Whitehorse Daily Star

Image title

Photo by Whitehorse Star

Audrey McLaughlin

Incident prompts meeting about show's mandate

Former Yukon MP Audrey McLaughlin is calling the new RCMP reality TV show "a bad idea gone, well, badder.”

By Ashley Joannou on August 15, 2013

Former Yukon MP Audrey McLaughlin is calling the new RCMP reality TV show "a bad idea gone, well, badder.”

McLaughlin has written a letter to Commissioner Bob Paulson at RCMP National Headquarters in Ottawa raising concerns about the show currently being filmed in Whitehorse. (See the full letter on p. 6.)

McLaughlin told the Star today she was walking her dog on Hoge Street in downtown Whitehorse Wednesday evening when she saw a woman being arrested by the RCMP.

"I looked back and I saw a guy with a clipboard crouching behind a vehicle, and then I noticed a sound system and cameras,” she said.

Starting earlier this week, the Yukon RCMP have been filming for a reality TV show, produced by an American television company.

At press time early this afternoon, the RCMP sent out a notification that they have suspended filming until they've had an opportunity to discuss recent feed back with the production company. There was no indication how long those discussions might take.

McLaughlin, a former leader of the federal New Democratic Party, said she has no problem with the way the police did their job in arresting the woman.

However, she questions the value of doing that while the cameras are rolling.

The woman was clearly distraught, angry and yelling.

"How can she possibly give permission for them to be filming her?” asked McLaughlin, who was the Yukon's MP from 1987 to 1997.

Both the RCMP and the production company, True Entertainment, have said publicly if a person does not sign a waiver after he or she is filmed, the footage will never be aired.

McLaughlin said she received different information from two of the production staff at the scene.

One told her the woman's face would be blurred before airing if the waiver was not signed.

A second said the footage would not be aired.

In an interview this morning, the Yukon RCMP's David Gilbert reiterated that if a waiver is not signed, the footage will not be telecast in any capacity.

He could not confirm whether the woman in question signed the waiver.

Gilbert said the police are aware of the concerns surrounding the show.

He said there are discussions planned for today with show producers to "very carefully look at what's going on.”

McLaughlin said she was not the only onlooker disturbed by what she saw.

Neighbours who came out to see what was going on were also bothered by it, she said.

"Not one person said, ‘Oh, isn't that interesting?'”

McLaughlin said she considers what happen "an intrusion of privacy.”

She also questions the amount of resources used for one arrested.

"It took two police cars (one carrying the second producer) to arrest the woman,” she said, wondering whether the officers' time could have been put to better use.

"I realize police have a tough job, and now this is making it tougher.”

McLaughlin said she was so affected by what she saw that she arrived home shaking.

"I don't think it is our role to try people on television. We have a justice system for that.”

After she went to the media with her concerns, McLaughlin said she received a phone call from Yukon RCMP Chief Supt. Peter Clark.

He told her he appreciated that feedback, and that Wednesday's incident wasn't supposed to be what the show was about, she said.

McLaughlin isn't the first person to raise concerns about the show.

Community groups have also spoken publicly with concerns about how complex situations will be displayed on television.

Comments (12)

Up 0 Down 0

Groucho d'North on Aug 17, 2013 at 2:30 am

It's a sad commentary about our community when nobody has the courage to talk about these long-time problems. How can anybody expect any positive change to these situations when every time the subject is brought up the social crusaders start accusing racism, gender bias and bigotry?

Let's all continue to look the other way and pretend these situations don't exit. There is lots of talk about why these problems exist, but very little on how as a community they can be solved. Pushing these taboo subjects back into the shadows is not a solution. If you live here, you know the issues because you see them everyday….IF you choose to see them.

It has become part of the city landscape. I believe progress could be made if we only had the courage to talk about these situations honestly and stop playing the blame game or hiding it away and pretending nothing is wrong.

Up 0 Down 0

Joel on Aug 16, 2013 at 12:00 pm

Too bad. I tend to be entertained by these people stumbling around town all the time. Wish everyone could see what they look like.

Maybe if everyone could see it, these people would think twice about their lives and what they do...but probably not.

Up 0 Down 0

as if on Aug 16, 2013 at 7:22 am

Reality tv does not belong in our tax-funded organizations or departments. What if it was your mother, father, grandparent, child or sibling being degraded for entertainment? Take a hike True Entertainment !!! Shame on the RCMP, havent your organization have enough crap to clean up from within?

