Whitehorse Daily Star

Image title

Photo by Whitehorse Star

Shelley Cuthbert

Humane society's turmoil headed for court

The acting president of the Humane Society Yukon (HSY) says the board is doing all it can to answer questions about its finances, but still plans to fight other government orders in Yukon Supreme Court.

By Ashley Joannou on September 14, 2012

The acting president of the Humane Society Yukon (HSY) says the board is doing all it can to answer questions about its finances, but still plans to fight other government orders in Yukon Supreme Court.

The board of directors of HSY had until today to provide the government with an explanation for why records are missing and no financial statements have been completed for the most recent fiscal year.

The territory's registrar of societies said in a report earlier this month that it is "extremely troubling” that the society does not have its finances in order.

"The society is responsible for maintaining proper financial records,” Fred Pretorius wrote in a report released earlier this month.

"Its failure to do so is extremely troubling, as is its delay in preparing financial statements for the last fiscal year.”

The 19-page report follows a four-month investigation into operations of the 14-year-old Mae Bachur Animal Shelter.

The registrar's orders include reinstating members who have been banned from the shelter.

Pretorius calls the rationale for excluding these members "preposterous.”

He also calls for an election of a new board.

The animal shelter is operated by board members of a non-profit society and is regulated by the Yukon Societies Act.

According to the act, the society must present financial statements for the last fiscal year at each annual general meeting.

If the AGM is more than four months after the last fiscal year (as it will be in this case), statements for the additional months must be provided.

"The HSY's last fiscal year ended on March 31, 2012 over five months ago,” the report says.

"It is currently planning to hold its next AGM on November 23, 2012, exactly 15 months after the last AGM — the last possible date permitted under (the regulations).

"Financial statements for the last fiscal year have apparently not yet been completed even in draft form, as a result of missing records.

"It is not clear when such statements will be prepared, and requests from my office to the board treasurer for an update on this effort have gone unanswered.”

Pretorius ordered "the HSY to report to (him) by Sept. 14 providing the name of the accountant preparing its financial statements, explaining why it has not yet prepared financial statements for 2011-2012, setting out what financial records are missing and identifying a date by when it will have draft financial statements for 2011-2012 completed.”

In a letter sent to the registrar today, board treasurer Gerald Thompson writes that when he was reappointed as the treasurer, he was given all the previous years' financial records for HSY but nothing current.

Delays in getting up to date information appears to be the latest in a long line of disputes between former and current board members.

"In trying to track down the current records, they were found to be in the possession of Madeleine Girard.  It was requested from her to return all documentation but she refused,” the letter says.

Girard has been a critic of the board and current acting president Shelley Cuthbert.

She is one of a group of former members who have been banned from the shelter.

"A director at the time had to get the RCMP to contact her and have them delivered to her at a neutral location,” Thompson's letter continues.

"I finally received them in late June and found that nothing had been done with them since December of 2011.

"Being as there are only so many hours in a day and this being a volunteer position, I was not able to get at them until mid-July, and finally got them completed in late August. 

"As soon as I receive any information regarding the reports, I will be happy to supply you with the information.”

Thompson also claims Girard has in her possession the treasurer's binder which has all the guidelines and budgets that she did not and will not return.

The copy of the letter, sent to the Star, notes that it has been "slightly edited due to confidentiality.”

In an interview today, Girard said involving the RCMP to obtain the documents was unnecessary, and that she currently has "absolutely nothing” in her possession regarding the shelter's finances.

Pretorius' report also highlights "further cause for concern” noting that minutes from an August 9 board meeting mention advice received from accountants that the society would "risk losing its charitable status if an audit were conducted at this time.”

But the registrar's concerns go beyond the society's bookkeeping.

Pretorius has ordered the board to reinstate members who have been banned from the shelter and applicants who have been denied membership.

The board has claimed the members were banned for disruptive and vexatious behaviour, something Girard denies.

In his report, Pretorius says "most of the rejections appear to be based merely on public criticism of the HSY board.

"Indeed, some of the applicants were rejected because of their public objection to a particular fund-raising event on the grounds that the HSY event was cruel and uncaring towards animals, and thus contrary to the HSY mission.

"The board's characterization of such criticism as contrary to the HSY mission of fostering ‘a caring and compassionate atmosphere' is preposterous.”

The order to reinstate members is one the board will be questioning when it files its case in Yukon Supreme Court requesting a judicial review, Cuthbert said today.

"We need to understand where he is coming from,” she said. "We went by legal precedent.”

Other orders, such as the one requiring a special meeting to elect a new board of directors be held no later than Oct. 5 are also on hold pending the court case, Cuthbert said.

As for how any legal fees will be paid, the president says community members have been donating to the shelter specifically to cover legal costs.

The board has sent a letter to Pretorius informing him of their intent to seek a judicial review, Cuthbert said.

"I think it is sad that it has gone this far; I think people are forgetting exactly what the purpose of the organization is – the animals,” she said.

See letter

Comments (10)

Up 0 Down 0

Bugs on Sep 23, 2012 at 3:26 pm

To Bill C. This article has nothing to do with HSY's recent fundraiser. This has all been caused by a personal gripe of a former board member with a conflict of interest. Shelley may not be perfect, but she has hung in against all the negative comments. Not everyone agrees with all that has been done, but under her leadership HSY has accomplished many positive tasks and she should be given credit for that. I hope all of you that are clamouring for an AGM are prepared to show up and possibly run for a position on what is probably the toughest board in town. The biggest problem with HSY AGMs is apathy on the part of the members and community who choose to leave the horrendous task of running HSY to a chosen few, with help from dedicated volunteers. No constructive help is offered by the critics, just negative comments.

