Whitehorse Daily Star

Image title

Photo by Vince Fedoroff

MAJOR WASTE CONFERENCE DRAWS A CROWD – Sean Smith (left), a Kwanlin Dün First Nation councillor, welcomes delegates to the Zero Waste conference Friday at Yukon College. Right: during his address, behavioural psychologist Ruben Anderson challenged the proposal for a mandatory residential recyclables pickup program.

Gathering ‘really energized’ delegates: councillor

More than 100 people converged on Yukon College on Friday and Saturday to look at how to keep waste out of the landfill and move toward a zero waste society.

By Stephanie Waddell on March 7, 2016

More than 100 people converged on Yukon College on Friday and Saturday to look at how to keep waste out of the landfill and move toward a zero waste society.

Over the weekend, conference delegates ranged from those working in the waste industry to government staffers and politicians.

They heard presentations on initiatives in other jurisdictions, and about behaviour and how that can impact waste reduction.

Others received a tour of the city’s landfill, the Raven Recycling Society’s facilities and the Mount Lorne transfer station.

Ben Derochie, Zero Waste Yukon’s co-ordinator, said he was pleased with the turnout – which saw delegates coming from across the North.

He was also pleased with the level of interest on each topic explored throughout the conference.

Presentations often ran longer than planned due to the questions those taking in each session asked. In some cases, the question and answers sessions had to be cut short due to timing.

“It was exciting,” Derochie said, noting he was pleased to see officials with various governments there throughout the entire conference.

The bulk of the events happened Friday and Saturday at the college.

An opening reception and public presentation with Christina Seidel from the Recycling Council of Alberta kicked things off last Thursday night at the Yukon Beringia Interpretive Centre.

And a hackathon aimed at finding better ways of managing waste was also held as part of the conference.

Throughout the sessions, the message was clear: more waste needs to be diverted from general landfilling and more responsibility needs to be taken for waste, whether it makes its way to the landfill, recycling centres or elsewhere.

Those sentiments were echoed by political leaders who welcomed delegates and shared the work of their respective governments in dealing with waste.

As Mayor Dan Curtis noted in his welcoming comments last Thursday evening: “The current build, buy and bury model of consumption cannot be sustained.

“And when I say ‘cannot be sustained,’ I don’t mean in 40 years from now, I mean now, we’re seeing the effects of this type of waste consumption on our cities right now.”

He went on throughout his speech to stress the importance of recycling and other initiatives that can make a difference.

An example is like Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR), which would see a fee attached to goods for packaging and waste to be dealt with at the end of the product’s life.

The city stressed its efforts in considering a mandatory city-wide blue box program (which has not yet been adopted) for those already on the city’s curbside collection program.

Behavioural psychologist Ruben Anderson, however, challenged the proposed program in his presentation Friday morning.

Throughout his speech, Anderson emphasized that the amount of conscious information any person can take in is limited.

While we often treat choice like it’s effortless, he said, it is in fact more like running a marathon.

Like any muscle, he said, our brain can become exhausted with the amount of decisions it must make.

Once it’s depleted of energy, it becomes increasingly difficult to make the conscious choices modern society asks of us, he said.

As examples, Anderson noted that people are asked to make decisions to use active transportation rather than drive, take shorter showers and so on throughout any given day.

“We have a lot of demands on our brain,” he told the standing-room-only crowd.

As a society, Anderson noted, systems have been developed to help people make those decisions – what day you put your garbage to the curb, which side of the road you drive on, etc.

“We can build systems that help us overcome our wiring,” he said.

As Anderson moved on to look specifically at the issue of waste in the Yukon, he noted much of the waste heading to the landfill comes from the industrial and construction sector, rather than from homes.

Given the challenges with “our limited attention span,” he then wondered the reason for bothering with a curbside residential blue box program when it’s the ICI sector that’s taking up more landfill space.

Both Curtis and Coun. Roslyn Woodcock defended the initiative.

As Derochie noted during another presentation, Curtis pointed out initiatives the city has taken that have impacted other sectors.

Those include ICI banning cardboard and moving forward with a compost collection option for businesses.

Curtis cited the curbside program as having a positive psychological shift for residents.

Woodcock also pointed out that the city is limited in what actions it can take. EPR fees and such are under the jurisdiction of the Yukon government, she said.

A curbside recycling program is one thing the city can do to effect change, she said.

“We have to keep chipping away at it,” she said.

As Derochie said: “It’s one of the steps.”

Both she and Derochie noted they hope to see further work by the Yukon government that would see EPR brought to the territory, and exploring further the mandatory fee on plastic bags that has been implemented in Yellowknife, an initiative delegates heard about over the weekend.

Community Services Minister Currie Dixon outlined work the territory has done.

He touched on community landfill transfer stations where waste is separated and the impending changes to the beverage container regulations to help keep waste out of landfill.

“There’s much more to be done,” he acknowledged.

