Inmate didn't assault guard, judge concludes
An inmate with a lengthy criminal record avoided more jail time when a territorial court judge acquitted him of assaulting a corrections officer and uttering threats.
An inmate with a lengthy criminal record avoided more jail time when a territorial court judge acquitted him of assaulting a corrections officer and uttering threats.
Restrained by wrist and ankle cuffs, Michael Nehass appeared in court Friday on two charges stemming from an incident at the Whitehorse Correctional Centre on Dec. 10, 2012.
Eldan Schmidt, a WCC corrections officer, told the RCMP Nehass had ignored repeated demands to "lock up,” or return to his cell, and had threatened the guard.
"He said, ‘Don't f*** with me .... You don't even know how close I am to smashing you up right now,'” Schmidt told the court.
He also said Nehass, 29, came within several inches of him, raised his arms and feigned a punch.
"He was obviously upset and he was trying to intimidate me by coming close to my person and into my personal space,” Schmidt said.
"In my experience, that's one of his favourite techniques.”
The court saw about three minutes of audio-free footage from a WCC security camera, which contradicted Schmidt's testimony.
"Clearly, that man does not raise his arms,” said defence lawyer David Tarnow.
He pointed out Schmidt had told RCMP officers Nehass had lunged forward and thrown a closed-fist punch that stopped just short of striking the guard.
"You were trying to embellish to make it worse for this fellow so he'd stay in segregation another 10 months,” Tarnow said.
Schmidt admitted his statement was incorrect, but that Nehass was nonetheless menacing, with muscles tensed and spittle flying during the confrontation.
"Spittle? You're making this up as you go along, aren't you?
"You lied to the police officer because you just love getting these guys in trouble.... You get your jollies from doing that....”
Schmidt had been supervising the WCC segregation unit, where "problematic” inmates are held for stretches of time and allowed out of their cell only one hour per day.
He had instructed Nehass to take 20 minutes to sweep and mop the unit's common area.
Instead, Schmidt said, Nehass walked near another cell, made "threatening gestures,” then sat down by a phone and made a call.
Several moments later, the video shows Nehass got up and confronted Schmidt, who said he no longer works shifts in the segregation unit.
"You remember what I did to Tony? I hit him so hard I pushed his nose back into his face,” Nehass allegedly said.
The remark referred to an incident in October 2010 where Nehass assaulted a WCC guard, throwing a punch that left a bone poking through his nose.
The defence said Schmidt's statement to the RCMP was "not forthright and completely exaggerated.”
He argued the Crown could not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Nehass had uttered threats, much less assaulted a guard.
No other witnesses were called to the stand.
Judge Peter Chisolm acquitted Nehass of both charges.
Nehass, in custody since December 2011, has served time for manslaughter, aggravated assault, assaulting a peace officer and break and enter.
He has faced charges on more than 70 counts over the past decade.
A territorial court judge earlier this year denied Nehass's application for a psychological assessment to gauge his mental stability.
The Crown sought an assessment "to determine whether Mr. Nehass is suffering from a mental disorder which makes him incapable of understanding the nature and consequences of his acts and therefore not criminally responsible,” according to the judge's ruling.
"Mr. Nehass has been a very difficult prisoner; probably one so difficult has never been experienced,” said Judge E. Dennis Schmidt.
During his time at the Whitehorse jail, from which he is approaching his release date, Nehass has broken many windows, threatened guards and necessitated seclusion from the other inmates.
Comments (17)
Up 3 Down 6
Arn Anderson on Nov 6, 2013 at 11:15 am
Of course Josey Wales would only bring up Canadian Criminal Code sec. 718.2(e) in this matter and other matters like it. He won't have an opinion when it helped a person out or set a new course in someones life. Those stories are not reported, justifying in Josey's eyes to basically do what he always does, piss and moan, no argument, no debate, just over-inflated hyped quips. Read the code, read it again and again, not Ezra's opinion of the matter, but from actual people within the law.
Up 4 Down 12
Hello on Nov 6, 2013 at 6:59 am
Josey Wales.
People like me?
Let the Judge be the judge! People LIKE you live in a black and white world...no grey areas! I feel sorry for all of YOU! Because ONE day, you or any of you writing may need help, but by the sounds of your comments, none of you are headed in that direction.
