General support evident for placer operation
The co-chair of the Marsh Lake local advisory council says she’s comfortable with the proposal for a placing mining operation along Judas Creek.
By Chuck Tobin on March 10, 2016
The co-chair of the Marsh Lake local advisory council says she’s comfortable with the proposal for a placing mining operation along Judas Creek.
Jo-Anne Smith said in addition to her personal views, she believes there was general support for the project among the 50-plus people who attended a
public meeting to discuss the proposal Wednesday evening at the Marsh Lake Community Centre.
“That is the feeling I got, and I talked to different people after the meeting,” Smith said by phone this morning.
“YESAB (Yukon Environmental and Socio-economic Assessment Board) got a bunch of input from the people that were there.”
Smith said she recognizes there are concerns about the impact the placer mine would have on the protected Carcross caribou herd, and the potential to
affect the local water quality.
Nicolai Goeppel, one of two project applicants, did a thorough job last night of addressing the two primary concerns as well as other concerns, Smith said.
YESAB hosted the meeting to gather more input, following a similar public meeting Tuesday night in Carcross.
The assessment board’s designated office in Teslin has extended the deadline for comments to March 15 at the request of a handful of different parties.
They included the Carcross/Tagish Renewable Resource Council and Environment Yukon.
Environment Yukon sought more time so that it could visit the site and prepare a report, with a focus on the Carcross caribou herd, which has been under the umbrella of the Southern Lakes Caribou Recovery Program since it began in 1992.
The proposed mine falls within the herd’s winter range. It’s in the middle of the herd’s migration routes on the east side of the Alaska Highway, about 4.5
kilometres north of Jakes Corner.
The co-chair of the advisory council noted there was a member of the Tagish advisory council who asked a number of questions last night about the
potential impact on the caribou.
Smith said Goeppel explained how the mining would occur along a tributary of Judas Creek and not on the main creek.
It would be mined in stages to minimize the project’s footprint, with a progressive reclamation plan to reclaim mined-out areas before moving on, she said.
Smith said the intent is to recycle the water required for the operation through a series of berms to remove silt and minimize the ongoing need for large
volumes of fresh water.
There would be no requirement for a camp because of the proximity to Whitehorse, and no need to store fuel on the site because fuel could be brought in daily, she pointed out.
Smith said listening to the young geologist talk last night, you know he’s done his homework.
From her view, she said, there was a general support for the proposal, which was viewed by those at the meeting as an opportunity to provide jobs for a
couple of young guys and others.
“As a person, I felt it was a viable project,” said the co-chair of the advisory council.
“I feel this is probably a good thing for Marsh Lake because it is the closest neighbour he has to it, and people are looking for work.”
Smith said the placer mining proposal will be on the advisory council’s agenda for next week to see if the council wants to take an official position on the
project application.
Goeppel and co-applicant Alex Shaman are seeking approval to mine a block of 45 placer claims in the area over the next 10 years, between May 1 and
Nov. 15 each year.
Comments (14)
Up 0 Down 0
nolabel on Mar 16, 2016 at 7:08 pm
A small group of people making decisions that can negatively impact everyone in Yukon is unacceptable.
The science comes in after the negative impacts are already in motion and not before. Don't forget science has a dark side. Scientists are human beings and human beings have a dark side. Infallible, always right, is definitely a part of the dark side.
Up 2 Down 1
ProScience Greenie on Mar 16, 2016 at 12:47 pm
Funny that the opponents of this project are either ecotourism owners or lobbyists or they are nimby that totally failed high school physical geography an haven't bothered getting up to speed on current rules, regs and guidelines.
Up 6 Down 5
Josey Whales on Mar 13, 2016 at 2:00 pm
I am hoping to see more responsible comments from people and there indeed are some here.
It's too easy to label people and call them names and then dismiss them as anti this or that, mining can be conducted responsibly. Wildlife can coexist with responsible mining.
Up 5 Down 5
Josey Wales on Mar 13, 2016 at 9:32 am
I understand if my remora has a cognitive issue, but it's "Josey"... SJW Josey.