Up 0 Down 0

Bill Campbell on Sep 22, 2012 at 11:20 pm

The present board of the HSY needs to get off it's high horse and think about what their mission is. Instead, in the face of public outrage, they continue to pay for a person who's methods are questionable at best to come to Whitehorse to headline their fundraisers. Then they have the nerve to ban people who don't like it from the property of the Mae Bachur shelter. Pretty arrogant to now think they have a case for not accounting for where they spent the TAX DOLLARS they got from the Government. It is about time they were taken to task.

Up 0 Down 0

susan on Sep 20, 2012 at 12:38 pm

The poor dogs and cats will pay the price for this. I wish I could adopt them all.

Up 0 Down 0

Don't forget on Sep 18, 2012 at 6:15 am

Let's not forget how much money this organization gets from YG as core funding. The Registrar of Societies should absolutely be intervening, and the funding should stop until a full audit of the HSY occurs.

This whole situation is ridiculous - but it isn't only member or community donations funding this farce of an organization - it's all of us.

Up 0 Down 0

yukonlinda on Sep 17, 2012 at 8:56 am

Max, it sounds to me like the registrar is intervening because they have not produced financial reports, and that definitely goes against the societies act. They are required by the act to file once a year, and that has not been done.

Up 0 Down 0

Max Mack on Sep 17, 2012 at 3:21 am

Whether you agree with the Humane Society or not, it is troubling that the registrar has decided to intervene on behalf of former members who have been actively engaged in a campaign to undermine the society -- including one former member who has refused to return financial and other documents.

I see no authority in the Societies Act for this aspect of the registrar's ruling.

The registrar's decision may very well exceed lawful jurisdiction and I question the political reasons for doing so.

Up 0 Down 0

Adele Sandrock on Sep 15, 2012 at 6:44 am

In all this turmoil - where is Animal Activist Mike Grieco with

his opinion? He is so unusually quiet - isn't he?

Up 0 Down 0

Bren Axon on Sep 15, 2012 at 2:08 am

Having had past and present involvement on five Boards in non profit organizations, including two Humane Societies, I find this whole affair rather worrying.

As far as I can tell from all the reports I have read about this matter (and there have been many) the fact that HSY wants to challenge the Registrar's ruling is somewhat suspicious and, to use legal parlance, vexatious. Every charity that relies on donations to continue it's work has a responsibility to account to the public for the money they have received. This means producing financial reports at each AGM as well as holding AGMs in a timely fashion. That the Society's accountant warned them that they may lose charitable status was a huge red flag to me and should be to those who have supported this Society.

In my opinion, the Society is being run by people who are not transparent in their dealings and wish to silence dissenters who disagree with them.

I believe that those people who are allegedly donating money to fund a legal challenge should think very carefully before doing so. The money they are donating to fund a legal action could be better used to help the animals at the shelter.

It seems to me the Society would benefit from a complete change of Directors and managers, starting again with a clean slate with Directors who are more interested in the core values of animal welfare and the work of the shelter, than with power struggles and empire building.

Stories that are appearing in the press at present will only serve to alienate the public and volunteers on whom the any charitable organization relies upon to help continue it's work.

Up 0 Down 0

A concerned observer on Sep 14, 2012 at 11:12 pm

You cannot simply hide behind the statement that something is "for the animals" or people are "losing sight of the animals" when you make poor financial decisions (such as repeating an event with a controversial trainer that lost money the first time), decisions to ban all criticism against you (even when it is people trying to speak out for the humane treatment of the animals), and are not engaged in the business of keeping proper record keeping (wonder if this is related to how much money was actually lost on the recent fundraisers?).

There are lots of Humane Societies, worldwide, that manage to abide by regulations, keep their books in order, respond to criticism in manners other than censorship and banishment, and still care a great deal about the animals. Caring about the animals and running a proper charity should not be mutually exclusive. They are intertwined at their very core.

If this board truly cared about the animals it would spend money on the animals and allow the Investigators report to stand. A good board, or any good elected official, should be able to stand in a democratic election process of the voting public (in this case the membership), on their track record. If the membership supports the board, they will be re-elected.

According to the investigator who adjudicated this matter, the YHS' lawyer misapplied the legal precedent they seek to hide behind. Fighting this out on the basis that the adjudicator got the law wrong is nothing more than fighting on principle to the detriment of the shelter animals, who would probably appreciate the money being spent on things like food, training alternatives that do not involve use of physical force on them, and parvo testing and treatment to help with the current parvo outbreak at Mae Bachur.

Taking the matter back to Court to fight an election shows only that this Board is afraid it truly has lost the confidence of the membership, and with actions like those quoted in the report, who can blame the membership?

Up 0 Down 0

Maureen Nowosad on Sep 14, 2012 at 8:10 am

I support the Mae Bachur Animal shelter for the animals.

Cuthbert and Girard need to stop this pathetic fight and ego rampage and allow the election of the new board of directors to go ahead on Oct 5.

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.