Photo by Whitehorse Star
Mark Smith, Nathan Miller, Kevin James and Bernard Buckles
Photo by Whitehorse Star
Mark Smith, Nathan Miller, Kevin James and Bernard Buckles
A proposed eight-plex condo unit on Ogilvie Street would detract from the old town character of the downtown, city council heard at its meeting Monday night.
A proposed eight-plex condo unit on Ogilvie Street would detract from the old town character of the downtown, city council heard at its meeting Monday night.
Ogilvie Street resident Mark Smith told council the spirit of the old town plan was to maintain the single-family residential flavour with some allowance for smaller multi-unit developments.
The eight-plex proposed by Narrow Gauge Construction directly across the street from Smith's home would be a big, solid block development, he said.
It would block out light and eliminate the feeling of openness which comes with separation between buildings on separate lots, he added.
"It will dwarf all other buildings on the street.”
Narrow Gauge and Suat Tuzlak of the Alpine Bakery have applied for special permission to build multi-unit dwellings downtown.
All three lots are zoned single-family residential, which allow for single-family detached homes or duplexes.
There is also a conditional use provision that allows for larger developments with the permission of council.
Narrow Gauge is seeking permission to build what it's calling Cowley Station, an eight-plex on two lots along the south side of Ogilvie, between Sixth and Seventh avenues.
Tuzlak wants to build a five-plex rental property on a single lot at the southwest corner of Jarvis Street and Seventh Avenue.
Both applications are scheduled to come back before city council for further discussion next Monday, with the final vote scheduled for Jan. 30.
Like Smith, Black Street resident Nathan Miller suggested council must use caution when considering such applications.
Miller said the plan for downtown calls for an emphasis on maintaining a single-family, low-density approach to development.
"I know there are a lot of residents in the downtown who are concerned about development in the area and the application of zoning and the change of zoning in the downtown,” he said.
Miller said both applications before city council require a much larger density than is currently recommended for the downtown area.
Does council, he asked, intend to accept all conditional use applications?
"Are we going to move to large apartment-style developments in the downtown?”
Kevin James, on the other hand, told council he supports Tuzlak's proposal for the five-plex and the plan to make it a super-green structure.
Increasing density helps to reduce urban sprawl while making greater use of existing infrastructure to enhance sustainability, said James, himself a developer who's just completed a multi-unit project on Jarvis Street.
James said restricting the downtown area to single-detached homes only increases the burden on the tax base.
It also nhibits a greater blend of the socio-economic classes by restricting access to those who can't afford a $450,000-plus home, he added.
If the city wants to promote a mix of those living in different economic classes, it needs to look at a mix of developments, said James, adding that he too supports the Narrow Gauge proposal.
Bernard Buckles, a member of the Downtown Community Association, said there are examples of conditional use developments that have fit nicely into the downtown area.
Phoenix Rising, the three-plex built at the end of Wheeler Street by Habitat for Humanity, works well, and is not intrusive with its location at the end of the street, Buckles told council.
But put it in the middle of the block and it becomes another story; it becomes a large building overshadowing the neighbouring homes, he said.
Buckles suggested proposed developments these days tend to use up every square inch of property they're allowed to build on, to the maximum height allowed.
"I do not think it is fair to the neighbours that you allow these large monstrosities to be built.”
The member of the community association did tell council he supports the Tuzlak application, as it is not an imposing structure.
Rob Fendrick, the city's director of administrative service, said the city has received nine written submissions on the Narrow Gauge application: two opposed; six with concerns and one in support.
He said there were 12 submissions on the Tuzlak application: four with concerns and eight in support.
In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.
Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.
Comments (4)
Up 0 Down 0
David McDonald on Jan 19, 2012 at 7:42 am
Though these three applications are coming up at the same time I consider them to be of different characters.
I'd be interested in seeing drawings of the proposed structures as a great range of design can be expressed in building home.
If we are to look at buildings previously built to the specs of the respective applicants we may gain insight into the character of the buildings they seek to construct. As I know it both applicants build high quality buildings.
Having spent some time in Olga the building at Eighth and Cook (which I think has 5 units) I would say that 5 or possibly more units may be built into a relatively low profile structure. Likewise a one family dwelling may be built a monster.
I've lived all over the back end of the downtown and truly loved the community and feel of the area. Change continues though and much of our choice lies in how to shape it in a manner that benefits our lives and those that share the earth with us.
I hope that rules in the Yukon are allowed to be bent when it benefits and is welcomed by the community of the Yukon.
Up 0 Down 0
No Really on Jan 18, 2012 at 8:58 am
Same old story. Everyone agrees that Whitehorse needs rental housing, but just NOT IN MY BACKYARD.
Up 0 Down 0
Mary-Anne O'Brien on Jan 17, 2012 at 11:11 am
Couldn't Whithorse allow this with a codicil of some sort saying that the new building has to be built to resemble similar buildings which are in the area?
In Quebec City's OLD section, all the buildings are old (Obviously)but there are NEW businesses like dance clubs, McDonalds etc. You wouldn't know they were there until you walked by, because they have rules about maintaining the historic buildings, and character of the area.
Up 0 Down 0
Joel on Jan 17, 2012 at 10:15 am
The old town character....
Wasn't the old town characterized by long barracks style structures in the downtown core?