Whitehorse Daily Star

Image title

Photo by Whitehorse Star

Shaunagh Stikeman

Group welcomes axing of four-lane highway

The Yukon Liberal government will not be proceeding with a $200-million plan for improvements to the Whitehorse corridor of the Alaska Highway.

By Taylor Blewett on October 31, 2017

The Yukon Liberal government will not be proceeding with a $200-million plan for improvements to the Whitehorse corridor of the Alaska Highway.

The controversial plan, which involved the long-term four-laning of much of the artery, had been devised under the previous Yukon Party (YP) government.

“We did not feel, going through the (2016) election campaign, there was an awful lot of public support for this,” Highways and Public Works Minister Richard Mostyn told reporters after question period Monday.

“We’ve instructed the department not to proceed with it.”

There are concerns along the Alaska Highway that need to be addressed, Mostyn noted. The Liberal government is going back to the consultation phase to look at possible ways to do so, he added.

Under former premier Darrell Pasloski, the government hired consultants to produce a functional plan for an approximately 40-kilometre section of the Alaska Highway stretching from the Carcross Road to the Mayo Road turnoffs and passes through Whitehorse.

Address concerns

The plan, published early in 2015, was designed to address “current and anticipated concerns about safety and congestion,” according to a Department of Highways and Public Works website dedicated to the project.

The functional plan included widening the highway to four lanes along specific stretches, adding passing lanes, and improving access points, speed zones, and intersections.

Changes to better accommodate pedestrians and cyclists, and to improve the multi-use trail that runs alongside the corridor were also cited.

Short-, intermediate- and long-term improvements were intended to be completed over several decades, at a cost of $52 million, $50 million, and $100 million, respectively.

Several businesses feared they’d lose part of their frontage land to accommodate a much wider highway.

A public consultation period on the plan held in the spring of 2015 received more than 500 responses via survey and email.

Yukon Party MLA Scott Kent served as minister of Highways and Public Works under the previous government.

He told the Star this morning he isn’t particularly disappointed to hear the Liberal government has dropped the plan he helped engineer.

“Certainly, this is their prerogative, and it’s not entirely different from what we announced a couple of years ago,” he said.

Mostyn appears to be keeping as priorities many of the safety concerns the YP functional plan highlighted, Kent added.

Indeed, Mostyn told reporters that locations at Robert Service Way and the South and North Klondike Highways have been flagged as requiring timely attention to address safety hazards.

“There’s work that needs to be done in this corridor,” he said.

“We are going to look at fixing those intersections with an eye to safety, and to benefit the users of the highway in those areas.”

$5 million for improvements

The government has allocated $5 million for improvements to the South Klondike Highway intersection this year, and a similar amount for the North Klondike intersection next year.

“What’s happened is, the corridor has grown up without a lot of oversight, so you have people coming on to the highway in areas that are dangers,” Mostyn explained.

Other areas of concern include locations in Hillcrest and Valleyview, at Two Mile Hill and at the Mayo Road where a major tanker rollover occurred June 22.

Shaunagh Stikeman, the president of the Hillcrest Community Association, said in an interview this morning that the Liberals’ decision to abandon the previous government’s plan for the corridor is news the association welcomes.

Stikeman was a vocal opponent of the plan as the NDP candidate for Mountainview in the 2016 election. The riding includes the Hillcrest, Valleyview, Granger, and McIntyre neighbourhoods.

“We don’t want a mega-highway. We want a safe highway,” Stikeman said of the corridor plan to widen the highway to four lanes where it passes by these communities.

“The plan proposed more lanes, which would encourage faster speed and more vehicles on the highway. And what we’re asking for is fewer lanes, reducing speed, and increasing the number of safe highway crossings,” she said.

However, the association is heartened by the government’s willingness to identify problem areas along the highway.

It’s looking forward to participating in future consultations about highway imporvements, Stikeman said, which Mostyn also promised will occur.

“We feel, as a government, that we’re going to have to talk to users of the highway to see what they want. We want to build through consultation and discussion,” he said.

Making changes to the highway is particularly challenging in populated areas, he explained, and requires more extensive consultation with citizens, communities, and industry compared to work on more isolated sections of road.

He cited soon-to-be completed construction at the intersection of the South Klondike and Alaska highways near the Carcross Cutoff as one example of more easily expedited, remote roadwork.

That construction project also came up in the legislative assembly Monday.

NDP Leader Liz Hanson told the house that a lack of lighting and signage at the intersection is leading to dangerous driving situations.

Nearby residents and businesses were told that lighting would be up two weeks ago – and signage far before that, she said.

Mostyn responded to the questions by emphasizing that safety is the government’s motivation behind this construction, and that the work should be finished “very soon.”

