Whitehorse Daily Star

Kennel owner not disclosing dogs’ whereabouts

The owner of the Tagish Dog Kennel has avoided being detained for civil contempt of court, as most of her dogs have been relocated.

By Gord Fortin on June 13, 2018

The owner of the Tagish Dog Kennel has avoided being detained for civil contempt of court, as most of her dogs have been relocated.

Shelley Cuthbert appeared in court by phone Tuesday afternoon, with Justice Leigh Gower presiding. Several of her neighbours looked on.

Meagan Hannam, one of the lawyers representing the neighbours, said fewer than 10 dogs were found during the last inspection of Cuthbert’s property, which pleased the neighbours.

Hannam explained they want to give her time to continue her efforts to move the operation off the Tagish property.

Hannam suggested bringing the matter back to court on June 26.

Cuthbert interjected, saying there are only two dogs left on the property.

Gower asked if this meant Cuthbert is in compliance with the Oct. 11, 2017 court order he placed on her.

This order dictated that Cuthbert could only keep two dogs on her property – and they must be kept inside from 10 p.m. to 7 a.m.

Cuthbert said she is now in compliance. Gower then agreed to set the next check-in on the matter to June 26.

Cuthbert has not disclosed to the court where she has moved the majority of her dogs, nor how she has done it.

She told the court last Thursday that the dogs would be moved off the property by the past Monday.

The Star asked Cuthbert where the dogs have been moved to. In an email today, she said the location will not be publicly disclosed.

Cuthbert has filed a $1-million defamation lawsuit against neighbours Stefan and Ursula Angerer, Leopold and Edeltraud Selinger, Gerry McGraw, Stefan Landfried, Emerald Gilespie, Anne Middler and Lisa Gallant. The suit was not discussed during Tuesday’s proceedings.

None of the neighbours in court yesterday were willing to comment due to the lawsuit.

Dan Moore, the executive director of the Yukon Humane Society’s Mae Bachur Shelter, said later Tuesday none of the dogs have been surrendered into their care. Moore added that Cuthbert has not contacted the shelter for help.

Graham Lang, another lawyer representing Cuthbert’s neighbours, spoke with the Star today regarding the future of this case.

He explained that the next step depends on Cuthbert’s compliance with the court order.

If she remains in compliance, Lang said, the matter would be adjourned on June 26.

If she is found not to have complied, the next step could be either a fine or imprisonment.

Lang is hopeful that she will not breach the order. He mentioned Cuthbert has clearly demonstrated she is capable of complying with the court order.

“From our point of view, the court case is complete unless she were to breach in the future,” he said.

Lang said he has not inquired about the kennel’s new location. He said the court order only affects her Tagish property.

He imagines that the Yukon government is interested in where the dogs are now being kept.

He expects YG officials are following up because Cuthbert has made comments in the media that she would go and camp with the dogs if necessary.

Lang believes that means she may have taken the dogs to Crown land. He and the neighbours hope that is not the case, and that she has found new private property.

They also hope this property does not pose the same detriments to any nearby neighbours.

As for Cuthbert’s lawsuit, Lang plans to bring in another lawyer with more experience in defamation law.

He expects to bring forward an application to have the suit struck as frivolous and vexatious. He estimates this will be sometime in the next couple of months.

The Star reached out to Environment Yukon to confirm if anyone from the government is monitoring Cuthbert’s activities.

No one from the department was available to provide that information.

Comments (11)

Up 0 Down 1

drum on Jun 19, 2018 at 7:53 pm

Community Gal - I only asked - now that Shelley is gone with all her dogs will all residents of Tagish only be allowed to have TWO DOGS. Or was she treated differently!!!!!!!!!

Up 15 Down 0

Community Gal on Jun 18, 2018 at 8:49 am

@Drum - we only need laws and bylaws when people don't act reasonably. People who have dogs generally feed, walk and train them so that neighbours and visitors are not at risk or disturbed. When people lack basic courtesy and consideration then the law must step in to mediate disputes. Obviously one person cannot take proper care of up to 80 dogs and ensure they are walked daily, fed properly, groomed, watered and trained. Some dogs have been neglected or abused, and that is no fault of Shelley's. However, one person cannot take GOOD care of that many dogs, especially ones with behavioural problems and a history of biting. I would not want to be a dog that gets left in a cage all day with no exercise or affection or grooming or training in a yard with dozens of other aggressive dogs. How is this a quality of life for any animal?

Up 13 Down 7

Joe on Jun 16, 2018 at 9:24 am

I think a vet should visit the new site to ensure the dogs are being cared for properly.

Up 8 Down 27

jean on Jun 15, 2018 at 4:48 pm

The media's 'reporting' drummed up a 'feeding frenzy' of self righteous intolerance personally directed at Cuthbert.
This issue has brought out the worst side of once tolerant Yukoners.
Many people should be ashamed for the 'group-think' intolerance they have clearly demonstrated.
Just hope the media never exposes you to the wrathful intolerance of small minded people.
"Thumbs down" will prove my point just as much as "Thumbs up" will.

Up 16 Down 20

drum on Jun 14, 2018 at 10:40 pm

If she was ordered to have only two dogs in her residence in Tagish by the Judge - I want a regular check to make sure that no residents of Tagish have more than two dogs. What is good for the goose should be good for the gander. She should not be treated differently from the other residents there. I wish her and her dogs peace and a happy life in a quiet place.

Up 10 Down 13

north_of_60 on Jun 14, 2018 at 4:02 pm

Stu Panton, where people choose to live is none of your damn business. How about you publish your address so people can go see if they think you're breaking any laws. Would you like that?

Up 22 Down 6

Torn A. Sunder on Jun 14, 2018 at 12:08 pm

Good luck keeping a secret (location) around Carcross / Tagish. lol

Up 20 Down 12

Stu Panton on Jun 14, 2018 at 8:18 am

Think we should follow up on this to see where the dogs are and how things evolve.

Up 17 Down 22

dog on Jun 13, 2018 at 6:36 pm

It's good that "Cuthbert has not disclosed to the court where she has moved the majority of her dogs, nor how she has done it."
The media turned her situation into a witch-hunt with blatantly biased 'reporting'. I can understand her reasons not to trust the media with any information ever again.

Up 17 Down 12

Max Mack on Jun 13, 2018 at 5:27 pm

Rather than saying Cuthbert has complied with the order, the headline paints Cuthbert as an uncooperative individual.
Attention, Whitehorse Star and other Yukon reporters: Cuthbert is under no obligation to report where she has taken her dogs.

Up 13 Down 7

Woodward&Bernstein on Jun 13, 2018 at 4:31 pm

Hold the front page eh ? In other news , paint dries on side of building.

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.