Whitehorse Daily Star

Image title

Photo by Whitehorse Star

John Streicker

Durban-based Greens report to Yukoners

The leaders of the federal Green Party addressed Yukoners Tuesday afternoon from the COP17 United Nations climate change conference in Durban, South Africa.

By Max Leighton on December 7, 2011

The leaders of the federal Green Party addressed Yukoners Tuesday afternoon from the COP17 United Nations climate change conference in Durban, South Africa.

Green Party president and Yukoner John Streicker and party leader Elizabeth May used Skype to address a group of about 20 attendees at the Yukon branch of the federal Green Party's annual general meeting, held at the Westmark Whitehorse Hotel.

Canadians, they say, should be doing more to combat global climate change.

"I am here to represent Canadians,” said Streicker. "I am here with a political hat, but I am not interested in what this means for the Green Party, but what it means to the nation and what it means for future negotiations.”

It is becoming more likely that the Durban conference will not result in a new treaty, said Streicker.

The Canadian government has proved a hindrance to the negotiation process, he said.

"It's disappointing being a Canadian here,” Streicker told the crowd.

"In 2005, we were the best country in the world. We were getting this moving; now we are the country blocking it all.

"So it's difficult to be here and be a Canadian, but that's the job. It's about letting other countries know that the government's position doesn't necessarily reflect Canadian values.”

Canadians should be speaking out about our government's role in the negotiations, said Streicker.

"Can we do something in Canada, in the Yukon? I say absolutely. We need to know that it will take pressure to get the government to move from a political agenda to a public agenda,” said Streicker.

Unlike other world governments, the Canadian government has not included political opposition leaders in its delegation.

That has left leaders like May unable to participate in negotiations.

"We have colleagues on the delegation, including some from the Yukon,” said Streicker

"But they can't really discuss what's going on. Each morning, though, Guy Saint-Jacques (Canada's chief negotiator and Ambassador for Climate Change) gives Canadian attendees who are not delegates some details. We are not getting a big picture of what's going on.”

As both an MP and party leader, May believes she should have been given the opportunity to represent Canadians at the delegation, and says the exclusion of opposition leaders has added to Canada's embarrassment at the conference.

"Pretty much everyone I have met here know I am a member of Parliament and the leader of the Green Party of Canada,” said May. "They are absolutely stunned that my own government had not allowed me to be part of their delegation.”

She has found a temporary home in Durban, however, alongside the delegation from Papua New Guinea.

May was invited to the delegation by friend Kevin Conrad, a Papuan lawyer and environmentalist. Conrad earned an international reputation during a 2007 UN climate conference for challenging the United States to "lead or get out of the way,” of negotiations.

"I have a lot of respect for the role of the Papua New Guinea delegation in this negotiation and they allowed me to be accredited with them,” said May.

"So far, I haven't been actually physically working for Papua New Guinea here. I have been working with the NGO groups, climate action network, in terms of getting the information and sharing it. Because the currency of these negotiations is information.”

Even with delegate status, May said, it has been difficult to take part in the discussions that will help determine future international policy on climate change.

"They basically told me that it was awful for me to be in the room because as a member of Parliament, the non-government organizations were allowing me to ask questions and they were giving up their time for me to ask questions,” she said. "And I responded by saying, ‘Well that's why I should be on the delegation.' It's sort of an odd catch 22.”

The Canadian government has claimed it "will support a new international climate change agreement that include commitments from all major emitters,” which including China, the world's largest emitter of greenhouse gases.

May believes the Harper government have already made up their mind on climate negotiation.

"It's very clear, about a week before we left Canada that the Harper government has already taken a position that they will start the proceedings to legally withdraw from Kyoto and announced it right before Christmas. It's really typical.”

By taking a hard-nosed stance on negotiations, the government is deliberately trying to stall the whole process, she said.

"China has said they will participate in Kyoto but our condition is that other countries do too. And then you have Canada saying, ‘We will not commit to Kyoto because it doesn't include China,'” she said.

"If they were really interested in a deal that includes China, they would say, ‘Well the situation here has changed, China has called on Canada to participate and we will.'

"You almost have to pretend Canada doesn't exist as a negotiator, because what we are doing is so unhelpful. Canada is seen as an unhelpful and irrelevant part of the negotiations.”

