Whitehorse Daily Star

Image title

Photo by Whitehorse Star

GOLDEN MEMORIES – Robert Els is remembered by his family as a man who loved his daughter and worked hard for her to have everything she needed in life. His death, labelled a suicide by the Yukon coroner and workers' compensation board, has haunted them for 15 years because no one who knew him well believe he would take his own life. Photo submitted

Family challenges ‘suicide' label on father's file

Ever since Robert Els' death 15 years ago, his family has been waiting for an explanation they can swallow.

By Justine Davidson on February 26, 2010

Ever since Robert Els' death 15 years ago, his family has been waiting for an explanation they can swallow.

This week, they finally got some news that gives them hope.

On Nov. 5, 1995, Els was crushed between the box and cab of a gravel truck while working on a Golden Hill Ventures road-building contract.

His body was found by one of his co-workers upon lifting the box of the truck, which was found with the passenger side door open and the engine running.

Els was found lying face-down beneath the box, with his hands under his head. At least that's what the one report says, while a handful of statements, photos and notes taken at the scene indicate otherwise.

Inside the cab was a letter from his sister – a letter which would mistakenly be labelled a suicide note by the coroner and police, and would become the bane of Els' daughter, Angela, and her mother, Lynn MacKinnon.

According to the coroner's report, investigators noted a single set of footprints showing Els had walked from the cab of the truck to the bed.

The investigators reported finding no sign of struggle, no injury to his head to indicate he had accidentally been knocked unconscious and fallen into harm's way.

According to a mechanical report done by the company's head mechanic, the truck was in working order and the box lift was functioning as it should, meaning it would drop eight seconds after being activated.

In the months following, MacKinnon and Angela were denied any surviors' benefits, because the Yukon's workers' compensation board ruled Els had taken himself off the job when he decided to take his own life.

They left the Yukon shortly after.

"I like it up there better than I like it here,” MacKinnon told the Star last week from her home in Alberta.

"I would have stayed, but they forced me out. They almost drove me nuts saying that Robert killed himself.”

Judging by the coroner's report, it was simple case of suicide. Look a little deeper, however, and the case of Els' death becomes murky indeed.

MacKinnon does not believe Els killed himself. As his partner for almost a decade, she knew Els as a man who adored his daughter, worked hard to save money for her education and wanted to have more children.

"It was his last day on shift,” MacKinnon said of the day Els died.

"He'd called home and was off the next day. He was planning to visit Angela; she was the main purpose in his life. He was planning a trip with his dad to Venezuela to visit his brother. He wasn't planning on killing himself.”

MacKinnon has more to go on than her belief that Els wouldn't take his own life.

She has pored over all the reports and documents produced in the course of the investigation into his death, and found too many holes to accept suicide as the explanation of her partner's death.

Police jumped to the suicide conclusion before finishing their investigation, MacKinnon said, using the letter from his sister as their evidence.

Two officers came to her door the night after Els was found and told her they knew it was suicide because there was a note. Her daughter, then eight years old, also heard the news before the coroner had made an official finding.

"She came home from school saying, ‘My dad killed himself.' Now where would she have heard that?” MacKinnon asked this week, her outrage still palpable a decade and a half later.

"She heard it from the kids who heard it from their parents. People were saying all kind of things that weren't true.”

She pointed to statements made by Els' co-workers, who said he was depressed and using cocaine.

"His autopsy came out clean; he wasn't taking any drugs,” MacKinnon said. " ... Why would they even have him on the job if they thought he was strung out on cocaine?”

Inconsistencies such as this one are rife throughout the case of Els' death.

They were noticed by the Yukon workers' advocate, who made submissions at a hearing on the case in front of the Workers' Compensation Appeal Tribunal 10 years after Els died.

During the 2005 appeal hearing, the advocate pointed out there was never any suicide note, only the eight-page letter from Els' sister, in which she said she hoped her brother was feeling better.