“When that work is completed, the proper signage and lighting will be up,” he said.

Comments (31)

Up 0 Down 0

buzz on Nov 6, 2017 at 10:39 pm

HPW spends millions upgrading the airport to accommodate skyrocketing passenger volume, but does nothing to improve the access to the airport off the highway. Brilliant. A stoplight and a crosswalk are needed at Hillcrest Drive to ensure safety for pedestrians and cyclists from Copper Ridge, Granger, Logan, McIntyre and Hillcrest and to control traffic turning in/out of airport. Some of the uncontrolled highway accesses (car wash, hotels) need to be blocked off and a new service road added. Ask any decent traffic engineer. Just don't go looking for one at HPW. They're too busy addressing the 7th and 8th priorities (of 8!) in their own HIghway Corridor Plan: the useless and poorly designed passing lane near SIma and the overkill upgrade of the Carcross Corner.

Up 12 Down 4

Josey Wales on Nov 5, 2017 at 9:55 pm

Hey Dave....love it, great sarcasm wrote from the heart.
Please carry on, winter is here....many snowflakes to melt.

Up 14 Down 6

ProScience Greenie on Nov 5, 2017 at 12:16 pm

Death trap in front of the Chalet? Can't see how if a person drives the speed limit, stays aware and isn't in a mad big city rush to get somewhere 30 seconds earlier than those driving safely and normally.

Up 21 Down 9

Dave Evans on Nov 5, 2017 at 5:53 am

If we don't waste money on coddling a growing population of people better suited to larger urban centers do you suppose they might consider moving south? If there is any chance in this then I vote for installing more potholes, taking out streetlights on the highways and not allowed no YG trucks on the highway until after ten am.

Seriously though, if the congestion bothers you then leave earlier. I commute from out of town and leave BEFORE the YG trucks start their day simply to have less traffic to deal with and to avoid trying to pass plow trucks stirring up loose snow into a cloud of strobe lit blindness.

If you can't drive in a few inches of snow, move south. If you can't modify your day to allow for the inevitable morning rush to work, move south. Do you find yourself wishing for four lanes to a desk and a mochfrappachino? Please, move south. Most importantly, anyone who views money as an abstract and fails to consider that 200 million dollars represents the lifetime tax contributions of 400 people.....move south.

People will continue to drive like idiots, people will continue to leave late who could leave early, people will continue to move here with desires for amenities of the south. Personally, if you're a danger to yourself or others splitting wood, changing a flat, driving an unplowed road, etc. Please move south. The north has a history of separating the weak from the strong, please do not continue to subsidize your pasty palms with cash from my callouses.

Up 27 Down 11

ERH on Nov 4, 2017 at 6:42 am

Anybody who thinks that this road is okay does not drive it very often. The section alone running past the Chalet and the airport is a death trap. Look at the tractor trailers and the tourist with their humongous vehicles and the traffic going to and from the airport. This is so dangerous. There are no proper turning Lanes and merging Lanes. And we all know about rabbit's foot Canyon the amount of people who have died there. And the other side of South access. With a divided highway and two lanes does not mean people will go faster it means people will be safer. Most this section resembles a cow Trail more than a highway. Can somebody start a petition here to get this thing done and stop the political BS?

Up 6 Down 16

warlord on Nov 4, 2017 at 12:55 am

The four-lane highway is absolutely crucial for the future when Russian and Chinese armies begin the planned invasion. It's a perfect corridor for ambush tactics. We could have look alike Fentie fake troops hidden in bushes, while the real fighters attack from the rear cutting off supply lines.

Up 11 Down 23

will-the-shake on Nov 2, 2017 at 3:59 pm

A $200 million farce - "it is a tale, told by an idiot, full of sound and fury,signifying nothing." Leave it be, and find something else to fritter your time away with.

Up 16 Down 8

Fearful on Nov 2, 2017 at 2:31 pm

@Yukoner - Yes! Every morning my life flashes before my eyes. I started going to work an hour earlier to alleviate the stress!

Up 12 Down 29

Drivers are an issues on Nov 2, 2017 at 12:28 pm

but a properly built road can change driving behavior. For example, why not train City traffic cops to use speeding devices. Why not put camera's in place for speeders and bad drivers.
Doing nothing is stupid.
I have worked on building highways, roads and streets and this needs to change. Some make comments which do not take safety into consideration.
When I worked in my family GM dealership I drove a wrecker on the week ends. We had a bad piece of highway which was harming and killing people. I lost three of my friends on this road. Our Premier has driven on it many times.
I watched three of my friend burn to death in a car and we could do nothing about it, until it was to late.
I have held the hands of people dying on the side of the road because the government would not fix the bad road.
It took for a well known judge and his two kids to get killed before anything was done with it.
The people here who think it OK need to get a life and come into the real world. No road can be safe enough. Thank god I grew up on a farm and understand dying.
Get a life people, let's hope none of your family is victim to this highway.
It takes tragic events for some people, to get it.
Wilf Carter

