Whitehorse Daily Star

Employers' outcry freezes changes to program

Changes to the Yukon worker nominee program are on hold after an outcry from employers,

By Justine Davidson on December 28, 2010

Changes to the Yukon worker nominee program are on hold after an outcry from employers, who say it will harm people's ability to immigrate to the Yukon.

"We have to get in line with other jurisdictions, but we have some flexibility,” Shawn Kitchen, director of labour market programs and services at the Department Education, said recently of Canada's response to the Yukon's objection to one of the new policies.

Last month, the territory announced it was changing the language and financial requirements for people coming to Canada under the foreign worker program as of Jan. 1, 2011.

People coming to work in the service industry will now have to pass a French or English language test before their application is accepted, a requirement which both the government and employers are happy with.

"It's a tightening-up of the program, which is good,” said Rick Karp, president of the Whitehorse Chamber of Commerce and an employer who hires through the program.

"It's really important in terms of health and safety of the nominees when they come to the country.

"If there's some sort of crisis in the workplace, being able to speak the language makes a huge difference. It also means people know their rights and understand their responsibilities.”

But the change that Karp and many of the employers he represents object to is a new requirement that immigrants coming to Canada under the program must have $10,000 in a Canadian bank before they will be considered.

That is an enormous sum for a person from the Philippines, the home country of 65 to 70 per cent of the Yukon's 400-odd nominees, according to Karp.

Ten thousand dollars represent several years' income for someone in the Philippines working in a job comparable to the ones currently being filled in the Yukon, namely those in the service or "critical impact” sector.

In the case of people who already have family here who are earning Canadian dollars, Karp said it is still difficult to put that money together because any extra income is generally wired back to the Philippines.

"How is a (potential) critical impact worker whose family is sending money home, going to meet that requirement?” he asked.

Previously, nominees could prove their financial stability with an "affidavit of support” from their employer.

That document would say they have work and that they would have financial support in the event the job doesn't work out.

But both the federal government and the territorial Department of Justice have found fault with that method, Kitchen said.

The Canadian government has simply said that having the money shows the nominees' "longer-term ability to succeed in Canada,” Kitchen said.

After doing a review of the program, the Department of Justice has also questioned the affidavit's legal validity.

"We would have a hard time trying to enforce it on a sponsor,” Kitchen said.

His department has had "conversations” with some employers regarding their responsibility to nominees, but has never gone to court to enforce an affidavit, he added.

The change to the financial requirements is "entirely driven by Canada,” Kitchen said.

"Based on our program reviews and our legal reviews, we may have made changes to the language requirements,” Kitchen said of the Yukon's position, "but I don't know that we would have made changes to the financial requirements.”

Karp said he planned to write a letter to the federal government on behalf of Whitehorse employers, outlining their objection to the $10,000 hurdle.

The Department of Education has also been having discussions with Canada about a compromise.

"We went back to (Citizenship and Immigration Canada) about the affidavit of support and they said it still had to go, but in terms of the $10,000 that there was flexibility in that amount and establishing that financial security,” Kitchen said.

Until the territory and Canada can come to a mutually agreeable new policy, the affidavit will stand, he said.

Comments (5)

Up 0 Down 0

Whitehorse Bambi on Jan 3, 2011 at 12:04 pm

Pillman

You miss the point. These are low skilled jobs, they don't get paid $25 an hour because that is not what the job is worth. If you were willing to pay $10 for a cup of coffee, or $20 for a big Mac then the service industry could pay service workers $25 an hour. We already pay crazy amounts for high taxes, electricity, Internet, wcb, and our core product costs which is the primary reason you pay "premium prices today."

Foreign workers do not get many of the benefits as your posts state. They are under contract, if the contract expires or is terminated, they go back to their home country at the employer's expense. The wages they earn in 1 year here are equal to 10 years in their own countries doing similar work. They also don't pay crazy amounts for high taxes, electricity, or wcb back in their home countries so the money earned here goes a lot farther for them.

Unlike many of the locals, the foreign workers actually work, work hard for their wages, know customer service, and show up for work. Until we get rid of all the welfare programs, high costs of doing business, these workers make it viable to own and run a business. Your other choice is to live in the world of Anne Rand's Atlas Shrugged.

Up 0 Down 0

francas pillman on Dec 29, 2010 at 9:57 am

What's wrong with having money before you enter someone's country? During the Gold-Rush, did you get to the summit and ask for a piece of paper so you could claim all your goods in Dawson? No, you had to pack all of your supply's, enough to last 6 months or 1 year, I can't remember. The point is to have people be self sufficient. Our healthcare system is stressed out as it is, as well as other aspects of our society. Having immigrants prove they have $10k is a benefit to you, me, and the person coming here. Why should I support someone who gets sponsored and in turn just becomes a welfare bum? And why are immigrants suddenly more important than citizens Alex Furlong? Seems the Yukon Labour Union is only interested in immigrant rights and issues. I never hear a peep out of them on anything else. Why are they not hounding these Yukon businesses that pay low wages but charge top dollar for their goods and services. And cry like the sky is falling unless their demands of low, cheap, predictable labor are met. Having money and speaking good English should be mandatory. Sorry, its not discrimination or racist, no matter what these groups will cry about. You are no benefit to our society if you do not have the basics of "our society" first. It's not asking much, stop making it into the end of the world.

Up 0 Down 0

Ace on Dec 29, 2010 at 9:46 am

I'd review it if I could understand it.

Up 0 Down 0

Mario Rayo Sr. on Dec 28, 2010 at 5:41 pm

It is well known that Canadians born in Canada become no longer good permanent workers for a minimum wages or a bit more. Unfortunately in the Yukon there is too much government help, for those ones that preferred not to be strong workers reason that places are filled up by foreigners.

Today's new requirements in discussion have some controversy. I do believe it's OK to test postulants about language knowledge but the 10.000 dollars are executing this foreign chances. It is huge money for them. I had been in Asia and good workers english speaking even never have a bank account. What we can expect? Sponsors have a commitment to taking care for income and open to listen of any weakness that these people could have. Hope this comment will be accepted and reviewed.

Up 0 Down 0

Pablo on Dec 28, 2010 at 11:58 am

Maybe if this program goes under changes, we kids could get a job. The gov needs to quit listening to employers and start listening to people more important, like voters.

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.