Meanwhile, Sean Smith, a Kwanlin Dün First Nation councillor, also pointed to initiatives his government has underway in dealing with waste. Those include a community cleanup and reducing paper through the use of technology.

By the end of the weekend, Derochie and Woodcock said, everyone seemed set to move forward in working to keep waste out of the landfill.

“We want to use the momentum,” Derochie said after noting he’s already been asked by several delegates if Zero Waste Yukon will host another conference some time.

As Woodcock summed up, “I know everyone came out of it really energized.”

Comments (16)

Up 2 Down 1

Joe Whale on Mar 12, 2016 at 4:47 pm

Are Planet Zealots Robin Hooding the poor citizens of Whitehorse. WHATEVER THAT MEANS, it's so hard to keep up with Josey Wales thought process.

I think Robin Hood would have been a very good Sustainability Manager. The City is doing fine Josey it's just that there are growing pains as we enter the modern world. And please do not try and always be anti-modern, its gets a little old.

Up 2 Down 1

Josey Wales on Mar 12, 2016 at 9:21 am

Hey really..how dare you compare other wee towns to our wee town.
Besides they are irrefutable FACTS, as you presented them, you will still upset folks.
Really I'm not sure if you are a regular here reading this nonsense called heavily moderated "opinions"
That said, you cannot infer mean things, cannot use facts in a debate, cannot voice dissent to the "entitlement" OVERDOSE syndrome nor any other adult common sense angles.
We must treat folks out here like we are children unable to formulate their own thoughts and reside in a land of love where icicles are like lolly-pops and all things bad (including fiscal COMPLETE irresponsibility) can be whisked away with love and thoughts of a "happy..safe space"...insulated from the real world.

Personally I quite liked your post which "Robin Hooded" the issue.
We have had decades of absolutely greedy civic trough feeders, a re-bloat on an already bloated sty of crats, a overly entitled new bunch of citizens fluffing up their resumes before returning to where ever home is. fleeing the high taxes they helped create.
Folks have been using that office for personal crusades for years once voted in by the sheep.
I just wonder how bad it can get before we take our town back?
Or are we now just a town full of suck-holes and lost our fight?
I encourage everyone out there to shame our civic leaders and get in their face moderation sans.
Oh yeah planet zealots? I drink different kool-aid than ya'll clearly consume...my stuff goes in the garbage...then the dump.
Just like it does now. I pick up more garbage than I personally produce..imagine eh?

Up 11 Down 1

Groucho d'North on Mar 11, 2016 at 6:52 pm

Well, ya got Trouble, my friend, right here,
I say, Trouble right here in River City.
With a capital T and its plain to see that stands for TRASH

Now, I know all you folks are the right kinda parents.
I'm gonna be perfectly frank.
Would ya like to know what garbage is worth
And who’s doin good at the bank?

Another tax when you buy it, they say is the fix
Like is done for tires and batteries already charged so legal
But all that money goes someplace
And I still pay tipping fees on this stuff at Son of War Eagle

Up 31 Down 3

Really on Mar 11, 2016 at 11:03 am

The CoW has one of the largest per capita revenue in Canada, in many cases three times more than places like Brandon MB, Prince Albert SK, Timmins ON. Other Canadian Cities have half as much as the CoW like Grande Prairie AB. And better than our northern counterparts Yellowknife and Iqaluit. When one looks at the over expenditure of revenue on items which are non essential, one must question the management of our municipal windfall. There is no logical reason for there to be a landfill problem here. We have the money, the technology and will to maintain a health waste management system without over burdening the taxpayers. It's time for real change in how the CoW operations and priorities its public funds.

Up 12 Down 9

Josey Wales on Mar 10, 2016 at 12:25 pm

see vlad can do it, why is it so hard?
One sees something factually incorrect, cite said FE...post it...TaDa!
Thanks vlad, I gave the Substitute drama teach more credit than deserved.
..kind of how he and his minions got to Ottawa.

PSG...sure is odd eh, how the progressive tolerant crews are by far not remotely tolerant of dissent & diametric view points.
Case in point I seem to have a parroting SJW that feels mocking one is a debate?
i suppose after decades of smiley faces doled out like a PM's mandate...one can expect that sort of irrational hissy fit when factual (gasp) 'reality" enter a/the debate.
Age ol' tactic of zealots.

Up 22 Down 2

north_of_60 on Mar 9, 2016 at 6:18 pm

@A-h-i-t

If you disagree with me or anyone, please quote the exact words you disagree with. I can defend my own words. I cannot defend someone else’s interpretation of what they thought I said.

I've never stated that I was opposed to reducing waste. I've been Reducing, Reusing & Recycling for more than 40 years; long before it was a 'fashionable' thing to do. I take one can of actual 'garbage' to the landfill per year.
How much do you waste?

If you were paying attention and reading slowly for comprehension, then you should realize my comments have been specifically directed at the wrong-headed way the CoW has decided to penalize and harass those responsible for less than 10% of the waste. Meanwhile the CoW does everything to accommodate the whims and excuses of the commercial/industrial sector that is responsible for more than 90% of the waste.
Got it now?

