Five men promote their mayoral qualifications
On Oct. 18, city voters will elect a new mayor.
By Stephanie Waddell on October 12, 2012
On Oct. 18, city voters will elect a new mayor.
Last night, at a forum hosted by the Whitehorse Chamber of Commerce at the Gold Rush Inn, the five vying for the position each told voters they have the experience they need to take on the role.
Over the course of the three-hour event, Mandeep Sidhu, Rick Karp, Dan Curtis, Scott Howell and Bernie Phillips outlined how they would like to see the city run and what they would bring to the role.
In some cases, they took cracks at other's campaigns.
"I'm tenacious when it comes to money,” said Sidhu, who was the first and last to address the crowd of about 75 onlookers.
He encouraged the electorate to hold him accountable not to the dollar, but to the penny.
Sidhu stressed his management background in his opening comments while others also noted their work experience.
Karp pointed to his work as chamber president in recent years, noting he has worked on a number of issues with the city and knows how it operates.
"I understand how city hall functions,” he said after taking issue with "robocalls” that have been made concerning the election.
A number of people in Whitehorse received calls Thursday – an automated message from Curtis, introducing himself and reminding voters of the advance poll.
Curtis then took issue with what he called "misinformation” coming from others after he pointed to his experience as the executive director of Skills Canada Yukon in bringing about partnerships.
The banter between the pair continued throughout the evening on a number of matters. At one point, they feuded over the impact mining in the territory has on the city.
Curtis argued skilled workers don't stay in the territory, with about 90 per cent flying in and out to work.
Karp offered a "correction” to that figure, noting a report showing 40 per cent of the workers at mines are First Nations.
Curtis later responded by stating that although 40 per cent of mine workers are indeed First Nations, those aren't the 90 per cent of skilled workers he was referring to.
"Big difference,” he said.
He later stressed the need for programs aimed at encouraging locals to get the training for the trades that will be needed.
While Curtis and Karp continued their own comments back and forth on one another's statements, Howell focused on the philosophical change he believes is needed at city hall. That, he said, would take the city out of its business mentality.
"We're on the verge of something very philosophical,” he said after stressing, "It's time for some real change.”
Phillips is the only candidate to have served as a councillor, from 1994 to 2000.
He used his opening statement to recall his childhood growing up as one in a family of eight sisters and brothers (including one who had cerebral palsy) and emphasized the need to support one another.
Those themes came forward as they answered questions prepared by the chamber and submitted by the audience. They were asked by moderator Larry Bagnell, the Yukon's former Liberal MP.
They were asked to rate in order of importance property tax, sustainable development, affordable housing and transit.
Curtis and Howell said that while they would speak to each issue, they couldn't put them in an order of importance.
As Howell noted, the city has to work on issues concurrently. Curtis said all of the issues are important.
The three other candidates each had a different priority at the top, though all put transit at the bottom, with Karp first outlining his first priority as affordable housing.
He then identified property tax and sustainable development as equally important, with transit at the end.
Phillips put sustainable development at the top of the list, followed by property taxes, affordable housing and transit.
Finally, Sidhu argued that property taxes are the top issue, with affordable housing being next in line.
Sustainable development was next, with transit at the end.
Housing, land use and city services continued to come up throughout the forum.
Curtis and Howell suggested there is enough land available and enough development plans underway to accommodate the city's needs.
Karp took another stance, arguing that with the mining sector in the territory expanding, there will be a lot of job opportunities in Whitehorse. The city needs to prepare for the future, he said.
Phillips, meanwhile, noted he's been asked by a number of country residential residents about being able to subdivide their lots to create additional properties.
Sidhu pointed to his "obvious” agreement in the development of the former tank farm going ahead, given that his father owns the property. He also suggested development should happen downtown.
Like Sidhu, the other candidates also noted the benefits that would come from remediating the contaminated soil of the former tank farm, then developing it for homes.
Howell was the only candidate to appear apprehensive about the proposed remediation.
He argued that Hillcrest residents, who live near the site, have valid concerns about it, though they do support cleaning up the site.
A number of nearby residents have raised issues with the possibility of noise, dust and traffic in the area should the plans go ahead.
