Photo by Whitehorse Star
Tamara Goeppel and Joe Jack
Photo by Whitehorse Star
Tamara Goeppel and Joe Jack
A Liberal party candidate’s use of proxy votes in Whitehorse Centre
A Liberal party candidate’s use of proxy votes in Whitehorse Centre has brought attention to barriers faced by people who are homeless at election time, and she should be commended for that, says a former chief of the Kwanlin Dun First Nation.
“(Tamara Goeppel) is saying that street people are not treated as fairly as other voters in an election,” Joe Jack told the Star Wednesday.
Jack was chief from 1996 to 1999, and formerly a vice-chair of the Council for Yukon Indians, now the Council of Yukon First Nations.
Voters who recognize the problems with fair treatment, he said, “should get out and support people like that, that are willing to make a difference and, at times, find themselves in hot water because their heart is bigger than their rationale.”
Goeppel came under fire last week for collecting proxy votes for 10 vulnerable people in the downtown riding.
Under the Elections Act, proxy votes are reserved for people who have reason to believe “voting may not be possible because of absence from the Yukon” on election day or advanced polling days.
Goeppel’s actions may have violated the Elections Act, so Elections Yukon has referred the matter to the RCMP. That investigation is ongoing.
The Yukon Liberal Party has condemned Goeppel’s use of proxy votes, with campaign chair Laura Cabott saying the first-time candidate “made a mistake.”
Liz Hanson, the leader of the NDP and the incumbent in Whitehorse Centre, has called on Silver to remove Goeppel as a candidate.
But not everyone is offended by Goeppel’s attempts to involve people who are precariously housed, and who live with addictions and mental health issues, in the election.
“Her bravery to become vulnerable in a political environment in the 11th hour of an election, it says a lot about who she is as a person,” said Jack, who has run federally for both the Liberals and the NDP in the territory.
Goeppel said in an interview this morning it was members of her campaign team who spoke to the 10 vulnerable voters.
All shared the belief that “there is a possibility that they (the voters) would be absent, on voting day,” she told the Star.
Barbara McLeod was one of the Whitehorse Centre constituents asked to be a proxy.
McLeod, who is married to Steve Robertson, a prominent Liberal, was put in touch with the Star Wednesday by Denise MacDonald, a spokesperson for the NDP.
“What we were told was that these were some people who were vulnerable people or perhaps people who had problems with alcoholism that would prevent them for voting,” McLeod said.
“If we had an inkling that we were doing something against the rules, we wouldn’t have agreed to do it.”
It appeared to McLeod that the Goeppel camp believed they were acting within the rules.
“I have dealt with Ms. Goeppel on at least one other matter professionally and I’ve known her to be ethical,” she said.
McLeod doesn’t plan to cast her proxy ballot until the controversy is resolved.
No one can make a judgment about where a specific voter may be on election day, other than the voter herself, said Goeppel.
“It is really in the eyes of the voter, that’s the qualifier, not in your eyes or my eyes or anyone else’s, as to where they believe they are going to be on election day.”
Some voters feel intimidated or afraid, said Goeppel, and in previous elections, those feelings were recognized.
Goeppel said that in past elections, electors had the option of voting at the Salvation Army, “which is a location that is more comfortable for folks.”
That isn’t being done this election.
“We saw the list of accommodating sites like a continuing care facility, one of the senior housing complexes was used, so other segments of society were given accommodation but these people weren’t,” said Goeppel.
Yukoners with no fixed address are permitted to use the Salvation Army as their address when they go to the polls.
It is harder for people in precarious housing situations, and people living with addictions, mental health issues and trauma to participate in the democratic process, said Jack, and it’s discriminatory.
“A lot of these people on the street are certainly the underclass in terms of getting by day to day... almost all people on the street don’t have ID,” he said.
“So what is the most equitable way to have them participate?”
It’s another question citizens should be asking, especially those in favour of electoral reform, he said.
Jack noted that the firestorm that’s erupted around Goeppel’s use of proxy votes signals to him that she’s a contender in the Whitehorse Centre race, which also involves Yukon Party candidate Doug Graham.
In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.
Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.
Comments (16)
Up 4 Down 2
Just Say'in on Nov 5, 2016 at 2:58 pm
@Moose. I agree wholeheartedly. However she is a Liberal not Yukon Party. Keep that part square when you are voting.
Up 16 Down 5
Moose Dr. on Nov 5, 2016 at 11:54 am
I have one question about these proxy votes which, in my mind, determines the righteousness of Tamara Goeppel's actions. Did she provide support for people who voted differently than "Yukon Party"? If she found homeless people and gave them a true voice, then her actions were selfless. If she only found ways for people to vote for her party, then she acted selfishly, and in a manner that does not enhance democracy.