Up 15 Down 3

vlad on Mar 9, 2016 at 5:23 pm

Josey, you are wrong. He is not a drama teacher, actually, he is a substitute drama teacher.

Up 15 Down 43

Anybody home in there? on Mar 9, 2016 at 2:10 pm

I think Joe, Josey and North of 60 should pay a special tax in order to pay for closing the current landfill and opening a new one since they don't seem to understand why reducing our waste is important. It's basic economics, not that anyone expects you geniuses to understand that.

Up 27 Down 8

jc on Mar 8, 2016 at 9:56 pm

A zero waste of time!

Up 39 Down 9

For region like waste management includes land fills on Mar 8, 2016 at 10:23 am

The Mayor has no understanding of waste management and what is realistic for City people. We're getting all the dangerous goods out of the waste stream. Try to take all waste out is not possible because the cost would be so great people would start revolting on waste management, which is already going on in the City.
It is only smart political management, when we come to a reasonable level of waste and land fills that are safe and responsible.
This is a no brainer but sometimes there is no brains left to make common sense to the interest of tax payers.

Up 57 Down 6

ProScience Greenie on Mar 8, 2016 at 9:21 am

How much did this meeting cost and how much unwanted C02 did it generate?
We would have a cleaner planet if all involved in this event spent 8 hours a day up at the landfill sorting through waste rather than these endless feel good meetings.
What is unsustainable is a territory with an economy more and more dependent on meetings, consultations, studies and more meetings.
And a big red flag when behavioral psychologists start getting involved.

Want a solution to limit waste? Keep Whitehorse a small simple friendly town instead of continuing to turn it into some ugly clone of a random Outside big city 10 times the size with all the amenities, services, big box stores and fast food outlets. These people are not as green as they think they are.

Up 38 Down 11

Josey Wales on Mar 7, 2016 at 8:52 pm

More green-washing nonsense. Despite the evidence folks still eat this gibberish up...intellectually challenged ?
Hence having a drama teacher for a PM, it's all about wealth redistribution and drawing NGO wages.
Facts and hucksters are like imaginations and zealots, seldom are they anything but diametric.
How did we ever live in this world without the progressive nanny stating power lust that is omni-present?

Up 53 Down 9

Joe on Mar 7, 2016 at 6:38 pm

95% of Yukon residents don't care one bit about this initiative. Intelligent decisions would involve education and incentives to encourage people to change their behaviours. This mayor and that one councillor don't have a clue, they keep upping taxes with no real results other than useless bragging. Nothing proposed will impact the earth in any way, not from Yukon anyway. Quit trying to take more of my money on useless initiatives.

Up 53 Down 7

north_of_60 on Mar 7, 2016 at 5:51 pm

"Anderson ...noted much of the waste heading to the landfill comes from the industrial and construction sector, rather than from homes. ... he then wondered the reason for bothering with a curbside residential blue box program when it’s the ICI sector that’s taking up more landfill space."

The "Outside Expert" agrees with what many Whitehorse residents have been saying since the CoW decided to cram mandatory fees for curbside recycle pick-up down our throats. The CoW's only defense of their highly unpopular decision was lame at best. With no way of measuring any success, mandatory curbside recycle pick-up fees are looking more and more like a blatant tax grab.

Up 13 Down 45

Josey Whales on Mar 7, 2016 at 4:28 pm

We have to decrease our ecological footprint despite it costing us all a little more in taxes and all that energy sorting our waste.

"Anderson emphasized that the amount of conscious information any person can take in is limited. While we often treat choice like it’s effortless, he said, it is in fact more like running a marathon. Like any muscle, he said, our brain can become exhausted with the amount of decisions it must make. Once it’s depleted of energy, it becomes increasingly difficult to make the conscious choices modern society asks of us, he said." What a lot of dogma Mr. Anderson. If we can hold down a job, raise children, drive vehicles to the grocery store and then choose groceries from the shelves we can certainly sort and recycle waste.

Mayor Curtis and Councillor Woodcock articulated a view that is visionary but perhaps unpopular with some residents. Thanks to their vision Whitehorse will become a better place to live.

Up 36 Down 19

Bud McGee on Mar 7, 2016 at 3:00 pm

The Yukon is huge. Our waste production takes up such an infinitesimally small amount of the Yukon land mass. Why are we making an issue of this? At the end of the day, the cost will be downloaded to the consuming public. The increased cost to handle construction waste will show up in housing costs, which are already too high for most people. It's sad, but our quality of life is decreasing. The economy depends on consumption, and if consumers are less active then a lot of people suffer. They lose jobs, make less money, and are able to afford less things. These politicians want to impose their world view on all of us. 100 hundred years from society will look back at the second half of the 20th century and first quarter of the 21st century as our golden age.

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.