Whitehorse Daily Star

Image title

Photo by Whitehorse Star

The quality of maintenance for the North Alaska Highway will be affected by no money from the U.S. for the Shakwak project, says Highways and Public Works Minister Richard Mostyn.

Funding crunch could see parts of highway reverted to gravel

The quality of maintenance for the North Alaska Highway will be affected by no money from the U.S. for the Shakwak project, says Highways and Public Works Minister Richard Mostyn.

By Chuck Tobin on February 25, 2019

The quality of maintenance for the North Alaska Highway will be affected by no money from the U.S. for the Shakwak project, says Highways and Public Works Minister Richard Mostyn.

The Yukon government will ensure the section of highway from Haines Junction to the U.S. border past Beaver Creek is maintained to safety standards, Mostyn told the Star.

But there’s no money to deal with fundamental issues like the rolling highway surface caused by heaving permafrost and climate change, he explained.

The minister said it may mean eventually returning to a gravel surface in some sections as opposed to BST.

“There’s hundreds of millions of dollars of work that needs to be done on the north highway,” Mostyn said.

“The territory simply doesn’t have hundreds of millions of dollars to maintain it to the standard to which the Alaskan authorities have come to expect.”

He said the Yukon government will do what it needs to ensure the roadway remains safe and functional for the hundreds of Yukoners who live along the north highway and for Alaskans.

But it doesn’t have the money to undertake any major repair work, Mostyn said.

The last of the Shakwak funding provided by the U.S. was budgeted in the current fiscal year, which will end March 31.

Yukon and Alaskan officials teamed up last fall in a $25-million application to a federal U.S. infrastructure fund but were not successful, Mostyn said, adding they will continue to explore other funding options.

“That application was assessed in December and we did not get the money,” he said.

The Shakwak Agreement dates back to the mid-1970s.

The U.S. agreed to provide funding to the Yukon government to ensure proper upgrades and maintenance of the Haines Highway from Haines Junction to Haines, Alaska, and of the North Alaska Highway from the Junction to the U.S. border past Beaver Creek.

Mostyn said the Alaska Highway – completed in 1942 by the U.S. to provide the only roadway into Alaska during the Second World War – continues to serve as a vital link to the state.

The Yukon says hundreds of thousands of visitors travel to or from Alaska every year along the Alaska Highway. It’s also an important artery for moving U.S. military equipment in and out of the state.

It was not unusual to have annual Shakwak budgets in excess of $20 million provided by the U.S.

Five years ago, for instance, the annual budget was $23 million. It then fell to $12 million, and then to $6 million.

For work last summer, there was $2 million.

But that’s it for U.S. funding so far, Mostyn said.

He said the Yukon has such a small tax base that it doesn’t have a lot of wiggle room when it comes to providing funding to maintain 4,000 kilometres of highway in the territory.

Comments (28)

Up 0 Down 0

chuck thompson on Mar 25, 2019 at 7:50 pm

The spark that funded the Shakwak project in its nascent days was the later U.S. Senator Ted Stevens and he had so much power in Congress, he could get anything he wanted.

Alas, ol' Ted is gone and now Alaska's sorry excuse for representation is former Governor Frank Murkowski's daughter and some nitwit named Dan Sullivan (there are a lot of nitwit Dan Sullivans in Alaska politics for some reason) and they have the political gravitas of a passing asteroid.

Where's Ottawa in all this? Aren't they supposed to be funding infrastructure as a political imperative? The road from Inuvik to Tuk certainly got funding without too much gnashing of teeth.

Up 1 Down 0

Old Graderman on Mar 3, 2019 at 3:49 pm

I wonder how many of the people on here saying turn it back to gravel would feel that way if it was going to be their $700 windshield repeatedly getting broken driving on it. I imagine residents living along that highway would be none to happy having to buy new windshields all the time, let alone the tourists with the $2500 RV windshields. Also, ‘some info’ is right gravel sounds good until you start rattling through kilometre after kilometre of bone jarring potholes and mud after every rainfall. With the summer traffic that highway sees it would be pounded right out continuously considering a wide road takes so much more time and money to blade and maintain than the narrow old roads did.

