Whitehorse Daily Star

‘I wallow in the shame of my actions'

A Whitehorse man convicted of two violent rapes has been sentenced to 12 years in prison.

By Justine Davidson on May 31, 2010

A Whitehorse man convicted of two violent rapes has been sentenced to 12 years in prison.

Douglas Hockley pleaded guilty to one of the attacks last year and was found guilty after trial for one he committed a month before his arrest.

He has been in jail for almost three years while his case has moved through the courts.

On the night of Oct. 30, 2007, Hockley broke into a home near his parents' Ibex Valley house by smashing a window.

The home's lone female resident awoke to the sound and turned on her bedroom light.

When Hockley entered the room, she saw he was wearing bright yellow rubber gloves and a mask which covered his entire face and made him look "Halloweenish”.

Had he not been wearing the mask, the woman would have recognized her 23-year-old attacker – he had known her when he was a teenager, although not well.

From the small amount of skin she could see within the eye holes, she was able to tell the RCMP that her attacker was caucasian.

Hockley flicked off the light and pinned the woman down by her throat.

He proceeded to rape her several times, forcing her body into positions that have left her with back and neck injuries which remain to this day.

At one point, her told her, "If you bite me, I will kill you. I mean it – I will kill you.”

The woman later told police she did not fight her attacker because she was sure he would carry through on his threat.

Hockley left the house on foot and the woman immediately called police.

Officers arrived and put the canine team on the rapist's trail. The sniffer dog led investigators to Hockley's house. There, police found an abundance of evidence, including the mask and clothing which bore traces of the woman's DNA.

Hockley was arrested.

In the days following, he was charged with another rape, this time of a woman who was attacked while walking through a Riverdale greenbelt a month previous to the Ibex Valley rape.

He pleaded not guilty, and at trial claimed the woman had traded sex for crack. He also admitted to being a drug dealer and addict.

For her part, the woman said Hockley stopped her on the trail and started up a conversation. When she turned to walk away, he pushed her down and violently raped her.

Supreme Court Justice Ron Veale found Hockley guilty in October 2009. He has remained in jail since, awaiting sentencing.

Hockley's lawyer and Crown prosecutor John Phelps came to an agreement on sentencing, and on Friday afternoon appeared before Veale with a joint submission.

They advised Veale to give Hockley four years for the Riverdale rape and eight years for the home invasion rape.

They also recommended he be labelled a long-time offender. That means he will be supervised for up to 10 years after his release.

Phelps noted that a 10-year term is the maximum, and that Hockley may be allowed out on parole before his sentence is up.

"That's up to him and how he performs in the federal penitentiary system,” he said.

So far, Hockley has not performed well in the territorial jail system.

A letter from a corrections official noted the 25-year-old man has more than 200 negative report notes on his file.

He has been found guilty of 43 internal offences at the jail, including assaults against corrections officers and inmates and running contraband.

In his first year and a half he spent behind bars, Hockley would throw tantrums and was a regular guest in the segregation cells.

"Mr. Hockley has been one of the most difficult inmates at Whitehorse Correctional Centre in recent memory,” the official wrote.

Hockley himself spoke to the court Friday, and admitted he has behaved badly in jail.

He apologized to the Ibex Valley woman, though notably not the Riverdale victim, and said he prayed for her every day.

"I wallow in the shame of my actions,” he said.

"... I need you to know this person is not me; it once was, but it is not anymore.”

He promised to "wholeheartedly embrace” anger management and drug rehabilitation programming while in prison.

Veale accepted the joint submission on sentencing, although he seemed dissatisfied with both lawyers' explanations of why Hockley should be given extra credit for his time served.

It would be highly irregular, however, for a judge to go against both sides' recommendations, so he ultimately gave Hockley 1.5 times credit for his time served, leaving him with a sentence of approximately 7 1/2 years.

Comments (7)

Up 0 Down 0

bobby bitman on Jun 2, 2010 at 10:00 am

Well said Patty.

Good riddance Hockley. You should be happy you are safe in jail. It amazes me the restraint people show in not taking matters into their own hands when individuals like this, what can one call him? this freak, get such lenient sentences. He should be permanently removed from society. There is something completely disengaged in his head and it would be best for all if he were just GONE. Put him on an ice-floe, I don't care but it would be murder to let him loose on the streets again.

Condolences to BOTH families.

Up 0 Down 0

Anonymous on Jun 1, 2010 at 10:35 pm

Sorry this and sorry that, Doug Hockley you deserve a much longer sentence for the pain and terror you caused those women! I hope you get to learn how they felt during your stay in prison.

Up 0 Down 0

Patty O on Jun 1, 2010 at 8:58 pm

As the Judge said in his sentencing report, he was loathe to give 1.5 for time served but that is what the defence and the prosecution had agreed upon. Judges cannot (or should not) set themselves in an adversarial position with both sides. The problem lies in the fact that these criminals have access to legal aid for their defence and endless avenues for appeals. The prosecution must bend in order to prevent appeals which drain the system of resources.

Imagine the frustration of the police who gather evidence, conduct the investigation, place it all in the hands of the Crown prosecutors and then watch these guys get endless extensions and judicial delays and then, finally, a slap on the wrist.

This guy gets ten years for two very violent offences and endless violent incidents while in jail (some remorse, eh?). Good thing he wasn't selling pot seeds or they would have thrown the book at him.

It is aptly called the criminal justice system as all the justice is for the benefit of the criminals. Sad.

Up 0 Down 0

DG on Jun 1, 2010 at 3:58 pm

These morons should never receive credit for time spent in jail, They won't learn if you hand it to them on a silver platter.

Up 0 Down 0

Don McKenzie on Jun 1, 2010 at 3:54 pm

Actually, I think this judge did about the best he/she could do. Even though federal legislation recently banned 2 for 1 time credits, this sicko, may have still been eligble for it. Unfortunately, judges are not allowed to put rapists into a room with 50 angry fathers, but instead must follow some rules. It is up to us, the citizens, to express our views to our Members of Parliment, to increase the sentences for these perverts.

Up 1 Down 0

damien lankow on Jun 1, 2010 at 11:18 am

i use to know doug when we were younger, he was a bit wild but i never seen this coming. i feel sorry for his brother, step mom and father who are all very good people.

Up 0 Down 0

JC on May 31, 2010 at 9:02 am

Notice how these monsters play the game of sorry and repentance when they stand before the Judge. And notice the Judges always buy it. Why give this bubble head any credit for time served? His lawyer purposely tied the case up for three years in order to get credit for time served. The justice system of this country is indeed sick. Or to be more precise, insane. The judge should join this perp in wallowing in the shame of his actions. There is absolutely no excuse for a judge not to do a complete job. Its time to elect Judges. Then when they are lax in their jobs, they can be tossed back into the EI lines.

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.