Whitehorse Daily Star

Image title

Photo by Vince Fedoroff

NEW VANTAGE POINT – Bev Buckway, who served two terms as mayor and opted not to run in last October's municipal election, was in the unusual position of addressing her former colleagues from the delegates' table on Monday evening.

Former mayor addresses council, lauds budget

The city's former mayor is praising the proposed operational budget for the year, but is stopping short at telling council how to handle things.

By Stephanie Waddell on March 13, 2013

The city's former mayor is praising the proposed operational budget for the year, but is stopping short at telling council how to handle things.

At Monday evening's city council meeting, former mayor Bev Buckway was the first delegate to speak out at a public input session on the proposed $65-million budget, which proposes a 3.83 per cent property tax hike.

"A city that does not keep up with growth stagnates,” she told the current council – elected in October 2012 – after congratulating members on bringing forward a balanced budget and on the financial award the city recently received for its accounting practices.

The former mayor also praised the city's plans for additional evening bus service through the week.

While many will complain about a tax hike, Buckway said she is one of the silent majority who doesn't mind paying an extra 14 cents a day for city services to be maintained.

As with all delegates before council, members were given the opportunity to question Buckway after her presentation.

Veteran councillor Dave Stockdale used that opportunity to question how she'd deal with the finances if she were back at the council table for a third term as mayor, something she did not run for last year.

He first questioned whether she thought the city should test the expanded evening bus service for one year before determining whether it will be a permanent part of the transit service.

"Good try, but you're in that seat,” she told Stockdale, smiling.

He then queried what she thought of the request coming forward from the Great Northern Ski Society for $400,000 in immediate cash as well as a long-term core funding for the Mount Sima recreation area.

She gave the same answer.

Much of the public input over the next nearly three hours came from residents speaking in support of Sima.

Others criticized further funding for the hill or took issue with the request (see Tuesday's Star).

Other speakers, though, noted their interest in other aspects of the budget, including the changes to transit and the proposed property tax hike, among others.

Daniel Ashley, the Yukon College student union's president, turned up to let council know the group supports the expansion of bus service into the evening, a move which will help students get home from class.

While students can often get to their evening classes by bus, they have to find alternatives to get back home, council was told.

"This is absolutely an essential service,” he said.

He noted his group is currently working on a plan with city officials to provide all full-time students with a transit pass next September, provided the evening service goes ahead.

The possibility of a reduced rate transit pass for part-time students and staff of the school is also being looked at, he said.

"I think it's a very important initiative,” Ashley commented.

Under questioning by Stockdale, Ashley told council the MOU that will see the student union and student services department at the college split the cost of the passes 50/50 is currently being drawn up, and he expects it will be signed before the end of May.

While Ashley praised the city for the transit changes proposed, Whitehorse Chamber of Commerce chair Philip Fitzgerald was not so complementary.

He took issue with the ongoing tax hikes that are expected to continue this year with the proposed 3.83 per cent hike.

The accumulated increases over the last few years have not matched inflation, Fitzgerald said.

He argued the chamber's position that the city should limit tax increases to two per cent or the rate of inflation.

The chamber, he said, is also asking council to bring forward the operating budget earlier with the capital budget rather than adopting them as two separate entities, and to reduce to the tax rate difference between residential and non-residential properties.

As Fitzgerald pointed out, the capital budget which comes forward in December and is adopted early in the new year has a direct impact on operating expenses.

Thus, the two should come forward together and be adopted much earlier.

With commercial properties paying a higher tax rate than residential properties, Fitzgerald suggested the rate difference between the two should be reduced.

He noted later, under questioning by Coun. Betty Irwin, that the chamber would be working with the city to explore ways of generating revenue outside of property taxes, provided other stakeholders were included in the discussions as well.

A public input report on the session is set to come forward at Monday's council meeting, with second and third readings of the budget then expected to come forward on March 25.

Mayor Dan Curtis and Coun. Kirk Cameron were absent from Monday's meeting.

