Driver shows scant emotion at hearing verdict
Michael Schmidt was found not guilty last Thursday of impaired driving causing bodily harm to Jessica Frotten and Michael Sanderson.
Michael Schmidt was found not guilty last Thursday of impaired driving causing bodily harm to Jessica Frotten and Michael Sanderson.
The verdict delivered by Deputy Justice Stephen Hiller of the Yukon Supreme Court came on the afternoon of the fourth day of Schmidt's retrial ordered by the Yukon Court of Appeal in November 2012.
Schmidt, 32, showed little emotion after the judge delivered his decision. He did have a long hug with his mother and a friend who were in the courtroom for the verdict.
The accused was found guilty after the initial trial in October 2011. He was sentenced to eight months in jail but was eventually released pending the results of an appeal.
The Yukon Court of Appeal in November 2012 ordered the verdict set aside and a new trial held after finding the judge had erred in the initial trial.
Frotten remains paralyzed from the waist down as a result of the single-vehicle rollover just after 4 p.m. on Dec. 14, 2009 along the Alaska Highway west of Whitehorse.
Hiller said Thursday while there was evidence Schmidt consumed alcohol that day, there was nothing overwhelming to support a finding that it contributed to the rollover on a stretch of highway where frost heaves were common.
There was evidence Schmidt drank about six beers the night before the accident before going to bed at 3 a.m.
He got up at about 10 a.m. and a friend poured him a drink of coffee and Irish Cream, though Schmidt didn't drink it all once learned there was alcohol in it.
He shared a pitcher of beer during lunch at the Airport Chalet, but it does not appear he had a test sample at Yukon Brewery where he, Frotten and Sanderson stopped to buy beer before heading out for Haines Junction.
There was nothing to indicate Schmidt had consumed any beer during the drive, Hiller said.
The judge recalled the testimony of the waitress at the Airport Chalet who told the court she'd seen nothing to suggest there was anything wrong with Schmidt's ability to drive after the three finished lunch.
Similarly, the clerk at the brewery who knew Schmidt as a regular customer saw nothing to suggest he shouldn't be driving, the judge said in delivering his decision.
Hiller said the video tape from the Porter Creek Super A where they stopped to buy gas, and where Schmidt purchased a bottle of water, did not show any signs that Schmidt was impaired while filling up.
Testimony from those at the accident scene indicates there was nothing in Schmidt's conduct to suggest he was impaired, the judge said.
Two breathalyzer tests taken at the Whitehorse RCMP detachment three hours after the mishap both registered blood-alcohol levels of .07, or slightly lower than .08, the point at which a driver is legally impaired. Neither of the police vehicles at the scene was equipped with roadside
breathalyzer kits.
The judge said there was evidence Schmidt was driving fast, though he noted testimony that it was commonplace for highway travellers in the Yukon to exceed the speed limit.
There was also an indication he had slowed down after hitting two sections of frost heaves, one before the Drurys' Circle D Ranch, and one right around the ranch, the judge said.
Hiller said there was also evidence of more frost heaving close to the area where Schmidt's Honda Civic left the highway and rolled about 2.5 kilometres on the Whitehorse side of the Takhini River Bridge.
It would be reasonable, the judge said, to infer that Schmidt's blood-alcohol level was above .07 at the time of the crash, but perhaps not significantly above.
Hiller said in a case of assessing criminal responsibility, a finding of guilt requires the court to be certain beyond a reasonable doubt.
It cannot be based on speculation nor measured by probabilities, Hiller said.
"Accordingly, I find the accused not guilty.”