Up 0 Down 0

Al on Mar 3, 2019 at 3:40 pm

@ HM - You still don't get it and ikely won't.

Wilf is right - it is a spending priority. Nobody is advocating doing it all at once. We would be unable to anyway given the physical resources it would take.
Once you cut the appropriate levels of funding to maintain the highway just to keep even then you fall behind (you must find the simple math in that!). With each successive cut in funding to the program you continue to lag to the point we are at now. So yes we bite the dust, stop funding nice to have stuff and look after the infrastructure we so wanted in the first place through devolution.

Up 5 Down 2

Some Info on Mar 2, 2019 at 4:18 pm

This Govt is dreaming if they think they will save money reverting this section of highway to gravel. With the traffic levels what they are on the north Alaska Hwy in the summer blading operations will have to be almost ongoing and for sure after every rain. Blading operations require at least two graders and a minimum of one water truck, a water pump and operators... these don't come for free.

Dust suppressants will be required (calcium chloride) at least two applications per season… not cheap. If regular blading and calcium applications are not kept up the road will pot hole and become dangerous and dusty... the Gov't cannot allow that given the legal risks involved. If there is an accident attributed to road conditions they have little defense...…
I know it is frustrating to try and maintain road through this permafrost rich area but reverting to gravel is not going to be the long term solution unless traffic volumes are reduced along with a significant speed reduction...….

Up 3 Down 2

Hugh Mungus on Mar 1, 2019 at 3:11 pm

Wilf, old bean.

Below you claim 'It is not funding problem but budget priority for the government '

The entire budget for the Yukon is roughly $1.5 Billion and you want to spend a third of that maintaining a road so Americans can get to the 'last frontier'? You need to give your head a shake. You'd think it would be apparent to you given your performance in elections, civil and public service that you are waaaaay out in left field.

Up 6 Down 0

Bobby Bitman on Mar 1, 2019 at 2:21 pm

A lot of good comments and solutions in these comments:

Go back to gravel which is more suitable for permafrost and a lot cheaper to maintain.
Charge a toll for all traffic except people living along the highway.
Put a weigh station in just past Haines Junction to keep track of what is going on with the transport trucks taking a left after coming from Haines, Alaska.

End of problems, all fair and square.

Up 17 Down 6

Wilf Carter on Mar 1, 2019 at 9:33 am

It is not funding problem but budget priority for the government to choose what are they spending public funds on for the public interest. The Yukon Government is top heavy on management and everyone knows it.

Up 4 Down 4

PA Gawd Squad on Feb 28, 2019 at 10:57 pm

So the other day I had coffee with Santa and the tooth fairy, the great pumpkin was to show...but it stood us up.

Patti the bible is not helping with your alleged reading savvy.
I would gladly drive gravel highways...if we could recycle PET grave marker...liberating it from its post of shame.
Attack OJW all ya like, might I recommend leaving your god of choice outta the conversation.
Not because it is offensive, it is not.
But my retort to such, most certain offend those whom choose said “choice”.

Up 11 Down 1

Guncache on Feb 28, 2019 at 7:19 pm

Brian, in regards to your comment about trucks coming out of Haines and turning left to Fairbanks. That is so true. I retired in 2017 from the Yukon gov't weigh scale in Whitehorse. The manager and director of the department had no concern about this traffic. The Haines Jct. scale was closed in 2000 or 2001. I was the Assistant Manager and attempted to make as many trips as I could to Haines Jct scale but most were refused. Management then and now are aware of this unmonitered traffic but don't care. I tried to get a summer student there but was denied. To management everything is rosy until something happens.

Up 15 Down 4

Patti Eyre on Feb 28, 2019 at 4:39 pm

This is not really a big deal, no evidence presented that Yukoners will be badly affected by this other than having to drive down a gravel highway, this will mainly affect Americans travelling to and from Alaska and it's only a small portion of the route at that. It in no way suggest returning to a horse and cart, like sky is falling Josie would have us believe! I forgive you Josie, the bible teaches forgiveness and tolerance.