Developers are proposing to dig up the contaminated soil. The city recently reversed its decision to put off second reading of the Official Community Plan (OCP) amendment for the temporary remediation.
It has now gone ahead with second reading, with the OCP change now going to the territorial minister for approval before it comes back to the city.
The tank farm is also set to go through the Yukon Environmental and Socio-economic Assessment process, zoning and other permitting procedures.
"This is really serious,” Howell said, noting he will have to see more on the plans before he's convinced that on-site crushing is a good thing.
Howell was also the only candidate to publicly endorse council candidates.
Each of the five wrapped up their comments again reiterating why they would make the best mayor for the city.
Howell called on voters to vote not only for himself, but also to place an X by the names of incumbent Betty Irwin, Pat Berrel and Jocelyn Curteanu when they cast their ballots.
See mayoral candidates profiles, commentary, letters
Comments (13)
Up 0 Down 0
Arn Anderson on Oct 17, 2012 at 12:02 am
The right not to vote is a choice, as with voting. People who are aware and well-informed of the candidates and choose not to vote is a vote, it means none of the candidates represent their values.
Not voting means so much is wrong with the current system, this is not Austrailia where people are forced to vote regardless of what they think of the candidates "chosen" for them.
Up 0 Down 0
Jackie Ward on Oct 16, 2012 at 4:52 am
And I would of supported Al. Until he opened his mouth about asking rick karp to be mayor.
Up 0 Down 0
Bill Smith on Oct 16, 2012 at 2:11 am
Good luck to all the candidates
Up 0 Down 0
Lisa on Oct 15, 2012 at 3:26 pm
Go Scottie!!!
Up 0 Down 0
north_of_60 on Oct 15, 2012 at 1:06 pm
It's the City's responsibility to spend taxpayers money efficiently and for the common good, not for special interest groups. There are Territorial and Federal social programs to deal with housing, homeless, food and shelter. The City has it's 'hands full' just maintaining the infrastructure and operating it efficiently.
Lets make sure that gas-tax-rebate money from the feds to maintain roads and make public transit less expensive for users, doesn't go to a ski hill zip line, or high-tech water meters on houses.
We need a Mayor and Council that can think responsibly, plan frugally, and keep our costs within our means to pay.
Contrary to the pipe-dream wishes of some there is no mining boom on the Yukon horizon, and no big gas line to the Lower 48 is going to happen.
Up 0 Down 0
Jackie Ward on Oct 15, 2012 at 10:28 am
*PREDICTION TIME* Rick Karp will be the new mayor. Long Lake? Give us a break Rick. What about snow removal? Yukon College as a University? Lmao. I went there years ago and it was a complete waste of my time and money. If that's the best you can come up with, I see a dark future for Whitehorse. BTW: I'm not wasting my time voting. There is not one mayor candidate or council candidate that has any sense. Affordable housing is not the city's job. And stop with the talk about working together with YTG. If they haven't done anything yet, nothing's going to change. And don't bother replying with "If you don't vote you have no right to complain" You bet I will complain. In the words of the late great George Carlin.
"I have solved this political dilemma in a very direct way: I don't vote. On Election Day, I stay home. I firmly believe that if you vote, you have no right to complain. Now, some people like to twist that around. They say, 'If you don't vote, you have no right to complain,' but where's the logic in that? If you vote, and you elect dishonest, incompetent politicians, and they get into office and screw everything up, you are responsible for what they have done. You voted them in. You caused the problem. You have no right to complain. I, on the other hand, who did not vote -- who did not even leave the house on Election Day -- am in no way responsible for that these politicians have done and have every right to complain about the mess that you created."
Up 0 Down 0
Sam on Oct 15, 2012 at 8:07 am
Judith is correct.
COW simply can't afford to build one single family dwelling let alone what would be required to 'deal with the housing issue'
What kind of numbers of people are we talking about here? A dozen? A hundred? A couple hundred? You could build a 6 story apartment complex for 10-20 million dollars on the old CT site and still not house more than a fraction of those people. Any mayoral candidate stating they will impact housing in the slightest is full of hogwash.
