Fentie says federal budget will benefit Yukon
As federal Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff signaled his party would support the federal budget amidst political drama unfolding on Parliament Hill,
As federal Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff signaled his party would support the federal budget amidst political drama unfolding on Parliament Hill, Yukon's leaders weighed in on what $85 billion in deficit spending would mean for the territory.
For Premier Dennis Fentie, the territory stands to benefit from the minority Conservative government's plan to spend its way out of the recession.
"It's going to be a large budget but stay tuned, we are just in the final stages of concluding the budget but there will be increases, as I said," Fentie said today.
At a glance, the Yukon stands poised to receive an additional $48 million in its annual transfer payment from Ottawa. As well, the federal budget earmarked $50 million to the Yukon for affordable housing.
"Just those two items give us approximately $98 million in more cash to work with in the short term," added Fentie.
While the premier hinted at large-scale projects, such as the Mayo-B hydro extension, likely to be paid for from more than $4 billion set aside for northern infrastructure, what he did confirm was $10 million to improve potable water in five Yukon communities. These are Marsh Lake, Ross River, Teslin, Haines Junction and Carcross.
"Other than Marsh Lake, these communities are predominantly first nations communities," said Fentie. "This investment will be dealing with such things as arsenic levels in the water."
While the premier is optimistic, Whitehorse Mayor Bev Buckway is wondering when the territorial government will dole out the Building Canada fund. Two weeks ago, federal Transport Minister John Baird said $175 million, contingent on a 25 per cent contribution from the Yukon, is available as soon as provinces and territories can take advantage.
However, both Fentie and Yukon Public Works Minister Archie Lang said no decision on where to spend would be made until June.
For Buckway, this is not soon enough.
"There's no clarity or certainty from the territorial government and we don't know right now how much is earmarked for municipalities," said Buckway. "There's been a lot of talk about accelerating programs ... and we have a concern if it takes until the end of the summer to work some of this out, the 2009 building season is lost."
Back in Ottawa, Yukon's Liberal MP Larry Bagnell explained the rationale behind conditions his party leader set before supporting for Prime Minister Stephen Harper's budget.
"This government has made a number of promises in the past and he didn't keep them, northern ice breakers, not taxing income trust, so this is a pattern," said Bagnell.
Ignatieff announced this morning that the Liberal backing depended on quarterly reviews on the impact of proposed economic stimulus.
"That's basically why we're supporting it conditionally. The Conservatives put a lot of things in there that we demanded but our worry is they don't get implemented, they don't get implemented fast enough and then they just lapse."
Bagnell added the Liberals will be watching for a plan down the road to get us out of deficit.
It took 10 years to knock $105 billion off the national debt and now that the Conservative's budget has Liberal backing, $85 billion in promised deficit spending over five years will return Canada's debt to levels not seen in years.
And this is what concerns the Yukon Federation of Labour president Alex Furlong.
"While there's massive amounts of money to be injected into the Canadian economy, I didn't really see significant changes to helping victims and further victims of this economic crisis," said Furlong.
Furlong said he is disappointed the Conservatives failed to scrap the two-week waiting period for Employment Insurance and harmonize these benefits across Canada.
But it is the massive deficit spending that concerns him most, and he doubts federal Finance Minister Jim Flaherty's assessment that the government would be in a surplus position by 2013.
"The devil's in the details, and we're in for a massive amount of money," Furlong told the Star. "And there's no way this government can predict it will be in a surplus in five years; that's wishful thinking."
BUDGET HIGHLIGHTS - from The Canadian Press and Winnipeg Sun
-
the federal government is estimating the $40 billion in stimulus through spending and tax cuts in 2009 will create or save 190,000 jobs;
-
by 2013, the national debt is expected to reach $294 billion, up from $233 billion in 2007;
-
$20 billion in personal income tax relief;
-
$85 billion deficit over five years (2013), including $34 billion this year and $30 billion in 2010;
-
cut personal taxes by $20 billion over six years including increasing the basic personal amount that can be earned tax free by 7.5 per cent;
-
cut business taxes by $2 billion over six years;
-
$12 billion ($7 billion in new cash) for infrastructure spending... roads, sewers, universities and an Arctic Research Station, including $1 billion for clean energy research and $1 billion for "green infrastructure;"
-
$7.8 billion for social housing and private home renovation tax credit of up to $1,350 per household (based on $10,000 worth of renos);
-
$8.3 billion for skills and training, including $1.5 billion in new cash to retrain workers;
-
extend Employment Insurance by five weeks for two years (maximum of 50 weeks);
-
$2.7 billion in short term loans to the auto industry;
-
$1 billion over two years for a Community Adjustment Fund (to help communities adjust to the economic hardship);
-
more than $1.4 billion for aboriginal schools, health, water, housing and community services and training.