Up 38 Down 21

Stupid idea on Nov 2, 2017 at 11:46 am

This piece of highway is not the problem. Drivers being distracted and in a rush to get somewhere 2 minutes earlier (afterall, it's Whitehorse, everything is 10 minutes away or less) is the problem. If drivers would slow down and pay attention, there would be less accidents. By creating these extra lanes, it will only create more accidents because terrible drivers won't be able to cross all the lanes properly and the through-lanes will only be an open highway for excessive speeding. I'm not saying the highway is great and can't use fixing, but this is not the solution to help drivers.

Up 39 Down 13

Miles Ocean on Nov 1, 2017 at 9:04 pm

This road is not unsafe but our drivers are and they should be called on it.

Up 42 Down 16

Wait a sec on Nov 1, 2017 at 6:17 pm

To all the comments below,

4th Ave, 2nd Ave, Robert Service Way, and Hamilton Blvd. are all too large and overbuilt? Those are 4 lanes and see less traffic than the AK highway.

The AK also is a throughfare that handles heavy industrial traffic and all tourist traffic. In your minds the AK should be narrower? 4 lanes is too much? Large portions of it are already 4 lanes, why not finish what was started. If modern yukoners had to build the AK highway it would be a fat bike trail that stopped at Whitehorse because that's all that seems to matter.

Up 35 Down 13

just plain ignorant on Nov 1, 2017 at 6:03 pm

Ignorance: when Hillcrest already has 4 lanes in front of it and the safety problem is people merging into one or attempting to turn. 4 lanes through would address your safety issue. You've instead voted that down. The same group that misrepresented the LIC and had the rate so high because of all of the extras they wanted and wouldn't give up.

You're throwing out 500+ emails to do another consultation. Thanks for making me feel like my effort was wasted the first time. Is Stikeman and her NDP council capable of pointing out any deficiencies in the existing plan? Or do they have any suggestions on how to make the plan better...
because if you do; why didn't you submit them the first time to be incorporated? If they weren't incorporated then so be it.

But now we stop all legislation so Stikeman and HCA can lobby the gov and harass ministers? Well for the other 30,000 Yukoners or the 500 that submitted, the plan to expand was good. Thanks for letting the ego and political motivations of a community association ruin an idea that would help increase mobility around the city.

But who needs that? The 4pm and 8am crawl are wonderful.

Up 22 Down 17

Mike 282 on Nov 1, 2017 at 4:47 pm

The plans to upgrade the Whitehorse corridor included a safe bicycle path along the north-east side of the highway right-of-way separated from traffic. Constructing a much needed bicycle path is a small budget item that will improve safety for motorists and bicycle riders. It is hoped that construction of this bicycle path can proceed ahead independently of any highway corridor upgrades.

Up 32 Down 9

There is safety problem, with this piece of highway on Nov 1, 2017 at 4:29 pm

How many who many made comments here have worked on highway projects. There are several good points here like lane entry ways.
Tell all the family members who were hurt or killed in car accidents on this piece of highway. The amount of accidents on this highway has increased by a lot over the years.
Highways and public works have it right and this piece of highway is dangerous to traverse. The next time some one is harmed on this highway, look in the mirror at yourself and was I right to not support a saver road.
Think about it it could be one of your family members.
Rhein, you are so out of touch.
SAFETY, Safety first before money. This is sickening.
This piece of highway is not safe and lives will be harmed by bad political management. Wilf Carter

Up 22 Down 23

Can't cross on Nov 1, 2017 at 3:56 pm

Was I the only one that noticed that the public consultation document for this white elephant had something like 4 cars visible in the air photos? Those cars were not inconvenienced by having to "follow another vehicle" (??!?!?) much less SEE another vehicle.

This corridor, and frankly beyond out to Marsh Lake, Cowley Lake, and points north and west, needs proper merge lanes for people trying to enter the traffic flow, but 4-laning the entire corridor inside City limits is a colossal waste of funds. Far better to spend this on other projects that also feed those dollars into the community.

As far as safety for cyclists and pedestrians, the original plan was designed for fast-moving cars, and that's about it. I'm dodging yahoos at 2-mile hill every day, and the 4-laning plan (more like 8-laning at 2-mile hill) would have made it far worse.