LUCKY YOU! I did not at no time at all say he shouldn't be punished for what he did! But who gives YOU guys the right to judge "MR.NEHASS"?! This is MY point, one day we all have to answer our maker. Not to you or these others with your holier than thou attitude.
As I said in the beginning of this comment "Let the Judge be the Judge!" With the proper support, anyone can be helped. I was once on the "other" side of the bars! After a few times, I turned my life around with support and judgment from others, it is not a easy road to travel when on a healing journey when half the population knows your business.
I hate to see the day when everything turns upside down in your world and no one is there for support and all they are doing is judging. Believe me, there is no saint in this whole mess. So, there is one judge and I hope YOU all remember that.
Up 14 Down 6
Josey Wales on Nov 6, 2013 at 12:11 am
hello...are you there?
Re: nobody has the right to judge. Let us assume for a moment you are correct, okay?
That said, no one has the right to... beat another... use others for stabbing practice... terrorize others... encroach on ones personal space...
steal other folks belongings... live off the fruits of others... kill another... sexually assault another...
drive hammered and create carnage as a result...
Not to imply as you called him "Mr. Nehass" did all or any of those things, but the Gladue crews often do...and with help from 718.2(e)
Do you wish for me to carry on, or do you get the point I'm and others are making?
Seems folks like you hold on to dear life asinine apartheid laws such as CC sect. 718.2(e) as I have "referenced".
Really it is nothing but an excuse for savage behavior in a somewhat civilized society we ALL have to "now" share.
"The life he lived"? what a load of enabling crap. Using that logic, why are our cab drivers not beheading folks daily? Certain a few were raised or "lived" on the Ivory coast where that is S.O.P. ...why are the Jews not killing and tormenting every German that comes into their life?
Ya see hello, many folks of many ethnicity (including the many many types of "whitey's") also have historical baggage.
Funny that as there seems to be no "special" place in Canada's criminal code tolerating savagery from the "rest"?
Up 10 Down 4
Piper on Nov 5, 2013 at 10:04 pm
We need a Russian gulag system. I would say crime would drop & criminals would reform rather then serve time. Make no mistake criminals do not cause any trouble in the Russian system & live to tell the tale.
Up 14 Down 1
@Hello & M.F.SMARCH on Nov 5, 2013 at 9:50 am
You are wrong, someone does have the right to judge people. Judges. In courts. And they can determine that a person is a Dangerous Offender.
Here is an excerpt from the Government of Canada's website on the provision:
"The Dangerous Offender provisions of the Criminal Code are intended to protect all Canadians from the most dangerous violent and sexual predators in the country. Individuals convicted of these offences can be designated as a Dangerous Offender during sentencing if a sentencing court is satisfied that the offender constitutes a threat to the life, safety or physical or mental well-being of the public. Where an offender is designated by the court as a Dangerous Offender, the offender may be sentenced to an indeterminate sentence of imprisonment."
Up 4 Down 18
Hello on Nov 4, 2013 at 9:07 am
For Real?! Did you acutually read between the lines or just have a tunnel vision when it comes to "criminals"? I simply stated that a person has no right to judge another person, regardless. As for the bullying part, I meant that no one has the right to judge and these types of comments especially made public like this is bullying. I personanlly know Mr. Nehass and as I said, I don't condone his behaviors, but I also know what type of life he has lived! No one to really depend on and no real support. I am sure all that commented are law abiding citizens? Before you judge someone, especially in a public, walk a mile in their moccasins first and then come back and right your self righteous comments!
Up 15 Down 3
bobby bitman on Nov 4, 2013 at 6:34 am
Max says: "If Mr. Nehass breaks the law, you can be sure he will be back in jail before you know it."
The problem is, Nehass 'breaking the law', is likely to consist of Michael Nehass assaulting someone or worse. Do we seriously have to wait for that event? He sounds like a sociopath who does not care in the slightest about others.
Some people have cashed their chips in terms of their right to run free on the streets. Michael Nehass sounds like one of them. He has already killed and committed numerous assaults. This is one very big problem with our justice system: that people who we are fairly positive are going to seriously hurt others again and again have the 'right' to freedom and cannot be dealt with effectively until they have done an enormous amount of damage to others.
Up 14 Down 7
Ryan Jamieson on Nov 2, 2013 at 4:40 pm
My Question is; What type of disciplinary action has been taken in regards to Mr. Schmidt's Actions?
