
Photo by Whitehorse Star
Mike Racz and Bill Thomas
Photo by Whitehorse Star
Mike Racz and Bill Thomas
Homes are selling for more than ever before in the Yukon and building has all but stalled.
Homes are selling for more than ever before in the Yukon and building has all but stalled.
The result: when housing is needed most as the population expands, it is becoming unaffordable for many Yukon residents and southerners looking to relocate here.
Following major growth in the mining and construction sectors, the Yukon is currently witnessing a population boom.
In 2009, the population was 34,157, with 25,690 living in Whitehorse.
Last year, the territory gained 510 new residents, bringing numbers to 34,667, with 614 more people living in Whitehorse. Lesser growth was felt in Burwash, Carcross, Dawson City, Carmacks, Destruction Bay and Tagish and it is a trend that shows no signs of slowing down.
At the same time, real estate costs have soared to unprecedented levels.
The price of an average home in Whitehorse has spiralled to $427,600, and record-setting prices are being seen across the territory, reports the Yukon Bureau of Statistics.
Between April and June of this year, the total sale value of properties in the Yukon reached $73.9 million, a record high for second-quarter growth.
And prices have had little bearing on new home development.
This year, just 76 single-family homes were sold in Whitehorse, grossing just $32.5 million, the lowest recorded number of sales since 1995.
As a reflection of high prices, condominiums and multi-family home sales rose during that period, contributing $15 million in sales, with a record 56 units sold this year.
"It's all to do with supply and demand,” Mike Racz, the president of the Yukon Real Estate Association, said today.
"Right now, there are only multi-family homes available because it has been economically viable to build condos downtown (Whitehorse),” he said.
"For instance, you buy a lot for $250,000 and put 20-unit condo developments down, the lot price per unit increases greatly. There just isn't the same level of investment in single-family housing.”
Though development has benefited some, specifically some younger families from urban areas, it is far from a solution to the growing population's need for housing.
"Many people move up here because they like the idea of space,” said Racz.
"The city is in a difficult situation because they hope to give people that space, but they still have to provide enough housing with the land we have available.”
It is a situation that is beginning to take its toll on all segments of society.
"Housing is only one part of what makes up quality of living in a community, but it's a huge part,” said Bill Thomas, the chair of the Housing Task Force of the Yukon Anti-Poverty Coalition.
"We have some of the highest wages in the country. Professional people want to be here and they are encouraged by things like job fairs, but they are not told about housing.
"Though many may even have the means to purchase a home here and get onto the property ladder, there just isn't enough available to them, and they may choose not to relocate as a result.”
The most obvious effects though, he added, are on the homeless, hard-to-house and working poor, who in large part simply cannot afford to rent in a community with such high property values.
Though the housing situation in the Yukon is dire, it's a trend being felt in resource towns from Kirkland Lake, Ont. to Yellowknife.
"This type of housing situation is happening in any small community going through an economic upturn,” said Thomas.
"It's a situation that happens whenever a community with low or negative growth suddenly, because of increases in resource revenue, becomes a destination for workers. It just takes time to build the necessary housing.”
It's clear that new solutions are needed, specifically opening up new lots for development in the city, said Thomas.
Its a platform the NDP, Liberals and governing Yukon Party have all adopted as a major priority in the Oct. 11 territorial election and is likely to become one of the most immediate challenges to whichever party forms the next government.
"We have to look at alternative ways to house people. They are out there, but so far, Whitehorse and the Yukon have been behind,” said Thomas.
In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.
Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.
Comments (6)
Up 0 Down 0
NYC of the north??? on Sep 21, 2011 at 7:48 am
NYC has 10,000 people/square km. Whitehorse has 63 people/square km. What is crazy is Whitehorse, unlike NYC, has plenty of vacant crown land suitable for housing development and our governments have no excuse for allowing the current housing crisis to get so far out of hand.
Wages here do not even compensate for increased costs of northern living compared with similar sized communities down south. We pay substantially more to heat our homes due to colder climate, NWTel rates and a host of other added costs due to a distinct lack of competition for almost everything other than some of the inferior products that can be bought on sale at the big box stores.
Without affordable housing enabled by a steady supply of new and reasonably priced residential building lots (which are both dependent upon and and completely within the means of our governments), people will not choose to stay.
Up 0 Down 0
Yukon Girl on Sep 20, 2011 at 8:16 am
Embrace the condos, at least they are being built! I just bought one of the new condos myself and I have to say they are a decent quality, you get options as to what they look like inside and they are much more affordable than a house in this town. Being a single income individual I have to say my mortgage payments are cheaper on a brand new condo than rent is on a crappy one bedroom basement suite.
Up 0 Down 0
yukonlinda on Sep 20, 2011 at 5:11 am
Why is it crazy that a condo sells here for just a bit less than in New York? I am willing to bet that unskilled labourers, office workers and the like make a lot more money here, comparatively, than they do in New York...
Up 0 Down 0
jack pott on Sep 19, 2011 at 4:54 pm
A friend recently paid 505K for a condo in Tribeca, New York City....450K in Whitehorse is insanity.
Up 0 Down 0
mark on Sep 19, 2011 at 8:30 am
stall the condo development and start building more affordable apartments for low income people in this city. what we need in this city is a large skyrise apartment building to fix this housing mess we are in.
Up 0 Down 0
bobby bitman on Sep 19, 2011 at 8:17 am
The quality and size of houses being built needs to be compared to the past as well, when comparing house prices with the past. The houses in 2011 are nicer, better built, more efficient, compliant to higher City of Whitehorse 'green standards', and many are very large homes. It's not like the little shacks that used to sell downtown, and the simple bungalows and duplexes and 3 bedroom family homes that used to be the norm.
With Whistle Bend coming on line over the next few years with what is it? 850 new lots? and the FN's talking about supplying lots in exchange for 75 to 95% of people's entire income tax returns (plus lease fees), I think the next story is going to be one of home owners unable to unload their $500,000 houses. In fact I think the tide is already turning as people wait to build in Whistle Bend starting in 2012.
If I were a politician, I would not be rushing to pump more lots onto the market. They are already well on their way. A glut on the market will affect many homeowners who will watch their personal net worth drop.