Up 51 Down 20

Dave on Nov 1, 2017 at 3:41 pm

I would have welcomed a uniform 4 lane highway through the Whitehorse corridor. The way it is now its a absolute hodgepodge of different widths, numbers of lanes that suddenly appear and then end, different designed intersections, etc. Watch people travelling through who aren't from here and you can tell how confused they get, that combined with our 'above average' Whitehorse drivers creates some dangerous close calls. I'm thinking those who aren't in favor of this upgrade would be from the same crowd who wouldn't have wanted it paved back in the day either. The 'Who needs pavement, where do we think we live Vancouver' train of thought back in the 60's.

Up 27 Down 18

martin on Nov 1, 2017 at 3:15 pm

At the Carcross Cut-off YG has already done the damage. The old gas bar and restaurant has the main entrance blocked from the Alaska Hwy and YG has refused to acommodate an alternative entrance. Nice way of looking after the future service area (sarcasm intended)

Up 27 Down 44

Hillcrest Resident on Nov 1, 2017 at 1:47 pm

There are no issues with congestion on our roads right now. We do have issues with people driving too fast. Slow the traffic through the city. Can't we think of a better way to spend 200 million? Nice work Shauna!

Up 18 Down 62

Werner Rhein on Nov 1, 2017 at 1:47 pm

This project was designed to accommodate unbelievable high truck traffic Fracking would have brought up here and nothing else. 400 to 600 hundred truckloads to set up 1 (one) fracking pad. 600 to 1000 tanker loads of water, hundreds of loads of fracking sand and chemicals.
One couldn't get his hands between the trucks on the Alaska HWY and then Mayo road (Klondike HWY 2) all the way to the Dempster.
The worst of all there would have been no money coming out for the Government because the frackers would have paid no nothing before their initial cost would be paid off. Maybe 3 to 4 years. The average producing time of a frack well is 5 years.

It was time to shut that stupidity down.
What we need is an extension of the public transport system. At least out to the Carcross Corner and maybe to the Takhini road cutoff.

Up 49 Down 18

Remember on Nov 1, 2017 at 12:38 pm

The next time there is a traffic related fatality on this stretch of highway. Please remember all the personalities mentioned in this article.

Up 37 Down 18

Yukoner on Nov 1, 2017 at 12:09 pm

Can they fix the mess they made at the Sima entrance, that turn has only gotten more dangerous with the work they did.

Up 45 Down 32

ProScience Greenie on Nov 1, 2017 at 9:42 am

Glad to see this unneeded $200 million gravy train project shut down. Would have been a complete waste of money. Lots of other road section across the Yukon that really need fixing up.

That project at the Carcross Cutoff was a complete waste of money. Totally unnecessary.

Up 56 Down 23

timesall on Oct 31, 2017 at 11:08 pm

The simplest explanation:
NDP - we want a cross walk and no highway. Benefit only to themselves without looking at the larger community picture.

Liberals - Here you get half a highway and half a cross walk. Doesnt work for anyone ...both sides are mutally happy and unhappy

Conservatives - you get both the cross walk and the highway. Both sides hate each other but are content they got what they asked for. A bit of yelling and move onto the next project.

Absolutely poor form for the president to push her political agenda on the community of Hillcrest. Hopefully people remember this when they vote in the next election.

Up 50 Down 31

jc on Oct 31, 2017 at 9:28 pm

Well, the simple fact is the Liberal government, like their Federal counterpart decided to trash the plan simply to use the money to pay for their welfare programs and buy votes. Not all of us out here are stupid. When the Libs cancel something out, you can be sure its for something that is going to benefit their party in the next election.

Up 33 Down 22

Ginger Johnson on Oct 31, 2017 at 5:14 pm

SS gets my vote for next leader of the Yukon NDP

It was time for Two Loss Liz to move on after the last election

Up 36 Down 43

ralpH on Oct 31, 2017 at 5:11 pm

Yea what a waste of resources. Plenty of more priorities than that. Just Yukon party making work projects for their cronies.

Up 38 Down 34

drum on Oct 31, 2017 at 5:02 pm

Best thing I have heard in a long time. We do not need 4 lanes from the Carcross Road to the Mayo Road cutoff. This is not downtown Vancouver.
What is the Liberal Government of the Yukon going to spend the $200 million on instead???????

Up 31 Down 49

Yawnsville on Oct 31, 2017 at 4:24 pm

What a total waste of time and , presumably, money. It's perfectly safe along its entire length as it is now.

Up 34 Down 50

Good on Oct 31, 2017 at 4:11 pm

GOOD. Way too much money to fix something that isn't broken.

Up 56 Down 27

Hugh Mungus on Oct 31, 2017 at 3:47 pm

How, exactly, does Stikeman think a wider highway means more cars?
People get killed every year just north (at 2 mile) and south (at south access) of her neighbourhood with the highway the way it is now.

It needs to be widened and turning lanes added.

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.