Whitehorse Daily Star

Judge is hearing sentencing arguments

A sentencing hearing began Thursday for a man who pleaded guilty in connection with the death of Wilfred “Dickie” Charlie.

By Gabrielle Plonka on July 24, 2020

A sentencing hearing began Thursday for a man who pleaded guilty in connection with the death of Wilfred “Dickie” Charlie.

Mario Reuben Skookum was initially charged with first-degree murder in connection to the 2017 death of Charlie. He pleaded guilty to manslaughter last year.

Skookum stands charged alongside his brother, Tyler Skookum, in the death of Charlie, 57, in Carmacks.

Charlie was reported missing on June 19, 2017. His body was found July 5 of that year in the Yukon River around Fort Selkirk.

The autopsy revealed the death was a homicide.

There’s a publication ban on the agreed statement of facts until all those who stand accused in relation to the case have been sentenced.

Victim impact statements were read on Thursday morning.

They described Charlie as a keeper of traditional knowledge, with his death causing rifts and fear in the community.

The Crown made recommendations for sentencing on Thursday afternoon.

Crown prosecutor Lauren Whyte recommended a jail term of five years. Skookum has already served about 2 1/2 years since 2017, leaving another 2 1/2 years remaining.

Whyte also recommended a 10-year weapons order and a lifetime ban on restricted weapons.

If a probation order is imposed, Whyte said, the Crown would seek a curfew condition, abstain and no-contact orders for those who submitted victim impact statements.

Whyte also recommended a condition requiring Skookum to inform the RCMP before visiting Carmacks, if he’s not living in the community.

The victim impact statements revealed that some community members feared seeing Skookum in town.

The order is not intended to penalize Skookum, but give sufficient notice to residents, Whyte said.

Skookum also pleaded guilty to breaching his probation. The Crown is seeking 30 days of custody served concurrently for the breach.

Whyte noted that Skookum, who was 25 at the time of his arrest in 2017, is a relatively young man. She said the Crown is hopeful that rehabilitation will be possible.

Skookum has been previously charged with assault and sexual assault.

His criminal history appears to be linked to substance abuse, Whyte said.

Whyte presented several mitigating and aggravating factors that contributed to the sentencing recommendation of five years.

Skookum’s guilty plea indicates an acceptance of responsibility, Whyte said. He also has shown remorse for his actions. These are both mitigating factors.

The Crown also considered the impact of colonialism and systemic racism on Skookum’s life.

“There is no question in the Crown’s mind these factors have touched Mr. Skookum’s life negatively,” Whyte said.

Without these factors, the Crown would likely have recommended a sentence closer to six years, Whyte said.

Skookum has also participated in rehabilitation programming while in custody, including Alcoholics Anonymous and counselling.

The Crown noted this as the final mitigating factor.

The Crown also presented several aggravating factors. 

The location of the crime is one of these, Whyte said.

“The fact that the death or the killing took place in Mr. Charlie’s own home, which should be a place of safety and sanctuary, is aggravating,” Whyte said.

Skookum also made no effort to provide Charlie with medical assistance, court was told. 

The final mitigating factor was Skookum’s criminal record, which Whyte called “concerning” from a risk assessment standpoint.

Skookum’s pre-sentence report said that he is a moderate risk for future violence, closely linked to substance abuse and his peer associations.

Whyte recommended a three-year probation period requiring that Skookum abstain from substances for its entirety.

Bibhas Vaze, the lawyer representing Skookum, then made submissions.

Vaze said Skookum didn’t intend bodily harm to Charlie, and that should be considered in his sentencing.

“The push to hold somebody responsible always has to be tempered by the push to have the right person held responsible,” Vaze said.

He said he doesn’t see a basis on which to sentence Skookum to five years.

He said the Crown failed to disclose its “star witness” against Skookum. He called this a “serious” breach that the Crown then failed to take responsibility for.

Skookum was forced to consider going to trial on a first-degree murder charge and possibly face a life sentence with the new information that the Crown provided late, Vaze said.

This put Skookum in an “impossible position,” the lawyer said.

Vaze was expected to continue his submission this morning.

Yukon Supreme Court Justice Edith Campbell is presiding over the sentencing hearing.