May praised northern Canadians' efforts and their contribution to the international conference, including an Inuit youth delegation from Nunavut, and Streicker, who, she said, has put the interests of Yukoners forward in discussions with the Canadian delegates.

She also called on Canadians to voice their concerns about the government's role in international climate change negotiations.

"The pressure that can be put on the Canadian government, really should come from Canadians in the next few days, saying we are unhappy with what the Canadian government is doing in Durban,” she said.

The conference will continue for two more days, with an "Action Plan for Africa” event being hosted today by the African Union and the World Bank.

Comments (5)

Up 0 Down 0

north of 60 on Dec 13, 2011 at 12:51 pm

If everyone in Canada went back to living as we did 100 years ago, it wouldn't make one iota of difference in the world's GHGs. Canada's total contribution, including the oilsands, is vanishingly insignificant. China emits more GHGs in a week than Canada does in a year.

We should deal with the problems which do cause hardship in our lives, like toxic pollution, and not waste our time on meaningless gestures.

If CO2 pollution is an issue, then why are annual 'Green-cult' meetings in high priced resorts?

Why does the 'Green' movement not use teleconferences or regional meetings to reduce costs of flying and carbon footprint?

The hypocritical 'Green' movement tells us to reduce carbon yet increases carbon though these conferences. The 'Greenies' should refuse to fly and instead should walk the talk and use teleconferences.

Why are some of the world's richest people with conspicuous consumption seen as role models?

Gore, Suzuki, Moore, Cameron, etc. live in many mansions and drive many large vehicles.

If I see answers to these questions from the AGW aficionados, then I will begin to take them seriously.

Up 0 Down 0

brian on Dec 9, 2011 at 9:26 am

The thing with the green alternatives that we have is that they are still dependent on oil based products. Windmills-still require oil to lubricate the internal pieces as well as any other metal that needs to be mined to make them. Solar panels- require oil products to make the panels. Hybrid vehicles-Require 2 to 3x the energy and resources to build them. The batteries used in these vehicle contain nasty chemicals that require a long and time(as well as expensive) consuming process to separate the chemicals once the battery isn't useful. The people who believe they are helping the environment with these cars are delusional. Your actually using more resources and energy instead of just keeping your current vehicle.

Up 0 Down 0

Francias Pillman on Dec 8, 2011 at 11:05 am

The only hot air I see is coming out of johns mouth. He sees a career in this whole global warming scam. And he is a hypocrite. Flying half way around the world for what? To fight pollution? Lol. Your stupid conferences create more pollution than most people do in their lifetime. Hypocritical to say the least.

Up 0 Down 0

Former Yukon Resident on Dec 8, 2011 at 5:31 am

I'm getting sick of these few greenies, OCW people claiming to represent the peoples values. 20 people do not represent 30,000. 50 people in Edmonton do not represent a city of a million. Get over yourselves and stop being disappointed about being Canadian.

Saint Suzuki brags about China's eco plans, yet never a peep from him about how much they pollute, 16 of the most polluted cities are in China. Not one peep out of the greenies during the 13 year Liberal reign when they did ZERO work on the Kyoto protocol (signing a piece of paper does not do anything btw) but magically come out blasting when there is Conservative gov't. I'm getting sick of the staged political ramblings and hypocrisy from the left and greenies.

Canada basically has to slash its economy in the name of CO2 emissions to have China "consider" doing the same. But at the same time while our economy is stalled, EI, CPP, welfare, healthcare payments continue to rise bankrupting our nation so China can decide whether or not to jump aboard and at the same time want all our green technology (technology that saint Suzuki never talks about) for free. LOL, go ask a Tibetan, a inner Mongolian or a Uyghur about China's "considerations".

Carbon taxes are essentially a WAR on the middle class and lower income people, the 99% they like to call them/us.

Up 0 Down 0

Thank you Federal Government on Dec 7, 2011 at 12:31 pm

The only disappointment to Canada is the fact Streicker and the other apologists are there. It was long overdue for the Feds to stand up and put an end to this useless Kyoto agreement where the biggest polluters in the world get off scott free while Canada is made out to be the bad guy.

China says they 'might consider' signing onto a GHG agreement 'only after 2020' and only if everyone else continues to be bound by binding emission cut agreements in the meanwhile. Give me a break!

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.