Jury still out on $36-M investment: Grits
A Liberal regime would make it illegal for the government to put savings in risky investments, party leader Arthur Mitchell told a news conference this morning in Whitehorse.
By Nadine Sander-Green on October 3, 2011
A Liberal regime would make it illegal for the government to put savings in risky investments, party leader Arthur Mitchell told a news conference this morning in Whitehorse.
He was referring to the $36. 5-million former premier Dennis Fentie's government invested in asset-backed commercial papers five years ago.
"Both Mr. Fentie and Ms. (deputy premier Elaine) Taylor stood in the legislature day after day and said, ‘Don't worry, we're getting our money back,'” said Mitchell.
"It's now more than four years later, and despite repeated promises that our money was safe, Yukon taxpayers still don't know if we will ever see our $36.5 million again.”
Mitchell said nobody knows how much the territory will receive from the investment, or when that might happen.
"The problem is it's simply a number on the ledger at this point. We don't have access to the money and we haven't ever gotten the money back,” he said.
A few years ago, Mitchell said, similar investments were sold on the market.
"They go 40 cents on the dollar, sometimes 50, sometimes less. The money is only worth what somebody will pay you for it.
"I can tell you, ‘I have an old, used Jeep worth $50,000, but is anyone going to give me $50,000?' That's the problem.”
Mitchell said Fentie should have been paying closer attention to what investments the government was making. After all, the list of investments fit on one piece of paper.
"To use the Sesame Street analogy...which of these is unlike the other? It's a pretty simple thing to spend 10 minutes once a week looking at that piece of paper.”
The Liberal leader also promised to require the Department of Finance to provide new incoming governments with a report on the territory's finances within 15 days of taking office.
Last week, NDP Leader Liz Hanson promised an NDP government would provide an external review of the government's current financial situation within a month of being in office.
At this morning's press conference, Mitchell said that unlike Hanson, he trusts Department of Finance to be "able and willing” to provide this information.
Mitchell also promised a Liberal government would not increase taxes, would establish a contingency fund in each budget for catastrophic events and review the Yukon's purchasing policy.
"The most common thing that we all notice is at the retail level,” he said. "You go into buy a book and you see two prices on the cover. In the United States, it's $20. In Canada, it's $28.”
Mitchell thinks Yukoners deserve a better deal on what they purchase and wants to work to encourage the private sector to price its goods more fairly.
A Liberal government, Mitchell said, would also make sure Prime Minister Stephen Harper's recent promise of a new resource revenue sharing agreement is kept and implemented.
Mitchell said we need to "get on this now” because the Yukon will reach its current $3-million royalty cap with all the new mining activity in the territory.
Comments (10)
Up 0 Down 0
YukonMax on Oct 7, 2011 at 6:43 am
Okay! Yukonlinda. So everything is just dandy. Because anyone,except the little people, can say it's someone elses fault, so case closed.
We could have bought off all the claims in the peel with that money.
Or finish paying the tab with the RCMP so we can get on negotiating the next contract.
Or subsidizing high speed internet to all communities that don't have it. Because yes, Whitehorse people, some of us in the communities don't have highspeed internet in this day and age.
Or figure out a way to improve medical transportation to and from the communities.
Or, subsidizing in part, grocery freight in the communities so that everyone can afford nutritious food.
Oh! I just love it, I can go on and on.....
Up 0 Down 0
Matthew on Oct 7, 2011 at 6:26 am
Oh boy. Please can I have a set of your rose coloured glasses. From all that I have read in the media about Denis, he does not strike me as the kind of guy who took "no" for an answer if he wanted something his way. Sheila Fraser certainly did not think that they were within the parameters of what they could do, so I Think Denis said "do it", and they did. Still raises the question, are we gonna ever see that money and I would say .... never!!
Up 0 Down 0
yukonlinda on Oct 6, 2011 at 10:44 am
I completely agree that it sucks that we will not see the large return on this investment that the government thought we would. But something I think that everyone forgets about is that the Premier does not just sit down by himself and decide what investments that the government will partake in. The Premier sits down with officials from the department of finance, with reams of briefing notes, and makes a decision based on their advice. I am fairly certain that these officials advised the Premier in good faith and thought that they were within the parameters of what government can and can't invest in.
Up 0 Down 0
Jack Malone on Oct 6, 2011 at 5:04 am
@ Stella: I call BS on you. Those monies are gone. Either you are a blind supporter of the Yukon Party or delusional. C'mon, I don't mind some of Yukon Party's achievements - but be honest. This $36 million could be the new FH Collins or 3 elementary schools or . . .
@ Nile: are you suggesting that Yukoners overlook or ignore the Yukon Party's track record?
Up 0 Down 0
Stella on Oct 6, 2011 at 4:14 am
Max those investments have not resulted in a permanent loss! Their value has increased by over a Million $. Just because the Liberals say something it doesn't make it fact. The $36 million is now worth almost $38. That's not a bad rainy day fund.
Up 0 Down 0
dick on Oct 5, 2011 at 11:23 pm
Nile, are we supposed to forget about this?? i know fentie did, and is enjoying his pension. That money would have gone a long way towards housing and other social issues plaguing Yukoners today. Stupid waste by an arrogant regime.
Up 0 Down 0
Max Mack on Oct 5, 2011 at 9:23 am
Government investments are typically regulated, subject to fairly well-defined investment policies and equipped with an investment management committee to act as overseer.
Public funds are not play-toys for government ministers or bureaucrats to invest in whatever suits them.
In this case, investment policies were intentionally and grossly violated and the result is the permanent loss of $36.5 million.
$36.5 million is nothing to sneeze at. Someone needs to be held to account.
Up 0 Down 0
Matthew on Oct 4, 2011 at 4:20 am
Asset Backed paper is a fancy name for what Wall Street was selling prior to the sub prime mortgage housing meltdown. Picture this…. Issue a $450K mortgage to a strawberry picker making $15K a year that is guaranteed to fail. Package it with a bunch of other mortgages of dubious quality and issue it as a security that the geniuses at S&P or Moodys rubber stamped as a viable investment, and then put it on the market for the gullible to buy. We bought, and it is my guess that the money is gone, gone, gone. Read "The Big Short” by Michael Lewis if you are interested in seeing how this whole thing played out. Safeguards are required to ensure that similar mistakes are not made again.
Up 0 Down 0
Nile on Oct 4, 2011 at 4:02 am
Way to beat a dead horse Arthur.
Up 0 Down 0
Big Ben Mahony on Oct 3, 2011 at 10:38 am
Welcome to the Rhino Party Arthur.
Good work.
You are our new leader.