
Photo by Whitehorse Star
Minister Glenn Hart, Vicki Durrant
Photo by Whitehorse Star
Minister Glenn Hart, Vicki Durrant
The Yukon government has all but shut the door on lending financial support to a proposed emergency youth shelter in Whitehorse.
The Yukon government has all but shut the door on lending financial support to a proposed emergency youth shelter in Whitehorse.
On Wednesday, Health and Social Services Minister Glenn Hart sent a letter to Vicki Durrant, director of the Youth of Today Society (YOTS), the group behind the shelter dubbed Angels' Nest, informing Durrant that, "the Yukon government cannot justify investing in your proposal."
The society is ready to purchase the Hide on Jeckell guest house but needed a three-year, $1.4-million commitment from the Yukon government to secure a $375,000-grant from the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corp. to close the deal.
As well as providing a safe place to sleep for up to 18 youth aged 18-24, the Angels' Nest proposed to provide addictions and life skills counselling and assistance finding long-term housing.
Hart's letter appears to be the minister's final word on the matter, as he has since refused all interview requests, including one from the Star.
"That was the reason he made his response public," said Matthew Grant, of the cabinet communications staff.
With a rally for the shelter planned for 4 p.m. today in front of the Yukon government administration building, Durrant is holding little hope it will change the minds of decision-makers.
"I just want the government to know there are people out there who do support this," said Durrant.
The current letter writing back-and-forth began on Aug. 27, with a communication from deputy Health minister Stuart Whitley about the YOTS proposal, which Hart's Wednesday letter briefly reiterates.
Last Thursday afternoon, a group of female protesters entered the government building in an attempt to change Hart's mind about the shelter.
After building security was called to evict the protesters, which included a 70-year-old aboriginal elder, the visitors agreed to leave if their letter could be delivered to Hart, who was in Quebec City at the time.
Hart's response to that missive said the YOTS proposal lacks a "needs analysis", detailed budget and "reasons why (the) proposal is considerably more expensive than existing shelter options."
But Durrant, who co-founded YOTS in 1999 and under its auspices operates the Blue Feather youth drop-in centre, said the "needs analysis" came in the form of $191,000 the government provided the Skookum Jim Friendship Centre outreach project early this year.
"That's what the pilot project's purpose was, and 30 people have used the service this year," Durrant added of the program that finds emergency shelter and counselling for youth at several locations around Whitehorse, but does not have a permanent facility.
Hart's suggestion that she direct "youth at risk to many programs currently in place to address their needs, including Skookum Jim's ... Many Rivers Youth Outreach Workers ... Bringing Youth Towards Equality, the Boys' and Girls' Club, as well as the Journey Far Carving Program," is confusing, said Durrant.
"None of these programs are providing what we are proposing to provide," she said. "A carving program is great but it's not really doing anything for a girl who's having sex for a place to sleep each night."
Durrant, who ran unsuccessfully three times for the Yukon Party in territorial elections, is now questioning the work she did for the party, including helping to craft its social policy.
"I guess that was a big waste of time," she said.
In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.
Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.
Comments (15)
Up 0 Down 1
Yeah Right on Sep 18, 2008 at 12:55 pm
For the very first time EVER, I believe the Gov has made the correct decision.(did everyone else feel the earth move when I typed that?)
The YOTS may not be the right group to deliver this service. While they are very passionate about the need for this service, I have not seen any evidence that they have the skills and expertise to deliver a program or service that will fully address this long existing problem. Perhaps if they (YOTS) were to fully disclose their plans to deliver this service and who they planned to hire and what skill sets they bring to the positions, I might change my opinion.
Up 0 Down 0
waja on Sep 17, 2008 at 12:00 pm
........or people could just do a better job at raising their kids.
Up 0 Down 0
Been There on Sep 17, 2008 at 9:59 am
I think that there is no question that a youth shelter is badly needed in Whitehorse.