Try formulating an argument vs. child like mockery, or did public school rob you of your independent thoughts and infected your gray matter with the "indoctrination"
Sure reads as though. Hey if you wish some real fun? Track me down in town for a debate, you might be surprised to find
"it doesn't mean that much to me, too mean that much to you."
I'm OK with folks disagreeing with me, seems you the "tolerant" one are not.
It is OK I know it's not your fault..it never is in this victim/ meanie infested socially engineered "safe space".
...off to the pitchfork store for the harvest...of sheep meat.
Up 8 Down 3
Joe Whale on Mar 12, 2016 at 4:40 pm
Josey, those woodland caribou out Marsh Lake way are not anti anything they just want to live off the land. Well, maybe they are anti-wolves and anti-bears.
Up 16 Down 18
YTres on Mar 11, 2016 at 5:25 pm
Josey
Most of the posters you label "anti-everything" are not in fact. They support responsible mining, with solid plans in place for reclamation, cleanup, impact mitigation etc. One can support a mining industry without supporting opening up the Peel for development. It's not a contradiction despite what you think.
Up 7 Down 5
Josey Whales on Mar 11, 2016 at 4:00 pm
It's not very odd that we have folks in a comment thread supporting mining?
I'd say people who call people the anti-everything greenies like to post provocative rhetoric just to get people going.
And of course we will see old Josee taking a jab at government workers and the nanny state whatever that may be.
And of course Josee wonders if GY or COW has ever done a computer audit to see who spends the most time not doing what they are paid for, for we all know protesting/lobbying is not what they get paid for. This actually seems so silly to me because most government workers work very hard and provide valuable services. And I can recall many examples of having to wait for sales people to finish conversations between themselves or friends at the till before they serve old Josey Whales- my example is to show some businesses have workers who do not provide good service, but having said that many people in these retail stores put their customers first even when they are underpaid.
Good luck on mining and please try and have as small a footprint as possible.
The real salt of the earth and no copy cat Josey Whales.
Up 13 Down 4
Kevin Brewer on Mar 11, 2016 at 3:07 pm
I have mineral claims just northeast of this location. In over 4 seasons of working in that area I am yet to see a caribou and also have not seen physical evidence of caribou in that area. Regardless of even if there is or is not caribou in the area, a small operation such as a placer miner would have no impact on that herd as they have more than enough habitat in the southern area to thrive. The problem to caribou was over hunting which stopped and they will continue to recover if that activity is curtailed. Small mine operations will not hurt the caribou herd.
Up 15 Down 8
Josey Wales on Mar 11, 2016 at 7:15 am
Very odd...we have three folks in a comment thread supporting mining?
Well four including this one.
I'd say the anti-everything greenies have yet to post the rhetoric. Guess we'll see after a day of surfing the net at their government attendance nanny state station.
I wonder if YG or CoW has ever done a computer audit to see who spends the most time not doing what they are paid for, as protesting/lobbying is not what they get paid for.
Good luck on turning rocks, I wish your operation well.
Up 22 Down 1
Boots on Mar 11, 2016 at 6:12 am
That was a great meeting. I live on Southern Lakes and don't see a problem with mining in this area. I'm sure the caribou feel the same.
Giver
Up 10 Down 25
Fast Eddy on Mar 10, 2016 at 11:46 pm
Has anyone consulted with the Dept of Environment fish biologists to find out how this proposed project will affect the struggling population of Lake trout? I would like to point out that the Tagish-Marsh lake system is everyone's resource and not just 50 people looking to dodge city taxes. We have looked after the lake trout population in this system (as well as others) most egregiously.
Up 26 Down 2
Martin on Mar 10, 2016 at 4:38 pm
Looks like they done a good job explaining and it will be a small placer operation; I think It could be educational for all.
Up 24 Down 4
ProScience Greenie on Mar 10, 2016 at 4:19 pm
Good guys and a good project and no reason to not let it proceed. Best of luck.
Up 34 Down 1
YTres on Mar 10, 2016 at 3:34 pm
While I fully support what Nick's doing (his family have been involved in placer mining for years), the idea that this mine is going to provide a bunch of jobs for Marsh lake residents is a bit optimistic. I reviewed the YESAB application documents, and its a pretty small project in the big scheme of things.
Hope it pans out for him and his partner. Pun intended.