Comments (10)
Up 28 Down 7
YukonertoAlbertan on Apr 23, 2014 at 2:56 pm
What Frotten suffered is nothing any of us can imagine. That being said, for those who think Schmidt is not suffering, think again. He is not on a clear conscience here. I suggest that you go to the Yukon Federal Court website and review the transcript of that initial hearing. For those who think his mistake DID NOT impact his life, you are sadly mistaken. It is very unfortunate what happened, it truly is. Michael is a very nice guy who made a horrible mistake and unfortunately Frotten had to suffer the most. If she felt that she was not safe to drive with Schmidt, then she had the option to not get into the vehicle. It is truly horrible that she has had such a drastic change in life and that Schmidt will always have that on his mind.
Up 39 Down 11
anie north on Apr 22, 2014 at 9:18 am
BnR: well said. He was charged with a specific crime, and the judge determined that the facts didn't support a guilty finding.
It is absurd to criticize this person because he was happy with the verdict. Would any of us reacted differently? This was a horrible, preventable, accident. Everyone involved will no doubt be plagued by guilt and "what if" questions. But the fact is that he was found not guilty of this specific crime. Period.
If it had been a case of a guilty verdict and unreasonably light sentence, then I could understand the venom of some of these posts. But setting ourselves up as some sort of additional judge, likely without access to all of the facts, is not fair or even logical.
"Buckle up. Drive sober" is the lesson we all should learn from this.
Up 16 Down 24
Stan on Apr 22, 2014 at 5:05 am
Drive sober is the message.
I was encouraged by the initial finding that if you were around the legal limit you were impaired which sent a message of do not drink and drive.
The legal system has a responsibility to err on the side of caution which in my mind means protecting people which was not done in this case.
If you are .07 three hours after an accident you were (based on rules of probability) at and likely over the limit three hours before.
How many more people have to die or be seriously injured before the justice system catches up with distracted driving and people impaired with alcohol, illegal drugs and legal drugs?
Up 35 Down 13
CJ on Apr 22, 2014 at 4:35 am
Thanks, Captain Obvious for speaking some truth.
Like the captain, I can't see that Schmidt hasn't suffered, and probably continues to. But I'm glad that the justice system didn't give up on him.
It is upsetting to see such ignorance about the justice system paraded around like this. Such tough talkers, too. I pray they never end up on a jury.
Up 81 Down 17
Captain Obvious on Apr 22, 2014 at 3:35 am
I'm glad this is over. I feel very bad for all the families involved.
It was a bad accident... key word being accident. Schmidt served jail time in addition to being wrung through the courts. My sympathies are definitely with Jessica on this one, but I firmly believe in personal responsibility.
People looking for justice in the system, that then in the next breath turn around with comments like "slap on the wrist", and "shining example" when a verdict turns against their lynchmob views are absolute morons. Justice is not a flog.
Buckle up. Drive sober.
Up 78 Down 22
BnR on Apr 22, 2014 at 2:46 am
What is it with these comments? This is a shining example of justice. He was charged and found not guilty of impaired driving causing bodily harm according to our legal system. That's justice. You might not like it, but that doesn't make it wrong. Maybe he should have been charged with careless driving?
Justice is not based on mob rules or "vigilante action". There were many things that may or may not have contributed to this tragic event, and on this one item, there was not enough evidence to prove the charge.
And besides, what would it accomplish? Vengeance? He probably thinks about what happened all the time and would change it if he could.
Up 20 Down 44
MIDNIGHTSUN007 on Apr 21, 2014 at 10:04 am
Goes to show that you can buy your way of jail! His lawyer's fees must be massive. I wonder how he sleeps at night.
Up 16 Down 32
Josey Wales on Apr 21, 2014 at 9:24 am
To call this a slap does those who are slapped a great disservice.
...but hey we are now "focused" on social justice these politically correct days.
With the many messages that come from our courts is it any wonder why folks don't even bother calling the RCMP on scumbags anymore.
There will be another case just like this one...just when is the question.
No roadside kits in the units?
Up 35 Down 51
June Jackson on Apr 21, 2014 at 7:08 am
Another shining example of Yukon justice.
Up 36 Down 56
yukoner on Apr 21, 2014 at 7:05 am
Another person let off with a slap on the wrist.