The advocate told the hearing panel there was a significant amount of documentation which was never released by the coroner, police and Els' employer, including a second inspection report done on the vehicle after Els' death.

She also referred to a handwritten document which said the truck was moved before Els' body was found. Another said it would take 25 seconds for the box to drop after the lever was activated.

Still another document brought forward by the workers' advocate said the truck had been moved 100 metres from where Els had left it and there were no footprints to show where Els had stepped out of the cab, and that another employee had walked to the cab and opened the door to see if Els was inside sleeping.

The tribunal dismissed MacKinnon's appeal, but the hearing only raised more issues for Els' family.

Shortly after the decision was made, it came out that one of the members of the appeal board, Ed Sumner, had spoken to one of the witnesses about the case while at the Whitehorse Curling Club.

MacKinnon made a complaint and workers' compensation board president Valerie Royle ordered an investigation.

The investigator reported that Sumner had asked Myles Kowalyshen, Els' uncle and foreman on the Golden Hill job site, about the case, but did not divulge any confidential information.

"If anything, Sumner was looking for answers as opposed to divulging information, as he knew that Myles was fairly well-informed given the fact he was a relative and the executor of Els' estate,” the inspector's report reads.

The report noted that neither Sumner nor Kowalyshen could remember exactly what they talked about. It also said Kowalyshen's wife was present during the conversation, but was never questioned about it.

Royle dismissed MacKinnon's complaint, saying "that at no time did Mr. Sumner divulge any confidential information to Mr. Kowalyshen.”

"I thought it was a conflict because Myles should have been sworn in under oath just like I was sworn in under oath,” MacKinnon said.

"And I don't think they should have been talking about it while drinking at the curling club. The person he was talking to was Robert's uncle, who was also the foreman for Golden Hill and also a friend of Jon Rudolph, who owned the company.”

Even if Sumner didn't technically "divulge” any information, MacKinnon still thinks it was inappropriate for him to be chatting about the case over beers at a bonspiel. If a judge did the same thing, she says, a retrial would be ordered.

MacKinnon has been fighting for the past five years to have the case reheard, and this week, she finally received some good news.

With help from the staff at the Yukon's NDP caucus office, MacKinnon lodged a complaint with the Yukon ombudsman last year.

On Monday, she received a letter informing her that ombudsman Tracy-Anne McPhee agrees with her position.

”Even though the presiding officer (Sumner) says he didn't learn anything new that affected the outcome, it is not the content of the conversation that was significant,” McPhee writes.

"Rather, it is the fact that the presiding officer stepped out of his role as an impartial adjudicator and became an investigator for the purpose of collecting information to assist in making the decision that creates a reasonable apprehension of bias. The information he was seeking was material to the very decision the tribunal had to make.”

She recommended that a new appeal panel be made to revisit the matter, and also delivered the news that the Workers' Compensation Appeal Tribunal has agreed.

"I think next time it will be wise for us to be there,” MacKinnon said Wednesday, referring to the fact she gave evidence over the phone at the 2005 hearing.

"I'm not too happy about this Val Royle. To say there was nothing wrong with what happened at the curling club, I think she was just protecting her people.”

MacKinnon said she hopes the panel will remove the suicide label from Els' file so his daughter can finally draw the benefits, and the closure MacKinnon says her daughter deserves.

"It's affected her upbringing, her education. It affected her by not getting what she needed,” MacKinnon said of Angela.

"And it's affected her because it was labelled suicide. That's a big word to slap on a person, especially when no one who knew him could believe it.”

Comments (7)

Up 0 Down 0

Darren MacKay on Oct 14, 2016 at 9:44 am

So Very Sorry for your TRAGIC loss...
The Workers Con Boards have failed many across Canada:
All are welcomed to Join our Facebook Groups and tell your stories:
https://www.facebook.com/groups/110338662763574/

Up 0 Down 0

francias pillman on Mar 4, 2010 at 7:30 pm

Why is it so hard to believe that WCB would fudge the facts? Sickening if you ask me. All about $$$$$$, nothing else.