Regardless what you think of a convicted criminals actions, there is a certain responsibility of those holding positions of power over others, and this power has clearly been abused. This officer appears to have lied on the stand in a public courtroom, thus calling into question his credibility which in my mind makes him unfit to hold said position, especially a supervisory or leadership position. Whether there was intent to further impede and negatively impact this inmates life, is uncertain. I don't think that should influence the matter.
People should be able to expect that regardless of where in the legal system they find themselves, they will be dealt with and treated, honestly, and not fear the justice system. Sad that this is not the case.
Up 9 Down 18
Max Mack on Nov 1, 2013 at 12:01 pm
I disagree with other posters who imply or state outright that Nehass should be convicted simply because he is "dangerous" or has a bad track record.
The principal of presumption of innocence must be adhered to unless we want a kangaroo court process and a police state.
Incarcerating people indefinitely on trumped-up charges is not only inhumane but it has never worked.
If Mr. Nehass breaks the law, you can be sure he will be back in jail before you know it.
Up 34 Down 3
for real?l on Oct 31, 2013 at 11:19 am
@Hello...you gave me a real chuckle with your comment, I almost fell out of my chair laughing at you mentioning bullying...Just to make sure I understood you correctly, you did mean bullying the poor person who has killed someone and broken the jail guards nose in the past through violent acts?
Some people need to be judged, convicted and the whole populace warned of what a danger they are to everyone else when they are finally, unfortunately released from jail to be inflicted upon the rest of the population again!
Up 12 Down 35
Hello on Oct 31, 2013 at 2:01 am
Amen! Mr. Smarch. I was just about to write something to this affect. I believe nobody has the right to judge someone at all. Regardless of who they are. A person does not know what another has been through whatsoever! If you were on the other side of the bars, I am sure you would feel differently. Yes, Mr. Nehass needs help, how are you going to help him move forward? Or are you just going to continue to judge people without knowing where they came from? You know the reading "for those who have not sinned, cast the first stone". I am not condoning what Mr. Nehass has done at the same time I am not condemning him. These types of comments should be considered "bullying".
Up 20 Down 33
M.F.SMARCH on Oct 30, 2013 at 7:57 am
I'd like to say something to those who have only read things about Michael, like Guncache. Yes his parent is unstable. For your info its his dad. He became unstable after his wife, Michael's mother, died in a car crash. Michael has had a rough and tough life. I am not saying they should turn their head the other way or just spank on the hand,
but people do change. He needs a little bit of direction for he has never had in his life before. No-one on this green earth has the RIGHT to JUDGE anyone. Sure he needs help. All we can do is try to HELP him to the best of our ability. Ii was not put on this earth perfect nor do I think I am perfect. My grandmother told me as a child that when you see someone down, do not boot them while their down, your supposed to help them back up on their feet. So please always remember we as people are not better than the one next to us.
Up 6 Down 15
Arn Anderson on Oct 29, 2013 at 5:33 am
Sounds like Mr Nehass has the mentality of a global corporation CEO or to become a prize bull in UFC.
Up 39 Down 6
bobby bitman on Oct 29, 2013 at 4:15 am
Give every imaginable benefit of the doubt to a person who shattered bones in a WCC guard's face, killed someone, assaulted others, and even in jail has broken windows and committed assault. The guard may well have believed that this chronic offender, who cultivates an image of violence to get what he wants, raised his fist. We do not always have perfect recall while under stress. He got a detail wrong and so Nehass gets a complete flyer on this?
This ruling does not serve justice or our community.
Up 43 Down 6
Bob Graham on Oct 29, 2013 at 1:42 am
Read this story very carefully as a very dangerous, unpredictable man is to be released amongst us.
Up 38 Down 8
Guncache on Oct 28, 2013 at 11:39 pm
Why is this deviant allowed to consume valuable resources like oxygen. He has already had a manslaughter charge (read, he murdered someone). There is no doubt he will do it again. Oh wait, none of this is his fault. He got spanked when he was younger, didn't get a bicycle at Christmas, parents were alcoholics etc,etc. For the bleeding hearts please offer to take him into your home for comfort and counselling.
Up 27 Down 13
Josey Wales on Oct 28, 2013 at 7:49 am
This "Lad" is a poster boy for everything wrong with Canadian Criminal Code sec. 718.2(e).
For anyone whom may try to argue the necessity of such an asinine section of the CC, get over yourselves.