Comments (6)
Up 0 Down 0
Name Witheld on Feb 3, 2009 at 12:21 pm
This discussion seems to focus outside the Yukon. What if it were re-focused inside the Yukon? Would it talk about questions like
1. "what is our government's plan to manage the stimulus money in the most effective way?" or
2. "has the government even thought about the topic enough to offer public comment?" or
3. "are they going to spend this as they always do...i.e. on pet projects to generate political support in key ridings before the next election?", or
4. "will they spend it when the market is flooded and order books are full?", or,
5. "will they do the wise thing and spend it in a rational, organized fashion, making their investments when the order books are empty, pricing falls, and people need some stability as the business cycle settles lower?"
Just a thought.....
Up 0 Down 0
Fair and Balanced on Feb 3, 2009 at 5:02 am
Conservatism has some great points Arn. Real conservatism. Not this Bush/Rove/Hannity/Limbaugh conservatism. Andrew Sullivan, author of the Conservative Soul, endorsed Barack Obama. Modern day conservatism in the States has been hijacked by Big Oil and religious zealots. I'm not a Harper fan, but his party has some good points to it and is nowhere near the Radical Republicans. There's a reason Obama has 3 Republicans in his cabinet, endorsements from Colin Powell, Scott Mclellan, Christopher Buckley, etc.
www.republicansforobama.org
www.rednecks4obama.com
Fox, MSNBC etc are all garbage. There is no real news. It's tabloid style down in the States.
Up 0 Down 0
Arn Anderson on Jan 31, 2009 at 11:55 am
Obamanomics, is there an echo in here? Before you praise him too much, look at the stimulus bill. The bill has more useless fat on it then any other bill, plus all that fat has nothing to do with ECONOMIC STIMULUS. None of that was even dared to be reported on NBC. Remember Barney Frank? The bigshot whom was oversighting the economy? Or maybe Alan Greenspan, whom served since 1987, maybe he is to blame, but its easier to blame President Bush because thats all anybody who doesnt like him knows how to do. Sorry buddy, blame coroporations for moving to China and creating the imbalance, BOTH PARTIES are at fault for not stopping them, but then again, you wont see those big deals at WalMart you crave for.
WW1 and WW2, how the world blamed the states for not getting involved in world politics with the likes of Hitler on the rise. Now when the US gets involved, its complete bashing with no thought into it. A prime example is, you can throw your shoes at President Bush, but I guarantee you, you wont be doing that in Saddams Iraq or in the Taliban, but give it a shot in N.Korea and tell me about it.
Wow, exaggerated numbers for Bill Clinton. Any person can take credit for a explosion in jobs after the 90s recession. You choose quantity over quality. More crappy jobs in the service industry were created to sell all that cheap crap from China. No complaints on the quality jobs heading overseas, but thats Bill's secert legacy.
Remeber the democrats controlled the house and a good portion of the senate for 2 years. People were clamoring for change and when the dems got in, ZERO RESULTS.
The last paragraph shows the state of mind your in and its known as left wing zealotry. Praising people whom dont share your views to die off shows that there is no point in debating with you, your mind is made up with complete hate of any kind of debate from the right wing. Keep watching low rated, almost bankrupt unfair and off balanced liberal networks and that completly almost destroyed the professionalism of journalism (aka Jon Stewart).
Up 0 Down 0
Fair and Balanced on Jan 30, 2009 at 12:10 am
Obamanomics? Keep watching Faux News Arn. I guess they leave out the part of President Obama having one choice... inflation or depression. He chose inflation and will try to pay it down later. Trickle down bush economics, deregulation and zero oversight, gigantic trade imbalance with China. A cocktail for disaster. What a mess. 3 wars. Iraq, Afghanistan, and the biggest one Bush waged for 8 years. War on the middle class. He created 3 million new jobs in 8 years, you need to create 1 million per year just to keep up with population growth. Bill Clinton created 22 million new jobs in 8 years.
Nixon's southern strategy coupled with there being no majority race/ethnic group in 40 years will make Republicans irrelevant. They need to move from the far white wing, i mean right wing, and get closer to the center. 2012 will bring in more youth voters, immigration, and more old republican racists will die off. Change you can believe in.
Up 0 Down 0
Arn Anderson on Jan 29, 2009 at 9:46 am
Just print off more money if they are worried about debt. After all most economics is all rigged anyway so why create this fall sense of security. Oh by the way, its called Obamanomics, spend spend spend.
Up 0 Down 0
John Lome on Jan 28, 2009 at 1:51 pm
Dear Archie;
Is this just another incentive for the Yukon to get it right the 5th try, or are you going to set the "very dangerous precedent" of getting it right the first time round?
Regards
John Lome