I know what it is like to be homeless as a youth, and I thank places like Covenent House youth shelter (and others) for offering me shelter, food, clothes,saftey and most importantly, dignity. I wonder if Covenent House has been contacted to gauge their support for this. I see that they have 3 different shelters in Alaska. They run a great program for youth 13-20, and require you to either be at school, looking for work or working full time. You are expected to abide by the curfews, and to be engaged in the program, as it is your program. If you can not abide by these requests, well then you are welcome to come back and try again. The choice is entirely up to the youth.
As for the gripe thinking $75000.00 (before taxes I might add) for the Director is too much, well the next time you have to deal with 10-15 teenagers, going through puberty, with no support, surly and who have some pretty dysfunctional BS in their past to deal with daily, ask your self...is this too high of a price to pay to help these young people become self sufficient, contributing adults? Thank you Vicki for always trying, please don't stop.
Up 0 Down 0
collinette on Sep 17, 2008 at 6:48 am
Fentie is again showing that he cares nothing for the young adults in the territory.
As I work with many youth that are not on SA and have no way been able to gain employment as they have no address...all is a catch 22.
He (Fentie) can squander million on a lost paper deal without a thought but will do nothing to help these people gain skills and support to become productive members of society. Remember Fentie at the polls on voting days...The people you are poo pooing on will not be voting for you. Fentie seems to only interested in his buds and the good old boys club. I guess money talks and the rest of us are out on the street.
These young adults are not asking for a hand out but a hand up...These people do not have healthy parents and need support to become healthy...They are trying to break the cycle.
Up 0 Down 0
JG on Sep 17, 2008 at 6:07 am
YN's comments above are ignorant and uninformed. BYTE does not (to my knowledge) provide services to homeless youth - it is a youth advocacy and empowerment group campaigning and providing a voice for youth in projects like this one. The shelter has a different mandate and should pull from different funding sources.
As for the shelter ...
I have heard that the biggest line item in the budget provided (apart from the cost of the house) was the Executive Director's salary. Sounds like someone is trying to create themselves a job. Instead of protesting when the report provided was deemed insufficient perhaps they should have tried to arrange a meeting to find the best and quickest solution to satisfy the Government requirements. If I recall correctly Vicki Durrant tried this a few years back - trying to get the Government to pony up money so that Blue Feather could buy The Roadhouse to function as a youth shelter. Perhaps there is some legacy issues here that are affecting the Government getting behind Vicki's agenda.
There are several services available to homeless youth in Whitehorse. For the past year the Government has been providing funding for Skookum Jim Centre to address this problem - is there a deficiency with that program?
The focus needs to be on empowering homeless youth to take care of themselves. The Government doesn't want to be seen as funding a flop house - and there is the possibility that in some cases Angel's Nest may function in that capacity.
I can't imagine that the Government wouldn't support a youth shelter ... I believe when they say that the report was insufficient - obviously something was not complete there. Protesters should spend more time working on revising that report. If this is a documented need in our community then we should all try and make it happen.
Up 0 Down 1
YN on Sep 16, 2008 at 6:30 am
It seems to me that the people who are making the most noise about this are the people who stand to make the most off of it. $75,000 a year to run a shelter? That seem a little much to me. We have to remember that groups like BYTE make their living off of these kinds of projects, so of course they are going to wine and cry when they don't get their way. It means less money for them! What really needs to happen is the First Nations groups to which most of these people belong to need to pony up and take care of their own people instead of sending peole to gamble at the River Rock Casino in Van because it's a part of their culture!
Up 0 Down 1
Francias Pillman on Sep 15, 2008 at 12:01 pm
Wheres the talk about the parents?
Everyone is outraged at the goverments decsion not to fund a youth shelter.
MOVE ON.
This is a social problem, trying to be pawned on the goverment.
And stop looking for the easy route, because a youth shelter will solve nothing but make everyone feel warm and fuzzy for a day, then forgotten next week.