Up 21 Down 6

Apex Parasite on Feb 28, 2019 at 9:10 am

Nothing wrong with gravel roads aside from the dust and cracked windshields. As others have said, way easier to maintain as the heaving comes and goes.
Not so nice for bikers and such but gravel roads tend to separate the men from the boys in this regard. Tourists would hate it.

My opinion, as always, is that we're too pampered and too entitled in our expectations of being able to flit about at will with no real regard to the upfront costs and the externalities associated with virtually everything humans do.

In the end, as always, money trumps need and money will decide what goes and what doesn't. Best get busy wasting it so we can get on with wasting more of it.

Up 15 Down 15

Josey Wales on Feb 27, 2019 at 9:29 pm

No cash for our roads eh, hmmmm?
What did our ruling classes...all of them, do with it all?
Did we spend it all debating, legislating that science and biology is now xenophobic?

Why not kick up the new age hippy fantasy a notch...and just rip the highway up reclaim the dirt for nature?
Stomp out our carbon footprint by ceasing all shipments of 21st century convenience. Most of the stuff is 3rd world manufactured pure crap anyway. Folks that stay, can have their pals walk up for a visit, perhaps a horse, kayak maybe.

Up 16 Down 6

Get ready for another tax on Feb 27, 2019 at 3:01 pm

One major problem with this territory. We're happy with all of the stuff we receive but we have no clue about the cost to maintain it. Just to maintain our highways + roads, water and sewer = more than the tax base of the Yukon can support.

I'm glad to see we are being held to task but I fear I know the answer. Increase taxes.
Why not free up the budget by giving up some pay + benefits + vacations + positions + funding/grants for essential services?

A toll would be great. Each truck going to Alaska that is over xxx amount of weight pays a fee for maintenance.
But, like the carbon tax, they won't tax the largest user/consumer of the highway. Hey! Maybe to offset the carbon tax the trucking industry has to pay for airlines, the airlines could pay for highway maintenance?

They don't use the highway but they should pay for it.
Airplanes cause the most C02 and they don't have to pay for that!
Everyone else has to! So it's the least the airline industry can do!

Up 4 Down 10

Politico on Feb 27, 2019 at 2:43 pm

@Karl Please tell the truth, different governments.

Up 6 Down 3

Wilf Carter on Feb 27, 2019 at 1:39 pm

Just Yukoners know every time a Canada commercial truck goes through the US border into Alaska we pay a fee. For example some mining trucks are paying over $200 a load to go through at Skagway. The reason I know because I worked on the fill.

Up 22 Down 5

Groucho d'North on Feb 27, 2019 at 11:37 am

As when it was constructed, the Alcan still serves as a military supply route. There are still anonymous unmarked freight trucks hauling military ordinance to the air bases in Alaska. When these shipments are impacted by poor traveling conditions Uncle Sam will no doubt wake up and start O&M negotiations again. Private sector haulers may not wait that long and will lobby their politicians when their trucks get beat up due to highway conditions.

Up 23 Down 9

Karl on Feb 27, 2019 at 10:49 am

So this government gave us a new tax and paved roads turned back into gravel?

Up 11 Down 6

Brian on Feb 27, 2019 at 6:03 am

I sat at the 1016 pub one afternoon and we counted 56 Semi transports in a 3 hour window that turned and headed towards Fairbanks.
In the spring when the miners head back to Alaska from Arizona or California in their motor homes, for a 3 weeks stretch every spring you will see one every 5-10 minutes turning and burning off to Alaska.
It’s amazing how many shipping container trucks come from Haines AK and turn towards Fairbanks. It’s like they got a deep sea port and use it to ship goods. Something we should be looking into doing to reduce our Truck flow from Edmonton and Vancouver.
When they shut the Air Force base down, like 20,000 troops flew back to the lower 48, but nearly 10,000 drove home, over that “artery” highway.
I would say with the build up of Russian Military off the coast of Alaska and their toe dipping into our National Defense alert response times. USA best want to keep that road up to snuff to protect their state. If they want to keep it, if Putin doesn’t take it back for non-payment.
But I guess with Trump building a wall, monies have gone else where.
Sounds like gravel is the best way to go, now those bumper stickers “i survived the AK Hyway” can mean something other then You drove a paved road.

