am

Finally, one of the territorial parties is offering something concrete and real to help alleviate the housing crisis in the Yukon. This initiative, along with the grant increase announced early this month for homeowners, is a great step in the right direction. I believe our economy is really suffering due to the housing situation, when employees can't find a place to live, and small investments like this from the government will spawn much greater economic benefits for everyone.

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.