Up 0 Down 0

CJ on Aug 16, 2013 at 4:55 am

Audrey rocks. I honestly can't remember the last time a politician, former or otherwise, stuck their neck out in such a visceral, passionate way for the principles of justice -- not soup-kitchen, food bank justice but the fundamental principles of dignity and fairness for everyone in the justice system from the first moment they're involved in it.

That we need them to is evident in the level of ignorance in some of the comments, the ones that run along the lines of "if the police were there, they must have been doing something wrong and if they're doing something wrong, anything goes."

Someone said seeing it in action was much different than hearing it described by the RCMP. That raises the issue of the timing of when the RCMP told the public about the initiative -- I think a day or two before they put it into effect.

Governments and other officials are putting this tactic into practice way too often -- the principle of, it's easier to apologize later than ask for permission. It's about time people stopped accusing each other of "whining" and took more seriously our responsibility to engage in these discussions in a critical, thoughtful way.

I'm thinking in less abstract terms, too. I can see the stress of dealing with police for even a minor traffic violation escalating into more serious territory when the alleged "offender" realizes a camera crew is nearby. The RCMP has really overstepped and over-estimated their ability to multi-task.

Bad idea, really bad idea. It was very lucky the first incident was witnessed by Audrey McLaughlin. I don't think I would have had the guts to do what she did. Thank you, Audrey.

Up 0 Down 0

Sam Gee on Aug 16, 2013 at 4:37 am

"McLaughlin said she was so affected by what she saw that she arrived home shaking." Yes that is the real world, I am always surprised how people can be so disconnected from the reality...especially when it comes from politician.

Up 0 Down 0

piper on Aug 16, 2013 at 1:30 am

The only ones who would be upset would be the law breakers, they don't want people to know who they are. Solution - don't be a criminal & you won't get exposed. Actually all criminals should get loads of exposure by the media - might reduce crime. I say on with the show.

Up 0 Down 0

B. Foster on Aug 15, 2013 at 11:24 pm

Now outside.

Yeah....other people's lives being picked at and made a spectacle of for shallow entertainment.

Actually shallow doesn't really cover it....kinda surprised the RCMP would even consider this stuff. It's certainly below what they have historically represented.

Lets keep this kind of springer-esque trash south of the border.

Up 0 Down 0

john on Aug 15, 2013 at 3:41 pm

Really. Is anyone asking why the police were there in the first place? Was the helpless drunk lady causing problems or how many calls to the police were caused by her? Or how often she had fought with police. Maybe if our officers had 2 per car there would be no need for two cars. And saying they have nothing better to do... Come on if they didn't show they'd be blamed for that. The simple fact is these drunks cause the majority of the calls our officers have to deal with and the courts keep them on the streets. How about we see what the show produces before we judge it??? Book and cover. No wonder she is a Former and not a current leader. GFY NDP. Keep up the good work RCMP.

Up 0 Down 0

north_of_60 on Aug 15, 2013 at 3:02 pm

This show is a bad idea for the RCMP.

When it's realistic, it only reinforces people's preconceived notions and stereotypes of aboriginals. What the police see is a very biased view of life in the North.

People with dull meaningless lives can get their vicarious entertainment from American cop TV.

Up 0 Down 0

Mark Radke on Aug 15, 2013 at 11:31 am

@now outside.

You're right. It's life. It's messy and it's hard and it's real. It also isn't, and shouldn't be, entertainment. I have lots of respect for the RCMP but this was a poor decision - reality t.v. debases us all and they should have no part in it.

Up 0 Down 0

Sam Minister on Aug 15, 2013 at 7:59 am

This was not a great idea because it in some way victimizes many people caught in poor lifestyles that are associated with alcohol and drugs, petty crime and an abundance of violence.

On the other hand it provides an accurate view of what police officers are dealing with and the types of situations which are commonplace in Whitehorse. The more negative aspects some people's lives may result in sympathy and programs which provide more assistance.

We often see the altercation and walk away and leave it to the police. Maybe its time to do more and this program may have helped.

Up 0 Down 0

now outside on Aug 15, 2013 at 7:16 am

Oh for gawds sake. Get over it, please. It's life.

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.