Whitehorse Daily Star

Fibre optic link has been poorly planned: MLA

The Yukon government’s recent announcement of a new fibre optic link along the Dempster Highway fell prey to criticisms Monday in the legislature.

By Aimee O'Connor on November 17, 2015

The Yukon government’s recent announcement of a new fibre optic link along the Dempster Highway fell prey to criticisms Monday in the legislature.

Yukon Liberal Leader Sandy Silver badgered Community Services Minister Currie Dixon to admit that the government has neither a financial plan for the project nor the will to put out a public tender for companies to build it.

As Highways and Public Works Minister Stacey Hassard was travelling and not in the legislature, Dixon was the designated alternate for questions related to that department.

The 750-kilometre line from Dawson City to Inuvik was initially estimated to cost $32 million, with a maximum of $10 million coming from Northwestel Inc. – but the territorial government has been slow to publicly announce how much it will pay and who will own the line.

“The reality is that this project was announced with no financial plan attached to it,” Silver said.

Dixon reiterated the importance of the project, having been in the works for years.

The territory has been plagued by lengthy failures in telecommunications services for years – often due to contractors’ heavy equipment unwittingly slicing through the fibre optic cable that provides service to the territory.

“The simple reality though is that we live in a part of the country where it is not economical for businesses to do this on their own, so the Yukon government is stepping forward and has committed to invest in this project,” Dixon said.

“We haven’t committed to a dollar amount yet, (but) we have committed to the project.”

Aside from reiterating the ballpark estimate of $32 million, the minister also indicated that there is a “reasonable degree of expectation” that the federal government and Northwest Territories would be interested in providing funding for the link.

“We haven’t arrived at a final conclusion as to how much those investments will be, mostly because in both the Northwest Territories and the Government of Canada, we have relatively new governments, and we want to take the time to speak with them and discuss what the options are going forward,” Dixon said.

Cabinet spokesperson Dan Macdonald was asked whether the government has provided funding to the N.W.T.’s Mackenzie Valley fibre optic line. He confirmed that the Yukon government did not contribute anything to that project.

The N.W.T.’s fibre optic link along the Mackenzie Valley is costing about $82 million, up from previous estimates of $60 million and $70 million.

After tendering the project, the territory signed a contract last November with the winning bidder, Northern Lights General Partnership – made up of Northwestel and Ledcor, a Vancouver-based construction company.

It was decided that Ledcor will build the 1,154-kilometre line and Northwestel will operate and maintain it for 20 years once built.

Northwestel spokesperson Adriann Kennedy explained that it was Northwestel’s proposal to connect the Yukon’s existing fibre link to the N.W.T.’s soon-to-be-completed line – all in the name of creating a redundant telecommunications network.

“Our proposal included Northwestel putting forward $10 million of the $32-million building cost of the Dempster Highway fibre,” Kennedy wrote in an email.

An additiona $5 million of that total will be put toward extending the existing fibre infrastructure from Stewart Crossing to Dawson City, she added.

The company will also assume all ongoing operations and maintenance over the lifetime of the fibre, Kennedy explained.

“All told, our proposal had Northwestel contributing over 75 per cent of the total cost of ownership.”

It’s unclear whether the line will be solely owned by Northwestel, or will involve another entity.

Silver called the announcement a last-minute decision to be able to “check off the done box” before the 2016 territorial election.

Despite being supportive overall of a backup fibre optic link in the territory, Silver voiced concern over the lack of public tender for the project, unlike in the Mackenzie Valley initiative.

“What we’re concerned about is this government picking winners and losers and funnelling money directly to one company or another without any competition. This is what the Yukon Party’s position was until it seems like they panicked and decided that announcing something before the next election was more important,” Silver said.

While Dixon did not address the lack of public tender specifically, he pointed out that in years past, Silver has criticized the government for not moving faster on the project.

“Now he’s ciriticizing us for panicking and making what he calls a hasty decision.”

“We have studied this issue over and over. We have looked at the options. We have considered alternatives. We have looked at funding models and we have arrived at a conclusion.”

The Dempster link is expected to take two years to build.

There is no current estimate for when construction might begin.

Comments (9)

Up 0 Down 0

Michael on Nov 16, 2016 at 1:25 pm

The Alaska / Yukon route is extremely viable. Submarine fiber has terminated in Skagway connecting to Juneau. There isn't an issue with international interconnection, it is done all over. The issue is the desire and the will. If they take another look at the Alaska route they will find the economics have changed considerably.

Up 6 Down 2

Groucho d'North on Nov 19, 2015 at 5:39 pm

Many fail to recognize the sway NWtel has in negotiating this project deal, ownership, O&M costs and related issues.
You see NWTel employs a few hundred people in the Yukon, I think they may be the largest private sector employer in the territory. So when they are eye to eye with the government, they can threaten to move their administration to Yellowknife if they don't get their way, and all those jobs are gone and our GDP also suffers. I've heard its happened before...of course these things would never be mentioned.

Up 5 Down 1

Phaze on Nov 19, 2015 at 8:21 am

Perhaps my prior comment was a bit ill received due to the immediate preconceptions it hit upon. Yes, there's the whole homeland security thing and NSA monitoring issues that come to mind. The issue at hand though has very little to do with tinfoil hat conspiracy theories (nor in actual conspiracy).
Running fiber through US territory is tantamount to expanding your 2nd floor network by running it through your neighbor's house to reach your 1st floor because you can't go through your own floor. You exacerbate the situation by incorporating politics into your solution.

Up 13 Down 4

Route through Alaska has negatives on Nov 18, 2015 at 2:01 pm

With all the goings-on of Homeland Security, NSA etc etc in US, I'm glad that YG re-thought the Alaska route. I'm not a huge fan of Nwtel but at least they are subject to Canadian laws when releasing internet and voice traffic to authorities

Up 6 Down 6

Phaze on Nov 18, 2015 at 1:58 pm

@why not via SEALASKA?
It's likely due to the obvious reason that the Skagway/Alaska route crosses an international border.

Up 11 Down 10

Stu Whatman on Nov 18, 2015 at 1:49 pm

Seems to me that if they funded the cable from Stewart Crossing to Dawson for 10 Million dollars the link from Whitehorse to Skagway which is only 160 km could be done very quickly and cheaply.

A little more thought on this please. Are we going to spend $20 million extra and allow NWT to have control over it for 20 years?
Many considerations of course what about the bottom line!

Up 18 Down 4

June Jackson on Nov 17, 2015 at 8:43 pm

Everything this government does is poorly thought out.

Betcha' Northwestel will end up owning the line. As they have agreed to maintain it for 20 years, they will insist on some collateral.

Checking it off before elections? Why? Does anyone in the YuConservative Party really think they will get in again? The Federal election, I thought, was not so much about putting Trudeau in, as getting Harper out. And that's how i feel about Paslowski... not so much who will get in..but getting him and his toady's out.

Up 19 Down 5

why not via SEALASKA? on Nov 17, 2015 at 8:36 pm

I haven't heard a good reason why the Inuvik route was chosen over the Skagway/Juneau route.

Up 15 Down 28

Kids in a sand box on Nov 17, 2015 at 3:00 pm

Folks this is BS.
Get on with it.
We need it.
No value in these comments.

The group for responsible government in the Yukon.
None found so far

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.