The city needs to find a way to do more with less. Taxation under the Buckway regime was out of control. Planners are building neighborhoods no one wants to live in (razed dustbowls with zero character)
Some serious change is in order.
Up 0 Down 0
Melba Disco Dancing Queen on Oct 15, 2012 at 5:41 am
Are the rumours true that Dan Curtis is the unnofficial Yukon Party Candidate? Is Rick Karp planning to pressure the territory to introduce an updated Landlord and Tenant Act that will disempower private residential landlords for the benefit of workers who are not paid enough to afford market rents in Whitehorse? (as the head of the Whitehorse Chamber of Commerce, perhaps he should be pushing for higher minimum wages instead, so full time workers in the private sector can actually afford housing). And how would Mandeep Sidhu approach his father's investment in the tank farm properties, which he bought cheap due to the responsibility of THE OWNER to do the environmental clean up? Any chance that the City might 'pick up the cost' for some or a lot of that to reach 'affordable housing goals'? So many questions about where the candidates are coming from, and why!
Up 0 Down 0
Michael Tillmann on Oct 15, 2012 at 5:04 am
Judith:
Well, housing isn't really federal jurisdiction. At least, not if you look at the Constitution. It would probably fall under 'property rights' or 'social programs', which is provincial. The federal government has gotten into the housing arena over the past decades, but, from a traditional constitution-focused perspective, it isn't their jurisdiction. Sort of like how some people are now lobbying city governments to step outside the traditional role; although, the federal government has a lot more money to throw around when they want to 'step out', that is true.
How could the city pay for housing programs? Well, for one, it could lobby the territorial government to give it some of the millions of dollars they have sitting in the bank for housing that hasn't been used. Other ideas... well, how about a hospitality sector tax? In BC, most cities put a 1 or 2 per cent tax on hotel room stays. Even a moderate sized city can generate several hundreds of thousands of dollars to several million dollars a year by that.
Of course, that may have some people complaining about increasing taxes... but, I don't see adding a few extra dollars to a tourist's hotel room bill as a major inconvenience. And that's just one idea.
Up 0 Down 0
Judith White on Oct 15, 2012 at 1:39 am
Michael, I'm not suggesting housing is not an important issue. The city does not have the financial resources, or the expertise, to deal with housing. I haven't heard anyone with authority from Territorial or Federal Government deny that it is their responsibility.
My question remains - where would the City of Whitehorse find the resources?
Up 0 Down 0
June Jackson on Oct 14, 2012 at 2:23 am
In addition to having no reserve funds, the City's borrowing power is maxed out at the banks..all of these mayoral candidates have neglected to mention where money will come from now, or how inappropriate a pay raise is in this economic climb.
I hope those folks running on 'experience, experience, experience'.. don't get a single vote, Maybe their own.. because its been my experience that Mayors and councilors with experience have NOT provided good service to the residents, OR managed balanced budgets, relying on their own past experience to make bad/poor decisions.
Up 0 Down 0
Michael Tillmann on Oct 13, 2012 at 11:00 pm
Judith:
Sewer, water, garbage and snow removal aren't much help if you don't have a roof over your head.
Housing isn't traditionally inside the jurisdiction of municipalities, but there is no law that forbids it. The Municipal Act allows municipalities to take over areas that are outside their traditional jurisdictions, after consulting with the territorial government.
It would be better if the territorial government stepped up to the plate on this issue, since the housing issue is within their traditional sphere, but they're not. They're doing tiny little half-measures here and there that will not amount to anything much.
Personally, I'm tired of people always passing the buck on the housing issue. I'm tired of politicians saying 'That's not our problem, go and see So and So'... I want someone to take ownership and do /something. Even if it turns out not to work in the end, at least it's better than sitting on your hands all the time and waiting for other people to take action.
Up 0 Down 0
Judith White on Oct 12, 2012 at 8:27 am
For all intents and purposes, the City has no money. The current council has pretty much decimated the reserve funds. I wish that one of these candidates would comment on where they plan to find the money to finance their housing solutions. I'd also be curious about whether the candidates have read the Municipal Act. Sewer, Water, Garbage and Snow Removal should surely have a bigger priority than Housing.