Comments (11)

Up 0 Down 0

DA on Oct 15, 2020 at 4:31 pm

@Bandit,
"MURDER" can mean a number of things. One "MURDER" may be very different than another "MURDER", and I would argue that manslaughter is a lesser form of "MURDER".
Thank you for not being a lawyer or a judge.

Up 2 Down 1

Bandit on Jul 30, 2020 at 12:07 pm

@DA
"This is a very different crime than manslaughter."
The only difference is that a plea bargain was allowed. It's still MURDER.

Up 1 Down 4

DA on Jul 30, 2020 at 9:17 am

Alain,

The case of 2013 and the current case are two very different stories. Just because a statement of facts was meaningless in one case does not mean that it'll be meaningless in the next. I believe a statement of facts would have value in this case, but I'd have to see them to really know. You may not agree, but I don't care. I'm not going to jump to conclusions and make assumptions without knowing facts.

Alain Stanley Franco - the "young man who viciously murdered two complete strangers in their South Vancouver" was charged with first degree murder. This is a very different crime than manslaughter.

Up 16 Down 1

agree with 'real world' on Jul 29, 2020 at 12:09 pm

I have to agree with 'Here's what happens in the real world!' in other places on the planet, alcohol is not an excuse for murder. See link below. So sick of this garbage here in the Yukon. It's like textbook. Every case hits the same road blocks, oh it's not his fault, oh he had alcohol problems, oh he is from a marginalized community, etc etc etc, all B.S. you do the crime, you do the time. Unless you're in the Yukon. What a farce.

https://kdvr.com/news/local/man-sentenced-to-life-in-prison-without-parole-for-driving-drunk-causing-fatal-lakewood-crash/

Up 10 Down 2

Alain Stanley Franco on Jul 28, 2020 at 8:46 pm

Yo DA - Man, it would not matter what the Agreed Statement of Facts say. We have seen time and again how meaningless they are. The R v Kodwat case of 2013 was illustrative of their meaningless and how dangerous they can be to the alleged offender’s or the victim/public safety. Guess who the Chief Crown responsible for that mess was. Oh wait a minute... The Crown has absolute discretion within the domain of its influence... Or, does it?

Anyways, the Kodwat conviction in 2013 was an unforgivable danger whose fault lays with the Crown.

An Agreed Statement of Facts is essentially a plea bargain that has more to do with the strength of the Crown’s case and the resources needed to argue it then it does with any objective reality. So good luck with that - You’d be better off sniffing around for unicorn farts.

Up 12 Down 1

Here's what happens in the real world! on Jul 28, 2020 at 6:07 pm

"A young man who viciously murdered two complete strangers in their South Vancouver home will serve 25 years in prison before he can apply for parole."

Up 19 Down 3

DA on Jul 28, 2020 at 9:14 am

I wish there wasn't a ban on the agreed statement of facts, as they would help me determine whether whether I think a 5 year sentence is reasonable or not. Hopefully Whitehorse Star publishes a follow-up article once sentencing is complete.

Up 26 Down 6

Josey Wales on Jul 26, 2020 at 6:19 pm

Guncache when ya ask?
Probably never, but it would help a great deal if folks stop voting for liberals making that party like our first world freedom, a piece of history.
As stated, hug ones dear to you... they may taken taken from you via LPC hug a thug policies.

Pile of unsolved murders in these parts, but socially distance, pick up your travelers sticker...public safety demands we do.
We should ban killing humans than it would cease...oh wait.

Up 30 Down 4

Salt on Jul 26, 2020 at 8:31 am

Another tale from a dying society.

Up 54 Down 4

Guncache on Jul 24, 2020 at 8:55 pm

Oh give me a break. When the hell are excuses going to stop? You murdered, you're guilty.

Up 63 Down 4

Josey Wales on Jul 24, 2020 at 3:54 pm

wow...just wow.
The time they are speaking of would be great for theft, drug dealing...naaaah a man dead? WTF?

There ya have it folks, more evidence of BOLE via our courts.
Hug your family, they may be killed by yet another re-offending violent POS.
The courts all over Canada churn them out like butter.

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.