Whitehorse Daily Star

Haeckel Hill wind farm gains clearance

The Yukon government and Navigation Canada have approved the proposal for a privately owned commercial wind farm on Haeckel Hill.

By Chuck Tobin on August 4, 2017

The Yukon government and Navigation Canada have approved the proposal for a privately owned commercial wind farm on Haeckel Hill.

Northern Energy Capital of Whitehorse is proposing a $14-million investment to put up three wind turbines capable of generating enough energy to supply 525 homes, with the possibility of a fourth turbine down the road.

“Construction will occur during the spring, summer and fall, with operations beginning in the fall of 2018 or 2019,” says the decision document.

The Yukon Environmental and Socio-economic Assessment Board recommended approval of the project in late June following a review of the proposal.

The decision document was issued this week.

Northern Energy president Malek Tawashy said Thursday from Vancouver all the company really needs now is a power purchase agreement with the territorial government.

It has an arrangement with Yukon Energy to sublease the site, he explained.

He said the company has applied for a small chunk of additional land to tack onto the existing lease, and has a letter from the City of Whitehorse supporting the application.

Tawashy said staff have completed a grid-impact assessment with ATCO Electric Yukon.

On Wednesday, the company learned from ATCO that as the result of a preliminary assessment, it looks like Northern Energy will be able to use the existing transmission line that runs from Haeckel Hill down to ATCO’s Fish Lake hydro infrastructure, he pointed out.

He said they’ve already submitted their application for the road improvement project required to transport the wind turbines up the hill.

The company also has more than one First Nation development corporation interested in becoming a partner, including the development corporation owned by the Kwanlin Dun First Nation, he said.

Tawashy said all they really need now is a power purchase agreement, but the window is quickly closing on the project becoming operational next year.

There is the lead time to order the turbines from Europe, have them built and delivered, he pointed out.

The Northern Energy president said if the turbines aren’t spinning next year, most certainly they will be in 2019.

Two primary concerns raised during the assessment board’s review focused on the potential impact on birds and bats and how the new turbines would affect the site as a popular launch and landing area for paragliders and hang gliders.

Based on evidence submitted, the assessment board found there would be very little if any impact on birds and bats.

While the new wind farm would alter the use of the site by paragliders and hang gliders, it could still be used safely, the board found.

The hub of each new tower will be 69 metres off the ground.

The top of the rotating blades will reach another 30 metres above the hub, resulting in a total height of 99 metres (325 feet) from the ground to the top of the spinning blade.

Each of the new turbines will have a generating capacity of 900 kilowatts, for a total of 2.7 megawatts, with the possibility of expanding to 3.6 megawatts if the fourth turbine is installed.

By comparison, the total generating capacity of the six diesel generators in Watson Lake is 5.7 megawatts.

The original Bonus turbine installed by Yukon Energy in 1993 as a pilot project has a generating capacity of 150 kilowatts, and is 41.5 metres tall from the highest point of the spinning blades. It’s been out of operation for several years.

The second turbine, installed in 2000, is 60.8 metres tall, and has a generating capacity of 660 kilowatts.

As part of the arrangement to lease the site from Yukon Energy, Northern Energy has proposed to decommission the Bonus turbine and refurbish it for use in a small, off-grid community, Tawashy said.

The Northern Energy president said they are continuing to work with the Yukon First Nation development corporations on the investment opportunities, as a means of developing community support for the project.

Northern Energy has the finanical means to go it alone but would prefer involvement from the community, he said.

Northern Energy has been in discussions with the Yukon government’s energy branch regarding the power purchase agreement.

Shane Andre, the director of the energy branch, was out of the office today and unavailable for comment.

It was Andre, on behalf of the Yukon government, who signed off on the decision document approving the proposal.

Comments (12)

Up 0 Down 0

Werner Rhein on Aug 27, 2017 at 12:29 pm

Where do the climate change deniers and naysayers to progress dig up all people who vote on an article like this.
They must be all illiterate, otherwise they would know that wind turbines kill only very few birds. The glass windows on the high-rises of the fossil fuel industry kill way more birds.
Windturbines are profitable all over the world and cost much less per kW installed then fossil fuel technology to create electricity and never mind the nuclear time bombs.
When will you guys learn how too read and search the internet for real information. Not alternative information during the gladiator games commercials.

Up 1 Down 2

Mark Ackerman on Aug 10, 2017 at 9:58 pm

Oh nice! Another ornament on the skyline of the hill. Will we see this one turn?

Up 8 Down 19

woodcutter on Aug 8, 2017 at 3:31 pm

cool project.

Nice to see we are moving in the right direction. The future is already written in many parts of the world, but it appears that perhaps the sceptics chalk up the results as fake news?

Up 11 Down 30

Greg Smith on Aug 7, 2017 at 4:02 pm

Great idea. Finally a government with some vision.

Up 30 Down 5

Prescience Greenie on Aug 7, 2017 at 12:21 pm

Whitehorse already has clean green hydro power so these things should be installed in Yukon communities still dependent on diesel. Because that isn't happening this project is nothing more than expensive green optics but not all that green.

Hopefully Yukon birders are brought on board to monitor the songbird kill rate and shut the things down if it is too much.

Up 30 Down 11

north_of_60 on Aug 6, 2017 at 8:03 pm

Wind turbines are designed to harvest taxpayer subsidies not energy.
They're toxic not 'green':
They fail much sooner than expected:
...and a they're huge waste of money and resources everywhere they're tried.

However as long as no public money is spent on this boondoggle and the company posts a bond for dismantling the turbine and reclaiming the site when the experiment is done, then I don't object to how people waste their own money.

Up 33 Down 21

Kraker on Aug 4, 2017 at 10:04 pm

Windfarms are giant bird killers period. Not sure why we are doing this, it's all optics.

Up 47 Down 11

yukon56 on Aug 4, 2017 at 8:50 pm

Do the math even on a best case scenario how can this be profitable for an independent investor. This is nothing but a startup who will operate somewhat and want taxpayer money to promote "Green Energy". Nothing but a scam

Up 12 Down 21

Politico on Aug 4, 2017 at 7:19 pm

Blown_in_the_Brain Blade heaters are standard practice now. If you Google "how to prevent ice on turbine blades" there is a raft of articles on the subject. Google can be your friend.

Up 43 Down 11

yukon56 on Aug 4, 2017 at 5:39 pm

What a waste of time. How long till they cry for funding???

Up 37 Down 10

Max Mack on Aug 4, 2017 at 5:32 pm

A pre-determined outcome given recent YESAB's rulings. A so-called "green" project gets the inevitable go-ahead, notwithstanding the true environmental cost of wind vs the minimal benefits. What a sham.

What really peeves me is that Yukoners will see inordinate rate increases as a result of the ridiculously high rates paid to these independent power "producers".

Up 27 Down 7

Blowing_in_the_wind on Aug 4, 2017 at 4:05 pm

I trust the rotor design incorporates leading edge heating elements to mitigate riming effects that seriously impact performance and efficiency. Otherwise, back to the drawing board immediately.

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.