Up 13 Down 9

cal on Feb 26, 2019 at 11:22 pm

Start charging a levy that'll wake up Trump.

Up 24 Down 2

Tater on Feb 26, 2019 at 3:09 pm

Meanwhile the premier is in Alaska discussing how to work together on cross-border issues. Wouldn't this be one of them?

Up 38 Down 10

Al on Feb 26, 2019 at 2:02 pm

Are you nuts Mostyn - Climate change has nothing to do with the state of the highway on the north west section of the highway. It has been like that since the highway was built. It is the result of heaving permafrost. Good grief !!!

Up 43 Down 2

North_of_60 on Feb 26, 2019 at 1:17 pm

Highways on permafrost should be gravel. Gravel surface can be better maintained with ever-changing permafrost. Pavement on permafrost was a waste of money.

Up 18 Down 3

dave on Feb 26, 2019 at 12:08 pm

This would be the smart thing to do. This should also be considered for other parts of terrible highway sections in Yukon.

Up 18 Down 1

Geoff on Feb 25, 2019 at 6:23 pm

The exact language of the Shakwak agreement should be checked. If it says ongoing maintenance "forever", then the US needs to be taken to task. if it says to upgrade, then that's been done, and Canada and Yukon are responsible for keeping up to date. Under Shakwak, bridges were replaced, inferior routing was fixed and inferior grades were rebuilt. Now, it may be our responsibility to keep it, whatever the cost, until Alaskans complain to their governor that it is no longer suitable as is. At least we should never have to put in an interstate-type roadway as that'll never exist in the panhandle!

Up 8 Down 17

Minister place a toll at Beaver Creek by the border on Feb 25, 2019 at 4:42 pm

It is simple
Wilf Carter

Up 28 Down 7

Dave on Feb 25, 2019 at 3:41 pm

I question the accuracy of some aspects of this article. I was present at the original Shakwak ribbon cutting ceremony in Haines Junction when the agreement was signed in the ‘70s and my understanding has always been that the US only agreed to pay for the Haines Rd./ north Alaska highway reconstruction costs which at that time was seen to be by far the lions share of capital outlay, while Yukon agreed to cover the maintenance cost of the reconstructed highways when completed.
The general feeling on this side of the border at the time was that Yukon definitely got the better end of the stick in the bargain. Only in more recent years once the affects of permafrost began to wreak havoc on the newly reconstructed highway has the Yukon government gone hat in hand back to the US government asking them to also kick in for the increased maintenance costs being experienced.
Recent news articles seem to try to portray the US government as somehow shirking some responsibility concerning those maintenance costs, however I imagine the attitude south of the border is that the US taxpayer has already shelled out tens or hundreds of millions for this reconstruction and now it’s time for Canada/Yukon to live up to our side of the agreement and maintain it as we agreed and signed off on.

Up 28 Down 8

Money hunting on Feb 25, 2019 at 3:26 pm

Funny how this article tells how important the highway is to Alaska but fails to mention how important it is to the Yukon. Without it we might as well close up shop. Maybe Moneybags Larry can throw some at this. The liberals announced almost $400,000,000 for secondary mining roads, but we can’t seem to replace the money the U.S. was putting into the Shakwak. This agreement expired, I believe in 2015. It's an election year. Funding should not even be an issue.

Up 23 Down 13

Politico on Feb 25, 2019 at 2:55 pm

I heard that 80% of the traffic on that highway is American. Why can't we charge them a toll to pay for the repairs? The Americans would if the situation was reversed. User pays!

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.