Input sought on intensity-based emissions targets for mining industry
The Yukon government is engaging with the mining industry, First Nations governments, environmental groups and the public on the development of intensity-based emissions targets for the mining sector.
The Yukon government is engaging with the mining industry, First Nations governments, environmental groups and the public on the development of intensity-based emissions targets for the mining sector.
The government is also engaging with large industrial facilities subject to the federal Output-Based Pricing System (OBPS) on the development of carbon rebate options.
Under Our Clean Future: A Yukon strategy for climate change, energy and a green economy, the government vowed to establishing intensity-based mining targets by the end of 2022.
Greenhouse gas emissions from mining can vary considerably from year to year, making it difficult to set an absolute cap, the government said Wednesday.
Intensity-based targets will set desired levels of greenhouse gas emissions per mining activity or per unit of material produced. This will encourage mines to look for innovative ways to reduce their emissions.
The government is proposing a target for the mining sector to reduce 45 per cent of its greenhouse gas emissions per unit of production by 2035.
This aligns with a territory-wide greenhouse gas target of 45 per cent reduction outside the mining sector by 2030.
As well, the government will develop a rebate for mining operators that are subject to the federal Output-Based Pricing System (OBPS).
The government is engaging with large mine operators to support the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions and identify methods for returning carbon pricing revenues.
Meetings will be held with affected stakeholders and parties throughout the end of the summer and into early fall.
“It is important that all sectors contribute to our shared work of reducing emissions and fighting climate change,” said Premier Sandy Silver.
“These targets will help the mining sector find innovative solutions to reduce their impact on our environment and better protect the territory for future generations of Yukoners.”
A discussion document that describes the government’s proposed approach for both its mining intensity and OBPS rebate frameworks can be found online at https://yukon.ca/engagements.
The deadline for submitting feedback is Oct. 3.
“In Our Clean Future, the Government of Yukon committed to reducing the territory’s carbon emissions and everyone must do their part, including the mining sector,” said Energy, Mines and Resources Minister John Streicker.
“Over the next years, the Yukon’s mining sector will play a critical role in Canada’s transition to a green economy by providing critical minerals that are essential for the development of clean energy.
“I look forward to working closely with the mining industry, First Nation governments and environmental groups to develop the best approach for setting intensity-based emissions targets in the Yukon.”
The government established the Yukon Government Carbon Price Rebate Act and regulations in the spring 2019.
The intent was to eventually create a mechanism to provide rebates to OBPS-covered facilities to help lower greenhouse gas emissions.
Establishing a new regulation to distribute OBPS proceeds contributes to this objective.
Territorial carbon pricing rebates were designed to uphold the government’s commitment that eligible rebate groups receive proportionally more money, on average, in rebates than they pay in carbon levies.
To date, all carbon pricing revenues continue to be returned to Yukoners.
Under Canada’s carbon pricing model, the OBPS applies to large industrial facilities that emit 50,000 tonnes or more of carbon emissions annually.
Facilities with annual carbon emissions between 10,000 tonnes and 50,000 tonnes can opt into the OBPS on a voluntary basis.
Comments (12)
Up 4 Down 5
MITCH on Aug 22, 2022 at 11:10 am
@ Politico- Sorry, I have real report cards, not participation trophies and silver stars. I don't even drive on principle. What do you drive?
Up 7 Down 22
Politico on Aug 19, 2022 at 6:00 pm
@MITCH Far more than you have I'll bet. Want to compare report cards?
@ North_of_60 Your lack of twisted scientific knowledge is stunning. Yes, plants need co2 to live but there is a limit to how much the atmosphere can support.https://www.fsis.usda.gov/sites/default/files/media_file/2020-08/Carbon-Dioxide.pdf
The other side effect of high CO2 levels is the warming of the planet. This has been well documented but some people still don't believe. This affect has been know for over 150 yrs. https://physicstoday.scitation.org/do/10.1063/pt.6.4.20210823a/full/
Amazing that 33 people on this forum do not care about how we leave this planet for our children. Profits over people!
Up 9 Down 2
Groucho d'North on Aug 19, 2022 at 5:08 pm
In one gallon of diesel fuel there are 26.87 pounds of CO2. Intensity does not alter this ratio. If you burn it fast or slow, it’s still going to be 26.87 pounds per gallon. So what is government attempting to do here besides deflecting from explaining themselves in plain English?