Up 33 Down 14
Mark Sanders on Nov 4, 2016 at 4:54 pm
So, someone agrees with Tamara but she still provides silly arguments and the rcmp investigation continues.
This shows poor judgement and poor social skills, not the type of person who will capably follow any set of democratic rules. The Elections Act clearly defines what proxy voting is meant for. Please honour how proxy voting was developed and admin wrongdoing. I do not understand why Tamara and the Liberal Party are so insistent on hurting their chances in this election.
Up 34 Down 37
joe and Jane on Nov 4, 2016 at 3:34 pm
She has our votes. Tired of all the bs from other parties, nice to see someone who actually cares.
Up 36 Down 22
She is not a humanitarian on Nov 4, 2016 at 3:32 pm
The Liebral candidate is many things but a humanitarian is not one of them. Her recent concern for the poor and marginalized too neatly coincides with her decision to run for political office. The twisted logic that she has used to try and spin her way out of trying to scam votes and her defensive behaviour is indicative of the wonky skill set she would bring to the table if she was elected ... imagine that mindset sitting in Cabinet and it is truly scary.
Up 38 Down 28
Busted on Nov 4, 2016 at 10:35 am
I would like to thank Tamara and her campaign team for stepping forward with full disclosure to show yet another avenue of how a political party can cheat in an election. No wonder the Liberals and Yukon Party are silent.
Only now with Tamara Goeppel's honesty has this underhanded technique been accidentally exposed.
Up 41 Down 19
Yukon Cornelius on Nov 4, 2016 at 9:45 am
What Tamara did is bad judgement at best, certainly not altruistic. Has anyone checked into proxy monkey business in other ridings? Likely this isn't the only case...
Up 23 Down 8
Doug on Nov 4, 2016 at 8:21 am
The same protocol is followed as with any cast ballot. Each signed proxy vote is scrutinized for legality by an Elections Canada official prior to its approval for submission.
Up 35 Down 30
north_of_60 on Nov 4, 2016 at 12:11 am
The LIBs love the Hillary Defense: If you''re a politico it's OK to break the law as long as your intent was honest and it was for the greater good. If caught, just take the moral high ground. Laws are for 'little people' to obey; the elite are excused. Now go vote for someone who knows what's best for you, vote LIB.
Up 25 Down 35
Unknown on Nov 3, 2016 at 10:26 pm
In response to Why Why's statement- Why, Why would she consider doing something that could have her taken out of the liberal race if there was a chance of being caught red handed? It doesn't make logical sense, she a humanitarian not a criminal.
I think people love a good ole 'Yukon Scandal' in an exciting election time. When you are looking for someone to hate it's easy to look past the good intentions.
Up 42 Down 13
How Convenient on Nov 3, 2016 at 6:58 pm
So initially Tamara had no problem admitting she did this and it was her 'hill to die on', then it gets passed on to the RCMP and now it was 'members of her campaign team that spoke to the 10 vulnerable voters'???
Up 38 Down 23
Lost in the Yukon on Nov 3, 2016 at 6:57 pm
Wow ... With this guy backing her all must be right with the world. This has NOTHING to do with helping them vote. There are many NGOs that work daily with disadvantaged and marginalized people and assist them in exercising their democratic right to vote. This was simply an ill conceived plan to stack the deck and in the process actual defranchise the poor. She was well aware of what was happening in Mountainview and was putting her own spin on it. She should be ashamed of herself.
Up 28 Down 31
Eggwald on Nov 3, 2016 at 5:09 pm
Look, even a former Chief is not angry about these matters but actually applauds them. Tamara has been contrite and probably feels very bad about this misunderstanding. Can we get on with the proper procedure here and let these people vote.
Up 103 Down 28
Sarah W on Nov 3, 2016 at 4:37 pm
The right thing to do would be to ask the permission of those at the Salvation Army to have Elections Yukon reach out to them, and then contact Elections Yukon to deliver special ballots to the folks so they could vote in an unpersuaded way. There was no need to go the proxy vote route unless you are soliciting votes for your party. You were wrong, Tamara.
Up 103 Down 49
Interesting on Nov 3, 2016 at 3:33 pm
So there was more Liberal involvement than just Ms.Goeppel? No wonder there's been crickets from the others.
Up 100 Down 55
Why Why on Nov 3, 2016 at 3:01 pm
The candidate should have checked the election act before doing that or the liberal handlers before acting.
She went ahead with the actions hoping she would not get caught.
What else is the liberals done that voter do not know about.