Grow up and be parents to your kids, the rest will follow.
Up 0 Down 0
Bobby Bitman on Sep 15, 2008 at 9:39 am
What gets me is they can find multi-millions to upgrade a highway for mining, likewise providing an electrical line primarily for mining.
All the same, a detailed budget and explanation for why the costs are higher than alternatives seems more than reasonable. And what was the $191,000 to Skookum for? A pilot project used by 30 people? Is that 30 visits or 30 people for a year, a month or what? If it is simply 30 visits, that's $6200 a night per bed.
18 beds at $475,000 per year = about $26,000 per year to give 18 youth full time digs including 'counselling' (don't know what the qualifications are of the staff).
That's a lot of money for a bed.
Also, the emotional rhetoric is getting high on this one as well: "Girls are having sex for a place to sleep if you do not give us the money."
Well, I'd rather see money go to kids than mining companies but this project looks half baked to me.
Up 1 Down 0
mark k on Sep 13, 2008 at 12:51 pm
I for one agree with YTG. Yes they have a large surplus, but there are other avenues open for these teens to get help. One lil shelter is not going to fix the problem. Lets put the money to use, such as keeping drug dealers out of the yukon. Fentie your slacking a bit, pull up your socks and get back to work.
Up 0 Down 0
Thomas Brewer on Sep 12, 2008 at 10:55 am
"Youth Shelter" and "Teens" are terms that keep getting tossed around when this issue is discussed.
The target age group for this facility is 18 to 25 year olds. Guess what people... they are ADULTS and eligible for Social Assistance to fund their own housing and food supplies (still on the public's teat).
Up 1 Down 0
Denise Simmons on Sep 12, 2008 at 8:00 am
I would just like to comment that as a human being, we need our basic needs met first... that is food, shelter, clothing and to feel safe. After these basic needs are met, then we can begin to address other issues. If I am hungry... I will want food, before I will want carving programs. If I don't have a home, I will want this before I would even look at any addictions in my life... basic needs have to be met for any individual even before any other program can really be effective in anyone's life. The youth shelter is very important to the Yukon, there are always many youth falling between the cracks. Their basic needs have to be met, before any programs will be effective for them... I hope the Yukon Government would really look at this issue, because if a child doesn't have a place to live.. should they be getting into the crowds who will welcome them in, and get them into drugs, etc. The Government Officials that are elected in, they and their families have their basic needs met. They feel safe in their homes, they have their discressionary money to go out and enjoy life, but the kids that the Vicky Durrant is trying to help, these kids don't have this luxery. The government officials who are making these decisions, should try living in these kid's shoes for a week, a month, etc. maybe their opion will change when they realize the lifestyle that these kids are forced to live in?
Up 0 Down 0
Confused on Sep 12, 2008 at 7:21 am
I'm confused... why put forth so much time & effort to protesting YTG's decision, and complaining about it, instead of delivering what they originally asked for? A detailed budget?????
Up 0 Down 0
Francias Pillman on Sep 11, 2008 at 5:09 pm
How about people hold rallys about oil prices.
100$ a barrel, same price at pumps as when it was $150
Sorry to say but this goverment has other prioritys, and it ain't its own people.
Up 0 Down 0
Brian S on Sep 11, 2008 at 11:19 am
This government should be ashamed of themselves. I hope they eat well at night, sleep cozy in their beds with a roof over their head not worrying day to day about where they're going to sleep each night. This government has more than overstayed it's welcome. It's time to bring in a new government with fresh ideas and who are actually concerned with it's citizens, not the government's own wallets instead. I am ashamed to have this government represent the Yukon and I hope come election time voters will remember who made these stupid decisions in the government.
Up 1 Down 0
Doug Rutherford on Sep 11, 2008 at 9:52 am
Let me get this straight. The territorial government had a $334 million surplus at the end of the last fiscal year and cannot find $1.4 million for a critically needed youth shelter. I must have missed something here...