EI changes have major implications
Whitehorse residents will be hit harder and in higher numbers than anywhere else across the North by changes to Employment Insurance, according to Access to Information documents.
Whitehorse residents will be hit harder and in higher numbers than anywhere else across the North by changes to Employment Insurance, according to Access to Information documents.
About 600 Whitehorse residents on EI stand to lose $3.3 million in entitlement benefits following changes thrown into gear over the Thanksgiving weekend.
The total amounts to nearly half the amount northerners will lose as a result of the new rules, state documents obtained by a Liberal MP.
The changes took effect Monday and impact the Yukon, Northwest Territories, Nunavut and Prince Edward Island.
The main change lies in splitting each territory into two EI zones — capital and “non-capital” — with eligibility now more difficult in Whitehorse, Yellowknife and Iqaluit than in the outlying regions.
Residents in those three cities now need to work at least 700 hours — instead of the previously demanded 420 hours — to qualify for EI.
Benefits can be collected for no longer than 36 weeks, down from 45 weeks.
“It just seems to me that it’s part of the trend that’s making it harder for working people to maintain a decent level of income,” Bill Thomas, co-chair of the Yukon Anti-Poverty Coalition, said in an interview today.
“We’ve always as Canadians for decades been proud of an income support program like EI ... I’m really disappointed in the government, they’re just making it more difficult.”
Thomas noted the federal government recently announced its plan to double the refundable child fitness tax credit.
But he also highlighted the rise in the number of people making use of food banks across the country.
“There’s more need now than ever for income support programs,” he said.
Yukon MP Ryan Leef could not be reached for comment on the impacts to the territory before press time this afternoon.
Employment Minister Jason Kenney’s office stated the EI system in the territory now “reflects the reality of the local labour market.
“EI benefits continue to be there for Yukoners, including in areas where jobs simply do not exist outside seasonal or specialized industries,” the Employment department said in a briefing.
It noted that since the 1970s, the unemployment calculation for the territories had been fixed at 25 per cent. “This outdated calculation ignored the local reality,” the Employment department stated.
At 6.3 per cent, Yukon’s unemployment rate is the third-lowest in the country, with Whitehorse at 5 per cent.
That figure belies figures from the struggling Yukon mining industry — Alexco Resources has suspended operations at its Bellekeno silver mine indefinitely — as well as a low vacancy rate that results in higher rent.
About 600 Whitehorse residents — out of a total 1,600 claimants — will get less cash or fewer weeks of EI due to the changes, resulting in $3.3 million in assistance losses, according to the documents.
None of the 1,000 claimants in the communities are slated to be negatively affected.
Nearly 1,400 northern residents total could be hit by the changes.
In Yellowknife, roughly 240 people are projected to lose about $1.4 million total, while 430 more people across the territory could see $2 million in losses.
Roughly 50 people in Iqaluit and another 50 in areas outside the capital are slated to lose $500,000 in all.
Comments (11)
Up 20 Down 1
north_of_60 on Oct 17, 2014 at 10:06 pm
@ralpH ... "This is insurance against not being able to find work, not a supplement to your income." "Plush summer government employment and then use the excuse that they cannot find anything in their pay range."
Exactly !! That is the sort of EI abuse we all know goes on in the North. They act like they're entitled to that benefit money because of the paltry amount they paid into it. That is obvious by the wording that they 'lose' their entitlement. They haven't 'lost 3.3 million, it wasn't theirs to claim.
Up 17 Down 1
Just Say'in on Oct 17, 2014 at 9:49 pm
Thanks June, for referring to this as U.I. as it should be, as it is insurance against unemployment. Our sickening political correctness where the Government feels compelled to refer to these hand outs as E.I. These precious Snow Flakes need to get a little humility and get to work. There are tons of jobs if you want to work.
Up 28 Down 3
ralpH on Oct 16, 2014 at 12:18 pm
Good comment Dan Davidson, but the problem with migrating to the communities is that there is ample work there as well. This is insurance against not being able to find work, not a supplement to your income. I have always believed that caseworkers are needed to assess every case on a regular basis to ensure that they are not abusing it. When you know someone who has done this for 28 years, tells you they are not using it for it's intended purpose. And there are many more like this. Plush summer government employment and then use the excuse that they cannot find anything in their pay range.
Up 31 Down 6
June Jackson on Oct 16, 2014 at 11:25 am
As long as there is one foreign worker in the country there shouldn't be a need for UI. I too see people working June, July, and Aug, maybe part of Sept. then collecting UI and Social Assistance for the remainder of the year. I am also on the "get off your ass and get a job" side of the fence. But, on the other side of this coin it costs business too much money to hire Canadians.. maybe some of these people can't get a job once the rush is over? Perhaps the answer is.. go after businesses with high foreign worker content and put in a Canadian First act into legislation?
Up 13 Down 23
Unintended impact on Oct 16, 2014 at 8:42 am
There is an unintended impact to these changes ... increase in persons seeking social assistance therefore social assistance case loads and costs will go up putting additional stress on a program that is understaffed and in disarray because of poor management. Impact on food bank which is always struggling. Increase in stress within families resulting a potential for increase in domestic abuse - resulting in more RCMP involvement, greater demand on Kaushees etc. The list can go on ... this is not a black and white situation.
Up 30 Down 6
ralpH on Oct 15, 2014 at 3:12 pm
@ good on very good comment. I know of people that have done this for years. one case is going on for 28 years. This should be in effect all across the north. Have a summer bu*^$#* tourists and sit around all winter doing the same to the government.
Up 20 Down 13
Dan Davidson on Oct 15, 2014 at 3:02 pm
Most commentators (and the government) seem to forget that it's NOT the government's money (or the commentator's for that matter) and that the people who are claiming from the fund paid into it. I've never used the fund myself, but I don't begrudge it to those who do.
Anyway - perhaps this will be an incentive for unemployed folks living in the city to relocate to the rural communities for the winter.
And by the way, putting the capital cities of all three territories in the same EI category is utterly silly. There's a world of difference between Whitehorse, Yellowknife and Iqaluit.
Up 50 Down 13
good on Oct 15, 2014 at 3:08 am
Good. Just because you work one job over the warm months gives you no right to sit on your ass all winter. If you are capable of working you should have to. The argument that you need the same type of work is BS. You are just lazy. Period. I welcome these changes. And I hope more are to come. Thank you Harper.
Up 51 Down 7
working man on Oct 14, 2014 at 10:23 pm
36 weeks is plenty of time to find work or continue the seasonal job you had last summer. Now instead of sledding all winter and complaining about all the taxes you paid working so much overtime, take advantage of the child fitness tax credit and get your fat kids off the ipad and back into sports.
Up 42 Down 6
bobbybitman on Oct 14, 2014 at 8:05 pm
Twenty weeks of work, then 36 weeks off to find a new job in Whitehorse is still incredibly generous.
Full credit to Harper for this move.
Up 42 Down 4
Yukon 2nd Nation on Oct 14, 2014 at 3:02 pm
“It just seems to me that it’s part of the trend that’s making it harder for working people to maintain a decent level of income,”
This statement just doesn't compute for me.
Shouldn't this really read, "it is harder for people who only work 400 hours to sit on their @ss for the remainder of the year, making contribution to an economy that needs to hire temporary foreign workers to fill job vacancies and has the resource sector screaming for local people"???
I am glad the Liberals are going to look into this. They are doing a great job doing NDP type work. Keep up the good work Libs, you just lost my vote.