Photo by Whitehorse Star
BEYOND REPAIR – The fire truck is seen after the Jan. 22 collision at the intersection of the Alaska Highway and Robert Service Way. Since the insurance company has written it off, the city must purchase a replacement.
Photo by Whitehorse Star
BEYOND REPAIR – The fire truck is seen after the Jan. 22 collision at the intersection of the Alaska Highway and Robert Service Way. Since the insurance company has written it off, the city must purchase a replacement.
Photo by Whitehorse Star
Photo by Whitehorse Star
A four-vehicle collision in January has cost the city a fire truck.
A four-vehicle collision in January has cost the city a fire truck.
Council is now considering the purchase of a new fire truck after insurance has written off the tanker involved in the Jan. 22 collision.
The accident seriously injured Lisa Gallant-McRobb, the 2018 Yukon Sourdough Rendezvous queen.
She had been driving her car when it became involved in the collision at the intersection of the Alaska Highway and Robert Service Way.
Gallant-McRobb told the Star in late January she was glad to have emerged from the collision alive. The fire truck had been proceeding to a call in the Whitehorse Copper subdivision.
At Monday evening’s council meeting, Richard Graham, the city’s manager of operations, brought forward a recommendation that council sole-source the $365,000 contract for a new fire truck.
The one involved in the collision – which had been purchased new in 2002 – has been written off by the city’s insurance company, Graham advised council.
“A capital budget amendment is required to fund the replacement Fire Department Tanker as insurance will likely only cover the current value of the written-off unit. Monies received from insurance will be returned to the Equipment Replacement Reserve,” he stated in his report to council.
“As time is of the essence in replacing this tanker, research into replacement options and timelines began immediately.
“A typical fire department emergency response unit is produced specifically for a client and delivered in 12 months or more after order and final approval of shop drawings,” the report said.
“A public process would likely take between 18 and 24 months from budget approval to delivery of this particular unit.”
There are two fire tankers currently available in the country.
Staff from the Fire and Operations Departments have reviewed both, which are similar in specifications but would require some modifications prior to purchase.
The 2017 Westvac M4 Fire Tanker would cost $298,000, while the 2018 Fort Garry Crusader Fire Tanker would cost $311,000.
Modifications are estimated to cost $32,000 while other costs such as the inspection, training, decals and shipping would total about $35,000.
While work continues to purchase a new truck, the city has secured a rental tanker for nine months, with a condition that the rental can be cancelled with five days’ notice.
Graham addressed Coun. Steve Roddick’s concerns about the cost of renting a fire truck.
He pointed out it is costing the city just $1, thanks to the territory’s fire marshal’s office. It is still getting ready for the road, but should be in service in a couple of weeks.
In his report, Graham noted the city could also rely on mutual aid partners for tanker services.
It’s recommended the purchase be sole-sourced to avoid the minimum 18-month process if it went to tender.
With that, Graham recommended the budget be amended for a new tanker and the contract be sole-sourced to Westvac Industrial Ltd. for the least expensive of the two options.
Council will vote on the recommendation next week.
Coun. Jocelyn Curteanu attended the meeting by conference call.
While Coun. Samson Hartland had also planned to attend by conference call, there were technical difficulties.
Mayor Dan Curtis noted the councillor was following the proceedings online.
In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.
Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.
Comments (5)
Up 4 Down 4
Max Mack on Mar 11, 2019 at 11:53 am
Perhaps the city needs to review it's emergency response protocols and require all first responders to follow them. Not every call requires folks to race through town and intersections with lights and sirens blaring.
Response times often differ very little whether the responder is traveling at the speed limit or speeding. Slow down - you might save a life.
Up 9 Down 2
Jared T on Mar 7, 2019 at 6:40 pm
@North of 60 - Contrary to popular belief, and most CSI shows, a full forensic investigation is not wrapped up in 45 min (with commercials). Most incidence have multiple factors at play (not blame) and they needed to be shifted through carefully. There’s also a highly likely chance of a civil lawsuit (they happen almost like clockwork when a major company or gov is involved) so everyone is most likely being sure not to jump to any conclusions and cause massive damage on a case that could take years. So I’m afraid your desire for instant finger pointing will have to wait as lawyers and investigators do their due diligence and not just “heap blame” as you so eagerly wish.
Up 20 Down 8
North_of_60 on Mar 7, 2019 at 2:11 pm
Why isn't more information about this accident being reported? It appears that an accurate description of events was quickly covered up and the focus was shifted to the prominent victim. If there are more traffic signal problems with this dangerous intersection then the public should be told.
Up 9 Down 8
Great Scott on Mar 6, 2019 at 9:46 pm
OJW... give your head a shake...
Do you know what happens when you smash your truck up and the insurance company writes it off because it's "beyond economical repair"? Based on your comments I'm guessing not. Anyway, you either have the option to buy the wrecked hulk, or receive a payout. If you take the money and run, then whatever is on your truck that you smashed up is property of the insurance company.
Maybe you should ask them for the audit.
Or, yell at a cloud. Your choice.
Up 9 Down 25
Josey Wales on Mar 5, 2019 at 10:23 pm
Gee...a written off expensive civic asset eh?
Might as well pull the VIN tag off then, if it serves no more civic duty.
Or has someone entitled to civic assets for some bizarre reason already lay claim to the salvage?
Actually a civic audit illustrating “clearly” where are all of the assets procured via the public, their history, paper trails etc and see how outta balanced it may or may not be the alleged inventory Vs. the tangible
Can we still ask things of our nobility and their minions in the context of fiscal prudence...or is that now too radical from us mere peons...peasants?