What's next rationing petro fuels by economic sector?
Up 15 Down 7
bonanzajoe on Aug 19, 2022 at 4:49 pm
@North_of_60 on Aug 18, 2022. As you probably already know, vegetation depends on Carbon Dioxide/CO2 or the more politically correct form "Carbon emissions" as it feeds on it. In turn vegetation gives off oxygen so all life can breathe and stay alive. When vegetation has no CO2, it dies - so also life on the planet. When the forests dry out, they become combustible - anything can set them on fire. Then, with less vegetation, there will eventually be an increase in respiratory and pulmonary diseases . I learned that in elementary school science class. Do they not teach this anymore?
Up 19 Down 8
bonanzajoe on Aug 19, 2022 at 4:33 pm
@Tired of the apologists justifying harms committed by the government on Aug 18, 2022 at 6:25 pm: Couldn't have said it better. I grew up on a farm and know that smell. I read the personal history of Karl Marx. At the height of his career, he wouldn't bath for weeks at a time. It was said, he smelled so bad, his family and friends wouldn't come near him. That's what his socialist communist ideology smells like, and every political party that adopts it.
Up 27 Down 7
Juniper Jackson on Aug 19, 2022 at 12:56 pm
I appreciate the way Gov, FN, Mining Industry etc, put on a nice stage play, however costly it will be to pay out lunches, per diems, honorariums, travel costs, etc. before doing exactly whatever they were going to do before posting for 'input' and making 'inclusive' decisions. My own input is, who makes money out of mining? The stockholders in the mine? NCO's? FN pay offs? AND, just maybe? perhaps some free stock options for government officials, MLAs making the decisions? (As long as YTG controls the law, we will never find out either.)
My point is.. no one is going to give up their money. What ever decisions are made will have a loop hole that will allow everyone to carry on business as usual.
For all his bawling and honking about carbon emissions, Trudeau slipped in a little loophole. Called "purchase offsets for the emissions". That means, you can create all the emissions and carbon footprints you want to..you just pay a little extra for it. (Remember Trudeau and his two planes going 500 miles because he didn't want to drive?) That makes all these talks, public input, just so much Liberal flim flam. No matter what they say..it's still about the money and will not impact the environment in any way at all. That family reusing a plastic grocery bag in their garbage can, taking their recycle in, using glass instead of buying a lot of plastic.. yup.. we're the ones making a difference..not big business.
Up 11 Down 6
MITCH on Aug 19, 2022 at 12:03 pm
@ POLITICO - What did you do about it?
Up 32 Down 5
Joseph campbell on Aug 18, 2022 at 8:46 pm
The rich who are responsible for all this nonsense will always eat steaks, while the poor useful idiots will eat fake foods made from styrofoam. Enjoy.
Up 41 Down 12
North_of_60 on Aug 18, 2022 at 8:15 pm
This is beyond ridiculous. ANY CO2 emissions from any source in the Yukon are immediately absorbed by our growing forests and grasslands.
This whole Climate Fright Scam is nothing more than political justification and excuses to raise taxes.
Up 31 Down 9
Tired of the apologists justifying harms committed by the government on Aug 18, 2022 at 6:25 pm
Dear Politico on Aug 18, 2022 at 3:09 pm:
We have known about the crisis in leadership well before the 70s. We have been asking for a little sanity and intelligence in government for decades and decades, centuries even, and yet we get an unrelenting torment of stupidity, doing the same thing over and over again…
We would like to reduce the emissions coming out of Ottawa and 2071 - 2nd Avenue - It smells like and endless parade of honey wagons in a hot spring growing season in farm country.
Up 36 Down 12
Todo por el estado on Aug 18, 2022 at 3:14 pm
Shuddupppp already! No soup for you! How about this - They get to emit 30% more to make up for the food shortages induced by fertilizer reductions. They will need it to out bid others in the food price/shortage wars to come!
This miner 49er wants some I can’t believe it’s not meat, chicken wings and a warm, flat draught beer at the next citizens appreciation day barbecue held by the Fed Libs.
Todo por el estado!
Up 16 Down 50
Politico on Aug 18, 2022 at 3:09 pm
To all the nay Sayers complaining this is too much too fast, Industry has known about the emissions issue since the 1970s and not even prepared for it. No one is asking for all emissions to end all at once. All that's being asked of industry is to start working at ways to reduce pollution little by little year after year. Let's leave a better planet for our children!