Comments (9)

Up 0 Down 0

DMZ on Mar 15, 2013 at 5:33 am

To be fair, Janni Korhonen, municipal politicians don't get pensions as federal and territorial politicians do. As far as I know. I wonder if they're eligible for EI.

Up 0 Down 0

June Jackson on Mar 14, 2013 at 4:00 pm

Ms. Buckway was not a popular Mayor, but, like the rest of us she can still say her piece. Like other posters here I think her figures are skewed..I also agree with J. Ward.. its the constant incessant tax hikes..this City is garnering a LOT of money, but throwing it away on Mt. Sima and other organizations that have stopped even trying to fund raise on their own and head right to City Hall for hand outs.

This council had better start learning to live within our means.. Does anyone else remember when the Mayor's and counselors positions were voluntary??

Up 0 Down 0

Arn Anderson on Mar 14, 2013 at 9:56 am

My tax dollars, my tax dollars...gimme a break, like the outrage over Mt Sima. The money DOESN'T belong to you, it belongs to someone else, hint? Economic slavery, truth hurts eh? The days of whipping people to do work is long gone, why not make some phoney incentives to make them work and constantly scare them with "economic growth" and "recessions". Whitehorse, Yukon, Canada, North America, all of the western world has already been bought and sold 50 years ago, it doesn't belong to us anymore, so shut up and pay up them tax dollars and enjoy the show!

Up 0 Down 0

Janni Korhonen on Mar 14, 2013 at 9:37 am

Can she just count her pension and rub it in our faces elsewhere? Stockdale and Buckway reminds me of the title of a certain Jim Carey film. The one that involves a little place called Aspen.

Up 0 Down 0

flyingfur on Mar 14, 2013 at 5:41 am

What the hell is she doing back in Chambers giving her opinion about taxes? I guess I can go in and do that and I can tell you I will not be putting the same positive spin on tax increases like Bev seems to have done. I have seen wasteful and reckless BS decisions from her and council over the last several years...Mount Sima, bike lockers that nobody uses, etc., etc.,

Up 0 Down 0

shane on Mar 13, 2013 at 11:44 pm

what the h%#@ is wrong with this place stop taxing

Up 0 Down 0

Philip Fitzgerald on Mar 13, 2013 at 12:20 pm

No one from the Star contacted me or the Chamber about this article .

Below is what I actually said with respect to the proposed tax hike. I believe the above reporting is somewhat misleading and simplifies the Chambers presentation.

"No one likes paying more taxes than necessary.

The Chamber has spoken against property tax increases every year for the last 7. I would like the discussion to become a positive one rather than a combative one.

Page 13 of the city's last annual report states that the total amount of property taxes collected by the city from 2006 to 2011 have increased by an average of 7% per year or $28,000,000 from $20,000,000. The budget proposes this amount increase to $32,000,000 for the 2013 year.

So in 8 years, the City has collected an additional $12 million in property taxes, a 60% increase from 2006.

This 60% increase has not been matched by a 60% increase in population, GDP nor services provided by the city.

We accept the city is growing, as is its obligations but the continued argument to increase taxes at rates well beyond inflation on a sustained basis, becomes weaker as time goes on."

The Chamber is attempting to work with the city rather than against it.

I would welcome any opportunity to clarify our position.

Up 0 Down 0

DMZ on Mar 13, 2013 at 8:43 am

Buckway's crazy math -- she was coming up with the same wild figures whenever she raised taxes. My tax increases add up to a lot more than .14 a day, or $1.50 a month or whatever figure she used to pull out of her ear.

Explains a lot about her tenure.

Up 0 Down 0

Jackie Ward on Mar 13, 2013 at 7:28 am

You are not in public office Buckway. Your opinion is moot. So you say you don't mind paying an extra 14 cents a year? How about every tax increase the last 10 years? What is that a day? I do mind paying more and more when essential city services continue to be cut. Where am I? The twilight zone? Folks you really can't make this stuff up. I for one am tired of the incompetence.

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.