Up 0 Down 0

LM on Mar 2, 2010 at 7:54 am

Wow, another example of investigators doing a not so thorough job. Mistakenly jumping to conclusions on assumptions. Seem to be alot of assumptions in the Yukon. Maybe the investagion unit needs some work on their technique of work ethics before they can make accusations that could put ones reputation at risk.

For Miss Els, I'm sorry for your loss...a very unfortunate casualty. Don't give up hope, stay strong and one day you will be able to put your father to rest. My thoughts are with you.

Up 0 Down 1

Max on Mar 1, 2010 at 9:46 am

Undoubtedly, the WCB accepted the coroner's report of suicide as the official cause of death. Unless there was a compelling reason for the WCB to believe that the coroner's report was materially flawed, the WCB would not ordinarily conduct a separate investigation as to the cause of death.

New evidence or material errors in fact or findings, however, may induce the WCB to revisit the case.

On a side note: the Yukon WCB has NOT shown a penchant for denying benefits for fatal work-related claims.

Up 0 Down 0

Angela Els on Mar 1, 2010 at 7:14 am

I have read through all my fathers documents that they no longer release as they reveal so many mistakes and I also have pictures of how this accident had happened, proving more of what was said about his death wrong. The equipment was tested after his death, however, by a person that worked for the company. Before a proper inspection could be done, the equipment that was apparently in good working order had been fixed, allowing no professional to evaluate the situation. This entire case, including all documents of it are based on typing errors and the views of people who are in the favor of the company. If this accident had happened anywhere but Whitehorse, WCB would at fault by default for its innapropriate "typing errors" that direct my fathers letters from his sister to "suicide" and accusations of "drug abuse" when his autopsy came out 100% clean. I find it pathetic that WCB would put such an effort in to ruin my fathers reputation, destroy documents and sacrifice my life in favor of saving themselves money. If anyone dealing with this case is shorthanded of former documents, please contact me as I have saved everything in my possesion for the past 15 years.

Up 0 Down 0

Bruce junker on Feb 28, 2010 at 1:42 am

Oh and by the way, why was the passenger side door open ?Was it due to the drivers side being inoperative? What position was the dump box lever in? Was the box loaded or empty?

Did anyone test the hydraulic fluid to see if it was contaminated with dirt / rocks / mud. Did the dump truck have a protecter over the hydraulic ram to prevent it from being compromised when loaded from the excavator? Was a professional investigation carried out? In my 25 yrs of trucking, I've seen dump truck boxes being pushed right off the frame, next to were people have been working, dump trucks tipping over due to un-level ground, and pretty much everything else you could imagine. This isn't rocket science here, mechanical equipment malfunctions all the time, and thats why they have so many repair facilities.

Up 0 Down 0

Bruce Junker on Feb 28, 2010 at 1:30 am

In 25 years, I've run lots of dump trucks and can verify that the dump box can come down on it's own anytime; Once it is raised and the lever is pulled to lower it and it doesn't come down, the driver's first intuition is to push the lever several times, then get get out and see if the cable or hydraulic line has broken, it is safer to crawl on the ground to check this, however it looks safe to just quickly peer over the frame to see if this has indeed happened, and this may well be exactly what has happened in this situation. I don't think many driver's realize how fast these boxes come down and think they can move out of the way. To go around accusing him of suicide and cocaine abuse is exactly the kind of way the workers compensation board escapes liability. I hope someone can give the benefit of doubt on behalf of this worker as I doubt very much anyone would consider suicide in this manner, and yes I have had the dump box, come down on me a few times, it has something to due with the hydraulic system malfunctioning. Or broken , hung-up, crimped cables, I would never peer over the frame unless I had a 8x8 block of hard wood placed across the frame, and yes they squish badly which proves this likely happened.

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.